12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Distributed Power Control of <strong>Wireless</strong> Cellular <strong>and</strong> Peer-to-Peer <strong>Networks</strong> 179convergence of the power update scheme (Bambos et al. 2000, Wu 2000)<strong>and</strong> the process of admitting links are an issue in a highly dynamic wirelessenvironment as illustrated in this chapter. Therefore, it is demonstrated thatthe state space <strong>and</strong> optimal schemes (Jagannathan et al. 2002) can converge<strong>and</strong> can admit significantly more links (Dontula <strong>and</strong> Jagannathan 2004)while guaranteeing that the links consume minimal power.In this chapter, a networking approach to the design of DPC schemesis discussed (Dontula <strong>and</strong> Jagannathan 2004), in which the issue of admissioncontrol is made central for the peer-to-peer scenario initially. Thestate space <strong>and</strong> an optimal power control schemes, which sustain the SIRof active links above a certain threshold referred to as active link-protection(ALP), are introduced when new links access the channel. Intuitively, thenew links gradually power up while the active ones are assured QoS witha protection margin. The DPC schemes can efficiently control the powerbeing used by the established links in a communication channel. Theseschemes can achieve the required SIR, which reflects a given level of QoS.Lower interference levels in the communication channel resulting fromthe use of this scheme can increase the channel efficiency, capacity, <strong>and</strong>reusability for the uplink scenario.It is proven that the DPC schemes converge <strong>and</strong> admit a greater numberof links when compared to the existing schemes (Bambos et al. 2000, Jantti<strong>and</strong> Kim 2000, Wu 2000). For the proposed schemes, it is analyticallyproven that a trade-off exists between convergence speed <strong>and</strong> powerconsumed by a mobile user. This trade-off is easily observed by using thefeedback gains. The power control scheme being highly distributive innature doesn’t require interlink communication, centralized computation,<strong>and</strong> reciprocity assumption as required in a centrally controlled wirelessenvironment. As the necessity of interlink communication is eliminated,network capacity increases <strong>and</strong> easy, controlled recovery from error eventsis possible. The DPC/ALP scheme can be used to work in a cellularnetwork environment. Instead of receiver–transmitter pairs as in the casewith peer-to-peer networks, users in a cell communicate with the basestation, which services the cell. To compare the DPC schemes discussedin the literature, users are assumed to request channel access at the sametime, at the beginning of the simulation. From the results, it is indicatedthat the proposed schemes provide lower outage probability, consumeless power, <strong>and</strong> converge in a reasonable amount of time.The DPC schemes have to be modified in the presence of fading channels.In fact, a novel channel estimator is introduced, which is embedded in theDPC (Jagannathan et al. 2006), so that the suitable power values can beselected in the presence of fading channels. Results indicate that the modifiedDPC with the embedded channel estimator provides a superior performance.First, the state-space-based controls design (SSCD) <strong>and</strong> optimal DPC schemesare presented; <strong>and</strong> subsequently, the modified DPC scheme is covered.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!