12.07.2015 Views

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2. Quadruple cuts 39We also note th<strong>at</strong> this solution only required knowledge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>two</strong>-mass easy boxmomentum structure. It is, therefore, applicable to any <strong>two</strong>-mass easy topology<strong>with</strong> arbitrary helicity structure. However, here we see a problem <strong>with</strong> our solution,a priori we do not know whether p 1 will be <strong>in</strong> a MHV or MHV configur<strong>at</strong>ion. If itforms part <strong>of</strong> a MHV three po<strong>in</strong>t vertex we see th<strong>at</strong> 〈l 2 1〉 = 0, which is not wh<strong>at</strong> wewanted. Wh<strong>at</strong> should be noted is th<strong>at</strong> earlier we explicitly chose ρ = 0, if however,we chose δ = 0 we would have found th<strong>at</strong>,l µ = αp µ 1 + 1 2 ρ〈1|γµ |4] (2.25)Clearly the solution for α is unchanged the equ<strong>at</strong>ion to determ<strong>in</strong>e ρ is given by0 = 〈1|P 123|4]〈4|P 123 |1]s 14− ρ〈4|P 123 |1]such th<strong>at</strong> the second solution for l is given byρ = 〈1|P 123|4]s 14, (2.26)|l] = |1] |l〉 = |P 123|4][41](2.27)One should <strong>in</strong>clude the contributions from both solutions to the loop momenta whencalcul<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g a box coefficient (although <strong>in</strong> this case one solution is always killed bythe MHV or MHV three po<strong>in</strong>t amplitude). For our coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest we first rewritethe <strong>in</strong>tegrand such th<strong>at</strong> it solely depends on l 2 us<strong>in</strong>g momentum conserv<strong>at</strong>ionthen substitute <strong>in</strong> our calcul<strong>at</strong>ed result.c 4;φ|1|23|4 = 〈l 1 l 2 〉 2 [l 2l 3 ] 3 〈l 3 3〉 4 [4l 1 ] 3[l 2 1][1l 3 ] 〈l 3 2〉〈23〉〈3l 4 〉〈l 4 l 3 〉 [l 4 4][l 4 l 1 ][4|l 1 |l 2 〉 2 [l 2 |l 3 |3〉 3 〈l 3 3〉[4l 1 ]=[l 2 1][1|l 3 |2〉〈23〉〈3|l 4 |l 1 ]〈l 3 |l 4 |4]= [4|P 123|l 2 〉 2 [l 2 1]〈13〉 4〈l 2 2〉〈23〉〈34〉〈1|P 23 |4]= A (0)4 (φ, 1− , 2 + , 3 − , 4 + )[4|P 23 1P 23 |4〉= A (0)4 (φ, 1 − , 2 + , 3 − , 4 + )(s 234 s 123 − s 1234 s 23 ) (2.28)Here the coefficient is given by the tree-level amplitude multiplied by a k<strong>in</strong>em<strong>at</strong>icfunction associ<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>with</strong> the <strong>two</strong> mass box [121].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!