12.07.2015 Views

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5. Summary 114The r<strong>at</strong>ional terms <strong>of</strong> eqs. (4.45) and (3.117), are each apparently s<strong>in</strong>gular <strong>in</strong>this limit. However, careful comb<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion reveals the s<strong>of</strong>t behaviour,ˆR 4 (φ, 1 − , 2 + , 3 − , 4 + ) + CR 4 (φ, 1 − , 2 + , 3 − , 4 + ) p φ→0→N P3 A(0) (1 − , 2 + , 3 − , 4 + ).(3.192)This is similar to the s<strong>of</strong>t limit found <strong>in</strong> ref. [108,205] for the MHV amplitudes <strong>with</strong>adjacent neg<strong>at</strong>ive helicities, but, as anticip<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ref. [106], is not consistent <strong>with</strong>the naive limit <strong>of</strong> eq. (3.186).3.5 SummaryIn this chapter we have <strong>in</strong>vestig<strong>at</strong>ed the φ-MHV amplitude <strong>with</strong> general helicities.Detailed descriptions <strong>of</strong> the unitarity method used to gener<strong>at</strong>e the cut-constructiblepieces for all n have been given. The r<strong>at</strong>ional pieces have also been studied, howeverto limit the number and complexity <strong>of</strong> the equ<strong>at</strong>ions we have focused on thefour-gluon amplitude for the overlap and recursive pieces. We have performed severalchecks on our results, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>of</strong>t <strong>Higgs</strong> and coll<strong>in</strong>ear checks. In the nextchapter we will use the methods described <strong>in</strong> this chapter to gener<strong>at</strong>e the φ-NMHVamplitude.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!