AGRONOMIJAS VÄSTIS - Latvijas LauksaimniecÄ«bas universitÄte

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AGRONOMIJAS VĒSTIS (Latvian Journal of Agronomy), No.10, LLU, 2008The TDM with the fixed DTD effect merged more cows in one subgroup. It gives an EBVwith more variations. The results showed that there are not significant differences between therankings of animals of EBV using TDM. The use of TD model produced EBV with higherreliability rates in the shortest time versus LM. Individual yields on test day can be the basis of agenetic evaluation system instead of estimates of yield during the first 305 days of lactation.ConclusionsEBV showed a large variation for all traits. EBV obtained in range from -1013.9 kg to1965.7 kg for milk yield. The lowest and highest values was obtained by the model with the fixedDTD effect. The results of these groups also showed largest variation of EBV (2968.8 kg). Thereare 6 bulls on all lists. There are bulls that showed similar ranking. Two bulls of HS breed haverespectively the 1 st and 2 nd position (HB No. 31352) and the 2 nd and 3 rd (HB No. 31415) position inall groups.The highest average EBV of fat yield are obtained in the II and IV group where the fixedDTD effect was included in the model, respectively 2.14 and 2.37 kg. Also the results of thesegroups showed the larger variation of EBV, respectively 132.43 and 131.30 kg. There were 8 bullson all lists when only the first 10 bulls are considered for the top list. The 1 st position of ranking ofall groups has a bull of DS breed (EBV from 69.3 to 93.6 kg). The bull of the HS breed has 2 nd and3 rd position of ranking in all groups (EBV from 46.1 to 85.3 kg).Using the model with fixed DTD effect results showed the highest variation of EBV ofprotein yield (respectively 91.74 and 93.56 kg) and the average EBV (respectively 1.86 and 1.99kg). In total 7 bulls included in the top list in all groups. The 1 st position has 2 bulls. The bull of ZSbreed showed EBV results from 35.5 kg to 37.3 kg when the fixed HTD effect was included in themodel. The bull of HS breed showed EBV results from 58.4 to 59.9 kg when the fixed DTD effectwas included in the model.The Spearman rank correlations (≥ 0.97) obtained by Kaya et al. (2003) indicated that theranking of animals for EBV for TD and 305-day milk yields closely correlated with each other andare in agreement with the results from this study.There are not significant differences between EBV of milk, protein yield in groups wherethe same HTD or DTD effect was included in the model and between all groups of fat yield(p
AGRONOMIJAS VĒSTIS (Latvian Journal of Agronomy), No.10, LLU, 20084. Pool M.H., Meuwissen T.H.E. (1999) Prediction of Daily Milk Yields from a Limited Number of TestDays Using Test Day Models. J. Dairy Sci., 82, 1555 – 1564.5. Ptak E., Schaeffer L.R. (1993) Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows.Livest. Prod. Sci., 34, 23 – 34.6. Reents R., Doop L. (1996) Genetic evaluation for dairy production traits with a test day model formultiple lactations. Proceedings of the 1996 Interbull Meeting: Interbull bulletin 14, 113 – 117.7. SAS 1998. SAS User’s guide SAS Institute Inc., Gary, North Carolina.8. Schaeffer L.R., Jamrozik J., Kistemaker G.J., Van Doormaal B.J. (2000) Experience with a Test – DayModel. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1135 – 1144.9. Swalve H.H. (2000) Theoretical Basis and Computational Methods for Different Test – Day GeneticEvaluation Methods. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 1115 – 1124.FOTOSINTĒZES PIGMENTU SATURA IZMAIĥAS VASARAS KVIEŠU LAPĀSATKARĪBĀ NO MINERĀLELEMENTU PIEGĀDES CAUR LAPĀMTHE CONTENT OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENTS IN SPRING WHEAT LEAVES INDEPENDENCE ON MINERAL SUPPLY THROUGH LEAVESStramkale V., Stramkalis A., Pakarna G., Vikmane G.Latgales Lauksaimniecības zinātnes centrs/ Scietific centre of agriculture of Latgale, Kultūras laukums 1a,ViĜāni, Rēzeknes rajons, Latvija LV-4650, phone: +371 64628140; e-mail: strzin@apollo.lvLatvijas Universitātes Bioloăijas fakultāte/ Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Kronvalda bulvāris 4,Rīga, Latvija LV-1010, phone: +371 67034864,e-mail: mara.vikmane@lu.lvAbstractFertilisers are of great significance in the formation of wheat (Triticum L.) spring varietyyield and its quality. Usually organic and mineral nutrients for plants are worked into the soil. It isknown that the utilisation of mineral nutrients from soil is not with the high efficiency. An actualproblem for agriculture is the rational using of nutrients. Mineral supply trough leaves increases theavailability of minerals and it is better for the environment. This was the first investigation of theinfluence of mineral supply trough leaves on amount of photosynthetic pigments in spring wheatleaves in Latvia. There were field tests and laboratory experiments.Field tests and laboratory experiments were carried out with wheat variety 'Jasna'.During the heading phase plants were sprayed with solution of micronutrients – DDMn(Mn:Zn:Cu:Mo:B = 4:0.010:0.020:0.001:0.010) and solution of macronutrients – Phosific(NH 4 NO 3 :P 2 O 5 :K 2 O:SO 3 = 10:15:5:30). The field tests were carried out in the LatgaleScientific Agricultural Centre in Eastern Latvia, but the laboratory experiments in theDepartment of Plant Physiology the faculty of Biology the University of Latvia. Field testswere performed in the year 2005. The field tests were organised according to the method of randomblocks with 4 repetitions. The total area for a block was 2 m × 10 m = 20 m 2 . The total space of thetest was 1600 m 2 . There was humus podzolic gley soil. The content of organic substances in thesoil was 5.2%, pH KCl – 6.45. Micronutrients in soil (mg l -1 ): N – 100, P – 730, K – 140, Ca – 13625,Mg – 2500, S –- 23, Fe – 2800, Mn – 125, Zn – 5, Cu – 8.5, Mo – 0.08, B – 1.20. Pre-plant wasflax. As a basic fertiliser "Kemira Grow How" complex mineral nutrition 5:10:25 3 c ha -1 , mineralsupplement was ammonium nitrate – 1 c ha -1 (the recommendations of the supplier). In field teststhe yield of wheat was determined. The wheat was cropped according to the seed ripening phase bygrain combine harvester Sampo–130.In the laboratory (in the year 2005 and 2006) experiments the seeds were germinated at20 o C in a Petri dish. The number of repetitions – 4. The number of seeds in every repetition was100. In the laboratory experiments were determined amount of photosynthetic pigments wereestimated spectrophotometricaly. During laboratory experiments plants were grown also incontainers with soil from Latgale Scientific Agricultural Centre (volume 1 litre) 10 plants in each.The number of repetitions – 4. Plants were sprayed with foliar fertiliser following directions.299
Page 1 and 2:
LATVIJAS LAUKSAIMNIECĪBAS UNIVERSI
Page 4 and 5:
AGRONOMIJAS VĒSTIS (Latvian Journa
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249: AGRONOMIJAS VĒSTIS (Latvian Journa
show all

AGRONOMIJAS VÄSTIS - Latvijas LauksaimniecÄ«bas universitÄte

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

AGRONOMIJAS VÄSTIS - Latvijas LauksaimniecÄ«bas universitÄte