International Land Coalition - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...
International Land Coalition - Independent Evaluation Group - World ... International Land Coalition - Independent Evaluation Group - World ...
Annex C 54Page No.Findings47 Members, partners, say ILC successful in facilitating dialogue but only "to some extentin decision-making processes"47 Sponsorship of attendance at 4 big international conferences48 Six countries cited (Guatemala, Philippines, South Africa, Zambia, Uganda, Niger)where ILC "encouraged governments to engage in dialogue." But some respondentsskeptical that it has gone beyond statements of intent.54–55 LAND program since 2003, participatory dialogue processes in Guatemala, Indonesia,Philippines, South Africa.Little evidence yet of improved policy processes or joint action to secure resources. (inSA LAND program halted due shift of policy) But limited gains must be judged againstdifficulty.LAND could become the country focus activity into which KP, NSP, CEF, feed.55 Platform 2002 aimed to present shared positions but nothing further happened.
55 Annex DAnnex D. ILC Members, Council, and SecretariatAnnex Table 6. ILC Members, at the Time of the External Evaluation(Members hold voting rights and may be elected to the Coalition Council.)Institution Country Web sitesALOP - Asociacion Latino-Americana deOrganizaciones e PromocionCosta Rica http://www.alcop.or.crALRD - Association for Land Reform andDevelopmentANGOC - Asian NGO for Agrarian Reformand Rural DevelopmentBangladeshPhilippineshttp://www.alrd@agni.comhttp://www.angoc.ngo.ph/BWI - Bread for the World Institute United States http://www.bread.orgCCC - Cooperation Committee forCambodiaCEPES - Centro Peruano de EstudiosSocialesCNIRD - Caribbean Network for IntegratedRural DevelopmentCOCOCH - Consejo Coordinador deOrganizaciones Campesinas de HondurasCONGCOOP - Coordinacion de ONG yCooperativesCambodiaPeruTrinidad andTobagoHondurasGuatemalahttp://www.ccc-cambodia.orghttp://www.cepes.org.pehttp://www.cnird.orghttp://www.twnside.org.sghttp://www.congcoop.org.gtDWHH - Deutsche Welthungerhilfe Germany http://www.welthungerhilfe.deEC - European CommissionELCI - Environment Liaison CentreInternationalFAO - Food and Agriculture Organization ofthe United NationsFENACOOP - Federeacion Nacional deCooperatives Agropecuarias yAgroIndustriales R.L.FEPP - Fondo Ecuatoriano PopulorumProgressioEuropean UnionKenyaInternationalNicaraguaEcuadorhttp://www.europa.eu.int/comm/index_en.htmhttp://www.elci.orghttp://www.fao.orgfenacoop@turbonett.comproterias@fepp.org.ecFundacion TIERRA Bolivia http://www.tierra.orgGrupo ALLPA - Comunidades y DesarrolloALLPAICRAF - International Centre for Researchin AgroforestryPeruInternationalhttp://www.allpa.org.pehttp://www.worldagroforestrycentre.orgIDB - Inter-American Development Bank Regional http://www.iadb.orgIFAD - The International Fund forAgricultural DevelopmentIFAP - International Federation ofAgricultural ProducersInternationalInternationalhttp://www.ifad.orghttp://www.ifap.org
- Page 29 and 30: 3Box 2. International Land Coalitio
- Page 31 and 32: 5Table 2. ILC Expenditures by Sourc
- Page 33 and 34: 7studies were prepared on ILC activ
- Page 35 and 36: 92.10 The EE could have gone furthe
- Page 37 and 38: 11Relevance3.3 Relevance 7 is discu
- Page 39 and 40: 13Box 6. The Land Focus in the Worl
- Page 41 and 42: 15influential in the facilitation o
- Page 43 and 44: 17Box 7. Imputed Logical Chain Corr
- Page 45 and 46: 193.26 Poverty Impact. On the secon
- Page 47 and 48: 21instance, page 65 of the EE found
- Page 49 and 50: 233.39 In addition to the above the
- Page 51 and 52: 25platform, or agreeing to disagree
- Page 53 and 54: 273.53 A cost that should not be ig
- Page 55 and 56: 29proactivity of its membership, fr
- Page 57 and 58: 314.15 The advantages for IFAD incl
- Page 59 and 60: 335. The World Bank and the ILC Par
- Page 61 and 62: 35trace the Bank’s financial cont
- Page 63 and 64: 376.4 The main lessons of this Glob
- Page 65 and 66: 39References 16Alilio, Martin S., w
- Page 67 and 68: 41Annex AAnnex A. Evaluation Framew
- Page 69 and 70: 43Annex AEvaluation Criteria and Qu
- Page 71 and 72: 45Annex AEvaluation Criteria and Qu
- Page 73 and 74: 47Annex AAnnex Table 3. Assessing t
- Page 75 and 76: 49 Annex BAnnex B. The External Eva
- Page 77 and 78: 51 Annex BFinding 20. ILC has sever
- Page 79: 53 Annex CAnnex C. Outcome Evidence
- Page 83 and 84: 57 Annex DInstitution Country Conta
- Page 85 and 86: 59 Annex EAnnex Table 10. ILC Balan
- Page 87 and 88: 61 Annex GAnnex G. Response of the
- Page 89 and 90: 63 Annex Gto be considered as findi
- Page 91: The organization that is now called
Annex C 54Page No.Findings47 Members, partners, say ILC successful in facilitating dialogue but only "to some extentin decision-making processes"47 Sponsorship of attendance at 4 big international conferences48 Six countries cited (Guatemala, Philippines, South Africa, Zambia, Uganda, Niger)where ILC "encouraged governments to engage in dialogue." But some respondentsskeptical that it has gone beyond statements of intent.54–55 LAND program since 2003, participatory dialogue processes in Guatemala, Indonesia,Philippines, South Africa.Little evidence yet of improved policy processes or joint action to secure resources. (inSA LAND program halted due shift of policy) But limited gains must be judged againstdifficulty.LAND could become the country focus activity into which KP, NSP, CEF, feed.55 Platform 2002 aimed to present shared positions but nothing further happened.
Change language