92 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKshe does not marry, she has no children to care for like the widowed Magda,and her family escapes poverty and social disgrace by the help of one of hersister's husband.) Miriam's cul-de-sac, her feeling of being trapped in stagnation,is a recurring theme in the three novels at hand (e.g. II 274). Theresignation and feeling of entrapment, extensions of the individual situation,would be defeating if Miriam, like Magda, did not always find the strength toclaim her own: "I am myself," she exclaims defiantly (II 286). A characteristicof both Magda and Miriam, this is a very important factor and it needs to berepeatedly pointed out because it is perhaps the single characteristic that allowsboth women, in the last analysis, to survive. Their struggle, continuouslyendangered by their resignation to the given, coupled with their aptitude toconstantly re-structure their own realities, has a chance only with their resoluteconfirmation of their own worth - despite of what (the contrary) patriarchydemonstrates.It can be said that Miriam has come further in her struggle than Magda,perhaps because she does not undergo the debilitating experience of marriageand has not been "executed" by the patriarchal demands of behaviour and roledesignation in that. Although she is more than aware of the male world onseveral levels ("Why do people always like a noise? Men. All the things meninvented, trains and cannons and things make a frightful noise" pi 327]), inher situation and in her mind, there is still the possibility of finding the male,who will treat her as an equal:She discovered that a single steady unexpected glance, meeting her own, from a manwho had the right kind of bearing - something right about the set of shoulders - coulddisperse all the vague trouble she felt [...] there was no need to be alone in order to behappy. (II 319)Somehow, independently from Miriam's struggle against patriarchy yetimplicitly connected with it, she too, like Magda in Kaffka's novel, feels theloss of social status as deeply tragic (e.g. Ill 352 and 360). In this, sheexperiences the same parameters in her "career" as a teacher and governess,as Magda in her second marriage and loss of financial - and consequentlysocial - position (e.g. Ill 370).Important as the possibility of an equal relationship in marriage appears toMiriam, her observations prove themselves to the contrary. The submissiverole that is necessary to have a "good" marriage often appears in her mind:He might be heavy and fat. But a leading Q.C. must have thoughts... and he hadbeen thin once... and there were those books... and he would read newspapers; perhapstoo many newspapers. He would know almost at once that she thought he read too
MARGIT KAFFKA AND DOROTHY RICHARDSON: A COMPARISON 93many newspapers. She would have to conceal that, to hear the voice going on and leavingher undisturbed. (Ill 367. My italics.)Miriam's perception of the masculine, i.e., patriarchal world is almostalways negative (e.g. "Men's ideas were devilish; clever and mean" III 404),but it is very important to understand that this negative perception is groundedin and a result of her acute observation of the world around her and thendecision to focus on what she has seen and experienced between men andwomen:That was feminine worldliness, pretending to be interested so that pleasant thingsmight go on. Masculine worldliness was refusing to be interested so that it might go ondoing things. Feminine worldliness then meant perpetual hard work and cheating andpretence at the door of a hidden garden. Masculine worldliness meant never really beingthere; always talking about things that had happened or making plans for things thatmight happen. (Ill 388)This macro-cosmos of the masculine, i.e., patriarchal world translates itselfto Miriam into a horrible image of the possibility of her married state, onewhich continuously struggles with the other possibility of finding an equalpartner.Richardson created the image of a new woman who rebels against patriarchywith a determination rooted in a Weltanschauung fully recognizing theposition of women in patriarchal society. Miriam's Weltanschauung is basedon observation and intellectual position-taking. On the other hand, this frameof mind does not operate as a result of personal experiences like MagdaPórtelky's. Both authors and both protagonists arrived at a rejection of theirrespective patriarchal societies but both did so following different paths.Magda experienced the effects of patriarchy while Miriam observed them. ForMagda the experience turns into the socio-factual, for Miriam the observationturns into intellectual reflection. This difference also accounts for the differentnarrative in the novels. Kaffka created the reflective narrative but which issocio-factual, while Richardson created the stream-of-consciousness narrativewhich is a result of her intellectual and emotional reflections of observations.
