AGENDA - San Antonio Housing Authority

BID TABULATIONGeneral Architecture Services 1302-906-07-3943Max Points KAI WestEast Rimkus DHR Sprinkle Nelson ALS 88 Debra Saldana &Criterion Description Weight Texas Design Consulting Architects Architects Architects Design Build Dockery AssociatesExperience : Professional's experience in design, conversionand/or rehabilitation of commercial, industrial, retail, single and multifamily housing including forensics1-520%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 3.00Total Score 15.00 15.00 13.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 8.00 10.00 9.00Average Score 5.00 5.00 4.33 3.67 3.67 4.00 2.67 3.33 3.00Weighted Score 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.73 0.73 0.80 0.53 0.67 0.60Projects: The projects devloped, rehabilitated, built, designedand/or supervised over the last 5 years .1-510%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 2.00Rater 2 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 4.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00Total Score 14.00 15.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 8.00 10.00 8.00Average Score 4.67 5.00 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 2.67 3.33 2.67Weighted Score 0.47 0.50 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.27 0.33 0.27Green Building : List exoperience and specialized training in"Green Building" .1-515%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 4.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00Rater 3 3.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 3.00Total Score 13.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 10.00 13.00 12.00 9.00Average Score 4.33 5.00 3.33 3.33 4.00 3.33 4.33 4.00 3.00Weighted Score 0.65 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.65 0.60 0.45Project Approach: Describe the Firms/Professional's approachand experience in evaluating the condition of existing properties.1-520%Rater 1 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00Rater 2 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 4.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00Total Score 14.00 14.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 8.00 9.00 8.00Average Score 4.67 4.67 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.67 3.00 2.67Weighted Score 0.93 0.93 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.53 0.60 0.531-5Team: Detail information regarding the Proposer's team.15%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Total Score 15.00 15.00 13.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 9.00 9.00 9.00Average Score 5.00 5.00 4.33 3.67 3.67 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Weighted Score 0.75 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.451-5Strength of the Section 3 plan:10%Rater 1 5.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00Rater 3 4.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00Total Score 14.00 0.00 8.00 11.00 6.00 8.00 9.00 5.00 9.00Average Score 4.67 0.00 2.67 3.67 2.00 2.67 3.00 1.67 3.00Weighted Score 0.47 0.00 0.27 0.37 0.20 0.27 0.30 0.17 0.301-5Strength of the S/W/MBE plan:10%Rater 1 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 2.50 3.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 3.00Rater 3 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Total Score 13.00 9.50 9.00 11.00 8.00 5.00 11.00 8.00 9.00Average Score 4.33 3.17 3.00 3.67 2.67 1.67 3.67 2.67 3.00Weighted Score 0.43 0.32 0.30 0.37 0.27 0.17 0.37 0.27 0.30to an additional 5 points.Priority 1: As detailed in Attachment D 5 (.25)