12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Congestion Control in ATM <strong>Networks</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Internet 137Throughput (Mbps) Throughput (Mbps) Throughput (Mbps)DATA 110TCPTQ50 0 10 20 30 40DATA 254TCPTQ3210 0 10 20 30 40DATA 354TCPTQ3210 0 10 20Time:(s)30 40Throughput (Mbps) Throughput (Mbps) Throughput (Mbps)CBR 110TCPTQ50 0 10 20 30 4010CBR 2TCPTQ50 0 10 20 30 40CBR 354TCPTQ3210 0 10 20Time:(s)30 40FIGURE 3.32Individual throughput with time for fairness policy.guaranteeing the QoS for the inelastic users. The rates are adjusted fromthe theoretical results presented in the previous sections, which guaranteeperformance. Consequently, the TQ scheme displays superior performancein comparison with the TCP. These results are significant as theInternet congestion control is not fair, <strong>and</strong> therefore a best-effort serviceresults. On the contrary, the proposed end-to-end congestion schemedeveloped using rigorous mathematics guarantees the performance of thescheme, both theoretically <strong>and</strong> via extensive simulation studies.TABLE 3.7Fairness ComparisonCase IV TQ New-Reno TCPPacket loss ratio 0 1.172%Transmission delay 0.0617 0.0650System power 7.475 7.0917

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!