12.07.2015 Views

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.6. The unitarity-bootstrap 63The second tensor structure vanishes when a and b have opposite helicities,(ε + a · ε − b − ε+ a · k b ε − b · k )a= − [aq b]〈bq a 〉k a · k b 〈aq a 〉[bq b ] + [ab]〈bq a〉〈ba〉[aq b ]〈aq a 〉[bq b ]〈ab〉[ba] = 0. (2.118)The def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>of</strong> the polaris<strong>at</strong>ion vectors <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> their reference vectors q i aregiven <strong>in</strong> Appendix A. S<strong>in</strong>ce the tensor structure vanishes <strong>at</strong> tree-level it should alsovanish for all loops (because the loops only change the form factor g 2 ). Thereforewhen the <strong>two</strong> gluons a and b have opposite helicity only the tree-like tensor structureenters the game and we understand the factoris<strong>at</strong>ion for complex momenta. However,when the <strong>two</strong> momenta have the same helicity the tensor structure no longervanishes,(ε + a · ε+ b − ε+ a · k b ε + b · k )ak a · k b= [ab]〈q bq a 〉〈aq a 〉〈bq b 〉 − [ab]〈bq a〉[ba]〉〈aq b 〉〈aq a 〉〈bq b 〉〈ab〉[ba]()[ab]= −〈ab〉〈q a q b 〉 + 〈bq a 〉〈aq b 〉〈ab〉〈aq a 〉〈bq b 〉= − [ab]〈ab〉 . (2.119)This tensor structure still vanishes if we approach the on-shell limit such th<strong>at</strong> [ab] →0 (or 〈ab〉 → 0 for the <strong>two</strong> neg<strong>at</strong>ive case). In these cases the tree-level also piece alsovanishes. If this tensor structure survives <strong>in</strong> the on-shell limit then it can producedouble poles <strong>in</strong> 〈ab〉 (when multiplied by the 1/s ab ). These double poles producesublead<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle poles whose complex momenta behaviour is not fully understood,and, <strong>at</strong> the moment, there is no system<strong>at</strong>ic way to <strong>in</strong>clude them <strong>in</strong>to the recursionrel<strong>at</strong>ions.Therefore when us<strong>in</strong>g the recursion rel<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> one-loop we have to ensure th<strong>at</strong>there are no shifts which conta<strong>in</strong> a three po<strong>in</strong>t vertex <strong>with</strong> <strong>two</strong> external gluons <strong>of</strong>the same helicity. However, as mentioned above if the tree-level amplitude for aparticular shift vanishes these diagrams do not contribute, e.g. if we shift |i〉 →|i〉 + z|k〉 and i is a neg<strong>at</strong>ive gluon found <strong>in</strong> a tree amplitude <strong>with</strong> j and ̂P ij thenwe f<strong>in</strong>d,̂P 2ij = 0 =⇒ 0 = P 2ij + z〈kj〉[ji] =⇒ z = −〈ij〉〈kj〉 . (2.120)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!