11.07.2015 Views

detalii - Institutul National de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru Cartof si ...

detalii - Institutul National de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru Cartof si ...

detalii - Institutul National de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru Cartof si ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGRICULTURII,ACADEMIA DE ŞTIINŢE'-"'-'''-.'''..1 ŞI SILVICE"Gheorghe lOn(~SCl.JL-~l~>eşl1BRAŞOV 2004


1016-4790ADRESA:(address)INSTITUTUL DE CERCETARE-DEZVOLTAREPENTRU CARTOF ŞI SFECLĂ ZAHĂR500470, Braşov, str. Fundăturii, nr. 2ROMÂNIATel: +40-268-474647; +40-268-476795+40-268-476608htW:/Iwww.potato.roE-mail: icpc@potato.roSe face schimb <strong>de</strong> publicaţii cu institutele <strong>si</strong>milare din ţară şi străinătate .......u...."'..........ut-J"" ofpublications is pos<strong>si</strong>ble with <strong>si</strong>lnilarinstitutions from Romania aud abroad.Cititorii se pot abona la publicaţiileI.C.D.C.S.Z. Braşov.Foreign rea<strong>de</strong>rs can subscribe to our publications at the above address.COMITETUL DE REDACTARECoordonator principal:Coordonator ştiinţific:Membri:Secretar <strong>de</strong> redacţie:Sorin Claudian CHIRUGheorghe OLTEANUIon BOZEŞANVictor DONESCUGheorghe PAMFILMaria-Alina IONESCUTehnoredactare şi grafică: OFICIUL DE CALCUL AL LC.D.C.S.Z. BraşovTipografiaPHOENIX BraşovStr. T. Vladirnirescu, nr.36 B; Tel: 0268-428 994


CUPRINSSfeclă <strong>de</strong>D. <strong>de</strong> create <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong>Suceava 42D. E. <strong>de</strong> create la Staţiunea <strong>de</strong><strong>Cercetare</strong> 50E. Rozhen un noi soi <strong>de</strong> cartof<strong>pentru</strong> consum înoroaSlJlata şi industrializare 57E. senzorială a soiurilor timpuriidin Bulgaria. . 66-"'"1""""""1"""" v ..,...,"'~"'.. '-".u-V'''''''''''''"' '>.'",IrI""""'" bulbocastanumselecţie la cartofcu un ridicat <strong>de</strong> amidon... 75M., A. ISTVAN, M. calitativă şi structuraOf()C1UlCnella tmele soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartofîn climatice specifice zonei Braşovului.83T. HEBEISEN, T. BALLMER. un nou"',",L',","'~JLU,soiurilor? 93asupra conservăriiLJ.L"'L .., '..""'LL."'L'-"-. • 97P. TALVOJA.,,'-'JL ,-'-"' 109


Jl.v.uLI..l..,.avecologice. 156M. C. POUSA,E. ĂLVAREZ şi calitatea" ........,"'... v'.............'V ... <strong>de</strong> la cu şi înN-V Spalliei 161TC. <strong>de</strong> şi .., ,.....,ca răspuns la şi cu azot în......................................................................................................... 176M. S. CALISKAN, H.şi ale datei <strong>de</strong> plantare asupra creşterii şi <strong>de</strong>condiţii <strong>de</strong> mediu <strong>de</strong> tip mediteranean 1891., P. KASAL. Combaterea buruienilor la cartofîn 199HERMEZIU, M., R. HERMEZIU. Mana şi înVV.l.L'-


esponse VUL~""J!. 1..Le>IJUI,UflUflt tuberosum, to water and nitrogen in North Portugal. 76M. S. CALISKAN, H. Effects ofpresprouting andon growth and yield ofpotato crop in a Mediterranean typev u • ..., 189P. KASAL. Weed control in potatoes in the Czech Republic 199M., R. HERl\1EZIU. Potato late blight and its in specific""'-"1''\r111~1I'''\C' ofBrasov area 206J. CEPL. New potato by u<strong>si</strong>ng ""·..,,,V U.Jll=.0 270""'''JlLU'I..'''-'Jt,,>., in the Czech Republic ..D. DONESCU, M. IANOŞI, D. R. CRAl\1ARIUC.~V"'Jlu.'-,·L'oJF,• ...," for potato storage 219P. 1., C. SĂLĂŞAN, S. MIRACEA. Researches corlcelll1rlg"'''"'', ''''.''''''''" impact ofBt technology utilization in potato Romania 228'--'''-L-J.LJll''-, M. Economy ofpotato production in the Czech Republic 234E.-L. DIMA, M.-A. IONESCU, E. I. PÎRVAN. Actual <strong>si</strong>tuationofpotato in Europe 243...................................................................................................... 259ILIEV. Importance ofvarieties and seed quality on yieldmcrealSUJllZ in Republic ofMoldova ,. 260"JL."'.-!,L_U'-'. O. I. Potato varieties adaptation and uses across different'-''-''-fHJl''-.L'-' zones in Nigeria , 262N., Şt. BRAN, M. DOLOIU. Antisera (ilnmunoglobulin andconjugates) for the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of PV~A and PVY virus infections inseed production by ELISA method 263J., V. EREMEEV, A. LOHMUS, H. ROOSTALU. Formation ofpotato yield and its quality according to seed tuber pre'·plantingpreparation and agrotechnology 265TARTLAN, L. The quality per<strong>si</strong>stence oftable potato 268MARTINS, F. 1. COUTINHO, V. SOUSA. The evolution potatoindustry in last ten years in Portugal.161


NOTĂAcest volum cuprin<strong>de</strong> lucrările prezentate la Simpozionul Internaţional privind"<strong>Dezvoltare</strong>a producerii cartofului în zona central şi est-europeană",organizat laMamaia/Constanţa,România, în perioda 23-27 iunie 2004, <strong>de</strong> către<strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>­<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong> şi Sfeclă<strong>de</strong> Zahăr (ICDCSZ) Braşov,România şi <strong>de</strong> Secţia <strong>de</strong>Agronomie a Asociaţiei Europene pentlu <strong>Cercetare</strong>a <strong>Cartof</strong>ului (EAPR), cu sediul laWageningen, Olanda.Folo<strong>si</strong>nd modul rapid, on-line, <strong>de</strong> cumunicare, autorii şi-au asumat responsabilitatearedactării lucrărilor într-o formă finală.Conform hotărârîi con1itetului <strong>de</strong> redactare, ordinea publicării lucrărilor în acestvolum a fost următoarea: genetică şi ameliorare, Inmulţirea rapidă şi producerea cartofului<strong>pentru</strong> sămânţă, tehnologia cartofului, economie şi marketing.Mulţumim conducerii Ministeruhli Educaţie şi Cercetării şi conducerii <strong>Institutul</strong>ui <strong>de</strong><strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong> şi Sfeclă<strong>de</strong> Zahăr Braşov<strong>pentru</strong> sptijinullogisttc şifinanciar acordat.Mulţumim tuturor participanţilor<strong>pentru</strong> contribuţia ştiinţifică.De asemenea, dorim să n1ulţumim dlui prof.dr. Enrique Ritler - preşedinte înfuncţiuneal EAPR şi dlui prof. Femando MARTINS- preşedintele Secţiei <strong>de</strong> Agronomiea EAPR <strong>pentru</strong> sprijinul acordat în organizarea şi <strong>de</strong>sfăşurareaacestui <strong>si</strong>mpozion ştiinţific.NOTEThis volume comprises the papers sllstained at the International Sympo<strong>si</strong>um on"Development ofpotato crop in Centra~ and East-European coulItries:', organizedat Mamaia, Romania, on June 23-27 tiJ by Research and Development Institute for Potataand Sugar Beet (ICDCSZ) Braşov, Romania, and the Agrononly Section ofEuropeanAssociation for Potato·Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.U<strong>si</strong>ng the most rapid way of communication (on-line), the authors have assunledthe respon<strong>si</strong>bility ofthe final ver<strong>si</strong>on ofpapers.According to the <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>si</strong>on ofeditors board, the succes<strong>si</strong>on ofpapers in this volumeis the following: genetics and breeding, rapid multiplication and seed potato production,potato technology, economy and marketing.We gratefully acknowledge the logistic and financial help ofRomanian Ministry ofEducation and Research, as well as of Research and Development Institute for Potatoand Sugar Beet Braşov.We thank alI the participants for their scientific contribution.We also wish to express our thanks to prof.dr. Enrique RITTER - pre<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>nt ofEAPR and to prof.dr. Femando MARTINS - chairman ofAgronomy Section ofEAPRfor their great support in organizing and carrying on this scientific meeting.Dr.ing Constantin DRAICAPreşedintele Comitetului Local <strong>de</strong> Organizare a Simpozionului şi coordonatorulacestui volum / Pre<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>nt ofLocal Organizing Committee and coordinator ofthis volume.VoI. XXXI 1


2SUMMARYS. C..CHIRU I , GH. OLTEANU!Research and Development Institute for Potato and Sugar Beet L'~"'''''~'JLJ'Braşov 500470, 2 FundăturÎÎ str, România, http://www.potato.ro; e-mail: lCpl:;(aJl)ot.ltO.roIn relation to the process of applying the principles of sustainable ...F-,JLLV ....... "'....L'-'VL.U""JLJ.ll..... a. logical sequence of the current components the agriculturalpresented for the potato crop; the limiting factors, <strong>de</strong>velopment sectors, shortterm aims for <strong>de</strong><strong>si</strong>gning priorities for research and <strong>de</strong>velopment.The perspective ofthe European integration ofRomania and the complexity ofthisprocess, the need for the reorganization and restructuring ofthe(especially in producing material from biological categories on theRomanian varieties) impose a new approach in the management activities alInstitute for Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov.words: sustainable agriculture, priorities,&<strong>de</strong>velopment strategiesINTRODUCTIONNowadays mankind is confronted with three major issues generating conflict andconcern: <strong>de</strong>mographic growth, the limiting offood resource, pollution and <strong>de</strong>gradationofthe environment (Picu and Sin, 2001' Olteanu et al., 2001). Agriculture is toand must intervene in solving these issues. Mo<strong>de</strong>rn agriculture sets as its mainobjective the continuous improvelnent ofthe production process (Chiru and Olteanu,2004). Only by up-dating concepts and methods in research and agriculture practicethis can be attained (Olteanu et al., 1989; Olteanu and Dudui, 1997).The concept of sustainability has a universal validity and applies in all hUITmn,sociological, economical and technological activity. Related to agriculture, "the termsustainable agriculture means an integrated system ofplant and ani11Jal productionpractices having a <strong>si</strong>te-specific application that will, over the term: a) satisfyhuman food and fiber needs; environmental the naturalresource base upon the economy mo<strong>si</strong>efficient use nonrenewable resources and on-farm resourceswhere appropriate, natural


Research and <strong>de</strong>velopment priorities in potato field with a view to the sustainable <strong>de</strong>velopment of···viability offarm operations; and enhance the quality of life for farmers andsocietyas a whole. "(US Congress Public Law 101-624, Title XVI, Subtitle A, Section1683, Govemment Printing Office, Washington,. D.C., NAL K.F 1692.831 1990)Sustainable agriculture components inclu<strong>de</strong> the use of re<strong>si</strong>stant and/or tolerantvarieties; zoning, structure and crop rotation; soiI and mineral nutrition management;control ofpollution and waste; integrated control ofcOlnpeting organisms (diseases, pestsand weeds); preci<strong>si</strong>on managelnent farm.Moving from a conventional agriculture towards an altel11ative sustainable agriculturerepresents a progres<strong>si</strong>ve tran<strong>si</strong>tion implyinglnomtoring, systems perspective,management and coordination ofprocesses by applying principles ofpreci<strong>si</strong>onsustainable agriculture.THE IMPORTANCE OF POTATOPotato crop i8 one of the most inten<strong>si</strong>ve crops. v'"-",..U ......VA.L performance' 18 iraccordance with the of lnanagelnent '"""'.......A,"'... ,,'......... Technological costs arehigh (over 100 lnil. Leii ha) the is one highest conlparison with othercrops. The high <strong>de</strong>gree of natural, economical resource<strong>si</strong>nvolved generate complex environmental Thus, the potato crop gets al theattention from agricultura! systems seeking ""UL,~o",~.u"''''lJ.UA1-',...."'........ ilnportance ona world scale, ranking 4 th after conl, wheat rice Of 2 nd after _""~~~o4~. and .!..1>;qo.lA ....!..U.Ucon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>red the second bread ofmankind.EVOLUTION AREAS YIELDThe evolution ofareas lnedium yield potato in Romania and the EU overthe last years is pres.ented in figure 1.The ten<strong>de</strong>ncy to continuously <strong>de</strong>crease cultivated area along the increase ofmedium yield (35 tlha) is noticed in the EU. In ROluania, last few years, thearea oscillated between 250000 and 300 000 with a mediurn yield of 12-14 tlha.VOL. XXXI 3


s. C. CHIRU, GH. OLTEANUî 1400g 1200~ 1000-; 800~ 600400200O--- --~-"">1.1989·91UE -151994·96 1999·02ROMANIA40;350-r----------------,25 i35.. 300~i30525 :; ]f 250 -J--------==""'>Ic-==----'~~-__j 20 ~ ICi o20 's;. g 20015 § E 15015 ct!10 ~5f::«100O 5015 i i+----------==~-----'~--j .~:>.!10 § 1+-------------__j '5!+-- __j 5 ~ 1-J----+------j----+----+-OPeriod 1989-91 1994-96 1999-02 2007Period-r-Suprafata (mii ha)i .....Prod med (tlha) i1 - Trends in the evolution ofpotato area and yield in EU and RomaniaIn or<strong>de</strong>r to accomplish the MAPDR strategy for potato crap (which foresees foran area stabilization of200 000 ha with a medium yield of19.5 t/ha and a total yieldof3.9 miL tons), in accordance with the EU integration ofaur country, it Is necessary forthe potato cultivated area ta <strong>si</strong>gnificantly <strong>de</strong>crease, through yield concentration andspecializatian. Only the producers that can cOlnpete with the EU producers will survivean the market. This will not lead to the total yield <strong>de</strong>crease but ta the concentration ofyield into large agricultural exploitations with the lneans for cOlnmunity funds absorptionup-to-date technology acqui<strong>si</strong>tion. A strong increase ofthe medium yield is hoped taaffinn Romania as a potato seed, early potato (for both intenlal consumption and export),autumn-winter potato and potato for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng producer.Lrmltm2 FactorsThe low yield obtained in ROlnania is due ta llluitiple factors:The reduced <strong>si</strong>ze of land areas, consequence ofthe fragmentation ofland <strong>de</strong>rivedfrom the enactment of Law 18/1991 (Figure 2), do not all0'Y the use of up-to-datetechnologies an a large productivity mechanized system (Draica, 2003);i0,4Figure 2 - Percentage of farms (<strong>si</strong>ze area)~ The illlproper sanitary quality of planting lnaterial used in the last years. Thesupply of only 1-5% (50.000 t) of the country necessary amount (850.000 t) withcertificated material (Prebase, Base, Certificated A and Certificated B) while the rest of4Anale /. C.D. C.S.z.


Research and <strong>de</strong>velopment priorities in potato field with a view to the sustainaNe <strong>de</strong>velopment of...the seed material is uncertificated, com-ing from the farmer's ownyield Of fromexchangesbetween fanners. Figure 3 presents the relation between the consumption of certifiedseed an the medium yield in Europe.800 Ţ"·····.,..·····T....··r·..··.,..··· ...,....···T..··...,..·....·T......T ......·',.........,........,........,........ ..,........,.........,. 3t:lIHl700600S'E500400300200100Figure 3 - Medium yield (to/ha) related to theEU15 and ROMANIA (1~ The low level ofprefes<strong>si</strong>onal education and ofmost~ The lack of financial sources for farmers to apply proper tec:nnOlclgyseed, good variety, effective luachines); most farmers use a illlJnmllmnthe edge of sub<strong>si</strong>stence.~ The climatic condjtions oflast few years (severethe inten<strong>si</strong>fication of the hydrothermic stress and have llnoose(l~requirelnent, irrigation aud the use of re<strong>si</strong>stant and tolerantpotato growers couldn't apply for financial reasons.In5.00 r---.--..---.----..---~-_ .._._--------,i4,50 -f-,--·---·-----..-·..-·------·---·-·-·--·-----------H4,00H--------------·-·-·-·--..-·---------il'13 3,50 -t-t+..---------lif----.-....--.----..-----..---------i'E :u 3,00-#!!_*-_1"'4~ ..m4+---~"'«"!,,.,.--:---"--""---~~ 2,50:E '0 2,00+-!III~~......,jt-\1;;.5 1,50 +-------"'------\t-1~.----"'~"'-'"1,00 +-------------~~--·-------·-·--=___,;l0,50 +----------------------------------1ii i...0,00 +rrrn-n-r-rrrr""""""M'T'rrrrrr"'l"T.,..rrrn"r"l'T"".-rrrT~"""""'''''''''''''''''''''M''l''M''-'''''''''.'''''''''''''''''''''_'cn_rt'M".-...,''''''';!li>...,.'"~ii ....ltl an~ ."~i i ~ ~


s. C CHIRU, GH. OLTEANUMAIN OBJECTIVES FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTThe Institute for Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet (ICDCSZ)Brasov was foun<strong>de</strong>d on June 1, 2002 in accordance with the law 290/29.05.2002through the reorganization of the research and <strong>de</strong>velopillent activity in the formerInstitute for Potato Research and Production and the Station for Sugar Beet and SweetSubstances Research and Production Brasov,ICDCSZ Brasov must take a well-<strong>de</strong>fined po<strong>si</strong>tion within the framework ofRomanian agricultural research as an institution ofnational interest due to the strategicimportance of the two crops: potato and sugar beet. Over the last few years the landarea cultivated with potato in Romania was of 240 000-280 000 ha, with a mediumyield of 12-14 t/ha - perfonnance way below the average in EU countries (36-40 tiha). The main cause respon<strong>si</strong>ble for this <strong>si</strong>tuation is the low sanitary quality afthe seedplanted by the large majority ofthe small potato growers that make a total of 90% ofthe whole cultivated area.The lnain research and <strong>de</strong>velopment directions at ICDCSZ Brasov, which wereperiodically recon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>red in their specificity and importance, can be summarized by thefollowing objectives:)o;> Breeding of new potato varieties with valuable agronomic traits, adapted taecological conditions ofRomania, u<strong>si</strong>ng clas<strong>si</strong>cal ar unconventional methods)o;> Seed potato production ofhigh biological classes (prebase and base) for ensuringthe Romanian necessary amount)o;> Drawing up lllo<strong>de</strong>m technologies in potato crop, with 10w input, less harmful tothe environment and generating benefits for different categories ofgrowers;)o;> Drawing up methods offorecast and waming against the main pests and disease<strong>si</strong>n or<strong>de</strong>r to achieve an integrated protection system)o;> Tuming into account the production by a suitable marketing)o;> Establishment ofphy<strong>si</strong>ological bases for crop growth)o;> Transfer and exten<strong>si</strong>on ofthe results acquired through research and <strong>de</strong>velopmentactivities.1. Breeding new potato varietiesOne of the priority aims of the ICDCSZ Brasov and of the specialized researchstations is breeding new potato varieties lnainly <strong>de</strong>fined by high productivity, constantquality in time and space and good adaptability to the climatic and soil conditions ofRomania.The Romanian official crop varieties catalogue for 2003 (pp. 34-35) records 73potato varieties, 42 ofthembeing Romanian varieties. At this point the <strong>si</strong>tuation is satisfyingbut becomes critical when we analyze the percentages of ROlnanian varieties from thetotalland areas cultivated in 2001-2002 (Figure 5).6Anale I.CD.CS.Z.


