METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY - Pennsylvania Public Utility ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The number of union and non-union employees at each of the FE-PA Companiesduring 2007 to 2009 is summarized in Exhibit X-5. From 2007 to 2008 staffing levelsincreased at the FE-PA Companies. The majority of this increase was in the non-uniongroup which, for the most part, includes supervisors and managers. Union staffing,which would include line workers, increased slightly from 2007 to 2008. In 2009 anearly retirement program was offered resulting in a drop in the number of employees ateach of the FE-PA Companies.Exhibit X-5FE-PA CompaniesNumber of Union and Non-Union Employees2007 – 20092007 2008 2009Met-EdUnion 535 536 509Non-Union 173 187 149Totals 708 723 658PenelecUnion 638 644 616Non-Union 299 319 261Totals 937 963 877Penn PowerUnion 166 164 147Non-Union 51 50 47Totals 217 214 194Source: Data Request HR-11The FE-PA Companies’ number of line worker straight time hours, overtimehours, and the percentage of overtime hours to straight time hours from 2006 through2009 are shown on Exhibits X-6 through X-8. It should be noted that the straight timehours in the exhibits do not include any non-work hours such as vacation, holidays, sicktime, etc. At each of the FE-PA Companies, overtime as a percentage of straight timeincreased consistently from 2006 through 2008 but dropped in 2009. The 2009decrease in overtime was mainly attributed to 2009 being a relatively better year interms of reliability performance. The FE-PA Companies did not experience as manymajor storms as they did in previous years and there weren’t as many reliability issueswhich led to less usage of line workers and hence a reduction in overtime hours during2009.- 66 -
Exhibit X-6Metropolitan Edison CompanyLine Worker Straight Time and Overtime Hours2006 – 20092006 2007 2008 2009Straight time hours 349,345 354,260 368,436 363,210Overtime hours 106,035 126,678 133,103 108,318Percentage 30.4% 35.8% 36.1% 29.8%Source: Data Request HR-34Exhibit X-7<strong>Pennsylvania</strong> Electric CompanyLine Worker Straight Time and Overtime Hours2006 – 20092006 2007 2008 2009Straight time hours 537,796 578,671 600,554 540,963Overtime hours 128,887 148,304 171,515 119,062Percentage 24% 25.6% 28.6% 22%Source: Data Request HR-34Exhibit X-8<strong>Pennsylvania</strong> Power CompanyLine Worker Straight Time and Overtime Hours2006 – 20092006 2007 2008 2009Straight time hours 127,963 147,450 161,336 163,267Overtime hours 35,471 42,338 57,137 33,366Percentage 27.7% 28.7% 35.4% 20.4%Source: Data Request HR-34The Workload and Manpower Planning Analysis performed by the consultant in2007 did not include an analysis of overtime hours. Although, the FE-PA Companies dotrack and complete an in-depth overtime analysis on a weekly, monthly, and annualbasis; it appears to the Audit Staff that this information is generally not used todetermine if the levels of overtime are reasonable. The FE-PA Companies stated thatthey use this information for developing annual overtime budgets and each FE-PACompany is accountable to manage that budget. Additionally, the FE-PA Companiesindicated that they have historically budgeted for overtime levels to be around 15%-18%- 67 -
Page 5:
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANYPENNSYLV
Page 8 and 9:
• Support Services• Human Resou
Page 10 and 11:
• Developed and implemented forma
Page 12 and 13:
FIRSTENERGY PENNSYLVANIA COMPANIESM
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23: FIRSTENERGY PENNSYLVANIA COMPANIESM
Page 24 and 25: III. AFFILIATE INTERESTSBackground
Page 26 and 27: In addition, subsidiary or related
Page 28 and 29: BWG recommended that a detailed, wr
Page 30 and 31: management. Other potential uses of
Page 32 and 33: IV. CORPORATE GOVERNANCEBackground
Page 34 and 35: V. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTBackground -
Page 36 and 37: the internal audit was to determine
Page 38 and 39: Committee citing the internal contr
Page 40 and 41: VI. ELECTRIC RELIABILITYBackground
Page 42: Exhibit VI-1Metropolitan Edison Com
Page 45 and 46: provide additional details to the C
Page 47 and 48: Exhibit VI-6FirstEnergy Pennsylvani
Page 49 and 50: All three FE-PA Companies have had
Page 51 and 52: FirstEnergy is following the right
Page 53 and 54: Company, and The Toledo Edison Comp
Page 55 and 56: technicians. These strategies are u
Page 57 and 58: VIII. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESSBackgro
Page 59 and 60: Routine periodic updating of the em
Page 61 and 62: Follow-up Finding and Conclusion No
Page 63 and 64: old excess inventory. Spare invento
Page 65 and 66: controls were automated. Moreover,
Page 67 and 68: Exhibit IX-6FE-PA CompaniesPercenta
Page 69 and 70: FE-PA Companies were unable to iden
Page 71: Staff’s Follow-up Recommendation
Page 75 and 76: Prior Recommendation - Develop a co
Page 77 and 78: Therefore, BWG suggested that First
Page 79 and 80: XI. CUSTOMER SERVICEBackground - Th
Page 81 and 82: Exhibit XI-2FE-PA CompaniesPercenta
Page 83 and 84: Exhibit XI-5FE-PA Companies Compare
Page 85 and 86: Exhibit XI-7FE-PA Companies Compare
Page 87 and 88: Follow-up Finding and Conclusion No
Page 89 and 90: uilding, in an effort to protect re
Page 91 and 92: Companies would submit a supplement
Page 93 and 94: 3. The "four-fifths" rule (underuti
Page 95 and 96: Met-Ed has female underutilization
Page 97 and 98: Exhibit XII-4Page 1 of 2FirstEnergy
Page 99 and 100: The number of years that FirstEnerg
Page 101 and 102: FE-PA Companies do track purchases
show all

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY - Pennsylvania Public Utility ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?