2011 Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods - Institute of Food ...

2011 Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods - Institute of Food ... 2011 Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods - Institute of Food ...

11.07.2015 Views

REP11/CF 11• Implications of different risk assessment outcomes and description of possible riskmanagement options.DISCUSSION PAPER ON OCHRATOXIN A IN COCOA (Agenda Item 9d) 1671. The Delegation of Ghana, as Chair of the electronic Working Group on Ochratoxin A (OTA)in Cocoa, introduced the document highlighting the main issues associated with the production ofcocoa in relation to contamination with ochratoxin A as contained in working document CX/CF11/43/12. In particular, the Delegation highlighted the recommendations of the working groupconcerning the future possible development of a code of practice for the prevention/reduction ofochratoxin A contamination in cocoa taking into account the knowledge currently available.72. Most of the delegations supported the recommendations as set out in paragraph 81 of theworking document in particular those related to encourage the cocoa processing industry to monitorthe levels of OTA in cocoa and cocoa products, develop studies directed to small holder farms togenerate data on levels of OTA over a period of several years, conduct dietary intake studies of OTAin cocoa and cocoa products for infants and children and the potential development of a code ofpractice once more information become available.73. Some delegations were of the view that the ong>Committeeong> was ready to start new work on thedevelopment of a code of practice based on the information available to date.74. Other delegations expressed the view that the elaboration of a code of practice might bepremature and that more information on OTA contamination in cocoa should be collected fromproducing countries before taking a decision to proceed with the development of such a code. In thisregard, they stressed the need to take into account agricultural and processing practices of small scaleproducers as cocoa production in many producing countries was mainly run by small scale farmers.Therefore, in elaborating further the proposal for the development of a code of practice, moreinformation should be gathered on such practices and OTA contamination so that the code canaccurately reflect good agricultural and manufacturing practices in the production of cocoa worldwidewhich would facilitate the implementation of the code by small scale farmers once adopted.Conclusion75. The ong>Committeeong> agreed to re-establish the electronic Working Group led by Ghana, working inEnglish only and open to all ong>Codexong> Members and Observers, to update the discussion paper based onthe above considerations with a view to the development of a code of practice, for consideration bythe next session of the ong>Committeeong>.DISCUSSION PAPER ON FURAN (Agenda Item 9e) 1776. The Delegation the United States of America, as Chair of the electronic Working Group onFuran, introduced the report of the working group, as presented in CX/CF 11/5/13.77. The ong>Committeeong> noted that to date research on furan had not been successful in identifyingpractical and consistently effective solutions for decreasing furan in food and that it was premature todevelop a Code of Practice at this stage.78. It was clarified that more information on mitigation approaches might provide more practicalsolutions that could form the basis for the future development of a Code of Practice and that furananalogues (e.g., 2-methylfuran, 3-methylfuran) in mitigation studies could be included.79. The ong>Committeeong> agreed that this work could be taken up in the future when more adequate1617CX/CF 11/5/12. CRD 3 (comments of Kenya); CRD 4 (comments of Mali); CRD 5 (comments of Côted'Ivoire); CRD 6 (comments of Philippines); CRD 7 (comments of the European Union); CRD 9(comments of Thailand); CRD 12 (comments of Tanzania); CRD 16 (comments of Nigeria); and CRD 17(comments of Cameroon).CX/CF 11/5/13; CRD 7 (comments of the European Union); CRD 8 (comments of Egypt); CRD 9(comments of Thailand); CRD 15 (comments of India); CRD 17 (comments of Cameroon); and CRD 19(comments of CIAA).