Research and <strong>de</strong>velopment priorities in potato field with a view to the sustainaNe <strong>de</strong>velopment of...CropsFigure 5 - Area percentage ofromanian varietiesWith a percentage of 1-2% (2 700-5 400 ha) frOln the cultivated arca ofRomania(approximately 270 000 ha) the Romanian potato varieties were absent Themain varieties cultivated in 2002 were Sante (36%), De<strong>si</strong>ree (31%) Ostara (11%),varieties grown for over 20 years. We have to notice here that 1978-1985Romanian varieties (Semenic, Colina, Sucevita, Super) were grown on 40% )fthepotatocultivated area in Romania.For the efficient capitalization ofthe investnlent ofwork volume, mind resourceand funds allocated by the state for financing Romanian varieties breeding activities. andfor getting over the current in<strong>si</strong>gnificant presence ofRomanian potato varieties in thepotato crop, the following recovery and <strong>de</strong>veloplnent measures are imperative. We havegrouped them into two types ofstrategies:1.1. Short term strategy (2004-2012)>- Choo<strong>si</strong>ng 6-9 Romanian varieties, more re<strong>si</strong>stant to drought and temperaturestress (AMELIA, CHRISTIAN, ROCLAS, DACIA, REDSEC, TENTANT,PRODUCTIV, MAGIC, ASTRAL) which wiU be promoted with prece<strong>de</strong>nce by acoherent market policy based on good seed quality, variety-specific technology andpropermarketing (2004)>- Drawing up a list of"Rec01mnen<strong>de</strong>d potato varieties" on the ha<strong>si</strong>s ofthe resultsobtained in Romanian research (2004)>- Waming the potato growers ~gainst the major risks ofimporting potato varietiessusceptible to quarantine diseases (2004)>- Reaching again, within the framework ofthe breeding program, ofilie minimunthreshold of 100000 generative seedlings (2004-2006)VOL. XXXI7


S. CHIRU. GH. OLTEANU~ Realistic application of conventional and non-conventional breeding methods,according to the current level offacility supply ofthe institute and affiliated agriculturalstations (2004-2012)1.2. Long-term strategy 2004-2020);> Continuation of breeding programs by dynalnic recon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>ration of breedingobjectives andjoining traditional aims (yield of40-60 t/ha, re<strong>si</strong>stance to pests and diseases)with special aims ofbreeding for the different uses ofpotato (for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng:changed starch structure, higher protein content););> Drawing the interest of seed potato production companies in or<strong>de</strong>r to grant thebreeding progralns~ PrOlnoting contracts with private fanners ("hobby bree<strong>de</strong>rs"));> Breeding programs shared (through fair collaboration contracts offering economicadvantage for ROlnania) with renowned potata breeding cOlnpanies from Halland,Belgium, Gennany, The UK, Czech Republic;}> Detennining of new gennplasm sources by testing the world's most valuablepotato creations in the fields ofthe Institute and ofthe affiliated research stations}> Breeding ofpotato varieties suited for sustainable agriculture with re<strong>si</strong>stance tohydra-thermic stress}> Rapidly prOlnoting the technology ofpotato production by true potato seed (TPS)that can revolutionize potato cropwith Iow inputY The profit obtained by the Institute through a rational promotion & marketingpolicy of the ROlnanian varieties (for both the national and international market) wiUinsure the ha<strong>si</strong>s for approaching new breeding methods and techniques (geneticlnanipulation ofthe genllplasm) (Directive 2003/90/EC)2. Seed potato productionThis activity represented the main ai111 ofresearch and <strong>de</strong>velopment from the startand presented <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>si</strong>ve implications for the in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce ofthe Romanian agriculturalpolicy with direct social implications.Over the last 15 years a shift fron1 the state seed potato production to the privateproduction occurred. However, it Is con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>red that for the present and for the future ofthe seed lnateriaI production systen1 the prcsence ofa strong public sector (along<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong> theprivate one) 1S nee<strong>de</strong>d to ensure stability on the lnarket, eliIninating centrifugal ten<strong>de</strong>ncîes.Potato cultivated land areas <strong>de</strong>creased dratnatically in OUl' country after 1990 when,through the enactlnent of the Law of landholding no. 18/1991 a radical change in thestructure ofagriculturalland property occurred. This had repercus<strong>si</strong>ons on the nationalseed potato production system through the continuous reducing ofland areas.Thus, from 12 000 ha grown with seed potato from superior biologic categories(Prebase and Base) in 1990 the area <strong>de</strong>creased ta 1 650 ha in 1998, ta 1 860 ha in1999, to 1 315 ha in 2000, to 1 100 ha in 2001, to 553 ha in 2002 and to 398 ha in 2003(Source: FCCR)8Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


Research and <strong>de</strong>velopment prie;rities in potate; fie/dthe .'>u..I·'Vnt1r/p <strong>de</strong>velopmentSeed potato from following classes: Prebase; Base (c1ass SE and E);'-''''c, U.L • ...,"'~_ .... (class A and class B) was grown an 5 642 ha in 1998, an 4 945 ha in 2000,an 3 353 ha in 2002 in 2003 reachcd 2 810 50% ccrtificd B seed (1 383ha) ta bc uscd only for cOlmnercial crops (souTec:Thc variety structurc analy<strong>si</strong>s, performcd on the ba<strong>si</strong>s of the all-categories seedgrowers replication.<strong>de</strong>clarations, in 2003 shows from the 44grown, 8 are RomanianIs duc tathe presence the the otherA1tV'''>1''''~'''' varieties cover 0.7% oftile arca.Small areas authorÎzed producers do not ensure isolation distancc ofseed cropsfrom viruses infection sources (potato for "VJUl".-oU....p ..,..v .." wintering anddo not follow strictly the seed potato P[()QUlCUOn 'Pf":i"lnr.IAf'nr leading ta a large"-'I"',,",L,,",U or <strong>de</strong>classed areas32% in 1999, in 2000,2002)Due ta the ofcustOlllS tax'-'ueIJ""....,..,.. biologic categorie;;and Prebase) frOlll EU countriesan annual quotaof3 500 - 4 000 t from differcnt varicties was '.....,·"'r"'1""'1"1........"17")i,('> o:l111t-11,nrI7prl producers,SmTInlIn,g up amiL Euro.amount of celiificatednor reachcd more than ofthe total nccds, forofplanting lllaterial and the inf1uenceSumming up data it can be asserted thatin Romania 1Sthe <strong>si</strong>tuation being anpotato crop in our and an import nced formiI. Euro.For redres<strong>si</strong>ng thi8 sector wc propose thc measurcs:2.1. Short-term IC'lt,... ... ftLJ........ T~ Urgent recon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>ration and reorganizationproduction of high biological classcs and'>'-U",l1to'rl tcchnological operations.~ Nonlination of Prcbasc Base and their structure.~ Rc-organization of seed potato ...... ~.U .... i-'JUl ,.., in micro-zoncs beyond thezones and thc ofplanting J....u;...,,"', ..~ Application ofvinls elimination .... u ...'UU./U....>arcas"oUltslCle "closcdXXXI9


s. C. CHIRU. GH. OLTEANUCOUNTYVARIETYDeclaratin of certificated seed potato area (ha) - 2003Botoşani Bacău Braşov Covasna Harghita Iaşi Neamţ SuceavaTotalAGATA - - 22.0 27,0 9,0 - 2,0 60,0ALWARA - - 21,2 - - - 21,2ARINDA - 6,0 5,5 - - - 1I,5ASTERIX - 5,0 11,0 - - - 16,0BOLESTA - - - 11,0 - - 11,0COLETTE - - 3,0 - - - 3,0COSMOS - 21,0 - - - 21,0COLUMBUŞ - - 16,0 - - - 16,0COVAL - - - 1,0 - - - - 1,0DESIREE - 5,0 77,5 15,0 126,0 64,0 68,0 162,0 517,5FABULA - - - 3,0 - - 3,0FARMER - 58,0 - - - - 58,0FONTANE - - - 2,0 - - 2,0HERMES - - - 7,1 - - - - 7,1IMPALA - 16,0 50,0 2,0 - 68,0KARLENA - - - - 7,0 - - - 7,0KONDOR - 5,0 97,0 93,8 16,0 4,0 10,0 15,0 240,8KU RO DA - - 3,0 - - - - 3,0LADY CLAIRE - - - 2,0 - - - 2,0LADY ROSETTA - 5,0 24,0 20,0 - - 49,0LATONA - - - 14,0 - - - 14,0LAURA - - 18,5 3,0 - 21,5LUIZA - - 1,0 - - - 1,0MARKlES - - - 2,0 - - - - 2,0MILENIUM - - 2,5 - - - 2,5MINERVA - 2,0 - - - - 2,0NEMERE - - 2,5 - - 2,5OSCAR - 6,0 - - - - - 6,0OSTARA - - 22,0 74,64 26,0 - 3,0 125,64PRODUCTIV - - 1,5 - - - - 1,5REDSEC 26,0 40,0 39,0 13,5 - - 44,0 35,0 197,5ROCLAS - 7,5 - - - - 7,5ROMANO - - 16,0 25,0 10,0 4,0 55,0ROSARA 4,0 6,0 4,5 - 6,0 - 20,5SANTANA - - 31,0 6,0 - - - - 37,0SANTE 9,0 13,0 400,5 49,6 370,8 44,0 219,0 1105,9SATINA - - 3,0 - - - - - 3,0SATURNA - - - 9,0 - - 9,0SIGNAL - - 1,0 - - - 1,0SOLARA - - 5,5 - - - - - 5,5Table 1SUCEVIŢA - - - - - - 2,0 2,0TIMATE - 2,5 - - - 2,5TOMENSA - - 7,0 13,0 38,0 - - 7,0 65,0VINETA - - 3,0 - - - 3,0TOTAL 35,0 71,0 870,0 504,84 641,3 68,0 178,0 442,0 2810,14* FROM: FCCR10Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Research and <strong>de</strong>velopment priorities in potato field with a view to the sustainaNe <strong>de</strong>velopmentWith the current facilities of ICDCSZ Brasov 3-4 Romanian ,,, .,,,.... ""1[...""" can be<strong>de</strong>veloped within the volmne and structure presented in 6. c1as<strong>si</strong>caltraditional scheme ofc10nes replication on high altitu<strong>de</strong> centers at Pauleni,Apa Ro<strong>si</strong>e and Lucina) improved with micropropagation elements.Figura 6 - Propunere <strong>de</strong> schemă cla<strong>si</strong>că îmbunătăţită <strong>de</strong> producere a cm101:ullusămânţă soiuri româneşti (3-4)200415.000 plantule iti> Seră ~5.000 microtub. iti> Seră [tit;TOTALII 2005 Iha* done A (Lăzarea)III 2206 5 ha* dane B (Lăzarea)IV 2007 25 ha* done C (Lăzarea., Păuleni,2008 125 ha* done D (B raşov' f2009 625 ha* BSE (Braşov,2010 3125 ha* SE (pRODUCĂTORI2011 15625 ha* E (PRODUCĂTORI AUTORIZAŢI)2012 40000 ha Celtificată A*producţie previzibilă <strong>de</strong> 15 t/haUntiI proper facilities acqui<strong>si</strong>tion the improved clas<strong>si</strong>calpatatoproduction will not be abandoned.By obtaining better facilities the time ofobtaining areas of40000 ha can b reauce:(lto a half. The same thing can be pos<strong>si</strong>ble by contracting a .....J .....""'""'VL"'...........JUlGreenhouses (Sere Codlea)~ Bringing the seeding material produced at ICDCSZ into the C':llnlt~lI-v.lparameters compatible with EU requirements (EU Council Directives no. 70/458/2000and 55/2002) and regaining growers trust into the "brand" ICDCSZ Brasov);> Cooperation with the following stations: seDC Tg Secuiesc, SeDe .LYJu.""" • "',....Ciuc and SCDC Suceava on economical ha<strong>si</strong>s by <strong>si</strong>gning.<strong>de</strong>ar CmmlJlenaal '""""'.L..""" .bothways profitable, mentioning ICDCSZ Brasov as head ofthe system (donematerial,Prebase) and the stations as producers of high biological classes (prebase, Base).);> Developlnent, in co-operation with FCCR and MAPDR, ofa systemoflicen<strong>si</strong>ng the seed producers, based on observing the b~ological class, the rotationand the isolation distances.);> Development, in co-operation with FCCR, of necessary actions or<strong>de</strong>rMAPDR sub<strong>si</strong>dize the certified seed buying price, the fun price of seed potato fromhigher biological c1asses, and the treatment ofCOlnnlon and gol<strong>de</strong>n nemato<strong>de</strong>s, Coloradobeetle and aphids.VOL. XXXI11


crops.vJ....,pJ..u"'J..J.~ ofthis sector we propose the actions:and protection technology improvement in view""UJ."J.V'U.~ nrot,ectlOn and adapting to the new system;~ Developillent ofvariety-specificPotato crop technologies 1110untain areas~ blight attack forecast warning mo<strong>de</strong>l forcost reduction"1--'''''''''.1.\... technologies for slnall (>90°,10 ofthe grownand affiliated agricultural stations will <strong>de</strong>velop an "Integrated cropst~chnological fitted for and preci<strong>si</strong>onn.1'"nr'lrllf"'crops, basedU.'L"~'"H",'''with gerletlCalVU.'~'V'.'V'J..C'f-Ar·>O"t:J> and marketing;IJ'-I .•. J. ... ~J.U.M pn:lctllce:s. ,..,.''',...".... rr down torCD.CSZ


<strong>de</strong>velOtJfnent pric;f'ities În potatohn-n.."\,(Y into account the re~;ea]rch? Penetrationearly BJV""""J""'"technology)Internal and international COlllDienlltlOnInternalscientific and hUlnan resource ..... ,...""""',-.non the European lnarket. This cooperation};> Developlnentba<strong>si</strong>s profitable forcoordination in different sectors};> Adviselnent ofaffiliated stations for aC(~CE;SICln)p> Strengthening of scientific relationsu<strong>si</strong>ng ICDCSZ Brasov facilitie<strong>si</strong>nternalVOL. XXXI


esearch .~~~.~"~statÎon<strong>si</strong>nternational proje.cts Of initiated byin co-operationpartners in the competition for "keyAfrican areas}ptprrnn1'p new pos<strong>si</strong>bilities ofco-operation after ROlnania to EU1 .2004: cercetare-<strong>de</strong>zvoltare ladurabile a agriculturii rou1âniei. A IV-a se<strong>si</strong>une <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>zbatere........LU,V.l.U.. a - ORIZONT- 2025, 731989: Resurse inSISTEM-MODEL-CALCULATOR, instrument încercetarea şi agriculturii. Editura DACIA, Cluj-Napoca, p. 294.Gh., Oltean I. lVI., Oltean Ioana, 2001' Agricultura <strong>de</strong> precizie - un nou1'''1'''''


<strong>de</strong>zvoltare.1. sălnânţăcartofînŞisămânţă ecrtificatrXXXI15


.2""-"-'1 ....."'•..1'RESPONSERITTER, I<strong>si</strong>bene SANCHEZ, AnaFlorencia LUCCABiotechnology Laboratory. NEIKER, PO Box 46, 01080, Vitoria-Gasteiz,In respond to water <strong>de</strong>ficit stressgain a un<strong>de</strong>rstanding ofexpres<strong>si</strong>on has been analysed withtec:nnlqlles allow to i<strong>de</strong>ntify gene<strong>si</strong>n response to water stresswater stress re<strong>si</strong>stant and susceptible material from different Solanumas weB as controls. Microarray analy<strong>si</strong>swhichstress and senescence. analy<strong>si</strong>s of expres<strong>si</strong>ons n'>ttt:>r... C'vs. non-stressed genotypes by cDNA-AFLP technique suggestsUH ...'UU'"' .....VU. .....l\.H.... J.J.' displays a level of gene expres<strong>si</strong>on. We observedp011mlDrpmsms related ta water stress based an the' aH .....AJ.U',.. J.~" as well as an their inten<strong>si</strong>ty. Future experiments u<strong>si</strong>ng microarrays, cDNA­AFLP and others gene tecl{pique~ 1)e perfon:ned in or<strong>de</strong>r to give a broadanswers to the plant responsc water stresswater Solanu1U; expres<strong>si</strong>on cDNA-AFLP.INTRODUCTIONPlant water <strong>de</strong>ficit may occur 'lll<strong>de</strong>r reduced soil water content causeosmotic stress and dramatically plant and crop productivity (Boyer, 1982).conditions, the plant responds regulating specifically gene expres<strong>si</strong>on. "-'Hu..;U.j;;;'VUt"v...r""('C'1r,.., are induced by complex transduction <strong>si</strong>gnals that have not beenVU"""""J.UHV-", The molecular ba<strong>si</strong>s involvedin tolerance to water stress is far fromcompletely un<strong>de</strong>rstood (Ingram & 1996).Within the frame of the DE R&P project APOPHYS (QLK5-CT-2002-01849)NElKER wants to i<strong>de</strong>ntify genes which provi<strong>de</strong> drought re<strong>si</strong>stance in potato. Molecularmarkers <strong>de</strong>rived frmn such genes could be applied in marker as<strong>si</strong>sted selection (MAS)for breeding potato varieties which are highly drought re<strong>si</strong>stant.To provi<strong>de</strong> in<strong>si</strong>ghts into phy<strong>si</strong>ological and biochemical changes associated with waterstress, Solanum genotypes characterized previously as water stress re<strong>si</strong>stant andsusceptible materials were submitted to water stress. Water stress re<strong>si</strong>stant materialinclu<strong>de</strong>s genotypes from different Solanum wild species such as: BER 3607, GND2423,IFD 1704, LPH 27215, PLT 53650, SeT 18315, SPL959, and the susceptible16Anale 1. C.D. C.S.z:


