Download complate issue - Ozean Publications

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FrequencyTable 3: ANOVA comparing the participants Response along the Education StatusSource of Variation Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.Between GroupsWithin GroupsTotal.42431.32831.7525131136.124.256.355 .878100education8060402001.001.502.00Std. Dev = .48Mean = 1.36N = 137.00Figure3.3educationThe findings of the third hypothesis as shown by the ANOVA results summarized in table 3 above were not confirmed. Inother words the hypothesis was rejected. This means that the religion of the respondents is significant to the extent thatindividuals perceived the stigma attached to the mentally ill people at Ha Leqele. Corroborating such studies as Comer(2004); Sharma (2000); and Harphan and Blue (1996) individual belief are potent fuel for reinforcing cultural stereotypesand, of course the stigma attached to mentally ill people over time. In addition to the above view, socio-cultural theoristsequally believe that abnormal functioning is influenced greatly by the labels and role assigned to troubled people (Szasz,2000). Religion and beliefs fall under culture of which every member of any given society affiliates to. These culturalbeliefs, most of the time builds the conceptions as well as the misconceptions about mental illness, sanity and generalhuman phenomena. The misconceptions in the cultures are roots for the stigmatization of the victims of mental illness andthe illness itself.Hypothesis FourThe fourth hypothesis stated that the respondents’ perception (i.e. knowledge, identification, treatment and support to thementally ill) will not significantly differ when the notion of their stigmatization is considered. ANOVA was used in testingthis hypothesis. The results are shown in table 4. From the table, the results in the four categories showed that while it wasstatistically significant at the levels of participants’ knowledge [F(5,131)=0.788;P
FrequencyTable 4: ANOVA Comparing the Participants along Knowledge, Identification,Treatment and Support respectivelySource of Variations Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.KnowledgeBetween GroupsWithin GroupsTotalIdentification Between GroupsWithin GroupsTotal.62033.58534.2042.16725.61427.78151311365131136.124.256.433.196.483 .7882.217 .056TreatmentBetween GroupsWithin GroupsTotal1.70935.76537.4745131136.342.2731.252 .289SupportBetween GroupsWithin GroupsTotal.75324.60525.3585131136.151.188.802 .55080knowledge604020Std. Dev = .50Mean = 1.480N = 137.001.001.502.004.1knowledge182
Page 4: Journal of Applied Sciences 2(3), 2
Page 7 and 8: Ozean Journal of Social Sciences 2(
Page 12: Ozean Journal of Social Sciences 2(
Page 23 and 24: with class marks L-P are shelved in
Page 25 and 26: Table 1: Classification of responde
Page 27 and 28: READING ROOM BFaculty of Arts(Gener
Page 29 and 30: Library of Congress (October 2008)
Page 47 and 48: The experience of the patients is t
Page 49 and 50: e well if the person “pulled hims
Page 51 and 52: RESEARCH METHODOLOGYThe study adopt
Page 53: Frequency80religion604020Std. Dev =
Page 57 and 58: Frequency140support12010080604020St
Page 59 and 60: Capuzzi, D & Gross. R. (2005). Coun
Page 61 and 62: Table 7: Treatment Sub-categoryMent
Page 63 and 64: The last one of principles of provi
Page 65 and 66: interdependence movements in Europe
Page 67 and 68: In military service issue, as meant
Page 71 and 72: spoon feed the general reader. This
Page 73 and 74: its own information support for wha
Page 75 and 76: the inmates and give them a taste o
Page 77: Ogunsola, L. A. 1999. The role of l

Download complate issue - Ozean Publications

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?