AGENDA - San Antonio Housing Authority

BID TABULATIONGeneral Architecture Services 1302-906-07-3943Max Points WestEast KAI Nelson Rimkus DHR ALS 88 Sprinkle Saldana DebraCriterion Description Weight Design Texas Architects Consulting Architects Design Build DockeryExperience : Professional's experience in design, conversionand/or rehabilitation of commercial, industrial, retail, single and multifamily housing including forensics1-520%Rater 1 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 3.50Total Score 15.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 9.00 9.50 9.50Average Score 5.00 4.00 4.33 4.67 4.00 3.33 3.00 3.17 3.17Weighted Score 1.00 0.80 0.87 0.93 0.80 0.67 0.60 0.63 0.63Projects: The projects devloped, rehabilitated, built, designedand/or supervised over the last 5 years .1-510%Rater 1 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00Rater 3 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.50Total Score 15.00 12.00 14.00 13.00 12.00 9.00 9.00 7.00 9.50Average Score 5.00 4.00 4.67 4.33 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.33 3.17Weighted Score 0.50 0.40 0.47 0.43 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.23 0.32Green Building : List exoperience and specialized training in"Green Building" .1-515%Rater 1 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00Rater 2 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 2.00Rater 3 4.50 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.50 5.00 3.00 2.00 2.00Total Score 13.50 11.00 11.00 6.00 11.50 14.00 9.00 6.00 6.00Average Score 4.50 3.67 3.67 2.00 3.83 4.67 3.00 2.00 2.00Weighted Score 0.68 0.55 0.55 0.30 0.58 0.70 0.45 0.30 0.30Project Approach: Describe the Firms/Professional's approachand experience in evaluating the condition of existing properties.1-520%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Total Score 15.00 13.00 12.00 12.00 9.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 9.00Average Score 5.00 4.33 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.33 3.00 3.00 3.00Weighted Score 1.00 0.87 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.67 0.60 0.60 0.601-5Team: Detail information regarding the Proposer's team.15%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.50 3.00Total Score 15.00 13.00 13.00 14.00 11.50 11.00 9.00 9.50 9.00Average Score 5.00 4.33 4.33 4.67 3.83 3.67 3.00 3.17 3.00Weighted Score 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.70 0.58 0.55 0.45 0.48 0.451-5Strength of the Section 3 plan:10%Rater 1 0.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 0.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 1.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00Total Score 1.00 11.00 13.00 9.00 11.00 10.00 7.00 9.00 8.00Average Score 0.33 3.67 4.33 3.00 3.67 3.33 2.33 3.00 2.67Weighted Score 0.03 0.37 0.43 0.30 0.37 0.33 0.23 0.30 0.271-5Strength of the S/W/MBE plan:10%Rater 1 5.00 5.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 2 5.00 5.00 1.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00Rater 3 4.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 2.00Total Score 14.00 14.00 5.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 8.00 9.00 8.00Average Score 4.67 4.67 1.67 3.67 3.67 4.00 2.67 3.00 2.67Weighted Score 0.47 0.47 0.17 0.37 0.37 0.40 0.27 0.30 0.27to an additional 5 points.Priority 1: As detailed in Attachment D 5 (.25)