CDNA-AFLPWater stress resÎstant and susceptible HP'THH'\TTU'L'above were grown in the greenhouse un<strong>de</strong>r 1humid (RH). The water stress re<strong>si</strong>stant and susceptible »n"~"">A~Uwere grown in pots containing a turf-sand Toeach genotype were subjected to progres<strong>si</strong>ve drought bywater. Controlof each genotype were irrigated daily. RH and temperature variationwas registered daily. absolute water content ofthe soil treatmentwas <strong>de</strong>termined by measuring the gravimetric soil water content. After 2 weeks 1"..t:'r:l1""''''t:'~.. 1"leaves from stressed and non-stressed plants were collected and used for t:>V'''''''''''L'C1IAnanaly<strong>si</strong>s. At this stage the stressed plants showed c1early known c"'{rrn.....t.,...n-.<strong>de</strong>ficitTotal RNA was extracted from leaves as <strong>de</strong>scribed by Bachem et al (1998). The totalconcentration was estimated by spectrophotometer and visualized on 1% agarose gel.RNA was obtained from lOmg of total RNA u<strong>si</strong>ng 5' biotinylated oIigo (dT) primerbound to paramagnetic beads coated with'yanat'ea


I<strong>de</strong>ntification of water stress response gene-sRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONMicroarray analy<strong>si</strong>sMicroarray analy<strong>si</strong>s revealed several transcripts which are involved in stressreactions and senescence (Table 1). These inclu<strong>de</strong> heat shock proteins: HSP83(TC51352) and HSP18.5 (TC45821), a protein phosphatase B' subunit (TC42826), aspermidin synthase gene (SPDS, TC53408), a senescence associated gene (TC44682),calmodulin-binding protein (TC48803) and particularly the known <strong>de</strong>hydration inducedprotein ERD 15 (TC53578). Several genes encoding proteins with functions not directlyrelated to stress were expressed in higher levels in response to drought treatment.Incorrect protein folding and assembly have been hypothe<strong>si</strong>zed as pos<strong>si</strong>ble effect ofwater stress. HSPs are involved in protein stabilization, and translocation andmay help to recover native protein conformation attenuating the effect ofstress. Osmoticadjustment is con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>red as one ofthe nlost mechanism adaptationto low levels of water in soil (Tumer, 1986; Munns, 1988). Dehydrins accumulateduring periods of water <strong>de</strong>ficit and display particular structural predicted tobe involved in hydrophobic interactions to macromolecule stabilization (Close, 1996)through <strong>de</strong>tergent and chaperone-like properties, suggesting that they induce an adaptiveresponse during water stress. Calmodulin is a calciuln-binding protein that maya pivotal role in stress tolerance. One or more components ofthe protein involved inthe perception and intracellular transduction ofthe stress <strong>si</strong>gnal might be altered duringthe adaptation processes. The Spermidin synthase gene acts as inhibitor or downregulator oflnetabolism processes related to tissue senescence and increases the contentofpolyamines during stress conditions.Microarray data analy<strong>si</strong>s implies the normalization and preproces<strong>si</strong>ng ofdata. Aseries ofdata transformation can help to i<strong>de</strong>ntify <strong>si</strong>gnificallt1y regulated genes. A globalrepresentation of the changes in expres<strong>si</strong>on of alI genes spotted on the microarraysli<strong>de</strong> is <strong>de</strong>picted in Figure 2. In this format we can i<strong>de</strong>ntify ea<strong>si</strong>ly genes that are up ordown regulated. Black points an the graphic i<strong>de</strong>ntify the subset of genes which arelisted in Table 1 and are mentioned before as closely related to water stress.VOL. XXXI 19


NQTable 1. List ofmR...1\IAs with differential hybridisation (induced or <strong>si</strong>lenced) in S.brachistotrichum exposed to water stress against a normal irrigated controlName I DescriptionPo<strong>si</strong>tion Water stressed Control non-stressed Ratio~Nmaterialmaterial44-1:12 2100.02 92.88 22.61 TC55942: harpin inducing protein {Nicotiana tabacum)44-9:24 2410.55 175.06 13.77 TC44893: probable 60S ribosomal protein L9 [imported] - Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana28-14:4 1162.42 90.67 12.82 TC49463: ethylene-respon<strong>si</strong>ve elongation factor EF-Ts precursor {Lycoper<strong>si</strong>con esculentum}36-24:1 1391.92 111.41 12.49 TC49889: 3-phosphoino<strong>si</strong>ti<strong>de</strong>-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt protein kinase-I {Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana): TC46842: 3-phosphoino<strong>si</strong>ti<strong>de</strong>-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt protein kinase-I {Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana}12-22:18 1232.21 104.04 11.84 TC42382: protein FIE22.4 [imported]- Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana40-1:22 3363.11 292.06 11.52 TC42826: B' regulatory subunit of PP2A (Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaiianaJ36-12:14 1077.66 95.45 11.29 TC54741 : vacuolar protein sorting protein [imported] - Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana32-26:1 1245.91 118.14 10.55 TC51352: Heat shock protein 83. [Violet Japanese morning glory] {Pharbitis nil); TC53264: Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain 1 chloroplast precursor (EC48-17:2 1520.24 147.98 10.274.1.1.39)TC51833: Atlg09020lF7Gl9_Il {Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana}36-1:2 4565.49 544.96 8.38 TC49954: gene_id:MCE21.3-rellNP_055486.I-strong <strong>si</strong>milarity to unknown protein (Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana)44-1:20 2250.50 268.99 8.37 TC52723: putative glycyl-tRNA synthetase (Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana); TC54758: putative glycyHRNA synthetase {Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaliana}24-1:11 1467.02 182.53 8.04 TC5461O: phototropin-like protein PsPK4 {Pisllm sativum}48-25:14 2065.82 270.58 7.63 TC46836: amidase {Arabidop<strong>si</strong>s thaiianaJ44-9:Il 3351.81 468.47 7.15 TC54438: Zeatin O-xylosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.204) (Zeatin O-beta-D- xylosyltransfemse).32-13:4 3736.59 545.79 6.85 TC56852: finger protein Dof - common tobacco (fragment)24-7:14 2035.d8 331.26 6.14 TC4391O: (S)-2-hydroxy-acid oxidase peroxisomal (EC 1.1.3.15) (Glycolate oxidase) (GOX)24-25:15 34,4405 892,01 25,89 TC55541: ca1ciumlcalmodulin-


Idlmti/i(:at,ion of water


E. RITTER, 1. SANCHEZ. A. ARAGONES. F. LUCCALow expres<strong>si</strong>on level High Up+-- ~10000i------t----!----+-----!----------i-----------+------i-1000-l-----l-----l----l-------4-----.,....--+.----------l-----I-100-r.-----t----+----l---------0.01 i-----l-----+-----l-----4--------l---------l·-------1h·"0.001 +----~.,.f--_.............,..j-........_..._.._.-l- _...l__-.........;..__....._I_0.001 0.01 0.1Net intet1slty(mea:n]{stresslcoml)L2. Scatter plot ofthe n1icroarray experiment showing the distributionthe log ofmean inten<strong>si</strong>ty in untreated plants (x axis) versus the log ofthe geneexpres<strong>si</strong>on ratio (y axis). The x axis reflects levels of gene expres<strong>si</strong>on and the y axisreflects up or down regulation ofgene expres<strong>si</strong>on. Black point i<strong>de</strong>ntifY specific genesexpressed differentially un<strong>de</strong>r water stress (see Table 1)cDNA-AFLPComparative analy<strong>si</strong>s ofexpres<strong>si</strong>ons pattems ofstressed vs. non-stressed genotype<strong>si</strong>n 3 suggests that progres<strong>si</strong>ve drought treatment displays a differentiallevel ofgeneexpres<strong>si</strong>on. Banding pattems generated in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly, u<strong>si</strong>ng the same primer combinationand the same mRNA populations were highly reproducible. The fragment <strong>si</strong>zes were........,,'u ... v ..... ,.""'.... between 50 to 500bp. Different primer combinations were and upto 20 polymorphic bands were obtained with some ofthe.se primer combination, anaverage of 10 polymorphisms per genotype. Figure 3 shows polymorphisms related tostress conditions. In addition to the presence/absence of transcripts we can aisoobserve inten<strong>si</strong>ty polymorphisms. This variable band inten<strong>si</strong>ty suggests that the preferentialaccumulation of transcripts is associated to an adaptive response OcculTing in thesesubjected to water lilnitation. I<strong>de</strong>ntical, differentially expressed bands ocurred indifferent genotypes in many cases. Sequencing and sequence analy<strong>si</strong>s of differentiallyexpressed cDNAs is in progress.22Anale J.C.D.C.S.Z


i<strong>de</strong>ntifica/fion of waterresponse genesVOL. XXXI


RlTTER, 1. SANCHEZ. A. "1\/",7'/lV/'t-laJmrrlOnlC1- K,OS~lCk, K. Andin face specific re<strong>si</strong>stance12:963-977.mOleClllla! ba<strong>si</strong>s of <strong>de</strong>hydration tlerance47:377-404,-,-,.c>'..,u.J.'.d..' - TIGR http: www.tigr.org/osrnOIlC adjustment? Aust J Plant72612. E. . Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory2. Cold Harbor laboratory Press, cold Sprig Harbor, NY.13. N. C. (1986)..Crop water <strong>de</strong>fficits: a <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of progress. Adv Agron24 Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


l<strong>de</strong>ntification cI watergenes14.ReZUlnats-a u.Jl..Lrr\


SUMMARYElena BADEA!, Sorina MIHACEA2, Mirela FRANTESCU2, Dorica BOTĂU 2 ,Luisa MIKE3, Gabriel NEDELEA2.lInstitue ofBiology, Romanian Aca<strong>de</strong>my, Bucharest2Univer<strong>si</strong>ty ofAgricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Timişoara,Romania2Potato Research Statiori, Târgu SecuiescOne ofthe most important potato pests all over the world i5 the Colorado beetle.'-"v......n .•.., '.~AV.......U .•...,"L.•VH. is the first step in obtaining potato cultivars with re<strong>si</strong>stance to Coloradobeetle.Our aim was ta obtain transgenic lines of Romanian potato varieties by u<strong>si</strong>ngvectors that transferred the cryIIIA gene the potato genome.transgenic lines were screened the level of gene expres<strong>si</strong>on u<strong>si</strong>ng.(Jt"1:I!J.nll'·ri~·INTRODUCTIONcrylIIA gene, potato transformation, ELISA analy<strong>si</strong>s,\..oe)Ot:lOn rates transgenic crops are unprece<strong>de</strong>nted and are the highest for anytechnology by agricultural industry standards (James, 2002). From 1996, when Gl\1first adopted, to 2003 the global area oftransgenic crops increased 40 fold,1,7 in 1996 ta 67,7 million hectares in 2003 (James, 2003)."u"'-'lJL.lU'JlA rates reflect farmer satisfaction the products that offer CI.l;;;'.UALl...,UJU_ U',,",.lA,",'.U""r'l14,('rU'\n frOlnnl0re convenient and flexible crap management, higherproductivity and/or"' ......A.l.."',.,.. per hectares (James, 2002; Gianes<strong>si</strong> el al., 2002; Brookes, 2003a,b; '-""'....u ........,health benefits (Pray et al., 2002) and a safer environment through....."'...'.. v""''''...... use ofconventional pestici<strong>de</strong>s (Phipps and Park, 2002; Gianes<strong>si</strong>, 2002), whichCOJ.lec:tlvelv contribute to a more sustainable agriculture.wave oftransgenic crops that are currently commercialized are tolerant tare<strong>si</strong>stant to pests. Bt technology makes pos<strong>si</strong>ble ta control the most ...UUL....... '....Acorn, cotton and potato. Onc ofthe lnost important potato pests alI over the world....... '-J'..v •. u....'v beetle. For Romania, growing transgenic potato plants with re<strong>si</strong>stance tameans not reduction ofchemical soil pollution, protection ofbeneficialpresence of re<strong>si</strong>dues in water and food, but26Anale


Results concerning the genetic transformation of two romanian potato varieties with crylllA 000economic benefits representing 10 million dollars peryear (4 minion insectici<strong>de</strong> cost and6 million cost ofinsectici<strong>de</strong> spreading) (Otiman, pers. comm).Colorado potato beetle re<strong>si</strong>stance has been achieved through the incorporation ofagene for the Bacillus thuringien<strong>si</strong>s (Bt) CRY protein into potatoes. Bacillusthuringien<strong>si</strong>s is a spore-fonning bacteriUill species, commonly found insoi!, wIDch containsa native crystal protein that when ingested by insectpests, causes a lethal paraly<strong>si</strong>s in thedigestive track. Bt foliar sprays have been used for 50 year to control insect pests andhave a long history ofsafe use.Genetic modification is the first step in obtaining potato cultivars with re<strong>si</strong>stance toColorado beetle. In this report we <strong>de</strong>scribed the obtaining oftransgenic lines from twoRomanian varieties by u<strong>si</strong>ng specific expres<strong>si</strong>on vectors that transferred the cryIIIAgene into the potato genome. The level ofcryllIA gene expres<strong>si</strong>on inthe transgenic lineswas also studied.MATERIALS AND METHODSPlant materialTwo Romanian potato varieties, Redsec and Coval, provi<strong>de</strong>dby the Târgu SecuiescPotato Research Station were used for genetic transformation. The two varieties usedfor transformation were selected due to thcir good yield, virus re<strong>si</strong>stance and qualitytraits. AH the material used for transformation obtained from spouts tubers wasconfirmed as virus free. Each plant was serologically tested (ELISA) for the presenceof the most worldwi<strong>de</strong> potato viruses PLRV, PVX, PVY, PVA, PVS ano PVM. Theanaly<strong>si</strong>s were performed both in the laboratOIY from AgroBiolnstitute Sofia, Bulgariaand from AGDIA, USA. Only virus free plants were used to obtain stock material.The stock plants were maintained through monthly subculture of the shoot tips (2-3no<strong>de</strong>s) at 19°C un<strong>de</strong>t 16 hours illumination. Fortransformation experiments, explantscon<strong>si</strong>sting for intemo<strong>de</strong>s segments long ofabout 5mm (witbout leaves) were prelevatedfrom aseptically grown plants.Bacteria strain and vectorThe transformation experiments were carried outu<strong>si</strong>ng Agrobacterium tumefaciensharboring the binary plasmid pMON 9843 with the crylIIA gene, encoding the Bt CRYprotein and the marker gene epsps conferring the glyphosate re<strong>si</strong>stance provi<strong>de</strong>d by theMonsanto Company.Bacteria were inoculated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented withchloramphenico125mg/l, streptomycin 50 mgll, spectinomycin 50 mg/ml and kanamycin50 mg/ml. The culture was grown with continue stirring (120 rmp) at 25°C. After 24hours, the bacterial culture was diluted 1: 10 in LB medium, supplemented with ilie samefour antibiotics and grew for an additional night in the same conditions. Fortransformation,the bacterial cuIture was diluted 1:9 in MS medium.VOL. XXXI27


Elena BADEA, Sorina MIHACEA, Mirela FRANTESCU, Durica BOTĂU,Luisa MIKE, G. NEDELEATransformation and n~gene:ration of transformantsPotato explants obtained frOlTI the young were immersed in bacteriumsuspen<strong>si</strong>on for 15 minutes, blotted on sterile filter paper and transferred to co-culturenledium. After 2 days co-cultivation, at 19°C, un<strong>de</strong>r 16 hours illumination, the explantswere transferred for callus induction to selection mediuln (table 1) containing 4.23mgl1 glyphosate and 500 mg/l cefotaxime.The cultures were incubated for 1 week at 19°C, un<strong>de</strong>r a 16 hour light cycle. Afterone week on callus induction medium, explants were transferred onto regeneration medium(table 1) containing 4.23mg/l glyphosate and 500 mg/l cefotaxime. At this stage,shoots were discar<strong>de</strong>d because they grew from the "escaped" buds and theyare not transformed.After four weeks, the appearing shoots from the callus maintained on the regenerationln~dium were removed. Only one shoot per end ofan explant was transferred onto PMmediulTI containing 8.26mg/l glyphosate. The non-rooting plants after one month onmedium with glyphosate were discar<strong>de</strong>d.Table 1. Media used for obtaining potato transgenic plantsIP"ro.pagation medium ICo-culture medium I Callus induction I Regeneration II PM I medium fmedium 1I Murashige&S~oog 1/10 Murashige ; Murashige&S~oog Murashige&S~oog ,! macro and micro &Skoog macro I macro and micro macro and micro1 eiements and micro I elements I elements II' elements -----!Vitamins I Vitamins I Vitamins 1---V-i-ta-m-in-s--~-11~·---T-h-ia-m":;;'in'--e-.-H-C-l---tjl---G-IY-C-in-e---+----G-lY-C-in-e-----+---G-ly-cI-'n-e-- I0.40 m!!!l 2.00 ITI!!!1 2.00 ITI!!/l ~.oo m!!!lMyo-ino<strong>si</strong>tol I Thiamine.HCl Thiamine.HCl' Thiamine. HCl100.00 m!!11 0.40 m!!!l 0.40 m!!!l 0.40 llr-IlI0.50 mgll0.50 mg/l. I O.50mg/l. I.-1IMyo-ino<strong>si</strong>tol I Myo-ino<strong>si</strong>tol I Myo-ino<strong>si</strong>tol100.00 m!!!l lOp.OOmg!l 100.00 m!!11PhvtohormonesPhvtohormonesNaphthaleneacetic acid Gibberelic acid0.10 m!!!l 0.50 mr-ilzeatin ribo<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>zeatin ribo<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>5 m!!!l. 5 mo-fl.Propagation of transgenic plantsEach transgenic plantlet rooted on medimTI supplemented with glyphosate wasmultiplied in ar<strong>de</strong>r ta be maintained in vi/ro and to be transferred inta pots containing a28 Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


