12.07.2015 Views

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluated programs were curriculum <strong>and</strong> group-based; focused on sexual behavior;focused on young people; had a experimental or quasi-experimental design; a samplesize of at least 100; measured impact on sexual behaviors <strong>for</strong> at least three to six months<strong>and</strong> were published after 1990 (UNESCO, 2009). (Gray I) (sex education, sexual partners,condom use, sex behavior)A review evaluating 83 sex <strong>and</strong> HIV education programs in developing <strong>and</strong> developedcountries that were based on a written curriculum <strong>and</strong> were implemented amonggroups of youth in schools, clinics or other community settings found that two-thirdsof the studies found a significant positive impact on one or more sexual behaviors oroutcomes, while only seven percent found a significant negative impact. One-third of theprograms had a positive impact on two or more behaviors or outcomes. The 83 studiesgenerally reported on one or more of six aspects of sexual behavior: initiation of sex,frequency of sex, number of sexual partners, condom use, contraceptive use in general,<strong>and</strong> composite measures of sexual risk-taking (e.g., frequency of sex without condoms).A few studies reported on pregnancy <strong>and</strong> STI rates. Initiation of Sex. Of the 52 studiesthat measured impact on this behavior, 22 (42 percent) found that the programs significantlydelayed the initiation of sex among one or more groups <strong>for</strong> at least six months,29 (55 percent) found no significant impact, <strong>and</strong> one (in the United States) found theprogram hastened the initiation of sex. Frequency of Sex. Of the 31 studies that measuredimpact on frequency, nine (29 percent) reduced the frequency, 19 (61 percent) found nosignificant change in frequency, <strong>and</strong> three (all in developed countries) found increasedfrequency among any major groups at any point in time. Number of Sexual Partners.Of 34 studies measuring this factor, 12 (35 percent) found a decrease in the number ofsexual partners, while 21 (62 percent) found no significant impact. Condom Use. Of the54 studies measuring program impact on condom use, almost half (48 percent) showedincreased condom use; none found decreased condom use. Contraceptive Use in General.Of the 15 studies measuring impact, six showed increased contraceptive use, eightshowed no impact, <strong>and</strong> one (in the United States) showed decreased contraceptive use.Sexual Risk Taking. Some studies (28) developed composite measures of sexual activity<strong>and</strong> condom use (e.g., frequency of sex without condoms). Half of them found significantlyreduced sexual risk-taking. None of them found increased sexual risk-taking.Pregnancy Rates. Of the 13 studies that measured pregnancy rates, three found significantpositive effects, nine found insignificant effects, <strong>and</strong> one (in the United States)found significant negative effects. STI Rates. Of the 10 studies that measured impact onSTI rates, two found a positive impact, six found no significant impact, <strong>and</strong> two founda negative impact. For example, in Tanzania, a sexuality education intervention reducedthe number of sexual partners among boys <strong>and</strong> increased condom use among both boys<strong>and</strong> girls. This evaluation used an experimental design <strong>and</strong> found positive behavioralimpacts over a three-year period (Ross et al., 2003 cited in Kirby et al., 2007). Skillsbased programs were more effective at changing behavior than were the knowledgebasedprograms. In the programs reviewed, female adolescents constituted betweenWHAT WORKS FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!