Generating light on landscape impacts - Campaign to Protect Rural ...

Generating light on landscape impacts - Campaign to Protect Rural ... Generating light on landscape impacts - Campaign to Protect Rural ...

cpreherefordshire.org.uk
from cpreherefordshire.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Return to contents13Case study 1: National Parks and Areas of Outstanding NaturalBeauty (AONB)Hill Farm in Cumbria demonstrates how turbines can affect NationalParks and AONB landscapes. Permission for six wind turbines andassociated infrastructure was granted on appeal in 2011 (see Annex 1).When built, the wind turbines will be sited in undesignated landscapebut sandwiched between the Lake District National Park and the SolwayCoast AONB. The application was originally rejected by the localplanning authority on the grounds that ‘individually and cumulatively’it would have a ‘harmful effect on the landscapeto the detriment of thevisual amenity of the area. Friends of the Lake District, which representsCPRE in Cumbria, raised concerns about the application. In the elevatedposition it occupied, they argued, the wind turbines would have anunacceptable impact on a significant proportion of the AONB. It wouldalso conflict with the local plan’s recommendation on the number ofturbines that the landscape could support.The Planning Inspector agreed, recognising that there would be severevisual impacts within 4-5km of the site – well within the visual rangeof the AONB and the National Park. Where visible, the Inspectorconcluded, the development will ‘reduce the sense of wildness andremoteness’ of the designated areas. The Inspector asserted that therewould be harm to views from the National Park and the AONB andwithin the vicinity of the development. On public rights of way therewould be adverse landscape impacts and it would conflict with locallandscape capacity as set out in the local plan. Disturbingly, theInspector concluded that the harm and policy conflict was outweighedby the national and regional need for developments to contribute tonational targets.Case study 2: Protected areasThorne Moors in South Yorkshire demonstrates how turbines affectnationally important designations. A major development of 22 turbinessited adjacent to the Thorne Moors National Nature Reserve and Site ofSpecial Scientific Interest was granted by the Secretary of State in 2008(see Annex 1). At 1,900 hectares Thorne Moors is considered the largestlowland raised bog in Europe. Seen as a landscape type in its ownright, it was a borough-designated Area of Special Landscape Valueand also recognised as a district Local Landscape Character Area.CPRE South Yorkshire opposed the application along with otherenvironmental groups because it was deemed the wind turbines wouldhave ‘significant, adverse and unacceptable impact’ on the uniquewilderness quality of the raised bog landscape. It was also shown tohave a significant impact on the tranquillity of the protected area.Nonetheless, the Inspector concluded that he found ‘no convincing casefor the refusal of consent on grounds of landscape and visual impact’.ong>Generatingong> ong>lightong> on landscape impacts: How to accommodate onshore wind while protecting the countryside

Return to contents1424. Protection afforded to the Green Belt poses a similar problem.The defining characteristic of Green Belt protection is retaining the‘openness’ of areas surrounding major towns and cities. 24 The NationalPlanning Policy Framework states that local planning authoritiesshould look to retain and enhance landscapes and that manyrenewable energy projects will comprise inappropriate developmentwithin the Green Belt. Any developments would therefore need todemonstrate ‘very special circumstances’ that clearly outweigh anyharm caused, including landscape impact. Very special circumstances,however, may include production of energy from renewable sources(see case study 3) highong>lightong>ing a clear contradiction in policy objectives.Case study 3: Green BeltsLand at Hook Moor, Leeds, had permission for five wind turbinesand associated infrastructure granted on appeal in 2011 (seeAnnex 1). The local planning authority rejected the originalapplication. An appeal was subsequently dismissed because theInspector considered that the development would unacceptablyharm the openness of the Green Belt. It was considered that theapplication conflicted with advice given on protection of theGreen Belt in Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 and its generalpresumption against ‘inappropriate development’. A High Courtruling, however, granted the developer a second appeal becausethe Inspector at the time gave no weight to the then recentlyrevoked Regional Spatial Strategies – a revocation which wassubsequently found to be unlawful.At the second appeal the new Inspector agreed with the previousInspector that the development constitutes inappropriatedevelopment in the Green Belt attracting ‘substantial weight’.The Inspector also agreed that the loss of openness in the areawould be ‘considerable’ because it would cause harm to thecharacter of the landscape. The Inspector, however, approved theappeal. In reaching his decision he highong>lightong>ed the recent andgrowing set of national policies on renewable energy and thestrong national support for them. In the Inspector’s judgement,the new policy context justified reaching a different conclusion tothe previous Inspector because the other considerations amountedto the ‘very special circumstances’ necessary to justify thedevelopment. It is not clear how judgements of this sort can bereconciled with the very strong localist emphasis in the NationalPlanning Policy Framework.25. Locally designated areas, while not enjoying national level protection,are also particularly sensitive to inappropriate development. Theseareas are often designated because they represent a unique characterwithin a local area. CPRE recognises that the national need for morerenewable energy will sometimes outweigh local level landscapedesignations, but we are concerned that it is too often the Planning24Department for Communities and LocalGovernment, National Planning PolicyFramework, 2012ong>Generatingong> ong>lightong> on landscape impacts: How to accommodate onshore wind while protecting the countryside