VOL. XXXI


f:fAUt.A, ;sorina M1HACt.A, Mirela FHANJ1;,SCU, LJorica HUlA U.Luisa MIKE. Ci, NEDELJ:..AANDevaluationability (figure 1) of the two...v .........·.,LU,V1"U varieties, we have procee<strong>de</strong>d to stern pieces obtained 4an selection rnedium glyphosat, for untransformed"""" ... V ....H".ljl!..lV for bacteria elimination, callus was lnultiplicationtransformed cells. AH shoots secn after one week are untransformed and frh


Results concerning the genetic transformation of two rOmanll';l!l potato varieties crylIlA ...Table 4. The acc1imatization frequencyPlantletsTransfom1ation transferred to soi!series_I_._---i--"-10=6'--.II 155IIIIVTOTALplants growing in greenhouseREDSEC.---j------:===-'-'î":.=:c-::..'----+----..::::~~~::.~~~---_I65287.........oa ......" ............v .... of crylIIA gene /llIV1i"'l


Elena BADEA, Surina MIHACEA. Mirela FRANTESCU, Dorica BOTĂU,Luisa MIKE, G. NEDELEAThe plants were grown in the greenhouse and they produced minitubers. The averagenumber of minitubers per plant was 6 for Redsec and 4 for Coval varieties. Theseminitubers will be used for beginning offield trials.Our results show that these the two Romanian varieties, Redsec and Coval, can beea<strong>si</strong>ly transformed via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which has ensured the obtaining ofa high number oflines with a high level ofgene expres<strong>si</strong>on.Fig. 1. Highly regenerative culture frOlTIuntransformed potato explantsFig. 2. Intemodal stems ofpotatoon the callu<strong>si</strong>ng mediumFig. 3 Propagation ofgeneticallymodified plantsFig. 4. Ex <strong>si</strong>tu multiplication ofgenetically modified plants32Anale 1.C.D.C.S.Z.


concerning the3.5.89.10.VOL. XXXI


Elena BADEA, Sorina MIHACEA, Mirela J


PERFORMANŢELEINSTITUTULCARTOF ŞI SFECLĂCREATEIon BOZEŞAN',Sorin CHIRUl, Constantin DRAICA Il<strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong> şi Sfeclă<strong>de</strong> Zahăr, Braşov500470, str. Fundăturii 2,România, www.potato.ro; e-mail: icpc@potato.roREZUMATPe plan mondial, dar şi în ROluânia, se cultivă o mare diver<strong>si</strong>tate <strong>de</strong> soiuri. Cultivarealor este necesară, întrucât cartoful are scopuri <strong>de</strong> utilizare diver<strong>si</strong>ficate, se cultivrlîn codiţii ecologice foarte diferite, este atacat <strong>de</strong> un numărfoalte IDare <strong>de</strong> boli şi dăunători,iar pretenţiile producătorilor şi consumatorilor <strong>de</strong> cartof sunt schimbătoare şi mereucrescân<strong>de</strong>.Din multitudinea <strong>de</strong> soiuri trebuie incluse în <strong>si</strong>stemul naţional <strong>de</strong> producere a cal10fului<strong>de</strong> sămânţă şi recomandate, cele mai performante, soiurile pot fi înmulţitedoarÎntr-un număr limitat.Din cele 37 soiuri create la In<strong>si</strong>tutul <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> Cnrtof şi Sfeclă<strong>de</strong> Zahăr au fost incluse în <strong>si</strong>stemul naţional <strong>de</strong> producere a cartofului pentlu sămânţăsoiurile Amelia, Christian, Dacia, Nicoleta, şi Rodas, fiind con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rate celemai performante soiuri <strong>pentru</strong> viitor.Cuvinte cheie: cartof, soiuri noi, rezistenţa la virusuri, capacitatea <strong>de</strong> producţie.INTRODUCEREAmeliorarea poate fi <strong>de</strong>finitădrept un proces <strong>de</strong> adaptare a planteIor <strong>de</strong> cultură la<strong>si</strong>stemul tehnologic utilizat la luomentul dat <strong>de</strong> cultivatori (Săulescu, 1999). Ameliorareaeste un proces continuu, care trebuie să ţină pasul cu nlodificarea condiţiilor ecologice,cu creşterea agre<strong>si</strong>vităţii şi a lărgirii patogenităţii agenţilorpatogeni, datorită-apariţiei <strong>de</strong>noi rase, tulpini, biotipuri şi patotipuri, dar şi <strong>de</strong> cerinţele mereu crescân<strong>de</strong> ale producătorilorşi consumatorilor.<strong>Cartof</strong>ul se numără printre plantele <strong>de</strong> cultură care nece<strong>si</strong>tă o mare diver<strong>si</strong>tate <strong>de</strong>soiuri datorită următoarelorcon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rente:- are scopuri <strong>de</strong> utilizare foarte diver<strong>si</strong>ficate. Astfel, cartoful se. cultivă <strong>pentru</strong>consum timpuriu, consum <strong>de</strong> vară, consum <strong>de</strong> toamnă- iarnă, <strong>pentru</strong> industrie (amidon,spirt, glucoză, <strong>de</strong>xtrină, etc.), industrializare (chips, pOlmnes-frites, fulgi, etc.) şi furajare;se cultivă în codiţiiecologice foarte diferite; .- este atacat <strong>de</strong> un număr foarte luare <strong>de</strong> boli şi dăunători;VoI. XXX! 35


ŞI ""LU"L'."'_""' <strong>de</strong> cartof.METODEVV''''>J'''''H.U <strong>de</strong> mneliorare a cartofuluil.4H-Ji.I.........A ~·..,v..,...... ,..., au create şi înregistrate un număr Însemnat careo perioadă <strong>de</strong> timp mai lungă sau mai scurtă. Este ca dintre acesteaLOU....' ......"''''' în naţional <strong>de</strong> producere a cartofului <strong>de</strong> sămânţă cele mai n""',.T"........... ..,1>'\1~a.Lv.. u .....u .. ~''-'J.'-' soiurilor au avut în ve<strong>de</strong>re realizate în1J"",''''V\.d.J.J.J.J.''''H'V'.,, rezistenţa la boli şi dăunători, în special la mană şi.u......,......... "",,,.........," FJlJ.J..."'.. I-" ..... ~.,.."""J.. însuşiri <strong>de</strong> calitate.Dintre soiurile <strong>de</strong> cartof româneşti create la <strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong> - <strong>Dezvoltare</strong><strong>Cartof</strong> şi Sfeclă <strong>de</strong> cele mai performante s-au dovedit a fi urrmlt:OalreU ..A..I-/ .." ...... şi ROCLAS şi CHRISTIAN;semitârzii: AMELIA, TÂMPA şi'-"'


Capacitatea ..n.v..vj'" ..........Tabelulr"rnr.>.,>"""r. 11',,...11.,,,,, în <strong>si</strong>stemul....A ' A A" pe~:lO{;UI1natlce arată o mare plasticitateChim, Bozeşan, 2000, Bozeşan,carto!- rom~ine:ştlTabelul 2mC;lm;e în <strong>si</strong>stemul naţional <strong>de</strong>Tulcea.C.D.A. Valu lui Traianrând<strong>de</strong>stinaţia""""'.............Asemitimpurii,....uAJ.L.....ClLJuorc>GUctll fOalie bune în condiţiirec;onlaUKlăsoiurile lhnpurii şi....... ,..",.-tn.ln.hiH u'..,"'.......u..... CO!lsumUlluI timpuriu şiVOL. XXXI37


on BOZEŞAN Sorin CHIRU. Constantin DRAICAPentru conSUln <strong>de</strong> toamnă - iarnă, cele mai mari producţii sunt realizate <strong>de</strong> soiurilesemitârzii (Bozeşan, Chim, 1999).Pentru industrie şi industrializare trebuie cultivate soiuri specializate (Chim,Bozeşan,200l).Condiţiile cliluatice din ROlnânia, în general, dar mai ales cele din ultimii ani, înspecial, au supus culturile <strong>de</strong> cartofunor puternice stresuri tennohidrice. Temperaturileridicate şi lipsa precipitaţiilor,au afectat culturile <strong>de</strong> cartofdin toate zonele <strong>de</strong> cultură, cuexcepţiacelor irigate (Ianoşi, 1998). Rezultatele experimentale obţinute, privind rezistenţasoiurilor româneşti<strong>de</strong> cartofincluse în <strong>si</strong>stelnul naţional <strong>de</strong> producere a cartofului <strong>pentru</strong>sămânţă,dar şi diferenţelemici dintre producţiile obţinute în condiţii<strong>de</strong> irigare şi neirigare~ne îndreptăţescsă afirmălncă unele dintre soiurile recomandate sunt rezistente la stresultermhidric (Săninoiu, 1996).Rezistenţa la boli şi dăunătoria avut în ve<strong>de</strong>re conlportarea soiurilor recomandateîn faţa atacului <strong>de</strong> lnană (Phythophthora infestans Munt. (<strong>de</strong> Bary.), la viroze grave,produse <strong>de</strong> virusul Y al cartofului (Solanum virus 2) şi virusul răsucirii frunzelor <strong>de</strong> cartof(Solanum virus 14), precmn şi la râia neagră a cartofului (Synehytrium endobiotieumSchil/î. (Pere.) şi nematodul auriu al cartofului (Glo"o<strong>de</strong>ra rostoehien<strong>si</strong>s Woll.).Soiurile recon1andate se cOlnportă diferit în faţa atacului <strong>de</strong> mană (Phythophthorainfestans Munt. (<strong>de</strong> Bary.). S-a constatat o sen<strong>si</strong>bilitate luai nlare la soiurile timpurii şisemitimpurii, în special la atacul pe frunze. Soiurile selnitârzii au o rezistenţă mai bună.Toate soiurile au o bună rezistenţă la atacul pe tuberculi, ceea ce nu permite transmitereainfecţiei <strong>de</strong> la un an la altul (tabelul 3).Datorită unei lnari pre<strong>si</strong>uni <strong>de</strong> infecţiecu boli virotice a apărut nece<strong>si</strong>tatea creării şipromovăriiunor soiuri rezistente. Soiurile recomandate au o rezistenţă ridicată şi foarteridicată la viroze grave, indiferent <strong>de</strong> grupa <strong>de</strong> precocitate (tabelul 3). Manifestareaacestor caractere pennit înmulţirealor în condiţii cu o pre<strong>si</strong>une <strong>de</strong> infecţie virotică lnairidicată (Bozeşan, Draica, 2001).Toate soiurile rec01nandate sunt rezistente la râia neagră a cartofului (Synchytriumendo/îiotieum Sehi/". (Pere.), dar sen<strong>si</strong>bile la nelnatodul auriu al cartofului (Glo/îo<strong>de</strong>rarostochien<strong>si</strong>s Woll.) (Tabelul 3).Tabelul 3Rezistenţa soiurilor <strong>de</strong> cartof româneştiincluse în <strong>si</strong>stemul naţional <strong>de</strong> producere a.cartofului <strong>de</strong> sămânţă la boli şi dăunătoriRezistenţa la ataculSoiul<strong>de</strong>: Dacia Rodas Christian Amelia Tâmpa NicoletaMană pe flUnze FS MR MS MS MS RMană pe tuberculi MR MR MS MS R RVirusul Y FR MR MR MR FR FRVirusul răsuciriifrunzelorR R S MR R RRâia neagră R R R R R RN ematodul auriu S S S S S S.38Anale J.C.D.C.S.Z.


Performanţele nuil(A' suiuri <strong>de</strong> cartul create <strong>de</strong> <strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-Dezvc,ltare penlm Carte:! şiLegenda:FS -foarte sen<strong>si</strong>bil;S sen<strong>si</strong>NI;MS - mijlociu sen<strong>si</strong>bilMR - rezistent;R - rezistent;FR -foarte rezistent.Însuşirile <strong>de</strong> se lnanifestă foarte ÎntreDin punct <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re al aspectului fizic, soiurile recomandate satisfac pecerinţele şi conslunatorilor <strong>de</strong> cartof.C01npoziţia chilnică şi în special conţinutul în le diferite L)"-''-,!J...... "<strong>de</strong> folo<strong>si</strong>nţă, <strong>pentru</strong> conSUIn tinlpuriu, <strong>de</strong> vară şi toamnă - iarnă, în stare proaspătă, dar şi<strong>pentru</strong> industrie şi industrializare. Calitatea culinară le majoritateapreparatelor (tabelul Acesta a fost un criteriu <strong>de</strong> a acestor soiuria fi <strong>si</strong>stemul naţional <strong>de</strong> producere a dar c011surue<strong>de</strong> bază în alegerea soiuluicare au ca <strong>de</strong>stinaţie industria şi Ă1.H......h>UJ.••u.L.....Principalele însuşiri <strong>de</strong> calitate a soiurile cartof româneşti lnC:lU~;eîn <strong>si</strong>stemulnaţional <strong>de</strong> producere a cartofului sămânţă;";"U';';.1[;4 <strong>de</strong> calitateSoiulDacia Rodas ChrisÎtan Amelia l'âmpa I NicoletaCuloarea cojii g g r r g gICuloarea pulpei g g g g g gFonna tuberculilor o o ro oAdâncimea ochilor s sa fs sa sa saConţinutul în amidon 16,0 17,0 17,0 20,0 16,5 21,5Înnegrirea pulpei cru<strong>de</strong> 3,8 3,1 3,7 3,5 2,5 1,9Clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate B B B AlB AlB BDestinaţiaLegenda:Culoarea cojii:Consumtim.puriu şi<strong>de</strong> vară0·-ConsumConsum <strong>de</strong>Consum Consum <strong>de</strong>,. <strong>de</strong>toamnă - iarnătimpuriu şi toamnăşiindustri-IndustralizareIv: şi<strong>de</strong> vară iamaindustrializarealizareCuloarea pulpei: g - iuyfhfC"U~Forma tuberculilor: o ­ro - rotund ovală.Adâncimea ochior: fs -·foarte superficiali;s - superficiali;sa - semiadânci~Înnegrirea pulpei cru<strong>de</strong>: 1 nu se înnegreşte;9 - se înnegreşteCOJrnf)lel.Clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate: A- cartofcon<strong>si</strong>stent;B --VOL. XX'J{J39


<strong>de</strong> cartof AMELIA. """""',,",J!.


Performanţele noilor soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof create <strong>de</strong> <strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong> şi 000From 37 potato varietes bred at Research and Development Institute for Potatoand Sugar Beet Braşov, the best ofthem:Dacia, Nicoleta, Timpaand Roclas have been introduced in the <strong>National</strong> SystelTI for Seed Potato Production asthe most perfonnant varieties.Keywords: potato, new variety, re<strong>si</strong>stance to viruses, yield eapaeity.Tables1. Biological yield potential ofpotato varieties inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the <strong>National</strong> System ofSeed Potato Production (NSSPP)2. Potato yield of the varieties inclu<strong>de</strong>d in ilie NSSPP un<strong>de</strong>r different climatieconditions3. Re<strong>si</strong>stance of potato varieties inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the NSSPP to diseases and pest: 1.late blight on leaves; 2. late blight on 3. PVY; 4. PLRV; 5. wartdisease(Synchitrium endof.ioticum); 6. cyst nemato<strong>de</strong> (Globo<strong>de</strong>ra rostochien<strong>si</strong>s).4. The main quality features ofpotato varieties inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the NSSPP: 1. Colourofskin: g- yellow, r - red; 2. Colour offlesh: g- yeUow; 3. Shape oftubers: o - oval, ro- round to oval; 4. Shallowness ofeyes: fs - very shaUow eyes, s - shallow eyes, samo<strong>de</strong>rate<strong>de</strong>ep eyes; 5. Blaekening offresh flesh: 1- not blackening, 9 - full blackening;6. Quality class/cooking type: A - firm, B - firmaVOI. XXXI41


NEWRESEARCHSUCEAVACREATED AT AGRICULTURALSTATION (SOCODBAo)SUMMARYDumitru BODEAAgricultural Research and Development Suceava 720262, 15 , 1Decembrie Bd., RomaniaEmail: scassc30@xnet.roThe introduction in the crops ofthe next potato varieties: AtraI, Magic, Victoria andClaudiu makes pos<strong>si</strong>ble the diver<strong>si</strong>fication ofthe assortment ofthe potato varieties tilledin the area.The results obtained in the respect of the re<strong>si</strong>stance to some unfavourable bioticfactors and in respect ofproductivity, write down the new genotypes ta varieties withhigh yielding capacity.Keywords: potato, new variety, yield capacity, rezistance to viruses.INTRODUCTIONIn the structure of crops fronl north and north - west of Moldova region, thepotato has a con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rable weight, by surface and economic importance. This fact isconstant by the variety of climate conditions and soil, which offer most propitiousbreeding conditions to a huge assortment ofpotato varieties.Bettering the assortment ofpotato varieties with more superior new genotypes, Isone of the most efficient way of increa<strong>si</strong>ng yield, quality and yielding stability. (D.Bo<strong>de</strong>a, 2001).The admis<strong>si</strong>on in the crops of a big number of varieties leads to high geneticvariety and to the pos<strong>si</strong>bility ofchoo<strong>si</strong>ng the best potato varieties that can adapt ea<strong>si</strong>erto yielding conditions and which suffer less from unfavourable factors. (1. Fodor, 1982).In this <strong>si</strong>tuation, the obtaining of bumper crops and stable to, require a rationalzoning ofthe crops and a good cognition ofthe varieties, those that have a high yieldcapacity and incfeased re<strong>si</strong>stance to the attack of diseases and pests.. The material and intellectual effort ma<strong>de</strong> in a constant way in the potato breedingprogramme from the Agricultural Research and Development Station of Suceavama<strong>de</strong> pos<strong>si</strong>ble the homologation of a number of ten potato varieties between theyears 2000-2004.Depending on the perfonnances of the new varieties there were chosen andpromoted in the national seed potato production 4 varieties: Astral, Magic, Victoriaand Claudiu.42Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


