12.07.2015 Views

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

MEETING OF COUNCIL - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTESTUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2013• Proposed addition to the rear <strong>of</strong> the existing upper level to include a new dining andalfresco area. Additional storey to replace existing observation deck and will includethree bedrooms, a family room and balconies to the front and rear <strong>of</strong> the dwelling.• The site slopes up from the front boundary <strong>of</strong> Chidley Road, approximately 4.5 metres tothe rear/eastern boundary.• The dwelling will have a flat ro<strong>of</strong> and does not exceed the line <strong>of</strong> height restrictionimposed by the restrictive covenant <strong>of</strong> 47.1 metres.• The overall height <strong>of</strong> the dwelling increases 1.69 metres above the existing brickbalustrade height to the observation deck.Applicant's justificationThe applicant has provided written justification for the variations to the acceptable developmentprovisions relating to the setback and visual privacy variations.Neighbour submissionThe <strong>Town</strong> notified the owners <strong>of</strong> the two properties directly adjoining the side boundaries <strong>of</strong> thesubject site, being Nos. 6 and 10 Chidley Road, City Beach. One submission was receivedfrom the owners <strong>of</strong> No. 6 Chidley Road objecting to the proximity <strong>of</strong> the dwelling to theirboundary and the resultant visual and acoustic privacy issues.Performance criteria assessmentBuildings setback from the boundaryProposedUpper Floor Side Setback • 2.4 metres from upperfloor wall to southernside boundaryAcceptable development provision• 3.3 metresPerformance criteria:Buildings setback from boundaries other than street boundaries so as to:• provide adequate direct sun and ventilation to the building;• ensure adequate direct sun and ventilation being available to adjoining properties;• provide adequate direct sun to the building and appurtenant open spaces;• assist with protection <strong>of</strong> access to direct sun for adjoining properties;• assist in ameliorating the impacts <strong>of</strong> building bulk on adjoining properties; and• assist in protecting privacy between adjoining properties.The proposed upper floor follows the line <strong>of</strong> the existing dwelling and increases the wall lengthfrom 7 metres to 12 metres. The existing dwelling has a brick balustrade around the ro<strong>of</strong> deckso that the additional storey will be 1.69 metres higher than the existing building height (notingthat the dwelling has a flat ro<strong>of</strong> so no additional height above the wall).There is a window proposed to the front bedroom which wraps around the front south-westcorner <strong>of</strong> the dwelling and this increases the setback requirement for the upper storey. If thewindow was deleted or screened, the setback requirement would be reduced and the proposedwall would meet acceptable development provisions.The adjoining property does not have any major openings on the side <strong>of</strong> the dwelling or activehabitable spaces so that the proposal does not impact on access to direct sun to adjoiningproperties. The proposed Bedroom 2 window overlooks the open front garden and front terraceH:\CEO\GOV\<strong>COUNCIL</strong> MINUTES\13 MINUTES\FEBRUARY 2013\B DV.DOCX 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!