- Page 1 and 2:
Papers of the Radnóti Memorial Con
- Page 3:
HUNGARIAN STUDIESVOLUME 11, 1996 CO
- Page 8 and 9:
6 GEORGE GÖMÖRIprobably Fürst an
- Page 10 and 11:
8 GEORGE GÖMÖRIof the utmost impo
- Page 12 and 13:
10 GEORGE GÖMÖRIén e földön...
- Page 14 and 15:
12 GEORGE GÖMÖRINotes1. Miklós R
- Page 16 and 17:
14 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁKself alwa
- Page 18 and 19:
16 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁKtype is r
- Page 20 and 21:
18 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁKpose, the
- Page 22 and 23:
20 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁK"Wozu Dic
- Page 24 and 25:
22 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁKand Wilme
- Page 26 and 27:
24 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁKbeen the
- Page 28 and 29:
26 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁKBolond, k
- Page 30 and 31:
28 MIHÁLY SZEGEDY-MASZÁK6. Emery
- Page 32 and 33:
30 ZSUZSANNA OZSVÁTHand breaks as
- Page 34 and 35:
32 ZSUZSANNA OZSVÁTHThe drama echo
- Page 36:
34 ZSUZSANNA OZSVÁTHcontinents at
- Page 39 and 40:
FROM CAIN TO NAHUM 37which, as Csap
- Page 41 and 42:
\FROM CAIN TO NAHUM 39and bears and
- Page 43 and 44: FROM CAIN TO NAHUM 41who sees what
- Page 45 and 46: FROM CAIN TO NAHUM 438. "A félelme
- Page 47 and 48: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE:THE VIRGELIA
- Page 49 and 50: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE 47compete! W
- Page 51 and 52: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE 49of a priva
- Page 53 and 54: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE 51Once again
- Page 55 and 56: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE 53Eighth Ecl
- Page 57 and 58: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE 55have that
- Page 59: HELP ME, PASTORAL MUSE 57Paul de Ma
- Page 62 and 63: 60 SAMUEL J. WILSONWe did, however,
- Page 64 and 65: 62 SAMUEL J. WILSONbeings and contr
- Page 66 and 67: 64 SAMUEL J. WILSONHungarians would
- Page 68 and 69: 66 SAMUEL J. WILSONthe Austrians. G
- Page 70 and 71: 68 SAMUEL J. WILSONnorth-eastern Zi
- Page 72 and 73: 70 SAMUEL J. WILSONoriginally pursu
- Page 74 and 75: 72 SAMUEL J. WILSONGörgey's decisi
- Page 76 and 77: 74 SAMUEL J. WILSONfrom occurring,
- Page 78 and 79: 76 SAMUEL J. WILSON8. Artúr Görge
- Page 80 and 81: 78 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKtört
- Page 82 and 83: 80 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKThe c
- Page 84 and 85: 82 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKher u
- Page 86 and 87: 84 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKthe b
- Page 88 and 89: 86 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKrooti
- Page 90 and 91: 88 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKcriti
- Page 92 and 93: 90 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEK'My f
- Page 96 and 97: 94 STEVEN TÖTÖSY de ZEPETNEKNotes
- Page 99 and 100: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYIVAL
- Page 101 and 102: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 99
- Page 103 and 104: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 10
- Page 105 and 106: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 10
- Page 107 and 108: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 10
- Page 109 and 110: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 10
- Page 111 and 112: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 10
- Page 113 and 114: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 11
- Page 115: BERLIN ET PARIS DE LAJOS TIHANYI 11
- Page 118 and 119: 116 KEVIN E. KELLYfilms Lugosi made
- Page 120 and 121: 118 KEVIN E. KELLYthe provinces, no
- Page 122 and 123: 120 KEVIN E. KELLYWith his brief an
- Page 124 and 125: 122 KEVIN E. KELLYboth his and Dean
- Page 126 and 127: 124 KEVIN E. KELLYfollowed it into
- Page 128 and 129: 126 KEVIN E. KELLYvampiric nobleman
- Page 130 and 131: 128 KEVIN E. KELLYThe film also boo
- Page 132 and 133: 130 KEVIN E. KELLYWood remained one
- Page 134 and 135: 132 KEVIN E. KELLYLugosi, convinced
- Page 136 and 137: 134 KEVIN E. KELLY19. Lennig, 112-1
- Page 139 and 140: THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIREIN GYÖ
- Page 141 and 142: THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 139poe
- Page 143 and 144: THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 141tra
- Page 145 and 146:
THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 143fek
- Page 147 and 148:
THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 145ner
- Page 149 and 150:
THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 147whi
- Page 151 and 152:
THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 149mov
- Page 153 and 154:
THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIRE 151for
- Page 155 and 156:
THE AGON OF IRONY AND SATIREA harma
- Page 157 and 158:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINSTranslated b
- Page 159 and 160:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINS 157"Afraid?
- Page 161 and 162:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINS 159Abády,
- Page 163 and 164:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINS 161"The mar
- Page 165 and 166:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINS 163Bálint
- Page 167 and 168:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINS 165"That is
- Page 169 and 170:
MURDER IN THE MOUNTAINS 167at hand,
- Page 171 and 172:
CONTRIBUTORSMiklós BÁNFFYLászló