New petata varielies, created al Agricultural Research and DevelDpment al Slation (S.CD.A.) SuceavavA.....upresent paper wants to....,';t-e....·'7,~h", .... afthe new 'Uit.r..... plant illnesscaused by viruses, curly Ieaf, to shorten ve,!:et(itlcm period, to red i ucllngyield and <strong>de</strong>preciation oftuber ........"...AU .....The levelofreducing yieldingby the species and the the·UU""'''''''C' is <strong>de</strong>termined, mostly,the potato 'IIrr.l1...tPl.... rc1imatic and technoiogicai conditions.The research that at a infectionwith 5-15% in the case ofviruses which have easy "'1 icn......'"50-80% in case of viruses which have


1-1 -+-Dumitru BODEAThe evaluation of the re<strong>si</strong>stance to the infection PVyo and PLRVTable 1IAstralVarietyI PVyOvirus PLRV!, Average I Average \ I. gra<strong>de</strong> Rating 2:ra<strong>de</strong> Rating18,7Very high Highlre.<strong>si</strong>stance 8,3 re<strong>si</strong>stance IMagic 9,0 ! Ve~y high 1 7,0 I M?<strong>de</strong>rat I~--------+-----------+-reslstance I 11,1 reslstence! II HighVeryDe<strong>si</strong>ree (Witness L.) 8,02,0I I re<strong>si</strong>stance I sen<strong>si</strong>tiveMiddleKondor (Witness yo) 3,2 I Sen<strong>si</strong>tive 6,8!sen<strong>si</strong>tiveIISante9,0 Very high 6,5MiddleL I I re<strong>si</strong>stance , sen<strong>si</strong>tive II~I I Very high i . Very high IVlctOJl."'la 9,0 . 8 7 II --II----"r...::.e=<strong>si</strong>=s=ta=n.:..:::c:..::::e---j '__-l-~r=es=istance .-,1, Ver.y high Mo<strong>de</strong>rat 9,0IClaudiu 7,5 I..~e::..:;s:.=.:ls::..:::t=an::.:.c:::..;e=--+_---__l-----:r:...=e=s=is=te=n=c,;.::e=--..j.Writing down the results from table 1. shows the superiority ofthe new varieties,regarding the re<strong>si</strong>stance to the Îl1fections brought about the yo virus and the virus ofcurly leaf, conlparative with the witness varieties and also with the variety Sante. Ifwe try ta make a clas<strong>si</strong>fication from this point ofview the ar<strong>de</strong>I' wouldbe next: Victoria,Astral, Claudiu, Magic, Sante:These re<strong>si</strong>stance qualities ofthe new varieties recommend them for crap becauseit is ma<strong>de</strong> pos<strong>si</strong>ble the yield ofseed without so much difficulties.In table 2. are showen the results regarding the behaviour of the varieties to thelate blight (Phytophthora infestans) attack; the re<strong>si</strong>stance to the black scab ofpotato(Synchytrium endobioticum); the re<strong>si</strong>stance ta the gol<strong>de</strong>n nematod (Globo<strong>de</strong>rarostochien<strong>si</strong>s Woll) and the re<strong>si</strong>stance ta the COlTIlTIOn scab (Streptomyces scabies).44Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


New pOlalO vanelles,2MR-middle serl<strong>si</strong>tJlVe:In respectthat varietiesthe variety Claudiuestablishedblight attack,condition untiU t"n,:>,hu''''"'A very ......JULp...J'>. ~JL....' ........'iLlL....'"'U.... (Globo<strong>de</strong>raaud Victoria are"'-'JU"'''''..'''''- .... bellaV'eel as sen<strong>si</strong>tive toofpotato varietiesVOL. XXXI45


LJumUru RUDEAThethe condition fromdata wrote downstrenghter the "",.,."nT1'",,"" affirmation in tIle waythey the yielding capacitya.u"l'~UcV.U ofthe rt


frOln Centers of r-v,..P ..·.tn"".... lf'Jli"" ........,.Thestressareas*.u."J'f".U'''UU conditionsyield ofthe new varieties in these ""'.-. ..... 1..... ,("...from early variety Ostara. Thethe fact that the varieties Victoria, Astral,technological inten<strong>si</strong>fication factor.Comparing the yield data in thesevarieties have a high yield capacity"....""............., and hydrological stres<strong>si</strong>rrigation system.featuresCosulnption potato quality i8 re1Jtre2~ente(1intern characters of the tubers, and also theDer Zaag (1992) the "quality" term ..u.v...........• ....that make it utilizable in alI purposes.Phy<strong>si</strong>ological qualities ofthe yielding, atregular shape from oval-flat toeyes with godson yellow or red coloredculinary quality reprezents a c01nplexCulinary quality i8 <strong>de</strong>tennened ofa complexfinnness, the lnealyness,'1f·h·.t,.. 'C'--------_.~----------------------_._---VOL XXXI


LJumllru DUVJ:.../iThe evaluation ofthe culinary quality ofnew varietiesThe characterVarietvAstral Magic Victoria Claudiu Ostara De<strong>si</strong>reeBoilin2: aspect (1-4) 27 25 30 20 25 2,0Taste (1-4) 22 2,2 30 30 22 20Color (1-6) 55 50 50 i 30 40 40Smashing at boiling (l-I2,5 2,2 2,5 1,5 2,04) I I 11I2,0Firmness (1-4) 25 2,0 2,5 20 2,0 201Mealvness (1-4) 20 I 20 I 125 20 20 20Moisture ( 1-4) 20 20 25 15 2,0 2,0Structure of stach ( 1-4) 20 20 25 20 20 20Oualitv class B B B AlB AlB AlBRaw color 43 3,6 30 26 36 50Phv<strong>si</strong>aue starch content 141 153 140 Il 8 160 16 OTable 6The results obtained by the new genotypes in the culinary features aspect arewritten down in table 6.The values obtained aner laboratory analyses are completely illustrating for theculinary quality ofthe new creations. These allow placing it frOln this point ofview in therang ofvaluable varieties. Regarding SOlne features as: boiling aspect, color, smashing atboiling, moisture and raw color, the variety Claudiu is the best from alI the varieties thatwere tested, having superior values.CONCLUSIONS1.The potato varieties Astral, Magic, Victoria and Claudiu are in the group ofinten<strong>si</strong>vemiddle early varieties, having a high potential yield, associated with some superioragronomic features.2.Very good re<strong>si</strong>stance to serious viruses makes pos<strong>si</strong>ble the multiplication ofseedwithout any difficulties.3.Middle early varieties Astral, Magic, Victoria and Claudiu are recommen<strong>de</strong>d forfavourable and very favourable areas for potato, and in areas with thermic and hydrologicalstress only in irrigation condition.REFERENCES1. BODEA D., 2001 - Magic şi Astral - noi soiuri semitimpurii <strong>de</strong> cartof. AnaleICPC, voI. XXVIII, 18-24.2. DRAICA C., 2003 - Reânoirea materialului <strong>de</strong> plantat la cartof. <strong>Cartof</strong>ul în România,voI. 13, nr. 3,3-6.3. FODOR1., 1982 - Creşterea potenţialului <strong>de</strong> producţie prin soi. <strong>Cartof</strong>, soi şi sămânţă.ICPC Braşov.48 Anale 1.C.D.C.S.Z.


New patato varielies, createdAgricultural Research al1d Development at Statiol1 (S.C.D.A.) Suceava4. MUREŞAN S., şi colah., 1974 - Calitatea cartofului <strong>pentru</strong> consum nn1!p.f"'hi'iTameliorare la cartof. Problelne <strong>de</strong> Genetică teoretică şi aplicată, vot637.5. VAN DER. ZAAG D.E., 1992 - <strong>Cartof</strong>ul şi cultivarea lui în Olanda.Olan<strong>de</strong>z al <strong>Cartof</strong>ului. Wageningen.SOIURI NOI DE CARTOF CREATE LARezumat:Introducerea în culturăa noilor soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof: Astral, Magic, Victoria, şi ....;;1.1..........&0......face po<strong>si</strong>bilă diver<strong>si</strong>ficarea sortimentului <strong>de</strong> soiuri.R.ezultatele obţinute cu privire la rezistenţa la unii factori abiotici care afecteazăproducţia recomandăsoiurile menţionate ca având o capacitate ridicată şiproducţie.Cuvinte cheie: cartof, soi nou, capacitate <strong>de</strong> producţie, rezistenţă.TabeleconstantăVImSUTI.1. Evaluarea rezistenţei soiurilor la infecţia cu virusul Y şi cu '\:T't"""'''"'"I' r'.,,,,,,f"","'·Ufrunzelor;2. Evaluarea rezistenţeisoiurilor la mană,râia comună,râia neagră şi cuchişti;3. Evaluarea potenţialuluimaxim <strong>de</strong> producţie în condiţiiledinInsula M".rre a Brăilei;4. Evaluarea capacităţii<strong>de</strong> producţie în zone foarte favorabile <strong>pentru</strong>5. Evalurea capacităţii<strong>de</strong> producţiea soiurilornoiîn zonacu6. Evaluarea calităţii culinare a noilor soiuri.VOL. XXXI49


REZUMATLuiza Mikc, Daniela'Staţiunea<strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong>525400, str. Ady Endre, nr. 55, Covasna, e-mail: ~fiilllli1;Q.Q!!tmStaţiunii <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong>specializatăpe crearea <strong>de</strong> soiuri conSUln şi industrializare, s-au înregistrat înLista Oficială a Soiuri/or în patru soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof, şi anume: ............"""'1.- ....,Nemere şi Luiza.Se prezintă <strong>de</strong>scrierea şi rezultatele obţinute după testarea acestor soiuri3 în 7 centre ale <strong>Institutul</strong>ui Naţional <strong>de</strong> Testare şi a SoiurilorToate cele patru soiuri sunt productive, au un conţinut în amidon cuprins Între 17­20%, sunt rezistente la nematozii cu din genul Gloho<strong>de</strong>ra rostochien<strong>si</strong>s, la râianeagră (Sinchitrium endoNoticum) şi la viroze. Soiurile au fost create prin hibridaresexuată, urmată <strong>de</strong> selecţie clonală individuală. La stabilirea genitorilor s-a ţinut cont'conţinutul în substanţă uscată, rezistenţa la llematozi, rezistenţa la viroze şi, nu înU"'''JlU .......... rînd, <strong>de</strong> capacitatea <strong>de</strong> producţie.După stabilirea genitorilor s-a unnat schema cla<strong>si</strong>că <strong>pentru</strong> anleliorareaîn câmpul <strong>de</strong> la şi scherua selecţiei <strong>de</strong> menţinere în câmpulla Apa Roşie.'•• \


JILJIA.......LC'.L.....''"-'JIl...< ŞI DESOlunJle au fost prin hibridare sexuată urmată <strong>de</strong> selecţie c10nală..,"'.nJl...."'JUL.... schemei cla<strong>si</strong>ce <strong>de</strong> atneliorare cartof. (Bozeşan, 2002).meto<strong>de</strong>i <strong>de</strong> lucru au fost:punct <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re al calităţilor tehnologice şi fiziologice<strong>de</strong> al soiului nou creat.hltlndlare:a sexuată şi incontinuare urmărindu-setoate etapele cla<strong>si</strong>ce: seminceri,VP:Of';1t~tliVf'; <strong>de</strong>scen<strong>de</strong>nţi, culturi cOluparative <strong>de</strong> orientare, culturi comparative<strong>de</strong> concurs, trei testare în reţeaua ISTIS.);> omologarea şi înregistrareaREZULTATE....""""...JU'.oYJLI'....... - a fost înregistrat în Lista Oficială a Soiurilor în anul 1999.(jene~llo~l!ia solului Redsec: M.P.I. 61-516-20 x CERTOCaracterele m()rIOI(~21,ce:TulpinaFrunza:lnftorescenţa:<strong>de</strong>schis, cusuperficiali<strong>de</strong>zvoltată, bogată in frunze cu numărmare <strong>de</strong> tulpinirăsfrrată, <strong>de</strong> culoare alb Iuaronie.muchiată, talie mare, semierectă,cu nmnar mare tulpinisemicompactă,cu fohole mari, <strong>de</strong> culoare ver<strong>de</strong> Îl!chiscimă <strong>si</strong>lnplă, cu peduncul <strong>de</strong>zvoltat, coroia <strong>de</strong> culoare violetantere <strong>de</strong> culoare galben <strong>de</strong>schis, cu polen mult.rotund, culoarea cojii roşie, culoarea pulpei galbenă, ochiI"Y47fi:!I"Utl la lumina difuză: au fonna oval alungită <strong>de</strong> culoare violacee, cuperozitate aIJ111llclerlta.Perioada <strong>de</strong> vegetaţie: 90 - 100 zile. Se ÎncadreazăÎn grupa soiurilor semitârziiSoiul COVAL - a fost înregistrat în Lista Oficialii a Soiurilor în anul 1999Genealogia Coval: EDBR x SUPERCaraceterele m(.rtIOl(ll2:lcee:Tufa:Radacina:Tulpina:Frunza:ver<strong>de</strong> clar.lnijlociu <strong>de</strong>zvoltată, rarefiată, cu numar mediu <strong>de</strong> tulpini.rasfirată, <strong>de</strong> culoare alb-maroniu<strong>de</strong>zvoltată,<strong>de</strong> talie luare, cu port semierect.este semicompactă cu faHole <strong>de</strong> mărime mijlocie, <strong>de</strong> culoareeste cimă <strong>si</strong>mplă, cu flori mari albe.VOL. XXXI51


LUlza MIKb, LJal1lela .t'U.t'A, bila L)/:"ZSUTuberculii: au fonna rotund - ovală, mari, bine conturaţi. Culoarea cojii <strong>si</strong>pulpei este galbenă, cu ochi superficiali.Colţi: la începutul <strong>de</strong>zvoltării <strong>de</strong> formă globulară, ulterior <strong>de</strong> forma butoiului,mugurele terminal mic, închis şi <strong>de</strong> culoare roşu-violaceu, cu ramificaţiilaterale lungi.Perioada <strong>de</strong> vegetaţie: este <strong>de</strong> 95 zile încadrîndu-se în grupa soiurilor semitârzii.Soiul NEMERE - a fost înregistrat în Lista Oficială a Soiurilor în anul 1999Genealogia soiului Nemere: M.P.!. 61-516-20 x CertaCaractere morfologice:Tufa: <strong>de</strong>zvoltată, foarte bogată în vreji, cu port semierect.Tulpina:viguroasă, bogată în frunze.Frunza: este cOlnpactă, <strong>de</strong> mărilne mijlocie, ver<strong>de</strong> închislnflorescenţa: cimă <strong>si</strong>mplă, corola <strong>de</strong> culoare albă cu flori mari, antere <strong>de</strong>culoare galben <strong>de</strong>schis, cu polen mult.Rădăcina~ răsfirată, <strong>de</strong> culoare alb n1aroniu.Tubercul: rotund, culoarea cojii galbenă, culoarea pulpei galbenă, cu ochiselniadanci.Perioada <strong>de</strong> v~getaţie: 85-95<strong>de</strong> zile.Se încadrează în grupa soiurilor semitârzii.Soiul LVIZA - a fost înregistrat în Lista Oficială a Soiurilor în anul 2000Genealogia solului Luiza: FANAL x OMEGACaractere morfologice:Tufa: <strong>de</strong>zvoltată, cu număr mediu <strong>de</strong> tulpini.Rădăcina: foarte <strong>de</strong>zvoltată. <strong>de</strong> culoare alb-maroniu.Tulpina: viguroasă, selnierectă, <strong>de</strong> culoare ver<strong>de</strong>~<strong>de</strong>schis.Frunza: <strong>de</strong> lnărilne mijlocie <strong>de</strong> culoare ver<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>schis.Inflorescenţa: cimă <strong>si</strong>mplă cu peduncul <strong>de</strong>zvoltat, corola <strong>de</strong> culoare albă, cuflori mari, cu antere <strong>de</strong> culoare galben <strong>de</strong>schis. 'Tubercul: oval, mare cu ochi superficiali, coaja galbenă, pulpa galbenă.'Colţii:<strong>de</strong> mărime mijlocie, la începutul <strong>de</strong>zvoltării lor <strong>de</strong> formă conică,ulterior <strong>de</strong> formă cilindrică, mugurele terminal <strong>de</strong> culoare roşie-violacee, cu ramificaţiilaterale scurte.Perioada <strong>de</strong> vegetaţie: 85-100<strong>de</strong> zile, se încadrează în grupa soiurilor semitârzii.52Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


Făinozitate (1-4)Umiditate (1-4)Structuraamidonului (1-4)2,0 2',0 1,8Clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate NB C BColorarea crudă(1-9)3,8Amidon fizic 17,54 ca <strong>de</strong>centre ale <strong>Institutul</strong>ui Stat Testarea şiperioadă 3 sunt prezentate înVOL XXXI53


Luiza MIKE, Daniela POPA, Ella DEZSO~ La soiul Redsec s-a obţinut o producţie lnaximă <strong>de</strong> 44,3 t/ha şi o producţiemedie <strong>de</strong> 29,1 t/ha.~ La soiul Coval s-a obţinuto producţie lnaximă <strong>de</strong> 47,7 t/ha, şi o producţie medie<strong>de</strong> 29,9 t/ha.~ La soiul Nemere s-a obţinut o productie maximă <strong>de</strong> 37,4 t/ha, şi o producţiemedie <strong>de</strong> 29,4 t/ha.Tabelull: Calitatea culinară a soiurilor: Redsec, Coval, Nemere, Luiza~ La soiul Luiza s-a obţinuto producţie lnaximă <strong>de</strong> 29,6 tlha, şi o producţie medie<strong>de</strong> 27,6 t/ha.Conform datelor prezentate în tab. 1, noile soiuri se caracerizează astfel:~ Soiul Redsec se încadrează în clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate A/B.Are calităţi culinaresuperioare, con<strong>si</strong>stenţămijlocie, fiind pretabil <strong>pentru</strong> majoritatea preparatelor culinare şi<strong>pentru</strong> obtinerea <strong>de</strong> chips. Acest soi se poate folo<strong>si</strong> atît <strong>pentru</strong> consum, cât şi· <strong>pentru</strong>industrializare.~ Soiul Coval se Încadrează în clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate B, având calităţi culinare bune.Poate fi folo<strong>si</strong>t atît <strong>pentru</strong> consum cât şi <strong>pentru</strong> industria producătoare <strong>de</strong> preparateculinare ca: chips, pOffilnes-frities şi chiar în industria amidonului.~ Soiul Nemere se încadrează în clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate C, are calităţi culinare superioare,gust bun, la fierbere tuberculii se crapă puţin, dar nu se sfărâmă şi se comportă bine laprepararea <strong>de</strong> chips. PQate fi folo<strong>si</strong>t atît <strong>pentru</strong> consum cât şi <strong>pentru</strong> industrializare.~ Soiul Luiza se ÎncadreazăÎn clasa <strong>de</strong> calitate B. Are calităţi culinflre bune, gustbun, se comportă bine la prepararea <strong>de</strong> chips. Se pretează atât <strong>pentru</strong> consum cât şi<strong>pentru</strong> industria amidonului.Tabelul 2. Rezistenţa la boli şi dăunători a soiurilor Redsec, Coval, Nemere, LuizaIVirusul răsuciriiSoiul i Virusul y" I ManăfrunzelorNotaNotaCalificativI Calificativ Nota Calificativmedie medie MedieRedsecRezistenta i 1 Rezistenta996Relativ II foarte ridicata ' I foarte ridicata I I rezisten~1I Rezistenta i MijlociuCaval 91 ridicata I 8 I Rezistent 1 5,I sen<strong>si</strong>bilNemere I 6,5Luiza 8,5-l--I Rezistenta I !Rezistenta I Relativmiilocie i 76i mo<strong>de</strong>ratai rezistentRezistenta8,5IRezistentaRelativ6foarte ridicata foarte ridicata rezistentINote:1-2 - foarte sen<strong>si</strong>bil9 - foarte rezistent54Anale 1.C.D.C.S.Z.


