Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

12.07.2015 Views

Distributed Power Control of Wireless Cellular and Peer-to-Peer Networks 211400Plot of average admission delay vs arrival rate350Average admission delay300250200150100500 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03Arrival rate of links/iterationFIGURE 5.24Average admission delay with arrivals.6Plot of average dropped links vs arrival rate5Average dropped links432100 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03Arrival rate of links/iterationFIGURE 5.25Average dropped links with arrivals.

212 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networksaverage admission delay and dropped links on the arrival rate. As arrivalrate of the users increases, interference in the network increases. Thepower control scheme would take more time to assign reasonable powerlevels for the large number of admission-seeking users. Some nodes dueto this reason may not reach their target SIRs in the predefined admissiontime assigned; hence, they drop out. Therefore, as arrival rate of the usersin the network increases, the admission delay and average number ofdropped links increase.5.4 Distributed Power Control in the Presenceof Fading ChannelsEarlier DPC works (Bambos 2000, Jantti and Kim 2000, Jagannathan et al.2002, Dontula and Jagannathan 2004) presented in Section 5.2 neglect thechanges observed in the radio channel. In fact, they all assume: (1) onlythe path loss component is present, (2) no other uncertainty exists in thechannel, and (3) the interference is held constant. Consequently, the convergencespeed of these algorithms and the associated power updates areof an issue in a highly dynamic wireless environment in which usermobility is quite common, and shadowing and Rayleigh fading effects aretypically observed in the channel. The proposed work in this sectionovercomes these limitations.In this section, we present a novel DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006)for the next generation wireless networks with channel uncertainties. Thisalgorithm estimates the variations in the slowly varying channel, and it issubsequently used in the power update so that a desired SIR is maintained.This algorithm, being highly distributive in nature, does not require interlinkcommunication, centralized computation, and reciprocity assumptionas required in a centrally controlled wireless environment. In addition, themodified DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006) converges faster comparedto the other schemes in the presence of channel uncertainties. As the necessityof interlink communication is eliminated, network capacity increases,and easy controlled recovery from error events is possible.5.4.1 Radio Channel UncertaintiesThe radio channel places fundamental limitations on wireless communicationsystems. The path between the transmitter and the receiver canvary from simple line-of-sight to one that is severely obstructed by buildings,mountains, and foliage. Unlike wired channels that are stationaryand predictable, radio channels involve many uncertain factors, so they

212 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>average admission delay <strong>and</strong> dropped links on the arrival rate. As arrivalrate of the users increases, interference in the network increases. Thepower control scheme would take more time to assign reasonable powerlevels for the large number of admission-seeking users. Some nodes dueto this reason may not reach their target SIRs in the predefined admissiontime assigned; hence, they drop out. Therefore, as arrival rate of the usersin the network increases, the admission delay <strong>and</strong> average number ofdropped links increase.5.4 Distributed Power Control in the Presenceof Fading ChannelsEarlier DPC works (Bambos 2000, Jantti <strong>and</strong> Kim 2000, Jagannathan et al.2002, Dontula <strong>and</strong> Jagannathan 2004) presented in Section 5.2 neglect thechanges observed in the radio channel. In fact, they all assume: (1) onlythe path loss component is present, (2) no other uncertainty exists in thechannel, <strong>and</strong> (3) the interference is held constant. Consequently, the convergencespeed of these algorithms <strong>and</strong> the associated power updates areof an issue in a highly dynamic wireless environment in which usermobility is quite common, <strong>and</strong> shadowing <strong>and</strong> Rayleigh fading effects aretypically observed in the channel. The proposed work in this sectionovercomes these limitations.In this section, we present a novel DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006)for the next generation wireless networks with channel uncertainties. Thisalgorithm estimates the variations in the slowly varying channel, <strong>and</strong> it issubsequently used in the power update so that a desired SIR is maintained.This algorithm, being highly distributive in nature, does not require interlinkcommunication, centralized computation, <strong>and</strong> reciprocity assumptionas required in a centrally controlled wireless environment. In addition, themodified DPC scheme (Jagannathan et al. 2006) converges faster comparedto the other schemes in the presence of channel uncertainties. As the necessityof interlink communication is eliminated, network capacity increases,<strong>and</strong> easy controlled recovery from error events is possible.5.4.1 Radio Channel UncertaintiesThe radio channel places fundamental limitations on wireless communicationsystems. The path between the transmitter <strong>and</strong> the receiver canvary from simple line-of-sight to one that is severely obstructed by buildings,mountains, <strong>and</strong> foliage. Unlike wired channels that are stationary<strong>and</strong> predictable, radio channels involve many uncertain factors, so they

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!