12.07.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2013Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed garage doors areacceptable and satisfy with the performance criteria for the following reason:-• the greater setback <strong>of</strong> the garage, overhanging balconies and landscaping in the frontsetback area combine to reduce the dominance <strong>of</strong> the garage on the streetscape.Vehicular accessProposedAcceptable development provisionSetback from a street tree 0.7 metres from the north 1.5 metresdwelling drivewayWidth <strong>of</strong> a driveway 55% Maximum 40%Performance criteria:Vehicular access provided so as to minimise the number <strong>of</strong> crossovers, avoid street trees, to besafe in use and not detract from the streetscape.The proposed driveways to the double garages are 4.5 metres wide in the front setback area.There is an existing street tree located between the two driveways. The <strong>Town</strong>’s InfrastructureServices has inspected the street tree and determined that the tree is in a good condition andthere is no reason to remove the tree. According to the drawings, the tree is greater than 1.0metre from the south dwelling’s driveway, but closer than 1.0 metre from the north dwelling’sdriveway. Whilst the tree is closer than the minimum requirement <strong>of</strong> 1.5 metres, due to the size<strong>of</strong> the tree the proposed setback <strong>of</strong> 0.7 metres is considered acceptable in this particularcircumstance. Of more important note is that the area available between the proposedcrossovers has a width <strong>of</strong> 2.6 metres, which is a more than adequate area available if theexisting tree is damaged and requires replacing.With regard to the width <strong>of</strong> the driveways, the width is less than a standard double driveway, inorder to accommodate more landscaping in the front setback area. The applicant has advisedthat this landscaping will be planted with mature vegetation to ensure a s<strong>of</strong>t green aesthetic isprojected to the street. It is considered in this particular instance, the width <strong>of</strong> the drivewaysare acceptable. There will be a loss <strong>of</strong> a street parking bay, however, there is sufficient spacefor a visitor to park on site, on the driveway in front <strong>of</strong> the garages, due to the greater setback<strong>of</strong> the garages from the street.Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed vehicular access isacceptable and satisfies the performance criteria for the following reasons:-• the width <strong>of</strong> the driveway, street tree between the driveways and the provision <strong>of</strong>landscaping in the front setback area will combine to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> the drivewayson the streetscape.Landscaping in the front setback areaLandscaping in the frontsetback areaProposedAcceptable development provision45% Minimum 60%H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\13 MINUTES\FEBRUARY 2013\B DV.DOCX 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!