12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>used to compare the proposed scheme with that of 802.11. The proposedMAC protocol renders significant increase in throughput in the presenceof channel variations compared with 802.11 although consuming lowenergy per bit.6.1 Introduction to DPCThe objectives of transmitter power control include minimizing powerconsumption while increasing the network capacity <strong>and</strong> prolonging thebattery life of mobile units by managing mutual interference so that eachmobile unit can meet its SIR <strong>and</strong> other quality of service (QoS) requirements.Rigorous work on DPC was performed for cellular networks (Bambos1998, Dontula <strong>and</strong> Jagannathan 2004, Jagannathan et al. 2002,Jagannathan et al. 2004, Hashem <strong>and</strong> Sousa 1998). A few DPC schemes(Park <strong>and</strong> Sivakumar 2002, Jung <strong>and</strong> Vaidya 2002, Gomez et al. 2001, Karn1990, Pursley et al. 2000) were developed for wireless ad hoc networkswhere the topology constantly changes because of node mobility <strong>and</strong>communication link failures. Similarly, see Maniezzo et al. (2002), Woo<strong>and</strong> Culler (2001), Ye et al. (2002), Singh <strong>and</strong> Raghavendra (1998).Unlike wired networks, radio channel uncertainties in a wireless network,for instance path loss, shadowing, <strong>and</strong> Rayleigh fading, can attenuatethe power of the transmitted signal causing variations in the receivedSIR <strong>and</strong> thus degrading the performance of any DPC. Low SIR meanshigh bit error rate (BER), which is unsatisfactory. Reported DPC schemes(Park <strong>and</strong> Sivakumar 2002, Jung <strong>and</strong> Vaidya 2002, Gomez et al. 2001, Karn1990, Pursley et al. 2000) for ad hoc networks assume that: (1) only pathloss is present, (2) no other channel uncertainty exists, <strong>and</strong> (3) the mutualinterference among the users is held constant during power update ofeach user. Moreover, improvement of spatial reuse factor is not adequatelyaddressed. Our previous effort (Jagannathan et al. 2004) was to developnew protocols to accommodate channel uncertainties for cellular networks.No work is currently reported for ad hoc wireless networks thataccommodate channel uncertainties.Furthermore, in an ad hoc network as mentioned in Chapter 1, requestto send (RTS) <strong>and</strong> clear to send (CTS) messages are used to establish aconnection for data transmission between a transmitter <strong>and</strong> a receiver.In (Jung <strong>and</strong> Vaidya 2002, Gomez et al. 2001), authors propose usingmaximum transmitter power only for RTS-CTS, whereas DATA <strong>and</strong>ACK transmission is accomplished at a much lower power. This lowerpower is calculated according to RTS <strong>and</strong> CTS reception conditions.However, the channel state can change between the RTS <strong>and</strong> the DATAtransmissions resulting in an inaccurate power selection. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!