Noi soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof create la Staţiunea <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong>Datele prezentate în 2 noilerezistenţeila boli:);> Soiul Redsec arerezistent la lnana pe frunze şi ~~~'_L''''~LL.nematodul cu);> Soiul Coval este rezistent la râia ....""... ~JL,""•.UHIA~Vj,'"şi tuberculi, cu rezistenţămijlocie la~ Soiul Nemere este rezistent lafrunze şi tuberculi, cu rezistenţă111ijlocie la virusurile Y şi} Soiul Luiza este mijlociu <strong>de</strong> sen<strong>si</strong>bil la manapela virusul Y şi virusul răsucirii frunzelor,şi la .... .,.',VlT.r),,1nmana peSoiurile nou create la SCDepf()Ou,cţl1e, suntvaloroase din punct <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re al rezlstt~nţl~letapa actuală este <strong>de</strong> o importanţănerespectarea rotaţiei culturilor şiPrin conţinutulmare <strong>de</strong> substanţălnCLUSlcne ŞIindustrializare care pot fi cultivate în slstelTIÎn ve<strong>de</strong>rea promovăriiîn producţie, s-au loturi <strong>de</strong>lnonst.ratlve în UAll',","'A'"""localităţidin România.În ve<strong>de</strong>rea promovării ca soiuri pentnl llU.....It..."' ..JLlUl.ll."'......înfiinţatloturi <strong>de</strong>monstrative în zona Făgăraş şi la se ROCLIP SA ­În prezent se dispune <strong>de</strong> rnaterial <strong>pentru</strong> plantare din categoria OU)lg1ca nr""h~':T~ 1,s-a reluat ciclul menţinerii la Centrul Apa Roşie.BIBLIOGRAFIE1. Bozeşan, 2002. Realizări şi perspective privind j;;."".....""'".........cartofului/ Achievements and prospects ofpotato gentics aud IJn~edllnj!'.LAJ&lA'·"""'"Braşov,voI XXIX (volumjubiliar), p. 16-36;2. Draica, C., Gh. Olteanu şi 1cartofîn România/Strategy ofpotato breeding inIV, p. 25-41·3. Mike, Luiza, 2001. Soiul <strong>de</strong> cartof Redsec/ Potato AnaleleICPC Braşov, voL XXVIII, p. 25-30;4. Mike, Luiza, 1. Bozeşan, N. Galfi, D. A. A. IleanaDiana Viciu, 2000. Soiuri şi linii <strong>de</strong> cartof pntru consum şi industrializare create laSCPC Tg. Secuiesc / Potato clones and varieties bred at SCPC Tg. AnaleleICpe Braşov, voI. XXVII, p. 27-36.VOL. XXXI55


1: '--" .... L ........CU2: A"-""0h'~UA''''''''Luiza1: ULJ.''-'U''"" Redsec, Nemere, Luiza56Anale rc.D.c.S.Z.


SUMMARYvariety is bred in the Maritsa Vel[!etaOJleofinbreeding 1186 x S.cIane selection. It is approved by the ExecutiveSeed Control, Sofia in 2004.The variety fonns frOlTI 12 to 14 tubers pershallow eyes and yellow flesh, with veryEmilia NACHEVAMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, BulgariaE-mail: e_nacheva@hotmail.com""e"',,,,..,,·'" lIlstltUtlC. Plovdiv as aan,p;'lnp,,, """''''''''L''F,. Approbationpossess russet gene for proces<strong>si</strong>ng. Mid-Iatevariety suitable for mid-early and late production. It i8 characterized withyield (over 3000 kg/dka). Suitable for meÎChamz(~(1It has mo<strong>de</strong>rate re<strong>si</strong>stance to virusre<strong>si</strong>stance to(Phythophtora infestans) and very re<strong>si</strong>stance to COlnmonand rhizoctoniose (Rhizoctonia The matter content is within16-170/0 and reducing sugars 0.15-0.20%. It possesses excellent taste "-I ••U~lUL.H""",i8 for fresh and H.-,,~n{"n_lrT1!I'·{' ootatoe:s. It is storedvery well during winter-spring season.words: breeding varieties~ f'r..:>.-"U""''''''''''''U'U'U'nrp'C'P?'\t the areas, are occupied potatoesBulgaria are over 500 000 dka, with a for an increase. main directions oftheir production are early, and late, cultivation as a crop by summerplanting,production of seed material. The early production is done by cultivation the plains,along the river valley aud around the big towns and tile mid-early and late ones - in hillyand upland zones.The diverse and often extreme conditions (Petkova, oftheindividual regions, the high infectious background in the country (Muletarova, Nacheva,1995) and propagation coefficient ofthe crop impose the use of a great set ofVoi. XXXI 57


mllw NACHbVAvarieties. The variety structure of our potato production is presented mainly by Dutchand German breeding, while the Bulgarian varieties are un<strong>de</strong>r lO per cent.The area augmentation and potato consumption in Bulgaria, the increasedrequirements ofgrowers, consumers, processors and the limited set ofBulgarian varietiesfor the particular production directions imposed the <strong>de</strong>velopment ofnew potato varietiesfor consumption and industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng with high biological potential for yie1d andquality, re<strong>si</strong>stant to biotic and abiotic factors ofstress and meeting the national peculiarities,<strong>de</strong>manding buyer's taste (Nacheva, 2002).The purpose ofthe present study is to be performed agrobiological and economicevaluation ofthe characters and qualities ofthe new variety Rozhen, bred in the MaritsaVegetable Crops Research Institute.MATERIAL AND METHODSThe variety Rozhen is bred in the Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute,Plovdiv, from author team - research worker Dr, Stephka Mouletarova, research workerDr. Emilia Nacheva and senior research worker Stoil Kalfov. It is <strong>de</strong>ve10ped as a resultofinbreeding in line 1186 (Katadin x S. sy<strong>si</strong>mbrifolium) and followed individual cloneselection. Morphological characteristics ofthe new variety inclu<strong>de</strong>s characters groun<strong>de</strong>don the methods of the Executive Agency for Plant Variety Testing, Approbation andVariety Maintenance for Distinction, Homogeneity and Stability which is harmonizedwith the UPOV requirements. For testing ofthe productive potential ofthe variety Rozhenis set three-factor field experiment by block method in four replications at drilling distance75/30 cm and <strong>si</strong>ze ofthe experimental plot 250 m Z • The following factors were studied:A - genotypic differences with 2 treatments: variety Rozhen and a control for themid-Iate group ofmaturity variety Agria.B - year of study: 1998 - 2000C - ecological regions with three classes: Plovdiv's region, located in the Highthracianplain, along the Maritsa river valley, altitu<strong>de</strong> 160 m; region ofthe village ofPavelsko,located in Rodopes mountain at altitu<strong>de</strong> 600 m; the region ofpeak Pashaliitsa, <strong>si</strong>tuated inRodopes mountain at altitu<strong>de</strong> 1600 m.The planting in the individual ecological zones is carried out in the beginning ofMarch, April and the second halfofMay, respectively, with planting material receivedfrom ourupland base in the village ofPavelsko and the harvesting was done during July,September and October. During the vegetation are ma<strong>de</strong> observations for the occurrenceofthe main phenophases ofpotato plants and is estimated the continuation ofvegetationperiod from planting ta drying ofabove-ground mass. The response ofsusceptibility atnatural background for infestation to fungal diseases Ieafand tuber blight (Ph. Infestans),common scab (Streptomyces scabies), rhizoctoniose (Rhizoctonia solani) by recordingthe extent ofdamages by 0-4 scale (Mckiney) was studied. The field re<strong>si</strong>stance ta viraldiseases PLRV (potato leaf roll virus), PVX (potato virus X), PVY (potato virus Y) i8<strong>de</strong>termined by recording the in<strong>de</strong>x ofdamage (0-9 scale).58 Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


f(oznen - a new f'Ulganan P0lalu vaneey Slluarlelur Jn:sn cunsumpuun anu processmgAt harvesting ofthe treatments are recor<strong>de</strong>d the characters tuber number per hill,tuber weight per hill (kg), tuber shape (length x 1001 diaIneter), eye <strong>de</strong>pth (1-9 scale),standard and total productive (kg/dka), percentage standard produce.Ofan average sample from 20 tubers is <strong>de</strong>tennined dry matter contents (by weight),starch (calculated by Reiman) aud reducing sugars (Shoorl - Reggenbogen) from eachtreatment are prepared chips, French and boiled potatoes to which 1S ma<strong>de</strong> a paneltest on the indices appearance, aroma, texture and taste.AH data are processed statistically (Lakin, 1990).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe results from the balance ofthe potato produce in Europe, where over 41% ofit is inten<strong>de</strong>d for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng (Reust et al, 1997) and in Bulgaria, where prior tothis moment there are no own specialized varieties for chips and French f<strong>de</strong>s indicatethe neces<strong>si</strong>ty from breeding for improvement ofchemical and technological aswell as organoleptie qualities ofBulgarianvarieties. With regard to this as starting materialfor the Rozhen breeding are used the variety Katadin and the species S. sy<strong>si</strong>mbrifolium.The mother form (Katadin) 1S inc1u<strong>de</strong>d inthe pedigree ofthe new variety (Fig. 1) mainlybecause ofits excellent taste qualities, adaptability for proces<strong>si</strong>ng in chips and Frenchfries, re<strong>si</strong>stance to drought, viruses X, Y, A, S and the Ied colour of its skin. It isdistinguished by high pIoductivity, adaptability and storability for the soil and climatieeonditions ofBulgaria. A paft ofthc shortcomings ofthis varicty - suscept~bility to Ieafand tuber blight (Ph. infestans), common scab (Streptomyees scabies), rhizoctoniose(Rhizoctonia solani) and the IeafrolI virus PLRV we have tried to improve by includingofthe S. sy<strong>si</strong>n1brifolium species. The previous studies carried out in the Maritsa VegetableCrop Research Institute showed that it is characterized with re<strong>si</strong>stance to potato lateblight, viruses X and Y and high re<strong>si</strong>stance to freezing (up to - 12°C). The received as aresuIt ofhybridization betweenthese two parents progeny is distinguished with reachdiver<strong>si</strong>ty offorms having differentproductivityandcombinationofthe characters requiredby us. With the most favourable combination ofmorphological, economical, chemicaland technological, and organoleptic qualities is characterized line 1186 in the inbreedingprogeny ofwhich 1S selected the variety Rozhen.Rozhen CIIIl411-------inbreeding118624642Katadin40568S.sy<strong>si</strong>mbrifoliumOriginofRozhenVOL. XXXI59


l:!-mllla NAC'Hl:!-VAThe sprout ofthe new variety is mid-large, wi<strong>de</strong>ly-cylindrical, red-purple, with mediuminten<strong>si</strong>ty of anthocyanin discolouration and weak pubescence in the base. The tip issmall, open and medium length ofthe lateral shoots. The plant is medium high to high,erected, leafy. The stems are thick, vital, with strong anthocyanin discolouration. Theleaves are large, green, medium open <strong>si</strong>lhouette and curly, with anthocyanine pigmentationofthe midrib and the young leaflets. The midrib, terminalleaflet and the lateralleafletsare characterized with comparatively high frequency of the secondary leaflets. Thevariety Rozhen is characterized with medium to high inten<strong>si</strong>ty ofthe blossoming <strong>de</strong>pendingon the saH and climatic conditions, red-violet flowers and typical anthocyanine pigmentationalong the bud, the flower stalk and the inner part of the coloured flower. Frequent1yproduce berries with specific conic shape and strongly tapered tip, which is one oftheITlain characters for variety distinction. The root system 1S well <strong>de</strong>veloped, tuber-bearingshoots are short and the cluster tidy. The variety forms 12 to 14 tubers per cluster. Thetubers are large, uniform in shape, long-oval with shaUow eyes and yellow flesh withvery good culinary and market qualities. The skin Is red, slightly rough with the presenceofrusset gene, which is correlatively related with the high suitability ofRozhen for industrialproces<strong>si</strong>ng and is one ofthe characters for variety distinction.The sun1marized data from agrobiological study ofthe varieties Rozhen and Agriashow con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rable differences in the expres<strong>si</strong>on of some principle morphologicalcharacters (Table 1). In comparison with the control Rozhen distinguishes by greaternumber of stems per plant (4.6) and greater tuber number per stern (2.7) as a result ofwhich in one cluster forms 4 tubers more than Agria but with lower average weightg). Excluding the character stem number per plant variation coefficients of theremaining are lower in variety Rozhen, which is an indication for its relatively higherstability in the ehange of the environment conditions. The average tuber weight perc1uster in variety Rozhen is by 133 g higher compared to the control. Because of thegenotypic homogeneity of the potato varieties follow that the recor<strong>de</strong>d eomparativelyhigh variability of this character in both varieties (CV = 29.1 - 32.1 %) is due to theeffect ofthe ecological factors and the genotype x environment interaction. In this waythe observed phenotypic variability by years and ecological zones ofthe character totalyield could be also explained (Fig. 2). The prooffor the ma<strong>de</strong> suppo<strong>si</strong>tion is found in theresults from the performed three-factorial analy<strong>si</strong>s ofvariance (Table.2). Data from theanaly<strong>si</strong>s ofthe varianee show that the differences in the productivity are <strong>de</strong>fined by thedifferent inheritance potential ofboth varieties. The strength ofinfluence ofthis factor 1S12.7%. Despite ofthe genotypic <strong>de</strong>termination of the studied character a eon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rableeffect on it exert the environment conditions. The phenotypic variation ofthe productivityin tested varieties is due to agreat extent to soH and climatie differences in the regions ofcultivation (510/0) and the interaction ofthe genotype with the faetors year and ecologicalzone (9.7%). The conditions ofyear though proved are characterized by lower strengthofinfluence (4.5°,/o}60Anale 1. C.D. C.S.z.


