Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...
Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...
Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.2. One-loop results 144+ 1s 123[−m 4 φ 〈1 ]3〉2 〈2 3〉〈1 2〉 〈2 |p φ | 4] 〈3 |p φ | 4] + 〈4 |p φ| 2] 2 〈4 |p φ | 1]〈4 |p φ | 3] [1 2][1 3]× F 2mh4F (s 14, s 123 , s 23 , m 2 φ[)]+ 1 m 4 φ 〈1 3〉3s 123 〈1 2〉 〈3 |p φ | 4] 〈1 |p φ | 4] − 〈4 |p φ | 2] 3〈4 |p φ | 3][1 2][2 3]× F 2mh4F (s 24, s 123 , s 13 , m 2 φ[) ]+ 1 m 4 φ 〈1 3〉2−s 123 〈2 |p φ | 4] 〈1 |p φ | 4] + 〈4 |p φ| 2] 2)}F 2mh4F (s 34 , s 123 , s 12 , m 2[1 3][2 3]φ){ }+ 3 ↔ 4 , (5.36)where the function conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g poles and associ<strong>at</strong>ed logarithms is conveniently writtenas,V 5 (s 12 , s 34 , s 13 , s 24 ) = − 1 [( ) µ2 ǫ ( ) µ2 ǫ ( ) µ2 ǫ+ − −ǫ 2 −s 12 −s 34 −s 13( µ2−s 24) ǫ ].(5.37)We note th<strong>at</strong> the apparent double pole <strong>in</strong> ǫ <strong>in</strong> Eq. (5.37) is cancelled upon expand<strong>in</strong>gabout ǫ = 0.This result for the φ amplitude is particularly simple, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g neither bubblecontributions nor r<strong>at</strong>ional terms. This is also true for the helicity amplitudeA 4;3 (φ, 1¯q , 2 q , 3 − g , 4+ g ) 2 , which can easily be checked us<strong>in</strong>g the previously calcul<strong>at</strong>edresults <strong>in</strong> ref. [109]. It is therefore more efficient to program the full result for A 4;3 ,r<strong>at</strong>her than to program the <strong>in</strong>dividual primitive amplitudes us<strong>in</strong>g Eq. (5.5).Furthermore, for the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>two</strong> neg<strong>at</strong>ive gluon helicities calcul<strong>at</strong>ed here one cancheck us<strong>in</strong>g Eq. (5.5) th<strong>at</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g φ † amplitude is zero. Therefore wehave,A 4;3 (H, 1 −¯q , 2 + q , 3 − g , 4 − g ) = iA 4;3 (A, 1 −¯q , 2 + q , 3 − g , 4 − g ) = A 4;3 (φ, 1 −¯q , 2 + q , 3 − g , 4 − g ) . (5.38)2 The amplitude A 4;3 (φ, 1¯q , 2 q , 3 + g , 4 − g ) is not <strong>in</strong>dependent and is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by swapp<strong>in</strong>g labels 3and 4.