Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Distributed Power Control of Wireless Cellular and Peer-to-Peer Networks 211400Plot of average admission delay vs arrival rate350Average admission delay300250200150100500 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03Arrival rate of links/iterationFIGURE 5.24Average admission delay with arrivals.6Plot of average dropped links vs arrival rate5Average dropped links432100 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03Arrival rate of links/iterationFIGURE 5.25Average dropped links with arrivals.
212 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networksaverage admission delay and dropped links on the arrival rate. As arrivalrate of the users increases, interference in the network increases. Thepower control scheme would take more time to assign reasonable powerlevels for the large number of admission-seeking users. Some nodes dueto this reason may not reach their target SIRs in the predefined admissiontime assigned; hence, they drop out. Therefore, as arrival rate of the usersin the network increases, the admission delay and average number ofdropped links increase.5.4 Distributed Power Control in the Presenceof Fading ChannelsEarlier DPC works (Bambos 2000, Jantti and Kim 2000, Jagannathan et al.2002, Dontula and Jagannathan 2004) presented in Section 5.2 neglect thechanges observed in the radio channel. In fact, they all assume: (1) onlythe path loss component is present, (2) no other uncertainty exists in thechannel, and (3) the interference is held constant. Consequently, the convergencespeed of these algorithms and the associated power updates areof an issue in a highly dynamic wireless environment in which usermobility is quite common, and shadowing and Rayleigh fading effects aretypically observed in the channel. The proposed work in this sectionovercomes these limitations.In this section, we present a novel DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006)for the next generation wireless networks with channel uncertainties. Thisalgorithm estimates the variations in the slowly varying channel, and it issubsequently used in the power update so that a desired SIR is maintained.This algorithm, being highly distributive in nature, does not require interlinkcommunication, centralized computation, and reciprocity assumptionas required in a centrally controlled wireless environment. In addition, themodified DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006) converges faster comparedto the other schemes in the presence of channel uncertainties. As the necessityof interlink communication is eliminated, network capacity increases,and easy controlled recovery from error events is possible.5.4.1 Radio Channel UncertaintiesThe radio channel places fundamental limitations on wireless communicationsystems. The path between the transmitter and the receiver canvary from simple line-of-sight to one that is severely obstructed by buildings,mountains, and foliage. Unlike wired channels that are stationaryand predictable, radio channels involve many uncertain factors, so they
- Page 184 and 185: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 186 and 187: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 188 and 189: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 190 and 191: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 192 and 193: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 194 and 195: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 196 and 197: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 198: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 201 and 202: 178 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 203 and 204: 180 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 205 and 206: 182 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 207 and 208: 184 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 209 and 210: 186 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 211 and 212: 188 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 213 and 214: 190 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 215 and 216: 192 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 217 and 218: 194 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 219 and 220: 196 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 221 and 222: 198 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 223 and 224: 200 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 225 and 226: 202 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 227 and 228: 204 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 229 and 230: 206 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 231 and 232: 208 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 233: 210 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 237 and 238: 214 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 239 and 240: 216 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 241 and 242: 218 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 243 and 244: 220 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 245 and 246: 222 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 247 and 248: 224 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 249 and 250: 226 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 251 and 252: 228 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 253 and 254: 230 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 255 and 256: 232 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 257 and 258: 234 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 259 and 260: 236 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 261 and 262: 238 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 263 and 264: 240 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 265 and 266: 242 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 267 and 268: 244 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 269 and 270: 246 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 271 and 272: 248 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 273 and 274: 250 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 275 and 276: 252 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 277 and 278: 254 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 279 and 280: 256 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 281 and 282: 258 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 283 and 284: 260 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
212 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>average admission delay <strong>and</strong> dropped links on the arrival rate. As arrivalrate of the users increases, interference in the network increases. Thepower control scheme would take more time to assign reasonable powerlevels for the large number of admission-seeking users. Some nodes dueto this reason may not reach their target SIRs in the predefined admissiontime assigned; hence, they drop out. Therefore, as arrival rate of the usersin the network increases, the admission delay <strong>and</strong> average number ofdropped links increase.5.4 Distributed Power Control in the Presenceof Fading ChannelsEarlier DPC works (Bambos 2000, Jantti <strong>and</strong> Kim 2000, Jagannathan et al.2002, Dontula <strong>and</strong> Jagannathan 2004) presented in Section 5.2 neglect thechanges observed in the radio channel. In fact, they all assume: (1) onlythe path loss component is present, (2) no other uncertainty exists in thechannel, <strong>and</strong> (3) the interference is held constant. Consequently, the convergencespeed of these algorithms <strong>and</strong> the associated power updates areof an issue in a highly dynamic wireless environment in which usermobility is quite common, <strong>and</strong> shadowing <strong>and</strong> Rayleigh fading effects aretypically observed in the channel. The proposed work in this sectionovercomes these limitations.In this section, we present a novel DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006)for the next generation wireless networks with channel uncertainties. Thisalgorithm estimates the variations in the slowly varying channel, <strong>and</strong> it issubsequently used in the power update so that a desired SIR is maintained.This algorithm, being highly distributive in nature, does not require interlinkcommunication, centralized computation, <strong>and</strong> reciprocity assumptionas required in a centrally controlled wireless environment. In addition, themodified DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006) converges faster comparedto the other schemes in the presence of channel uncertainties. As the necessityof interlink communication is eliminated, network capacity increases,<strong>and</strong> easy controlled recovery from error events is possible.5.4.1 Radio Channel UncertaintiesThe radio channel places fundamental limitations on wireless communicationsystems. The path between the transmitter <strong>and</strong> the receiver canvary from simple line-of-sight to one that is severely obstructed by buildings,mountains, <strong>and</strong> foliage. Unlike wired channels that are stationary<strong>and</strong> predictable, radio channels involve many uncertain factors, so they