12.07.2015 Views

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

their jobs (Human Rights Watch, 2004a). Studies have found that women in Kenya will givebirth at home rather than at a health facility in order to avoid being <strong>for</strong>ced to take an HIV test,be tested without their in<strong>for</strong>med consent, or have the confidentiality of their HIV tests resultsbreeched (Turan et al., 2008a). Further, a survey of 1,268 respondents in Botswana in 2004found that while most participants reported being in favor of routine testing, 43 percent ofparticipants believed that routine testing would lead people to avoid going to the doctor <strong>for</strong>fear of testing (Weiser et al., 2006a). In the same study, 14 percent agreed that routine testingleads to more violence against women <strong>and</strong> that 62 percent of women <strong>and</strong> 76 percent of menbelieved that they could not refuse an HIV test (PHR, 2007a).Clearly, HIV testing which discourages women from needed health services contraindicatesall public health benefits that could accrue from knowing one’s serostatus. It is possibleto increase access to HIV testing <strong>and</strong> more likely <strong>for</strong> women to engage in HIV prevention ifcounseling, confidentiality <strong>and</strong> consent are inherent to the HIV testing process (WHO <strong>and</strong>UNAIDS, 2007). Routinely offering <strong>and</strong> recommending HIV testing <strong>and</strong> counseling, butrequiring that women specifically agree (“opt-in”) may increase the numbers of those testedwhile respecting human rights (Jurgens, 2007a). Studies are needed to compare routine testingthat includes an “opt-in” component with other approaches to what have been called “opt-out”testing, evaluating outcomes both in terms of respect <strong>for</strong> human rights <strong>and</strong> increasing thenumbers of those who want to get an HIV test. The “opt-in” aspect of routine testing wouldmean that providers explain the benefits of HIV tests <strong>and</strong> recommend an HIV test. Additionalresearch is needed to assess how to streamline but keep essential elements of pre- <strong>and</strong> posttestcounseling (Jurgens, 2007a; Chersich <strong>and</strong> Temmerman, 2008). A study in Zimbabwe of5,775 people based on survey data between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000, followed by a repeat survey in 2003found that women who had had pre-test counseling were significantly more likely to return <strong>for</strong>their test results than those with no pre-test counseling (Sherr et al., 2007). For those who testHIV-negative, testing should be seen as part of an ongoing prevention strategy, with encouragement<strong>for</strong> those who are HIV-negative or untested to protect themselves <strong>and</strong> others fromHIV transmission (Bell et al., 2007).Interventions are needed to help those who have tested HIV-positive to prepare <strong>for</strong> disclosure.Policy documents <strong>and</strong> reports that strongly advocate <strong>for</strong> the involvement of people whohave tested positive often do not consider the processes involved, the psychological impact ofdisclosure, <strong>and</strong> the potential impact on relationships or career prospects (Manchester, 2004).Possible approaches include disclosure plans, disclosure mediated by a friend or counselor,<strong>and</strong> couple counseling. Voluntary couples counseling can encourage men to reduce negativereactions <strong>and</strong> promote shared responsibility <strong>for</strong> reproductive health; however, women’s confidentialitymust be guaranteed, along with support (Cohen <strong>and</strong> Burger, 2000).WHAT WORKS FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!