12.07.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2013ATTACHMENTS:1. Applicant's justification and neighbour's comments.ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION:That, in accordance with Part 4 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme No. 1,Council APPROVES the application for a second storey addition and alterations to the existingdwelling as submitted by T Jackson at Lot 1 (No. 8) Chidley Road, City Beach, as shown on theplans dated 23 October 2012 subject to the following conditions:-(i)(ii)the easternmost panel <strong>of</strong> window to Bedroom 2 on the south elevation <strong>of</strong> the dwellingbeing deleted or provided with opaque glass; andthe section <strong>of</strong> the rear balcony to level which is shown as having a solid balustrade shallbe provided with a screen wall height <strong>of</strong> 1.6 metres from floor level as marked in red onthe approved plan.Committee Meeting 11 December 2012During discussion, Members were advised that the applicant is to submit amended plans andhas requested that the item be deferred.<strong>COUNCIL</strong> DECISION:(COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION)That the item relating to Lot 1 (No.8) Chidley Road, City Beach be deferred to enable amendedplans to be submitted.FURTHER REPORT (Post Council Meeting 18 December 2012)The applicant submitted amended plans on 20 December 2012 responding to conditions <strong>of</strong>approval recommended by the Administration being:-• The south elevation east most panel to Bedroom 2 window being deleted; and• The rear balcony being provided with a brick screen wall 1.6 metres in height.In addition, the applicant increased the upper storey wall length by approximately 650mm whichincreases the setback requirement for this wall from 3.3 metres to 3.5 metres. If the cornerbedroom window was deleted, the setback requirement would be 1.6 metres and therefore theproposal would meet acceptable development provisions.Neighbour's SubmissionAt the Council meeting on 18 December 2012, the adjoining landowners raised various issuesprincipally in relation to the stairs up to the southern side <strong>of</strong> the dwelling where the newentrance is proposed.Question 1How did the planning department recommend for approval, proposed plans that were based onan existing unapproved development?H:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\13 MINUTES\FEBRUARY 2013\B DV.DOCX 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!