Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Distributed Power Control of Wireless Cellular and Peer-to-Peer Networks 2077. An active link is dropped from the network if it has transmittedfor its maximum allowable transmission time T i .8. If link’s SIR is less than the threshold value γ i (not active) and ifit is not dropped, its power is updated by calculating the newtransmitter powers using Theorem 5.2.1.9. The above steps are repeated until all the links get added to thenetwork and have transmitted for a maximum allowable transmissiontime.Example 5.3.1: Admission Control of Links in aPeer-to-Peer NetworkEfficiency of a power control scheme would depend on maintaining thestable state of the system after a new link is added. The scheme shouldmaintain the SIR of all active nodes above a threshold, and power at whicha node transmits should be maintained below the maximum power level.From this example, it will be shown that Bambos (2000) DPC schemeappears not to satisfy this condition during admission control. The powerlevels of the active links increase to maintain their actual SIRs because ofthe interference caused by the new node. To evaluate the DPC with activelink protection, link 5 is introduced closer to the receiver of the link 1 asshown in Figure 5.18. The power update scheme of Bambos DPC allows500S-Transmitting node (source) & R-Receiving node4504004S4R9S9R350Distance in meters3002502001501001S2S1R3S2R5R5S3R6S7S6R8S7R8R5010S0010R50 100 150 200 250 300Distance in meters11S11R350 400 450 500FIGURE 5.18Node placement.
208 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks6Plot for SIR vs Time units54Node 1Node 2Node 3Node 4Node 5Node 6Node 7Node 8Node 9Node 10Node 11SIR32100 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Time unitsFIGURE 5.19Response of Bambo’s update during admission of new links.the link 5 to get admitted into the network causing severe interference tolink 1. In fact, Figure 5.19 and Figure 5.20 depict that the individual powersof all active links increase significantly as link 5 is being added into thesystem, causing a surge in power consumption of all active links.The SSCD and optimal schemes simulation displayed in Figure 5.21 andFigure 5.22 would not allow link 5 to be added into the system. In fact,SSCD and optimal DPC schemes use an extra requirement that has to besatisfied by the admission-seeking links. The admission links power upgradually, but whenever a link power update is greater than a predefinedvalue (which implies it would cause high interference when added to theactive links), the link is dropped from the network. The threshold levelshould be carefully selected to increase the efficiency of the network.The comparison of the total power consumed for the two schemes inFigure 5.23 illustrates clearly that the total power consumed using theoptimal DPC update is way below that of Bambos scheme. Hence, theoptimal DPC scheme provides efficient admission control.Example 5.3.2: Evaluation of Admission Delay and DroppedLinks with Number of UsersTo study the effect of number of users gaining admission and delay, considerthe scenario from Example 5.3.1 except the number of admission seekinglinks is increased. Figure 5.24 and Figure 5.25 show the dependence of
- Page 180 and 181: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 182 and 183: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 184 and 185: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 186 and 187: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 188 and 189: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 190 and 191: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 192 and 193: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 194 and 195: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 196 and 197: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 198: Admission Controller Design for Hig
- Page 201 and 202: 178 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 203 and 204: 180 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 205 and 206: 182 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 207 and 208: 184 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 209 and 210: 186 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 211 and 212: 188 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 213 and 214: 190 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 215 and 216: 192 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 217 and 218: 194 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 219 and 220: 196 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 221 and 222: 198 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 223 and 224: 200 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 225 and 226: 202 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 227 and 228: 204 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 229: 206 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 233 and 234: 210 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 235 and 236: 212 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 237 and 238: 214 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 239 and 240: 216 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 241 and 242: 218 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 243 and 244: 220 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 245 and 246: 222 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 247 and 248: 224 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 249 and 250: 226 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 251 and 252: 228 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 253 and 254: 230 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 255 and 256: 232 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 257 and 258: 234 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 259 and 260: 236 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 261 and 262: 238 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 263 and 264: 240 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 265 and 266: 242 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 267 and 268: 244 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 269 and 270: 246 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 271 and 272: 248 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 273 and 274: 250 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 275 and 276: 252 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 277 and 278: 254 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 279 and 280: 256 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
208 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>6Plot for SIR vs Time units54Node 1Node 2Node 3Node 4Node 5Node 6Node 7Node 8Node 9Node 10Node 11SIR32100 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Time unitsFIGURE 5.19Response of Bambo’s update during admission of new links.the link 5 to get admitted into the network causing severe interference tolink 1. In fact, Figure 5.19 <strong>and</strong> Figure 5.20 depict that the individual powersof all active links increase significantly as link 5 is being added into thesystem, causing a surge in power consumption of all active links.The SSCD <strong>and</strong> optimal schemes simulation displayed in Figure 5.21 <strong>and</strong>Figure 5.22 would not allow link 5 to be added into the system. In fact,SSCD <strong>and</strong> optimal DPC schemes use an extra requirement that has to besatisfied by the admission-seeking links. The admission links power upgradually, but whenever a link power update is greater than a predefinedvalue (which implies it would cause high interference when added to theactive links), the link is dropped from the network. The threshold levelshould be carefully selected to increase the efficiency of the network.The comparison of the total power consumed for the two schemes inFigure 5.23 illustrates clearly that the total power consumed using theoptimal DPC update is way below that of Bambos scheme. Hence, theoptimal DPC scheme provides efficient admission control.Example 5.3.2: Evaluation of <strong>Ad</strong>mission Delay <strong>and</strong> DroppedLinks with Number of UsersTo study the effect of number of users gaining admission <strong>and</strong> delay, considerthe scenario from Example 5.3.1 except the number of admission seekinglinks is increased. Figure 5.24 <strong>and</strong> Figure 5.25 show the dependence of