Rozhen - a new rulgarian potato variety suitaNe for .fresh consumption and proces<strong>si</strong>ng1Morphological characteristics ofvarieties .ll'-'-,L...ILt....ucCharactersNumber of stems per plant 4.6Number of tubers el' lant 2.7Number of tubers er hl!L--f-_....;:1=2=.4_=-_-----f-_~:..::.:.__._+----'=-.:..;;...--l_--=-=---_1Standard tuber number el' hill 9.5Nonastandard tuber number per 2.9hillAverage tuber weight (g) 74.3Average tuber weight per hillk0.75621.529.120.7U.OThree-factorial analy<strong>si</strong>s ofvariance oftotalofF-value*** P L 0.001VOL. XXXI


Emilia NACHEVARozhenAgriaI200015001.\1%Fig 2. Total productivity ofvarieties Rozhen and AgriaIn comparison ofthc values ofthe arithmetical means ofboth varieties (Table3.) are established differences not only in total but also in their standard productivity.Rozhen is distinguished by higher percentage of standard produce (93.4%) as a62Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


f(ozllen - a new t'ulgarian pulato variety sUllaNeIresh consumplion and proces<strong>si</strong>ngresult of which surpasses the total yield of the control by 17.30/0 and the standardone by 21.9%. The advantage of the new variety 1S the re<strong>si</strong>stance to fungaidiseases - common scab (Streptomycestuber blight (Ph.Jnfestans),rhizoctoniose (Rhizoctonia solani) (0.9, 0.83,0.95 and 0.67) compared to the control(3.85, 1.95~ 1.07,2.1) and relatively high field re<strong>si</strong>stance to viral diseases.The results from the chemical analy<strong>si</strong>s ofthe tubers (Table 4.) show that Rozhenis characterized by in<strong>si</strong>gnifican't lower content of dry matter (22.6%) and starch(16.9%) than Agria (23.1; 17.3%). The recor<strong>de</strong>d values ofboth indices \,;VJlH!J'.!""I,'Vlmeet chemical and technological requiren1ents for the production ofchips and Frenchfries and clas<strong>si</strong>fy the varieties as suitable for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng. An additionaladvantage ofthe new variety is the triple lower ofreducing sugars (content O.compared to the control (0.48%) as a result of which the obtained in fryingproducts are distinguished by inten<strong>si</strong>vely gol<strong>de</strong>n yellow color and receive excellentorganoleptic evaluations (4.44, 4.35). The performed sensory analy<strong>si</strong>s ofpotatoes show higher panel test nlark (4.07) for Rozhen appearing aconsequence oflower expressed flouriness and very good taste qualities.Economic characteristics ofvarieties Rozhen and AgriaTable 3CharactersRozhenx± sdAgriax± sdDuration ofvegetation period 124.3 ± 9.7 127.5 ± 10.8Standard yield (kgldka) 2989 ± 521 2452 ± 549Total yield (kgldka) 3200 ± 609 2728 ± 731% standard produce 93.4 ± 2.1 89.9 ± 2:2 .-Standard yield compared to control 121.9 100Total yield compared to control Il7.3 100Re<strong>si</strong>stance to rhizoctomose 0.67 ± 0.30 2.10 ± 0.25Re<strong>si</strong>stance to common scab 0.90 0.10 3.85 ± 1.30Re<strong>si</strong>stance to leafblight 0.83 ± 0.07 1.95 ± 0.47Re<strong>si</strong>stance to tuber blight 0.95 ± 0.05 1.07 ± 0.10Re<strong>si</strong>stance to PLRV 7.7 ± 1.05 5.8 ± 1.8Re<strong>si</strong>stance to PVX 7.1 ± 0.65 8.2 ± l.10 IRe<strong>si</strong>stance to PVY 7.3 ± 0.60 8.2 ± 0.95VOL. XXXI63


Emilia NACHEVATable 4Chemical-technological and organoleptic characteristics ofvarieties Rozhen andAgriaCharactersRozhenAgriax± sd x± sdDry matter contents (%) 22.6 ± 2.32 23.1 ± 2.94Starch contents (%) 16.9 ± 1.44 17.3 ± 1.57Reducing sugar contents (%) 0.16 ± 0.024 0.48 ±0.082Quality ofboiled potatoes 4.07 ± 0.61 3.60 ± 0.55Quality ofchips 4.44 ± 0.53 4.13 ± 0.48Quality ofFrench fries 4.35 ± 0.58 3.95 ± 0.47CONCLUSIONSThe agrobiological evaluation ma<strong>de</strong> ofthe potato variety Rozhen show that 1S bredan original genetic plasm characterized with valuable morphological characters. Thehigher productive potential of the new variety, its re<strong>si</strong>stance to sonle economicallyimportant for the country diseases and the improved chemical and technological, as wellas taste qualities give liS a reaso!} to guarantee its competitive power an Bulgarianmarket.REFERENCES1 Lakin G., 1990. Biometrics Higher school, Moscow, 352.2 Muletarova, S:, E ..Nacheva, 1995. Monitoring ofthe viral diseases on potatoesthe main seed productive regions. Higher Institute ofAgriculture~Plovdiv,ScientificSes<strong>si</strong>on ofJubilee october Scientific Works, v.IlI, book 2, 15-18.3 Nacheva, E., 2002. Variability and inheritance ofthe productivity inFI potato hybrids.First sympo<strong>si</strong>um of horticulture, Skopie, 20-24 October, 2002. Sympo<strong>si</strong>umproceedings.357-362.4 Petkova V., E.Nacheva, 2001. Effect ofhigh temperature and drought onchlorophyllfluorescence parameters in potato varieties and acces<strong>si</strong>ons. Scientific researchesofthe union ofscientists-Plovdiv. 30 November 2001.75-82.5 Reust W., Winiger F., Maag W., 1997. Survey ofnew potato varieties for the foodindustry. Results of the main trials of new varieties for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng in1993-1995 (series 65). Revue Suisse d Agriculture 1997,29:2, 85-89.6 Staikov. G., 2002. The role ofintroduction for <strong>de</strong>velopment ofpotato production inBulgaria.Scientific Ses<strong>si</strong>on ofJubilee 2002-Sadovo. II 219-222.64 Anale rc.D.c.s.z.


J


SANSORYANALYSISPROCESSINGBULGARIANGalina PEVICHAROVAi, Emilia NACHEVA 2Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, BulgariaIE-mail: gpevicharova@abv.bg2E-mail: e_nacheva@hotmail.comThe organoleptic properties of seven early lines of potatoes, processed in threetreatments - boiled, French fries and chips were evaluated. The sensory analy<strong>si</strong>s wasperformed by fol1owing characters: eolour, aroma, texture and taste. For boiledpotatoes the characters external appearanee, frtaNlity and stareh taste weread<strong>de</strong>d. best complex evaluation ofboiled potatoes was obtained in line E whichwas distinguished by homogeneous yellow colour, strong aroma and taste, having chestnutnuance, uniform, melting during consumption texture and lack ofstarcb taste. The tuberswere not friable and their surface remained smooth after peeling ofthe skin. The abovementionedline as weU as the lines E 78 and E 686 obtained high total sensory evaluationin proces<strong>si</strong>ng as French fries. The colour ofthe slices was inten<strong>si</strong>vely yellow, bumingfree the texture was ten<strong>de</strong>r without a dividillg line between a core AE 112 was the n10st suitable for chips. It had uniformly gol<strong>de</strong>n pigmentation, veryfraii and crisp texture. The best lines at least in one ofboth experimental years from thethree ofheat treatlnent did not differ in total sensory evaluation from thequality Sante. The correlation between the dry matter content and sensoryevaluation for chips was <strong>si</strong>gnificant (r = 0.669) while in boiled potatoes and French fhe<strong>si</strong>t was in<strong>si</strong>gnificant. A relationship between the reducing sugars content and total sensoryevaluation for the three treatments ofpotato tuber proces<strong>si</strong>ng was not established.words: boiled potatoes, French fries, chips, organoleptic evaluationINTRODUCTIONbreeding program of potatoes for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng in l\laritsa VegetableResearch Institute 1S directed to creation cultivars with complex properties,satisfying concurrently aU participants at the market. The producers wishing to cultivatehigh yielding cultivars with <strong>de</strong>fined Inorphological properties re<strong>si</strong>stant to unfavourablebiotic and abiotic factors are on the one hand. Their purpose 1S a sure profit after produceselling to be obtained. The consun1ers are on the other hand. Their requirements aredirected mainly to the health safety (toxic elements free), nutritive value and taste propertiesofthe potato tubers.66Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


""'VRJl.L.......H"I-'UVJl." both for incoming wholesome componentsthey provoke by their arOlua, colour andpuree and other products. GoodreC:i1l2'.at],On as a raw material for different directions ofn.""'·~r'I·lnnwhen thesensory analy<strong>si</strong>s isThe organoleptic propertiesof the breeding process.productivity,In thisevaluationsMATERIALSI\lIETI-IODSJ.JLH,U''''''!Jll.'-' rangepn~parat:LOn of dataVOL. XXXI67


VUllflU r L r ll..-n/11\U r /:1, LmltlU IV/:I Gr1J:. Y/:1(Pevichrova and Manuelyan, 1995). The correlation coefficients and the coefficients ofvariability were calculated (Lakin, 1990).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONIn both experimental years the studied potato breeding lines distinguished byhomogenous and inten<strong>si</strong>ve colour after boiling oftubers (Table 1). This sensory characterwas evaluated the highest. Comparatively high were also the average values for thecharacterfriability. Great amplitu<strong>de</strong>s were observed during the period ofinvestigatîon- from 2.70 ta 4.10 for line E 78 and from 2.95 ta 4.10 for line E 112. The variation învalues ofthis character most probably is due to the relationship genotype x envîronment.The most stabile was the expres<strong>si</strong>on in lines E 419 and E 292 in which irrespective ofclimatic conditions ofcultivation the tubers after boiling remained with smooth surfaceand with preserved shape. Aroma in individuallines showed by non-typical or slightlycaught ta typical, strongly expressed. Taste panelists were unanimous that line L292 themost properly meets their requirements in this respect.Table 1. Sensory characters ofboiled potatoesLineIt':l! III ~ II·._0...,' (l) (J'l II 5 .cs i;E ~I1] g I


Sansory analy<strong>si</strong>s ofearly rulga1'ian pulalo lines 101' p1'uces<strong>si</strong>ng!tasteofboiled potatoes is an un<strong>de</strong><strong>si</strong>redlow evaluatiol1s in realization ofpanel taste. In the studied fromstarch taste was expressed establishment ofsharp <strong>de</strong>viationscharacter texture the not con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rably which was confirmedalso from low values for both experimental years (TableAs a the texture with low firmness. The coefficients ofvariabilityfor taste were low. Regardless close values line E 292 excee<strong>de</strong>dother in 2003 also the control cultivar Sante. Itdistinguished by specific,uniform, very pleasant taste chestnut nuance.Data for total evaluation showed that the studied lines are very close in sensoryqualities (Fig. 1). The <strong>si</strong>ngle statistical difference was proved between E 112 and E 292,which carne up as a lea<strong>de</strong>r in this group. The proved by Duncan's multiple range testin<strong>si</strong>gnificance of<strong>si</strong>x lines and cultivar Sante, which we accepted for favourite in respectto the quality, is anindicator for the presence ofgood organoleptic characteristics. Furtherrealization ofthe lines wiU <strong>de</strong>pend to agreatextent from theirproductive aud morphologica~potential.Figure 1. Total sensory evaluation ofprocessed potatoestexture was theproces<strong>si</strong>ng ofthe lines in Frenchfries. The coefficients variability between tIle individual samples were with valuesun<strong>de</strong>r 6.10 % in bothyears (Table 2). The highest evaluations took lines E292, E 78 aud E 686 in which the fexture was ten<strong>de</strong>r, without Iimit between core andsurface. Comparatively low was variation between the lines also by the charactertaste. Greater was observed in The slices line E 292 distinguishedby and homogeneous while in the other lines includingalso the control Sante there were ends. The total organolepticevaluation <strong>de</strong>termine D 112 and S 419 as lnore unsuitable for proces<strong>si</strong>ng in Frenchfries, while the line as lea<strong>de</strong>rs carne up E 292, E 78 and E 686 (Fig. 1).VOL. XXXI69


Galina PEVICHAROVA, Emilia NACHEVATable 2. Sensory characters of French friesLine~§~~ .~.=;~2002D 112 3.30 3.15 3.65 3.60 3.50E 78 3.75 3.65 3.50 3.55 3.60E419 3.10 2.90 3.30 3.20 3.15E 112 4.05 4.00I 3.65 3.75 3.65E292 4.30 4.10 3.90 3.70 3.75E606 3.80 3.90 3.90 3.80 3.85E686 3.75 4.05 3.65 3.80 3.80Sante 3.95 3.90 3.95 4.10 3.95Mean±sd 3.75±O.39 3.71±O.45 3.69±O.22 3.69±O.26 3.66±O.25CV(%) 10.38 12.05 ! 6.05 ! 6.98 I 6.842003D 112 3.951 3.75 I 3.85 I 3.70 3.75E 78 4.50 4.40 4.20 4.15 4.40E419 4.15 ! l3.85 4.10 4.20 4.25E 112 3.75 4.05 3.80 3.70 3.85E 292 4.30 4.60 4.35 4.30 4.35E606 4.25 4.25 4.05 4.05 4.00E686 4.15 4.10 4.25 4.00 4.15Sante 3.75 3.45 3.80 3.75 3.80Mean±sd 4.1O±O.27 4.06±O.37 4.05±O.2\ 3.98±O.24 I 4.07±O.25CV (%) 6.49 9.12 I 5.28 5.96 6.26CV - coefficient ofvariability; sd- standard <strong>de</strong>viationAn impres<strong>si</strong>on is ma<strong>de</strong> that in 2003 the evaluations for an sensory characters arehigher compared to these in 2002. Most probably this is due to the used for frying cookingoiI. In the first year was used palm oiI, which after cooling became solid and formed filmon the surface ofthe slices and in a sense, created difficulties for the taste panelists. Thecooking oiI "Olineza" eliminated these shortcomings in 2003.For the same reason in 2003 the sensory evaluations ofthe lines after proces<strong>si</strong>ng oftheir tubers in chips are higher (Table 3). The lowest is the variation of the characteraroma. The thin potato rings in frying take agreat part ofthe fat aroma, which disguisethe real aroma ofthe chips. As a result the taste panelists failed ta cateh the <strong>si</strong>gnificantdifferences between samples this charaeter.The colour is the most important sensory characteristics in production ofchips. Aninten<strong>si</strong>ve, gol<strong>de</strong>n-yellow, uniform colour without bums ofthe ends, in the core or radiallyis preferred. The most completely to these requirements respon<strong>de</strong>d lines E 112, E 78 andAnale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Sansory analy<strong>si</strong>s ofearly bulgarian potato lines for proces<strong>si</strong>ngD 112. However, lines D 112 aud E 78 had insufficiently ten<strong>de</strong>r and crisp texture whichhas reflected on the evaluation for taste and finally on total sensory evaluation (Fig. 1).It is interesting to be mentioned that the line E 112, which has obtained the lowestevaluations in panel test in boiled tubers is a lea<strong>de</strong>r in the group for making chips.The sensory characters of the potato products <strong>de</strong>pend to agreat extent of thechemical compo<strong>si</strong>tion oftubers. In the production ofFrench fries and chips the cultivarswith minimum reducing sugars content are preferred in reference to saving ofthe colourhomogeneity. The dry matter content should be higher which warrants for taking oflower oiI absorption and saving ofslice texture in frying.The reducing sugars in the studied early potato lines were with low values (Table4). During 2003 there was agreat drought, which resulted in prolougation ofthevegetationperiod and ma<strong>de</strong> conditions for conver<strong>si</strong>on ofthe rcducing sugars iuto starch.Table 3. Sensory characters of chipsLine~:::lo'OUII1II2002D 112 3.80 ·3.90 3.65 3.85 3.70E 78 4.25 4.05 4.05 3.90 4.05E 419 3.45 3.00 2.70 2.75 2.75E 112 3.90 3.85 4.40 4.35 4.15E 292 3.80 3.80 3.30 3.50 3.60E 606 3.70 1 3.40 3.95 3.90 3.75CV (%) 6.25 9.16 16.04 14.52 12.142003D 112E78E419E 112E292E606E686SanteMean±sdCV (%)4.454.153.954.304.254.103.904.204.17±O.194.514.153.903.404.154.053.703.154.203.84±O.3910.134.204.404.354.604.454.353.804.454.33±O.245.564.204.203.904.354.304.103.804.354.15±O.214.954.104.053.704.504.104.003.654.354.06±O.297.11CV - coefficÎent ofvariability; sd- standard <strong>de</strong>viationVOL. XXXI


Galina PEVICHAROVA, Emilia NACHEVAIt was not established a <strong>si</strong>gnificantbetween the total sensory evaluationand reducing sugars content afier proces<strong>si</strong>ng in fries, chips and boiled potatoes (Fig.According to Rodriguez-Saona and Wrolstad (1997) reducing sugars did not completelyexplain and predict colour quality, when it was presented in low concentrations (about < 60mgl100 g). Similarly to other authors (Sirtautaite et 1999) a correlation between drymatter content and total sensory evaluation in chips was established (Fig. 3). During bothexperimental years the correlation coefficients were with high values 0.760) and logica1lythe total correlation coefficient (r = 0.669) <strong>de</strong>fined the correlation as a <strong>si</strong>gnificant one.Table 4. Dry matter and reducing sugar content in raw potatoes2. Correlation between total sensory evaluation ofprocessed potatoes andreducing sugars content ofraw material3. Correlation between total sensory evaluation ofprocessed potatoes andmatter content of raw "",.,.1rnf-,-.""c