REP11/CF 12data became available and that at that time the re-establishment of the electronic Working Group tofurther develop the discussion paper could be considered.DISCUSSION PAPER ON PYRROLIZIDINE ALKALOIDS (Agenda Item 9f) 1880. The Delegation of the Netherlands, as Chair of the electronic Working Group on PAs,introduced the document highlighting the main issues associated with PA contamination in food andfeed as presented in CX/CF 11/5/14.81. The ong>Committeeong> noted that there was general agreement with the recommendations of theworking group as set out in paragraphs 167-171 of the discussion paper namely: to encourage ong>Codexong>members and observers to develop more analytical reference standards for PA to enable thedevelopment and validation of analytical methods; to generate more occurrence data on PAcontamination in food and feed; to request JECFA to identify which PA in food and feed (as carry overfrom feed to animal products) were of key interest to human health and to perform a full riskassessment based on the available data for the identified PA and/or to identify data gaps if full riskassessment was not possible (see Agenda Item 11); and to start work on a code of practice for theprevention/reduction of contamination of food with PA including a compilation of existing effectivemanagement/mitigation practices to prevent/reduce PAs contamination of food. In view of theseconsiderations, the ong>Committeeong> also agreed with the recommendation of the working group not to startwork on an ML for PA in food and feed for the time being.Conclusion82. The ong>Committeeong> agreed to re-establish the electronic Working Group on PA, led by theNetherlands, working in English only and open to all ong>Codexong> members and observers, to update thediscussion paper based on the above considerations, in particular to undertake further compilation ofexisting management practices and to evaluate the possibility to develop a code of practice forconsideration by the next session of the ong>Committeeong>.83. The ong>Committeeong> also encouraged ong>Codexong> members and observer to develop more analyticalreference standards for PA and to gather more information on the occurrence of PA in food and feed.OTHER MATTERSPreparation of discussion papers and other working documents84. The ong>Committeeong> noted that discussion papers should be focused on the questions/issues putforward by the ong>Committeeong> and should present succinct supportive information necessary to providethe rationale for the recommendations. Additional background scientific information that may beuseful for further consultation by ong>Codexong> members and observers could be retained in Annexes inoriginal language. This will also facilitate discussion at plenary by focusing on the issue at hand andnot deviating the attention by also commenting on the background information. The ong>Committeeong> alsonoted that when available, scientific information should preferably be cross referenced instead ofreproducing it in the discussion paper and that, if JECFA monographs were not yet available, thedrafts could be obtained from the JECFA Secretariat. The ong>Committeeong> further noted that longdocuments could add to additional printing and translation costs that might be sometimes cumbersomefor the host country. It was noted that the ong>Codexong> Secretariat may provide examples or guidelines onhow to prepare discussion papers in order to have a uniform presentation of these documents.ENDORSEMENT OF PROVISIONS FOR HEALTH-RELATED LIMITS FOR CERTAINSUBSTANCES IN THE STANDARD FOR NATURAL MINERAL WATER (Agenda Item 10) 1985. The ong>Committeeong> recalled that its last session had considered the removal of the temporaryendorsement of sections 3.2.17 to 3.2.20 of the Standard for Natural Mineral Waters (CODEX STAN1819CX/CF 11/5/14. CRD 7 (comments of the European Union); CRD 9 (comments of Thailand); CRD 12(comments of Tanzania); and CRD 20 (comments of Republic of Korea).CX/CF 11/5/15; CRD 3 (comments of Kenya); CRD 4 (comments of Mali); CRD 7 (comments of theEuropean Union); CRD 9 (comments of Thailand); CRD 13 (comments of Indonesia); and CRD 14(comments of Japan).

