Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Control Scheme 463interference measured at each reader is used as a local feedback parameterto dynamically adjust its transmission power. With the same underlyingconcept, decentralized adaptive power control uses SNR to adapt powerat discrete time steps, whereas PPC adapts the transmission power basedon a certain probability distribution. A Lyapunov-based approach is usedto show the convergence of the proposed DAPC scheme. Simulationresults demonstrate theoretical conclusions.10.2 Problem FormulationThe frequency interference problem needs to be fully understood beforea solution can be evolved. In this section, we present an analysis of thisproblem and the assumptions made.10.2.1 Mathematical RelationsIn a backscatter communication system, SNR must meet a required thresholdR required , which can be expressed asR = ( E N ) ( W D)requiredb0(10.1)where E b is the energy per bit of the received signal in watts, N 0 is thenoise power in watts per Hertz, D is the bit rate in bits per second, and Wis the radio channel bandwidth in Hertz. For a known modulation methodand BER, E N can be calculated. Hence, R required can be selected basedon desired a data rate and BER.For any reader i, the following must hold for successful tag detection:b/ 0PIbsi= R ≥Rirequired(10.2)where P bs is the backscatter power from a tag, I i is the interference at thetag backscatter frequency, and R i is the SNR at a given reader.In general, P bs can be evaluated in terms of the reader transmissionpower P i and tag distance r i−t . Other variables such as reader and tagantenna gains, modulation indexing, and wavelength, derived in Rappaport(1999), can be considered as constants and simplified in Equation 10.3as K 1 . Then,P K P ibs = 1 ⋅ = g Pq ii ⋅4iri−t(10.3)
464 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networkswhere q is an environment-dependent variable considering path loss,and g ii represents the channel loss from reader i to tag and back.Communication channel between the reader and interrogated tagshould be in a relatively short range; for this reason Rayleigh fadingand shadowing effects are not considered for the reader–tag link.Influence by reflection can also be considered as a constant merginginto g ii assuming the environment is relatively stable. Hence, P bs canbe evaluated using path loss alone and by ignoring other channeluncertainties. However, the channel uncertainites are consideredduring the calculation of interference as reader locations are relativelyfarther away compared to a reader and a tag, and readers are powersources.Interference caused by reader j at reader i is given asI K P j2ij = 2 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ X g Pq ij = ij ⋅2jrij(10.4)10 0.1ζ 10 01where P j is the transmission power of reader j, r ij is the distance betweenthe two readers, K 2 represents all other constant properties, . ζ correspondsto the effect of shadowing, and X is a random variable withRayleigh distribution (Rappaport 1999) to account for Rayleigh fadingloss in the channel between reader j and reader i. After simplification, g ijrepresents the channel loss from reader j to reader i. Note that becausethe interference actually occurs at the tag backscatter sideband, onlypower at that particular frequency needs to be considered. This factor isalso accounted for in K 2 and g ij .Cumulative interference I i at any given reader i is essentially the sumof interferences introduced by all other readers plus the variance of thenoise η :I≠∑= g P + ηi ij jj i(10.5)Given the transmission power and interference, the actual detectionrange of a reader is given byrK=R⋅ Pi⋅ I4q1actualrequiredi(10.6)Received SNR for a tag at a desired range r d can be calculated asRrdK=r14qd⋅ Pi⋅ Ii(10.7)
- Page 436 and 437: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 438 and 439: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 440 and 441: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 442 and 443: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 444 and 445: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 446 and 447: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 448 and 449: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 450 and 451: Optimized Energy and Delay-Based Ro
- Page 452 and 453: 9Predictive Congestion Control for
- Page 454 and 455: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 456 and 457: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 458 and 459: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 460 and 461: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 462 and 463: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 464 and 465: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 466 and 467: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 468 and 469: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 470 and 471: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 472 and 473: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 474 and 475: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 476 and 477: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 478 and 479: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 480 and 481: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 482 and 483: Predictive Congestion Control for W
- Page 484 and 485: 10Adaptive and Probabilistic Power
- Page 488 and 489: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 490 and 491: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 492 and 493: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 494 and 495: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 496 and 497: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 498 and 499: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 500 and 501: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 502 and 503: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 504 and 505: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 506 and 507: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 508: Adaptive and Probabilistic Power Co
- Page 511 and 512: 488 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 513 and 514: 490 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 515 and 516: 492 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 517 and 518: 494 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 519 and 520: 496 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 521 and 522: 498 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 523 and 524: 500 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 525 and 526: 502 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 527 and 528: 504 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 529 and 530: 506 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 531 and 532: 508 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 533 and 534: 510 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 535 and 536: 512 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
<strong>Ad</strong>aptive <strong>and</strong> Probabilistic Power Control Scheme 463interference measured at each reader is used as a local feedback parameterto dynamically adjust its transmission power. With the same underlyingconcept, decentralized adaptive power control uses SNR to adapt powerat discrete time steps, whereas PPC adapts the transmission power basedon a certain probability distribution. A Lyapunov-based approach is usedto show the convergence of the proposed DAPC scheme. Simulationresults demonstrate theoretical conclusions.10.2 Problem FormulationThe frequency interference problem needs to be fully understood beforea solution can be evolved. In this section, we present an analysis of thisproblem <strong>and</strong> the assumptions made.10.2.1 Mathematical RelationsIn a backscatter communication system, SNR must meet a required thresholdR required , which can be expressed asR = ( E N ) ( W D)requiredb0(10.1)where E b is the energy per bit of the received signal in watts, N 0 is thenoise power in watts per Hertz, D is the bit rate in bits per second, <strong>and</strong> Wis the radio channel b<strong>and</strong>width in Hertz. For a known modulation method<strong>and</strong> BER, E N can be calculated. Hence, R required can be selected basedon desired a data rate <strong>and</strong> BER.For any reader i, the following must hold for successful tag detection:b/ 0PIbsi= R ≥Rirequired(10.2)where P bs is the backscatter power from a tag, I i is the interference at thetag backscatter frequency, <strong>and</strong> R i is the SNR at a given reader.In general, P bs can be evaluated in terms of the reader transmissionpower P i <strong>and</strong> tag distance r i−t . Other variables such as reader <strong>and</strong> tagantenna gains, modulation indexing, <strong>and</strong> wavelength, derived in Rappaport(1999), can be considered as constants <strong>and</strong> simplified in Equation 10.3as K 1 . Then,P K P ibs = 1 ⋅ = g Pq ii ⋅4iri−t(10.3)