Executive Summary - NASA

UAV Roadmap 2002FIGURE D-8: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: GENERAL. ............................................................ 120FIGURE D-9: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: IMINT. ................................................................ 121FIGURE D-10: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: MASINT. .......................................................... 122FIGURE D-11: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: SIGINT.............................................................. 122FIGURE D-12: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: COMMUNICATION............................................... 123FIGURE D-13: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: MULIT-FUNCTION. ............................................. 123FIGURE D-14: PAYLOADS & SENSORS: RADAR. .............................................................. 123FIGURE D-15: CONTROL: GENERAL. ............................................................................... 125FIGURE D-16: CONTROL: HEALTH MANAGEMENT/MIXED INITIATIVE/PLANNING &SUPPORT. ................................................................................................................. 125FIGURE D-17: CONTROL: AUTONOMY............................................................................. 126FIGURE E-1: UAV WINGSPAN VS. WEIGHT..................................................................... 129FIGURE G-1: JOINT FAA/OSD APPROACH TO REGULATING UAVS................................ 154FIGURE G-2: US MILITARY UAV MISHAP RATES, 1986-2001 ....................................... 155FIGURE G-3: UAVS AND AIRSPACE CLASSES OF THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM...... 158FIGURE H-1: TPPU-TRANSFORMING DCGS TO NET-CENTRICITY.................................. 165FIGURE H-2: AIR FORCE’S DCGS (DCGS-AF)............................................................... 167FIGURE H-3: ARMY’S DCGS (DCGS-A) ........................................................................ 168FIGURE H-4: NAVY’S DCGS (ISR NET)......................................................................... 168FIGURE H-5: USMC’S DCGS (MAGIS) ......................................................................... 169FIGURE H-6: DOD DCGS ENVISIONED STRUCTURE IN 2015 .......................................... 171FIGURE I-1: “ISSUES & DRIVERS”.................................................................................... 176FIGURE I-2: WEAPONIZED MQ-1B PREDATOR A. ........................................................... 177FIGURE I-3: PREDATOR/PREDATOR B, HUNTER-KILLER CONOPS................................. 177FIGURE I-4: SEAD/EA CONOPS, COOPERATIVE OPERATION. ...................................... 178FIGURE I-5: UCAV ENGAGEMENT CONOPS.................................................................. 179FIGURE I-6: EO/IR TARGETING SYSTEMS. ...................................................................... 180FIGURE I-7: RADAR. ........................................................................................................ 180FIGURE I-8: PROCESSORS................................................................................................. 181FIGURE I-9: UCAV APERTURES...................................................................................... 182FIGURE J-1: U.S. MILITARY UAV MISHAP RATES (LIFETIME), 1986 – 2002.................. 187FIGURE J-2: AVERAGE SOURCES OF SYSTEM FAILURES FOR U.S. MILITARY UAV FLEET(BASED ON 97,000 HOURS)....................................................................................... 189FIGURE J-3: AVERAGE SOURCES OF SYSTEM FAILURES FOR IAI UAV FLEET (BASED ON100,000 HOURS) ...................................................................................................... 189x