REP11/CF 12data became available and that at that time the re-establishment <strong>of</strong> the electr<strong>on</strong>ic Work<strong>in</strong>g Group t<strong>of</strong>urther develop the discussi<strong>on</strong> paper could be c<strong>on</strong>sidered.DISCUSSION PAPER ON PYRROLIZIDINE ALKALOIDS (Agenda Item 9f) 1880. The Delegati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands, as Chair <strong>of</strong> the electr<strong>on</strong>ic Work<strong>in</strong>g Group <strong>on</strong> PAs,<strong>in</strong>troduced the document highlight<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> issues associated with PA c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> food andfeed as presented <strong>in</strong> CX/CF 11/5/14.81. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> noted that there was general agreement with the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> thework<strong>in</strong>g group as set out <strong>in</strong> paragraphs 167-171 <strong>of</strong> the discussi<strong>on</strong> paper namely: to encourage <str<strong>on</strong>g>Codex</str<strong>on</strong>g>members and observers to develop more analytical reference standards for PA to enable thedevelopment and validati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> analytical methods; to generate more occurrence data <strong>on</strong> PAc<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> food and feed; to request JECFA to identify which PA <strong>in</strong> food and feed (as carry overfrom feed to animal products) were <strong>of</strong> key <strong>in</strong>terest to human health and to perform a full riskassessment based <strong>on</strong> the available data for the identified PA and/or to identify data gaps if full riskassessment was not possible (see Agenda Item 11); and to start work <strong>on</strong> a code <strong>of</strong> practice for thepreventi<strong>on</strong>/reducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> food with PA <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a compilati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g effectivemanagement/mitigati<strong>on</strong> practices to prevent/reduce PAs c<strong>on</strong>tam<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> food. In view <strong>of</strong> thesec<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> also agreed with the recommendati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the work<strong>in</strong>g group not to startwork <strong>on</strong> an ML for PA <strong>in</strong> food and feed for the time be<strong>in</strong>g.C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>82. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> agreed to re-establish the electr<strong>on</strong>ic Work<strong>in</strong>g Group <strong>on</strong> PA, led by theNetherlands, work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> English <strong>on</strong>ly and open to all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Codex</str<strong>on</strong>g> members and observers, to update thediscussi<strong>on</strong> paper based <strong>on</strong> the above c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>in</strong> particular to undertake further compilati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>exist<strong>in</strong>g management practices and to evaluate the possibility to develop a code <strong>of</strong> practice forc<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> by the next sessi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g>.83. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> also encouraged <str<strong>on</strong>g>Codex</str<strong>on</strong>g> members and observer to develop more analyticalreference standards for PA and to gather more <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> PA <strong>in</strong> food and feed.OTHER MATTERSPreparati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> discussi<strong>on</strong> papers and other work<strong>in</strong>g documents84. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> noted that discussi<strong>on</strong> papers should be focused <strong>on</strong> the questi<strong>on</strong>s/issues putforward by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> and should present succ<strong>in</strong>ct supportive <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> necessary to providethe rati<strong>on</strong>ale for the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s. Additi<strong>on</strong>al background scientific <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> that may beuseful for further c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Codex</str<strong>on</strong>g> members and observers could be reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Annexes <strong>in</strong>orig<strong>in</strong>al language. This will also facilitate discussi<strong>on</strong> at plenary by focus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> the issue at hand andnot deviat<strong>in</strong>g the attenti<strong>on</strong> by also comment<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> the background <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> als<strong>on</strong>oted that when available, scientific <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> should preferably be cross referenced <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong>reproduc<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> the discussi<strong>on</strong> paper and that, if JECFA m<strong>on</strong>ographs were not yet available, thedrafts could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the JECFA Secretariat. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> further noted that l<strong>on</strong>gdocuments could add to additi<strong>on</strong>al pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and translati<strong>on</strong> costs that might be sometimes cumbersomefor the host country. It was noted that the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Codex</str<strong>on</strong>g> Secretariat may provide examples or guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>on</strong>how to prepare discussi<strong>on</strong> papers <strong>in</strong> order to have a uniform presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> these documents.ENDORSEMENT OF PROVISIONS FOR HEALTH-RELATED LIMITS FOR CERTAINSUBSTANCES IN THE STANDARD FOR NATURAL MINERAL WATER (Agenda Item 10) 1985. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> recalled that its last sessi<strong>on</strong> had c<strong>on</strong>sidered the removal <strong>of</strong> the temporaryendorsement <strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong>s 3.2.17 to 3.2.20 <strong>of</strong> the Standard for Natural M<strong>in</strong>eral Waters (CODEX STAN1819CX/CF 11/5/14. CRD 7 (comments <strong>of</strong> the European Uni<strong>on</strong>); CRD 9 (comments <strong>of</strong> Thailand); CRD 12(comments <strong>of</strong> Tanzania); and CRD 20 (comments <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea).CX/CF 11/5/15; CRD 3 (comments <strong>of</strong> Kenya); CRD 4 (comments <strong>of</strong> Mali); CRD 7 (comments <strong>of</strong> theEuropean Uni<strong>on</strong>); CRD 9 (comments <strong>of</strong> Thailand); CRD 13 (comments <strong>of</strong> Ind<strong>on</strong>esia); and CRD 14(comments <strong>of</strong> Japan).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!