- Page 5 and 6: assertions and allegations made at
- Page 7 and 8: ‘to hold the United Nations and t
- Page 10 and 11: about its jurisdiction in the case
- Page 12 and 13: acceptance of the status of the def
- Page 14 and 15: have any consequences for the valid
- Page 16 and 17: 36. Consequently, the District Cour
- Page 18 and 19: international obligation under Arti
- Page 20 and 21: had already issued an Advisory Opin
- Page 22 and 23: cannot perceive any legal construct
- Page 25 and 26: very dissimilar to each other, ther
- Page 27 and 28: State immunity versus immunity of i
- Page 29 and 30: 67. In the Manderlier Case the UN p
- Page 31 and 32: claim to immunity (A. Reinisch, Int
- Page 33 and 34: It follows from this quotation also
- Page 35 and 36: 80. The Convention is based on the
- Page 37 and 38: the decision of the District Court
- Page 39 and 40: menschenrechtlichen Verpflichtungen
- Page 41 and 42: ‘When national courts are seised
- Page 43 and 44: - it is established that the UN had
- Page 45 and 46: view of, inter alia, the manner in
- Page 47 and 48: 107. The District Court endorses al
- Page 49 and 50: Explanation of ground of appeal 911
- Page 51 and 52: 116. The District Court considered
- Page 53 and 54:
Committee does not exist and nor do
- Page 55 and 56:
conflicting norms is necessary beca
- Page 57 and 58:
and Punishment of the Crime of Geno
- Page 59 and 60:
in preventing the commission of gen
- Page 61 and 62:
was the ethnic cleansing of this ar
- Page 63 and 64:
similar cases are brought before th
- Page 65 and 66:
‘(b) Adopting appropriate and eff
- Page 67 and 68:
154. The Basic Principles provide a
- Page 69 and 70:
unwritten law pertaining to proper
- Page 71 and 72:
the European Court of Human Rights
- Page 73 and 74:
issue of a hierarchy between the di
- Page 75 and 76:
any grant of immunity. Should that
- Page 77 and 78:
Article 6 ECHR only if the institut
- Page 79 and 80:
the functional necessity for that i
- Page 81 and 82:
United Nations has offered under Se
- Page 83 and 84:
where an international organisation
- Page 85 and 86:
199. The European Court of Justice
- Page 87 and 88:
created a municipal legal order of
- Page 89 and 90:
immediate rights and obligations. T
- Page 91 and 92:
Sanctions Committee - a diplomatic
- Page 93 and 94:
under the United Nations and the Co
- Page 95 and 96:
206. That case concerned European C
- Page 97 and 98:
Ground of appeal 16213. The Distric
- Page 99:
international and human rights law,