12.07.2015 Views

677kb pdf - Geoscience Society of New Zealand

677kb pdf - Geoscience Society of New Zealand

677kb pdf - Geoscience Society of New Zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE PUKETOKA FORMATION AND THE AGEOF THE HAURAKI GRABEN.Leaders: Bruce Hayward, Hugh GrenfellIntroductionThe Hauraki Graben is a major geomorphiccomponent <strong>of</strong> northern <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>, butwhat do we really understand about its timeand mode <strong>of</strong> formation? One much debatedquestion is - “When was it formed?” TheCoromandel-derived conglomerates <strong>of</strong> theenigmatic Puketoka Formation appear to <strong>of</strong>fersome important clues (Battey 1949, Kear2000, 2004).This field trip explores the seldom-visitedtype locality <strong>of</strong> Puketoka Formation at thescenic Puketoka trig, near Maramarua(S12/046401). A second important outcrop atKidds Beach (R12/720560) on the southernshores <strong>of</strong> the Manukau Harbour will also beexamined in the context <strong>of</strong> pathways for theCoromandel-derived sediment and ageconstraints on the subsidence <strong>of</strong> the HaurakiGraben.Fig 1: View from Monument Road - hills in thebackground are the type locality <strong>of</strong> the PuketokaFormation near Maramarua.Fig. 2 Outcrop <strong>of</strong> the Puketoka Formation at KiddsBeach, southern Manukau Harbour.Age <strong>of</strong> Hauraki Graben founderingEdbrooke (2001, p.52) summarises mostcurrent thinking on the formation <strong>of</strong> thisfeature: “The Hauraki Plains and Firth <strong>of</strong>Thames are interpreted as being part <strong>of</strong> anactive continental rift structure (Hauraki Rift),extending more than 250 km from aconcealed junction with the TVZ to thenorthern Hauraki Gulf (Hochstein andBallance, 1993). The Hauraki Rift is boundedby Firth <strong>of</strong> Thames Fault and Hauraki Fault tothe west and east respectively. It consists <strong>of</strong>up to 3 half-grabens adjacent to west-dippingmaster faults, and contains up to 2.5 km <strong>of</strong>sediment. The rift is thought to haveoriginated during Late Miocene uplift in theback-arc region, parallel to the Coromandelvolcanic arc, and was probablyaccommodating sediment by 5-7 Ma (LateMiocene).”In recent years David Kear (e.g. Kear, 2000,2004) had made us well aware <strong>of</strong> HughBattey’s (1949) report <strong>of</strong> Coromandel-derivedcobbles in a Pliocene conglomerate atPuketoka trig, and the implications for ayoung age <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> the HaurakiGraben that now lies between the Coromandeland Hunua Ranges.Edbrooke (2001) was aware <strong>of</strong> thisconglomerate and suggested the following toaccommodate it: “Periods <strong>of</strong> sedimentaccumulation [in the Hauraki Rift] probablyalternated with periods <strong>of</strong> sediment bypass,allowing pyroclastic flows and sediment toreach areas west <strong>of</strong> the rift (Hochstein andBallance, 1993).” By the end <strong>of</strong> today’s tripyou can make your own judgement on howplausible this explanation might be.The clasts within the type PuketokaFormation include rhyolite, vein quartz andsilicified wood, inferred to be derived fromthe northern or central Coromandel Rangevolcanic sequence (essentially <strong>of</strong> Middle andLate Miocene age, ~18-5 Ma). The oldestrhyolitic volcanism is dated at ~11 Ma(Adams et al., 1994) giving a lower ageconstraint on the conglomerate.In the southern part <strong>of</strong> the Hauraki Graben,the Kerepehi Fault has a mappable fault scarpand is considered to be active (e.g. Houghtonand Cuthbertson, 1989), suggesting that theGraben may still be slowly foundering, at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!