12.07.2015 Views

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.2. Improvements from the semi-numeric code 148where σ(gg → H) is the total cross section. Sett<strong>in</strong>g x = 4m 2 t/m 2 Hthe correction forthe f<strong>in</strong>ite mass <strong>of</strong> the top quark <strong>in</strong> the region x > 1 is [72],[3x( [R = 1 − (x − 1) s<strong>in</strong> −1 1] 2 ) ] 2√x . (6.4)2This quantity when used to normalise an effective theory cross section providesa good approxim<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the cross section from the full theory, see Ref. [66] andreferences there<strong>in</strong>. However for the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Higgs</strong> + 1 jet it has been found th<strong>at</strong>the effect <strong>of</strong> bottom quark loops and additional electroweak diagrams can also beimportant [92] and these effects should also be <strong>in</strong>cluded. Our numerical results forthe <strong>Higgs</strong> cross section will not <strong>in</strong>clude the rescal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Eqs. (6.3,6.4).6.2 Improvements from the semi-numeric codeThe phenomenology <strong>of</strong> the <strong>production</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Higgs</strong> <strong>boson</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>associ<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>two</strong> <strong>jets</strong>has been presented <strong>in</strong> Ref. [104, 105] for the case <strong>of</strong> the LHC oper<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> √ s =14 TeV. The NLO analysis <strong>in</strong> th<strong>at</strong> paper was based on real m<strong>at</strong>rix elements for the<strong>Higgs</strong>+5 parton processes given <strong>in</strong> Ref. [209], supplemented by the results <strong>of</strong> Ref. [95,146] <strong>in</strong> the cases where these l<strong>at</strong>ter results lead to more efficient code. In Ref. [105]the virtual m<strong>at</strong>rix element corrections for the <strong>Higgs</strong> + 4 parton process were takenfrom Ref. [104]. For the Hgggg and Hq¯qgg sub-processes the virtual correctionswere based on a semi-numerical technique [211], whilst the m<strong>at</strong>rix elements squaredfor the one-loop processes Hq¯qq ′¯q ′ and Hq¯qq¯q were given analytically <strong>in</strong> Ref. [104].In the three years s<strong>in</strong>ce Ref. [105] was published a gre<strong>at</strong> deal <strong>of</strong> effort has beendevoted to the analytic calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> one-loop corrections to <strong>Higgs</strong> + n-partonamplitudes, <strong>with</strong> particular emphasis on the n = 4 amplitudes which are relevantfor this study. The complete set <strong>of</strong> one-loop amplitudes for all <strong>Higgs</strong> + 4 partonprocesses is now available and analytic expressions can be found <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>greferences:• Hgggg: (Chapter 3, Chapter 4) Refs. [106–108,206,208];• H¯qqgg: (Chapter 5) Refs. [109,212];

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!