28.11.2012 Views

Twenty years after the Windhoek Declaration on press freedom

Twenty years after the Windhoek Declaration on press freedom

Twenty years after the Windhoek Declaration on press freedom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How African media, and journalism<br />

schools, can deal with cultural diversity<br />

By Dr Facks<strong>on</strong> Banda<br />

Dr Facks<strong>on</strong> Banda is Programme<br />

Specialist, Divisi<strong>on</strong> for Freedom of<br />

Ex<strong>press</strong>i<strong>on</strong> & Media Development<br />

(FEM), UNESCO. He was previously<br />

UNESCO-SAB Chair of Media<br />

and Democracy at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> School of<br />

Journalism and Media Studies,<br />

Rhodes University.<br />

186 | Media in Africa - 2011<br />

According to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> UNESCO World<br />

Report <strong>on</strong> Investing in Cultural<br />

Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue,<br />

intercultural dialogue is<br />

largely dependent <strong>on</strong> intercultural<br />

competencies, defined as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

complex of abilities needed to<br />

interact appropriately with those<br />

who are different from <strong>on</strong>eself.<br />

In terms of promoting intercultural<br />

dialogue in Africa, an important<br />

element to c<strong>on</strong>sider is reflected in<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> UNESCO World Report when it<br />

argues that:<br />

“Dialogue should be seen not as involving<br />

a loss of self but as dependent<br />

up<strong>on</strong> knowing <strong>on</strong>eself and being<br />

able to shift between different<br />

frames of reference. It requires <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

empowerment of all participants<br />

through capacity building and<br />

projects that permit interacti<strong>on</strong><br />

without a loss of per-s<strong>on</strong>al or collective<br />

identity. (My emphasis).<br />

Clearly, intercultural dialogue seems<br />

to revolve around communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

and capacity-building. Put differently:<br />

in order to promote intercultural<br />

dialogue, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is need to build<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> communicative capacity of media<br />

actors. Here, journalism educa-<br />

ti<strong>on</strong> plays an important role.<br />

Journalists, and journalism educators,<br />

can do a lot to promote<br />

cultural diversity and at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same<br />

time enabling citizens to see <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

comm<strong>on</strong>alities that bind human<br />

beings toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, regardless of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir<br />

geographical, racial, sexual, and<br />

o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r differences.<br />

Underpinning this challenge is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

questi<strong>on</strong> of how <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> African media<br />

represent peoples and cultures. In<br />

this regard, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se outlets become a<br />

social instituti<strong>on</strong> through which a<br />

society learns about itself and builds<br />

a sense of community.<br />

In this way, Africa’s media c<strong>on</strong>tributes<br />

to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> way in which “we” and<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r” see <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> world. The term<br />

“o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r” c<strong>on</strong>notes a way of defining<br />

<strong>on</strong>e’s own identity through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> stigmatisati<strong>on</strong><br />

of “an-o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r”. Therefore,<br />

“we” and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r” often becomes<br />

a dichotomy in societies where intolerance<br />

breeds, and where power<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>s are polarised between<br />

those who identify <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves as<br />

“us” and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r”.<br />

“It requires <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

empowerment of all<br />

participants through<br />

capacity building and<br />

projects that permit<br />

interacti<strong>on</strong> without<br />

a loss of pers<strong>on</strong>al or<br />

collective identity.”<br />

The role of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> media should become<br />

<strong>on</strong>e of building bridges between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

“we” and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r”, but not in a<br />

way that obliterates or frowns up<strong>on</strong><br />

difference. Indeed, it is a reas<strong>on</strong>able

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!