Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Congestion Control in ATM Networks and the Internet 97Example 3.3.1: Multiple ON/OFF SourcesTo evaluate the performance of the control schemes in the presence ofON/OFF traffic, network congestion was created by altering the servicecapacity at the destination switch as follows:S r = 48,000 cells/sec, 0 ≤t≤360msec,= 45,000 cells/sec,361 ≤t≤720msec,= 40,000 cells/sec, 721 ≤t≤1080msec,(3.32)= 45,000 cells/sec,1081 ≤t≤1440msec,= 48,000 cells/sec,1441 ≤t≤1800msec.Congestion was created by reducing the service capacity to 40,000 cells/sec (less than the MCR). Figure 3.6 and Figure 3.7 (same as Figure 3.6, butwith threshold scheme removed) show the CLR with time when threshold,adaptive, one-layer, two-layer — with and without offline training-basedCell loss ratio0.0450.040.0350.030.0250.020.015ThresholdAdaptiveOne layerTwo layer w/oTwo layer withBuffer length = 2500.010.0050200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Time in msecFIGURE 3.6Cell loss ratio with congestion.
98 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor NetworksCell loss ratio1.6 × 10−31.41.210.80.60.4AdaptiveOne layerTwo layer w/o trainingTwo layer with trainingBuffer length = 2500.20200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Time in msecFIGURE 3.7Cell loss ratio with congestion.congestion control schemes — were deployed at the network switch withbuffer length of 250 cells. The service capacity at the switch for differentintervals of time is given by Equation 3.32. As expected, the CLR for thethreshold, ARMAX, the one-layer NN method increases as the servicecapacity is decreased, reaches a maximum value when the service capacityis reduced to a small value during the time interval of 721 ≤t≤1080msec.The CLR again decreases as the service capacity is increased toward thePCR of the combined traffic.In contrast, the CLR for the two-layer NN method, with and without apriori training, remains near zero throughout the simulation time, evenwhen the service capacity was reduced to 20,000 cells/sec, which impliesthat the two-layer NN controller performs better than all other methodsduring congestion in controlling the arrival rate of the cells into the destinationbuffer. As all the traffic used was of ON/OFF type, the sourcerates were reduced fairly and quickly using the proposed scheme, resultingin a low CLR. Further, a transmission delay of approximately 25 msec(
- Page 69 and 70: 46 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 72 and 73: 2BackgroundIn this chapter, we prov
- Page 74 and 75: Background 51u(k)x n (k + 1)x n (k)
- Page 76 and 77: Background 53with x( 0)being the in
- Page 78 and 79: Background 55with tr(.) the matrix
- Page 80 and 81: Background 57nGiven a function ft (
- Page 82 and 83: Background 592.3.2 Lyapunov Stabili
- Page 84 and 85: Background 61as well as Jagannathan
- Page 86 and 87: Background 63The subsequent example
- Page 88 and 89: Background 65Evaluating this along
- Page 90 and 91: Background 67Now, select the feedba
- Page 92 and 93: Background 69is SISL if and only if
- Page 94 and 95: Background 71L 1 (x)L(x, t)L 0 (x)0
- Page 96 and 97: Background 73for some R > 0 such th
- Page 98 and 99: Background 75Evaluating the first d
- Page 100: Background 77Section 2.4Problem 2.4
- Page 103 and 104: 80 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 105 and 106: 82 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 107 and 108: 84 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 109 and 110: 86 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 111 and 112: 88 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 113 and 114: 90 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 115 and 116: 92 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 117 and 118: 94 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 119: 96 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netwo
- Page 123 and 124: 100 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 125 and 126: 102 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 127 and 128: 104 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 129 and 130: 106 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 131 and 132: 108 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 133 and 134: 110 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 135 and 136: 112 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 137 and 138: 114 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 139 and 140: 116 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 141 and 142: 118 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 143 and 144: 120 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 145 and 146: 122 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 147 and 148: 124 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 149 and 150: 126 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 151 and 152: 128 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 153 and 154: 130 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 155 and 156: 132 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 157 and 158: 134 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 159 and 160: 136 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 161 and 162: 138 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 163 and 164: 140 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 165 and 166: 142 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
- Page 167 and 168: 144 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Netw
98 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>Cell loss ratio1.6 × 10−31.41.210.80.60.4<strong>Ad</strong>aptiveOne layerTwo layer w/o trainingTwo layer with trainingBuffer length = 2500.20200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Time in msecFIGURE 3.7Cell loss ratio with congestion.congestion control schemes — were deployed at the network switch withbuffer length of 250 cells. The service capacity at the switch for differentintervals of time is given by Equation 3.32. As expected, the CLR for thethreshold, ARMAX, the one-layer NN method increases as the servicecapacity is decreased, reaches a maximum value when the service capacityis reduced to a small value during the time interval of 721 ≤t≤1080msec.The CLR again decreases as the service capacity is increased toward thePCR of the combined traffic.In contrast, the CLR for the two-layer NN method, with <strong>and</strong> without apriori training, remains near zero throughout the simulation time, evenwhen the service capacity was reduced to 20,000 cells/sec, which impliesthat the two-layer NN controller performs better than all other methodsduring congestion in controlling the arrival rate of the cells into the destinationbuffer. As all the traffic used was of ON/OFF type, the sourcerates were reduced fairly <strong>and</strong> quickly using the proposed scheme, resultingin a low CLR. Further, a transmission delay of approximately 25 msec(