12.07.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2013sun access, it is noted that overshadowing <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property to the south has beencalculated at 13.7 percent (or 88.58m 2 ), which is within the acceptable development criteria.Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, and notwithstanding neighbour concerns, it isconsidered that the proposed height <strong>of</strong> the development is acceptable and satisfies theperformance criteria for the following reason:-• the additional height <strong>of</strong> the dwelling is unlikely to have a significant detrimental impact onthe streetscape or the amenity <strong>of</strong> neighbouring properties.Visual privacyRear verandahPerformance criteria:Proposed• 3.2 metres to southernside boundary withincone <strong>of</strong> vision• 4.0m metres to northernside boundary withincone <strong>of</strong> visionAcceptable development provision7.5 metres within the cone <strong>of</strong> visionDirect overlooking <strong>of</strong> active habitable spaces and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong> other dwellings isminimised by building layout, location and design <strong>of</strong> major openings and outdoor activehabitable spaces, screening devices and landscape, or remoteness.Effective location <strong>of</strong> major openings and outdoor active habitable spaces to avoidoverlooking is preferred to the use <strong>of</strong> screening devices or obscured glass.Where these are used, they should be integrated with the building design and have minimalimpact on residents’ or neighbours’ amenity.Where opposite windows are <strong>of</strong>fset from the edge <strong>of</strong> one window to the edge <strong>of</strong> another, the distance<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fset should be sufficient to limit views into adjacent windows.In respect to overlooking towards the southern neighbour, it is noted that privacy screening to1.65 metres has been provided along the southern side <strong>of</strong> the verandah. This screening directsoverlooking towards the rear yard area <strong>of</strong> the subject site and limits overlooking within the cone<strong>of</strong> vision to a small section along the side <strong>of</strong> the lot to the south. It is also noted that the ownersintend to maintain the mature trees along the southern boundary which will assist in theprovision <strong>of</strong> privacy between neighbours. The existing boundary fence along the southern sideboundary will also act as further screening to prevent any direct overlooking.The property to the north contains no major openings or outdoor living areas which could beoverlooked from the proposed verandah. A rear pool area will not be visible from the verandah.The extent <strong>of</strong> overlooking is therefore considered minor and will have minimal impact uponneighbour's amenity.Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the potential overlooking from thedevelopment is acceptable and complies with the performance criteria for the followingreasons:-• overlooking <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property to the south is minimised though screening andexisting mature vegetation;H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\13 MINUTES\FEBRUARY 2013\B DV.DOCX 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!