MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2013COMMUNITY CONSULTATION:This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirementsfor consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions of the Town PlanningScheme.ATTACHMENTS:1. Summary of applicant's justification.COUNCIL DECISION:(COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION)Moved by Cr MacRae, seconded by Cr BradleyThat, in accordance with Part 4 of the Town of Cambridge Town Planning Scheme No. 1,Council APPROVES the application for a carport with parapet wall submitted by ChrisLiversage at Lot 77 (No. 22) Highbury Street, Floreat, as shown on the plans dated 22December 2012 subject to the following conditions:-(i)(ii)(iii)the surface finish of boundary walls facing the adjoining property to the south-eastto be rendered, painted or face brickwork to the satisfaction of the Town;the carport to remain open on three sides. No solid door is to be installed;the tree located on the verge directly adjacent to the subject site to be retained.Footnote:1. The applicant be advised that in relation to the fencing proposed to be constructedalong the side property boundaries, the applicant should liaise with the affectedlandowners with respect to the rights and responsibilities of landowners under theDividing Fences Act.2. All works within the road reserve, such as vehicle crossovers, verge paving andlandscaping require a separate application and approval by the Town’sInfrastructure Services. These works must conform to the Town’s specifications.Carried 9/0H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\13 MINUTES\FEBRUARY 2013\B DV.DOCX 95
COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2013DV13.17LOT 601 (NO. 34) ARBORDALE STREET, FLOREAT - TWO STOREYDWELLING - AMENDED PLANS - PATIOSUMMARY:The Town has received an application for amended plans for a two storey dwelling at No. 34Arbordale Street, Floreat. The plans show the ground floor roof of the dwelling extending to therear to create a covered outdoor living area.The application requires a Council determination as an assessment is required against the rearsetback performance criteria of the Residential Design Codes of WA (R Codes) and anobjection has been received during the consultation period that cannot be resolved through acondition of planning approval.The proposal, as amended, to a minimum setback of 2.0 metres for the southern post, isconsidered to satisfy the relevant performance criteria for the following reasons:-• the patio does not have a significant impact on access to direct sun and ventilation to theadjoining property• the patio is open sided and extends for a short length (7.6 metres) adjacent to theneighbour’s side (41.4 metre long) boundary• the patio is at ground level and there are no variations to the privacy acceptabledevelopment requirements.Accordingly, the proposal is recommended for approval.BACKGROUND:Application: 340DA-2012.01Owner:Mr D and Mrs L OsbourneApplicant: Roger Joyner – Building DesignerZoning: Residential R12.5Use class: Dwelling (single) ‘P’ – permittedLand area: 827 m²An application for a two storey dwelling on the subject site was approved by the Council at itsmeeting held on 25 September 2012 (DV12.109). The approved plans annotated that the roofcovering at the rear of the dwelling was a ‘pergola’ rather than a patio. The R Codes definepergola as “an unroofed open-framed structure” and patio as “a water impermeable roofedopen-sided area which may or may not be attached to a dwelling”.On 16 November 2012, the applicant submitted amended plans showing changes to the frontelevation of the dwelling. In assessing these plans, Council officers queried the applicant onwhether the intention was to cover the rear area with a solid roof covering as indicated on theelevations, despite inconsistency with the ‘pergola’ annotation on the site and floor plans. Thiswas indeed the case, so the plans were amended to show this area as a patio and theneighbours were consulted. The amendments to the front elevation were approved underdelegated authority on 29 January 2013. It is the patio that is the subject of the followingreport.H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\13 MINUTES\FEBRUARY 2013\B DV.DOCX 96
Page 1 and 2:
Council Minutes26 FEBRUARY 2013
Page 3 and 4:
COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48: COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY
Page 97: COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
show all

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?