12.07.2015 Views

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2. The cut-constructible parts 84The vanish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> three-mass triangle coefficientsThe three-mass triangle <strong>in</strong>tegral is listed <strong>with</strong> the other basis <strong>in</strong>tegrals <strong>in</strong> Appendix Band is f<strong>in</strong>ite (i.e. it has no poles <strong>in</strong> the dimensional parameter ǫ) and as such thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> the three-mass triangle cannot be fixed by <strong>in</strong>fra-red safety conditions.However, for any φ-MHV helicity configur<strong>at</strong>ion there can be no non-zero three-masstriangle coefficients. The general topologies are shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.7 for each one thereis always <strong>at</strong> least one vertex which vanishes.One- and <strong>two</strong>-mass triangle coefficientsThe rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g triangle coefficients which are associ<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>with</strong> one- and <strong>two</strong>-masstriangles can be calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>in</strong>fra-red safety conditions. To ensure correct <strong>in</strong>fraredbehaviour the ǫ −2 pieces <strong>of</strong> the amplitude must have the follow<strong>in</strong>g form,A (1)n= − c Γǫ 2 A(0) nn∑( µ2i=1−s i,i+1) ǫ+ O(ǫ 0 ). (3.54)In general we expect the coefficients <strong>of</strong> the various triangles to possess a similarstructure to the box coefficients, i.e. we expect to f<strong>in</strong>d the follow<strong>in</strong>g sorts <strong>of</strong> terms<strong>in</strong> our amplitude,(−4(Cn;1 3−cut (φ, 1 − , 2 + , . . ., m − , . . ., n + ) = A (0)n(1 − N f4N c)A φF,3−cutn;1 (m, n) − 2A φG,3−cut1 − N fN c)A φS,3−cutn;1 (m, n)n;1 (m, n)). (3.55)In this decomposition it is clear th<strong>at</strong> only A φG,3−cutn;1 (m, n) can contribute to eq. (3.54),further we can <strong>in</strong>fer th<strong>at</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce no <strong>in</strong>fra-red poles are proportional to N f (s<strong>in</strong>ce thereexists no (n+1) φ plus gluon tree amplitude which has an N f dependence) we knowth<strong>at</strong> the triangles which occur <strong>in</strong> these pieces must cancel the poles which arise fromthe box contributions. The case where m = 2 has been calcul<strong>at</strong>ed [108] and thefollow<strong>in</strong>g contributions were found,A φG,3−cutn;1 (2, n) =n∑i=1(F 1m3 (s i,n+i−2 ) − F 1m3 (s i,n+i−1 )) (3.56)A φF,3−cutn;1 (2, n) = A φS,3−cutn;1 (2, n) = 0 (3.57)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!