Return <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tents13Case study 1: Nati<strong>on</strong>al Parks and Areas of Outstanding NaturalBeauty (AONB)Hill Farm in Cumbria dem<strong>on</strong>strates how turbines can affect Nati<strong>on</strong>alParks and AONB <strong>landscape</strong>s. Permissi<strong>on</strong> for six wind turbines andassociated infrastructure was granted <strong>on</strong> appeal in 2011 (see Annex 1).When built, the wind turbines will be sited in undesignated <strong>landscape</strong>but sandwiched between the Lake District Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park and the SolwayCoast AONB. The applicati<strong>on</strong> was originally rejected by the localplanning authority <strong>on</strong> the grounds that ‘individually and cumulatively’it would have a ‘harmful effect <strong>on</strong> the <strong>landscape</strong>’ <strong>to</strong> the detriment of thevisual amenity of the area. Friends of the Lake District, which representsCPRE in Cumbria, raised c<strong>on</strong>cerns about the applicati<strong>on</strong>. In the elevatedpositi<strong>on</strong> it occupied, they argued, the wind turbines would have anunacceptable impact <strong>on</strong> a significant proporti<strong>on</strong> of the AONB. It wouldalso c<strong>on</strong>flict with the local plan’s recommendati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the number ofturbines that the <strong>landscape</strong> could support.The Planning Inspec<strong>to</strong>r agreed, recognising that there would be severevisual <strong>impacts</strong> within 4-5km of the site – well within the visual rangeof the AONB and the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park. Where visible, the Inspec<strong>to</strong>rc<strong>on</strong>cluded, the development will ‘reduce the sense of wildness andremoteness’ of the designated areas. The Inspec<strong>to</strong>r asserted that therewould be harm <strong>to</strong> views from the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park and the AONB andwithin the vicinity of the development. On public rights of way therewould be adverse <strong>landscape</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> and it would c<strong>on</strong>flict with local<strong>landscape</strong> capacity as set out in the local plan. Disturbingly, theInspec<strong>to</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>cluded that the harm and policy c<strong>on</strong>flict was outweighedby the nati<strong>on</strong>al and regi<strong>on</strong>al need for developments <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tribute t<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>al targets.Case study 2: <strong>Protect</strong>ed areasThorne Moors in South Yorkshire dem<strong>on</strong>strates how turbines affectnati<strong>on</strong>ally important designati<strong>on</strong>s. A major development of 22 turbinessited adjacent <strong>to</strong> the Thorne Moors Nati<strong>on</strong>al Nature Reserve and Site ofSpecial Scientific Interest was granted by the Secretary of State in 2008(see Annex 1). At 1,900 hectares Thorne Moors is c<strong>on</strong>sidered the largestlowland raised bog in Europe. Seen as a <strong>landscape</strong> type in its ownright, it was a borough-designated Area of Special Landscape Valueand also recognised as a district Local Landscape Character Area.CPRE South Yorkshire opposed the applicati<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g with otherenvir<strong>on</strong>mental groups because it was deemed the wind turbines wouldhave ‘significant, adverse and unacceptable impact’ <strong>on</strong> the uniquewilderness quality of the raised bog <strong>landscape</strong>. It was also shown <strong>to</strong>have a significant impact <strong>on</strong> the tranquillity of the protected area.N<strong>on</strong>etheless, the Inspec<strong>to</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>cluded that he found ‘no c<strong>on</strong>vincing casefor the refusal of c<strong>on</strong>sent <strong>on</strong> grounds of <strong>landscape</strong> and visual impact’.<str<strong>on</strong>g>Generating</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>light</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>landscape</strong> <strong>impacts</strong>: How <strong>to</strong> accommodate <strong>on</strong>shore wind while protecting the countryside

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!