12.07.2015 Views

AGENDA - San Antonio Housing Authority

AGENDA - San Antonio Housing Authority

AGENDA - San Antonio Housing Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BID TABULATIONGeneral Architecture Service 1302-906-07-3943Max Points Beatty Robey Zapata Mayse RPGA A G DeMunbrun YoungCriterion Description Weight Palmer Architecture Design Group Associates Scarnato EngineeringExperience : Professional's experience in design, conversionand/or rehabilitation of commercial, industrial, retail, single and multifamily housing including forensics1-520%Rater 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00Rater 2 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00Rater 3 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.00 2.00 3.00Total Score 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 8.75 6.00 6.00 9.00Average Score 3.00 3.00 2.67 3.00 2.92 2.00 2.00 3.00Weighted Score 0.60 0.60 0.53 0.60 0.58 0.40 0.40 0.60Projects: The projects devloped, rehabilitated, built, designedand/or supervised over the last 5 years .1-510%Rater 1 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00Rater 2 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00Rater 3 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00Total Score 9.00 9.00 6.00 7.00 6.50 6.00 6.00 4.00Average Score 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 2.17 2.00 2.00 1.33Weighted Score 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.13Green Building : List exoperience and specialized training in"Green Building".1-515%Rater 1 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.00Rater 2 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00Rater 3 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Total Score 9.00 8.00 4.00 5.50 7.00 3.00 3.00 1.00Average Score 3.00 2.67 1.33 1.83 2.33 1.00 1.00 0.33Weighted Score 0.45 0.40 0.20 0.28 0.35 0.15 0.15 0.05Project Approach: Describe the Firms/Professional's approachand experience in evaluating the condition of existing properties.1-520%Rater 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00Rater 2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Total Score 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 8.00Average Score 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.67 2.67 2.67 2.33 2.67Weighted Score 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.47 0.531-5Team: Detail information regarding the Proposer's team.15%Rater 1 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00Rater 2 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Rater 3 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00Total Score 8.00 9.00 6.00 6.50 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00Average Score 2.67 3.00 2.00 2.17 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.67Weighted Score 0.40 0.45 0.30 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.251-5Strength of the Section 3 plan:10%Rater 1 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Rater 2 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00Rater 3 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 3.00Total Score 4.00 3.00 5.00 1.00 3.00 3.50 4.00 5.00Average Score 1.33 1.00 1.67 0.33 1.00 1.17 1.33 1.67Weighted Score 0.13 0.10 0.17 0.03 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.171-5Strength of the S/W/MBE plan:10%Rater 1 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00Rater 2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00Rater 3 2.50 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00Total Score 8.50 9.00 7.00 9.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 5.00Average Score 2.83 3.00 2.33 3.00 2.33 2.67 3.00 1.67Weighted Score 0.28 0.30 0.23 0.30 0.23 0.27 0.30 0.17Priority 1: As detailed in Attachment D 5 (.25)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!