12.07.2015 Views

139736eo.pdf (20MB) - Japan Oceanographic Data Center

139736eo.pdf (20MB) - Japan Oceanographic Data Center

139736eo.pdf (20MB) - Japan Oceanographic Data Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of equipment and larger vessels, on the continental shelf and in the deep sea. Indian scientists havedeveloped collaboration programmes with Sri Lanka and Seychelles, and programmes are now beingdrawn up for collaboration with Mauritius.INTRODUCTIONThe Indian Ocean (Area: 74.917 x lo6 km2, Water Volume: 291.945 x lo6 km3, AverageDepth: 3897 m) is the third largest of the world oceans. The lands bordering the Ocean contain almost40 percent of the worlds population and contribute substantially to some of the essential mineral rawmaterials for the world economy; i.e., oil, tin, iron and manganese ores, mica and chromite.The present paper reviews the surficial mineral resources of the Indian Ocean, excluding thosein bedrock (oil, gas and sulphur etc.) and the metalliferous brine deposits of the Red Sea.The minerals for the review have been grouped as (i) Terrigenous (ii) Biogenous and (iii)Chemogenous. The present review covers the Indian Ocean as defined by FAIRBRIDGE (1966),extending from the east of the African continent to the west of the Australian continent and from theIndian sub-continent to Antarctica.SEDIMENT TYPESTERRIGENOUS SEDIMENTSHeavy mineral placers are known from the beaches of many countries bordering the IndianOcean (Fig. 1). The placers contain ilmenite, rutile, zircon, magnetite, monazite, garnet, kyanite andtin in significant proportions. Many of these placers are economically exploited and contributesignificantly to the world production (Table 1). The offshore extension of some of these placers hasalso been explored, but at present only offshore tin placers are being exploited.The present onshore deposits of heavy mineral placers can provide a clue about the nature anddistribution of offshore deposits in submerged valleys and beaches on the continental shelf. Though alarge number of placers are known to occur on the beaches of the Indian Ocean, offshore extensions ofonly a few have been explored. These are reviewed below:Mozambique: Known onshore placer deposits at Pebana, Vila Luiza and Micaune contain ilmenite,zircon, rutile and minor amounts of monazite. The R.V. VALDIVIA in 1971 and 1973 carried outdetailed geological and geophysical surveys on the shelf off northern Mozambique (BEIERSDORF etal., 1980) to locate marine placer deposits. The heavy minerals included ilmenite (Ti0249.5; Fe033.1 and 02030.18 %), zircon (ZrO2 63.05, Ti02 0.71 %), rutile ( Ti02 87.7 %) magnetite, garnet,etc. Sediments on the Zambesi delta between water depth of 30 to 60 m are estimated to contain 50million tons of ilmenite, 0.9 million tons of rutile and 4 million tons of zircon.Tanzania: Placers containing garnet (4.3 million tonnes), ilmenite (3.6 million tonnes), rutile (0.4million tonnes), kyanite, zircon, magnetite and monazite were reported (DUYVERMAN, 198 1) alongthe coast of Tanzania. Heavy mineral concentrations, ranging up to 23 percent, decrease northwardsexcept at Ndega beach. The data on either the size of resources or their offshore extension are notavailable.India: Placers are known from a number of localities along the Indian coast (Fig. 2), of which thebeach and dune placers along Kerala coast are best known. These deposits are reported to contain 17million tonnes of ilmenite, 1 million tonnes of rutile, 1.2 million tonnes of zircon and 0.2 million124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!