Sansory analy<strong>si</strong>s of early bulgarian poiata lines for proces<strong>si</strong>ngCONCLUSIONSOn the ba<strong>si</strong>s ofthe study the COI1CII1SHJ~ndifferences in tastecould be ma<strong>de</strong>. It is the best, whenof potato tubers areestimated in different directionsfor the breedingprocess, where is worked with agreat A.l"""AAV'VAand cultivars and a 10ss ofvaluable genotypes in one-<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>dsensory properties is pos<strong>si</strong>ble. Theperformance of panel test only one Df()Ce:ssed nrn,nnPT (for example chips) coul<strong>de</strong>liminate variants suitable for anotherexample boiledpotatoes or puree). The role of the sensory is to be covered pos<strong>si</strong>bly moreaspects ofvisual, olfactory and gustatory consumers. this wayit will really support the breeding and for the evaluation ofthenewly re1eased potato lines for 1n,rtncrM'll1 pf()CeSSln~.REFERENCES1 Dale,M.and Mackay, G. 1994. aud Potatogenetics. pp 285-3152 Duncan,D., 1955. Multiple range aud F-test. Biometrics Il: 1-423 Holm,E.,Orr,P., Johansen,R. as potatoesfor french fries and flakes. Potato 1-134 Lakin., 1990. Biometry. High school, Moskow5 Lovatti,L., Castagnoli,M., 1999. Evaluation of qualityapplied to breeding. Informatore Agrario 55:6 Pevicharova,G., Manuelyan,H. 1995. UUl....."'......v ........ ~1'l~l'\1~1'"<strong>si</strong>gnificant differences in their v.J'VJL'........,Science 1: 447-4537 Rodriges-Saona,L., R. 1997. Influence compo<strong>si</strong>tion on chipcolor quality. American Potato Joumal8 Segnini,S., Dejmek,P., Oste,R. 1999. KeJLaW[)llS.mpanaly<strong>si</strong>s of texture677-6909 Sirtautaite,S., Danilcenko,H., Konference:Jaunais Gad<strong>si</strong>mts un partika. Jelgava10 Thybo,A. and Martens,M. 1998.potatoes by multivariate dataVOI. XXXI73


valma f'.t,VJ~HAf(UVll. b/1lllla NllCHHVAANALIZA SENZORIALĂ A SOIURILOR TIMPURII DE CARTOFPENTRU INDUSTRIALIZARE DIN BULGARIARezumatAu fost evaluate proprietăţileorganoleptice a şapte linii <strong>de</strong> cartofprelucrate în treimoduri - fierţi, pommes-frites şi chips. Analiza senzorialăa avut următoareleelemente:culoarea, aroma, textura şi gustul. Pentru cartoful fiert, s-au adăugat caracteristicile:aspect exterior, sfărâmare şi gustul amidonului. Cea mai bună evaluare completă acartofilor fierţi s-a obţinut la linia E 292, care s-a distins prin culoarea galbenă omogenă,savoare şi gust <strong>de</strong>osebit, cu aromă <strong>de</strong> castane, prin textura uniformă, care se topeşte întimpul consumării şi prin lipsa gustului <strong>de</strong> amidon. Tuberculii nu au crăpatiar suprafaţalor a rămas netedă după în<strong>de</strong>părtarea cojii. Linia 11lai sus menţionată precum şi liniile E78 şi E 686 au avut o evaluare senzorială totală cu parametri calitate ridicaţi in ceeace priveşte prelucrarea sub fonnă <strong>de</strong> pOlnmes-frites. Culoarea feliilor a fost galben intens,fără înnegire iar textura a fost n10ale fără o linie <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>marcaţie între coajă şi pulpă. LiniaE 112 a fost cea mai potrivită <strong>pentru</strong> fabricarea chipsului. A <strong>de</strong>monstrat o pigmentareuniformă în auriu, o textură foarte fragilă şi crocantă. Cele mai bune linii din cel puţinunul dintre anii <strong>de</strong> experienţă cu cele trei variante <strong>de</strong> tratament teITI1ic nu au fost diferiteîn ceea ce priveşte evaluarea senzorială completă faţă <strong>de</strong> soiul n1artor Sante. Corelaţiadintre conţinutul <strong>de</strong> substanţă uscată şi evaluarea senzorială în cazul chipsului a fostsenlnificativă (r = 0.669) în tilnp ce <strong>pentru</strong> cartoful fiert şi pommes-frites a fostnesemnificativă. Nu s-a stabilit o relaţie Între conţinutul <strong>de</strong> zaharuri reducătoare şievaluarea senzorială totală<strong>pentru</strong> cele trei moduri <strong>de</strong> preparare telmicăa tuberculilor <strong>de</strong>cartof.Cuvinte cheie: cartof fiert, pommes frites, chips, evaluare organoleptică.Tabele1. Caracteristici senzoriale ale cartofului fiert2. Caracteristici senzoriale ale pOlYlmes-frites-ului3. Caracteristici senzoriale ale chips-urilor4. Conţinutul<strong>de</strong> substanţă uscată şi <strong>de</strong> zaharuri reducătoare la cartoful crudFiguri1. Evaluarea senzorială totală a cartofilor preparaţi: fiert, pommes-frites, chips.2. Corelaţia dintre evaluarea senzorială totală a cartofilor prelucraţi şi conţinutul <strong>de</strong>zaharuri reducătoaredin materia prin1ă3. Corelaţia dintre evaluarea senzorială totală a cartofului prelucrat şi conţinutul<strong>de</strong>substanţă uscată din cartoful crud74Anale l. C.D. C.S.z.


IInstitute for Potato ResearchAnatoly PODGAYETSKlYicrMr'nlhlr"ll Sciense; Nemishaive, Borodyanka07853 Ukraine; e-mail: upri@visti.comOn an extent 2000-2002forms with highlycontents ofstarch amonghybrids ofa potatoparticipation ofwild mexican Solanumbulbocastanum Dun. Presence ofa materia!with the contents ofstarch 1S tIlan at t!le best varieties - in aU years ofrealization ofresearches value ofthe Atthe same time,only the small amonnt created has contents of starch of14% and is lower. The wi<strong>de</strong> genetic ba<strong>si</strong>s ofthe created material has allowed to allocatethe combining contents with agronomical properties, forexample: sre<strong>si</strong>stance to virus high productivity, crap, biggerperplant and others.contents ofstarch, interspecificproperties.INTRODUCTIONOne oftheofvarieties ofastarch (Pyskun GJ.,as it1S established by many resem~Cherscreation highly starch it 1S caused ilietetraploid a nature ofvarieties, his contents at :s.tulJlcrOSm.TI(Ross H., 1986) Taking account that numerouscharacterized by the and contents ofpractice allows to create varieties lts contentsMATERIAL ANDIn research use <strong>si</strong>x-specificthen backcrosses: n {(S.acaule xS.bulbocastanum) x S.phureja} x S.<strong>de</strong>missum I xx S.tuberosum; fivespecifichybrids - I {(S.acaule x S.bulbocastanum) x S.phureja} x S.<strong>de</strong>missum I xS.tuberosum; four-specific - [(S.<strong>de</strong>missum xx S.andigenum] xS.tuberosum; x x S.tuberosum. Thecontents ofstarch productivity, marketability ofaU tubers aud commodity with<strong>si</strong>multaneous eount <strong>de</strong>termined on <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ties,theln tovisuall:'111',\prU1Ctro.n1701. XXXI75


Anatoly PODGAYETSKIYRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONAs a result ofours recearch created new ba<strong>si</strong>c selection material with participationof many wild and cultivated species~ in particular such to which the high contents ofstarch. The received data evi<strong>de</strong>nce to his high display among this material (tab. 1).Table 1.Distribution ofmultispecific hybrids according to the contents ofstarchMaterialMultispecific hybridsand them brckcossesPan (%) material with contents ofstarch, %Appreci- 14,014,1-1 16,1-1 18,1-2- 20,1-2- 22,1-2-24,0ated and and6,0 8,0 0,0 2,0 4,0lessmore2000 p ..334 7,5 12,0 23,1 25,7 22,5 6,9 2,3Standard varietiesMavka 18,1Lvovyanka 21,1Zarevo 22,3Multispecific hybridsand them brckcosses2001 p.278 12,2 14,7 26,6 20,2 18,0 4,3 4,0Standard varietiesMavka 18,7Lvovyanka 23,1Zarevo 23,22002 p.Multispecific hybridsand them brckcosses456 8,1 13,8 37,9 25,5 10,8 3,5 0,4Standard varietiesMavka 18,0Lvovyanka 19,8Zarevo 21,9Only the in<strong>si</strong>gnificant quantity ofhybrids has rather contents of starch (14% andare lower). The received data testify, that distribution a material on display ofpropertyon years not i<strong>de</strong>ntical. A modal class in 2000 was 18,1-20,0, and in the following - 16,1­18,0%. Various display ofproperty for this period have also standards varieties and onIyat varieties Mavka conotents ofstarch was approxinlately i<strong>de</strong>ntical. As opposed to stated,practically irrespective ofexternal conditions rather high and high contents ofstarch (it ismore than 180/0) characterizes nUlnerous interspecific hybrids. anyears it has accordinglyma<strong>de</strong>: 57,4; 46,5; 40,2%. For lneteorological a cOlnplex optimUln for accUlnulation ofstarch was 2002.76Anale r C.D. c.s.z.


lnvolvmg :iOlanum t'ulC'ocasmnumfU15" "0It is especially necessary to note,m2lteJlai has above thecontents ofstarch than in this respe24,0Re<strong>si</strong>stance againstlate blightRe<strong>si</strong>stance againstdry rotRe<strong>si</strong>stance againstpotato nemato<strong>de</strong>MultitubersOther nurseries14119,8':>"""""""'""o,.h, JL..JL"'......"."..." in conditionsAU....A .......' ..... among multitubers formsofa modai class changedto a materiaL Ifin 2000following only 16,1­speeially generatednrr\nprh., at materiala few less results are reeeived onmore) had 69 hybrids.an origin 87.791s5 oVOL. XXXI77


Anatoty YULi0Afbl::JK11Lvovyanka - 23,8%. Yet four hybri<strong>de</strong>s have excee<strong>de</strong>d behind the contents of starchvariety standart the Zarevo. That is, among the created material search form with highcontants ofstarch is pos<strong>si</strong>ble.analy<strong>si</strong>s ofthe received data allows to assert about <strong>si</strong>gnificant value for <strong>si</strong>nglingout backcrosses with the high contents of starch of SOlue parent forms. For exm;nple,only in one combination 90.691 (85.368s17-0 Gitte) four hybrids high display ofproperty.U.U.HU.''''.l concerns to a population 81.386s41 (77.277/3 oP551l02), muong studyprogenyis allocated such three forms. At faur combinations frequency hybri<strong>de</strong>s with high contantsof starch has tua<strong>de</strong> an two.It i8 established, 'that separate backcrosses compound interspecific hybrids allowto allocate fonus with high display ofan property ilTespective ofpollinater, that testifiesto presence at them balanced genom the control of the high contents to starch. Forexample, with participation backcrosses 85.568s9 it is allocated eight of 69 forms, or11,6%. Similar concerns to backcrosse 85.368s17. an four it Is with high contentsofhybri<strong>de</strong>s it is received with participation ofhybrids 81.459s15 and 91 1s2.only at involving in cros<strong>si</strong>ng offour backcrosses it 1S received 34,80/0 allocatedof hybrids. It is necessary to note, that due to the effective geneticofproperty ofparent fonns - interspecific hybrids, obtain valuable forms occurslrr'CSt)ectlv'C of varieties pollinaters, For example, pollinaters at cros<strong>si</strong>ng ismentioned backcrosse 85.568s9 were varieties: Gitte, Nelneshaevska 10 times,- <strong>si</strong>x times, and with 85.368s17: Gitte - 3 tilues, Volovetska - 2, Lvovyanka,backcrosse an interspecific hybrid - on one. It is necessary to note high phenotypicalhigh contents of starch alnong parent forms-backcrosses 85.568s9 and85.368s17, accordiugly 20,4 and 20,9%.Among 69 allocated hybrids frequency ofvarieties - pollinaters following: Volovetska- 24,6; Lvovyanka - 5,8%. Others as cOluponents cros<strong>si</strong>ng meet muchIt is established, that is with high contents ofstarch obtain forms in progeny of<strong>si</strong>x­"V""'-'.U.1'-' hybrids with an origin: [1 {(S.acaule x S,bulbocastanmn) x S.phureja} x S.<strong>de</strong>missumIx S.andigenum] x S.tuberosum - 40 fonus (58% from alI allocated to an property), five­'"'IJ'-",IJLI..L"" hybrids - I {(S.acaule x S.bulbocastanmn) x S.phureja} x S.<strong>de</strong>missum 1 xS.tuberosum (8,7%),-four-specific - [(S.<strong>de</strong>missmu x S.bulbocastanum) x S.al1digenum]x S.tuberosmll (17,4%), three-specific - (S.<strong>de</strong>luissum x S.bulbocastanmll) x S.tuberosum(15,9%). The <strong>de</strong>gree backcrosse the l11entioned secondary interspecific hybrids was:B 1, B2, B3 and even B4.Allocation is forms with high contents of starch pos<strong>si</strong>ble not only with usebackcros<strong>si</strong>ng, but also at use self-pollination. The received data testify, that the part ofthe allocated material is received with use last method. Moreover F2 may be the form oflTIother: hybrids 83.33s27, 83.58552, 83.192s5, 83.752s5 or as population a material forselections: backcrosses 88.1450s2, 88.1439s6, 88.1450s3, 88.1431 s44, 90.683/31 andothers.78Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


lnvolving Solanum hulrocastanum ty creati'"n o/ an tastc selectlon malerlal O} pOlalO wlln mgn ...It is known, that the contents of starch changes on external factors. However,these changes in the certain lneasure are caused by a genotype. So, among anappreciatematerial there are forms with <strong>si</strong>gnificant variability of an propety (the coeffitient ofvariations makes about 20%). Itconcems to such hybrids: 83.3327, 83.192s5, 91.318-2,91.765/15 and SGlne other. However~ fluctuations in display ofan propetyat a leve1 ofstandardvarieties Lvovyanka (V =7,8%) had such backcrosses: 81.397s50. 83A33s6~85.368s17, 89.721s81, 97.448s1 and others. Feature ofthe standard variety the Zarevonot only in existance the form with high contents of starch, but also related stabilitydisplay of property on years (V = 3,0%). A1TIOng appreciate material the <strong>si</strong>milarcharacteristic have: 90.662/15, 90.674/12, 85.4568s9, 96.977/3 and others, and atseparate forms the variation contents starch oftuber on years even was lower than at avariety the Zarevo. These are such backcrosses: 90.666/15,90.676/140, 98.1431s44.In table 3 the presenta data displays at fonn with high contents ofstarch ofotheragronomical properties. Except for two hybrids: 81.386s41 and 91.318-2 the presentationmaterial Is characterized high re<strong>si</strong>stance against virus diseases (the supreme than atstandards varieties). More half of sublnitted lnaterial (51,4%) has such characteristic,and once backcrosse 90.676/140 within three years had no symptoms ofvirus diseases.The combination in one hybrid high contents ofstarch and yield is very important.The received data evi<strong>de</strong>nce, that with use ofa material ofan interspecific origin it pos<strong>si</strong>bleto be ma<strong>de</strong>. At the maximal display ofproductivity among standards varieties at - the488g/plant, only 7 hybrids among present in the table have lower display ofproperty. Atthe same time, 13 hybrids are characterized by yield more a 600glplant. is, in anlaterial ofan interspecific origin the combination in one form point out prope~'1S pos<strong>si</strong>ble.Marketability of a yield is the i.mportant property of varieties of a fromtechnological, conSUlller and other <strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>s. Therefore value ofan ba<strong>si</strong>c selection material,varieties may be limited low display ofher. The received data testifY, that only one hybri<strong>de</strong>xceeds marketability of a yield the best in this respect standard variety Lvovyanka(93%). Two more hybrids: 86.293s47, 92.9s28 characterize <strong>si</strong>milar display ofproperty.However, it is necessary to note, that about halfselected for high contents ofstarch ofamaterial has marketability ofa yield of90% aud more, and it is higher than at other twostandards varieties.Despite ofuse of saturational cros<strong>si</strong>ngs for the most part ofhybrids it is peculiarmultitubers which is inherited from wild and cultural species. The received data evi<strong>de</strong>nceabout to rather easy cOlnbination in one fonn ofthis property and the high contents ofstarch. And, at 10 hybrids the quantity tubers on a plant has roa<strong>de</strong> 20 aud more, thatalmost is twice higher than at standards varieties.Oppo<strong>si</strong>te it is observed concerning average ware tuber weight. In this respect anyhybrid has not excee<strong>de</strong>d the standard variety the Zarevo and only two: 89.721 s81 and97.448s1 have close value.It is established, that behind a cOlnplex of agronomical properties the best are thefollowing with high contents of starch backcrosses: 85.291c12, 89.721c81, 90.663/22,90.676/140,91.51-52,91.765/31,96.963/30, 97.448s1 aud some other.VOL. XXXI79


00=The characteristic ofthe best a complex ofagronomical properties with highlycontants ofstarch multispecies hybrids (2000 2002):...::ll:::l~~oţJel~NRe<strong>si</strong>stance StarchNumber ofYield, Marketa-Average wareN hybrid Qrigin against virus content,· tuber5 perg/plant bility, % tuber weight, gdiseases, point %plant, pC581.386s41 77.277/3 x 551102 7,5 22,1 433 78 12 4481.386s65 Those same 8,6 22,1 622 78 24 3881.397550 - «- 8,7 21,5 519 69 22 5281.406527 77.277/0 x 65/26 8,3 20,2 578 85 16 5583.58552 80.4555 x Mavka 8,7 22,9 456 80 10 57~-83.19255 8035521 x Gitte 8,9 22,4 926 85 24 5183.43356 14··2518 x Gitte 8,9 21,6 421 79 14 5184.202515 81.386s28 x Gitte 8,7 20,8 540 77 15 5585.291512 ? 70.486/112 x 81.3865103 8,6 20,7 809 91 15 6185.368517 81.1686/8 x Gitte 8,8 20,9 491 78 16 4786.293547 81.37751 x Gitte 8,5 20,5 472 93 10 6286.56354 81.785512 x Hybridna 14 8,3 21,0 518 90 12 6388.730s3 84.209515 x Aguti 8,7 20,9 588 74 20 5188.1431544 F285.19510 8,8 20,5 554 77 23 4188.145053 F2 83.2419s26 8,7 20,1 635 87 22 43'89.721s81 85.1591s7 x Byelorus<strong>si</strong>an 3 8,6 21,1 567 95 10 7990.662/15 80.24s14 x Nemeshaevska 10 8,4 20,9 664 91 14 5990.663/22 80.24s14 x Volovetska 8,6 21,5 571 92 12 6790.666/25 81.386s97 x Volovetska 8,8 21,9 678 87 21 46


2§ţ"


A nalOly J-'UL!liA rJ:,18KlrCONCLUSIONSThus, the received data evi<strong>de</strong>nce, that for years of realization of researches onlythe in<strong>si</strong>gnificant part ofdifficult interspecific hybrids has rather low contents ofstarch(up to 14%). It confirms special value creation in this respect. Separate forms arecharacterized by good transfer ofproperty progeny, that allows to rec01nmend them forpractica! selection use. It first of alI backcrosses: 85.568s9 aud 85.368817. It isestablished, that forms with high conteuts ofstarch can be created backcrosses secondaryinterspe9ific hybrids (more often) or with use of self-pollination, cros<strong>si</strong>ng backcrossesamong themselves. Behind a variation of the contents of starch an years the materialcon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rably differs among themselves, however at some fanns display of an propetystably (V = 3% and are lower). The opportunity ofa combination in one form ofthe highcontents ofstarch and re<strong>si</strong>stance to virus, high yield multitubers re<strong>si</strong>stance ta late blightand other properties both separately, and in aggregate is proved.REF'ERENCES1. Pyskun G.I. Selection of a potato on the high contents of starch: stages, results.Material the international conference. Minsk, 2003, P. 40-46.2. Ross H. Potato breedsng - problems and perspectives. Paul Parey, Berlin andHamdurg, 1986, 132 p.3. Podgayetskiy A.A. Use genofond a potato for introduce valuable genes at creationofan initial selection material. Dis., Kiev, 1993,319 p.IMPLICAREA SPECIEI SĂLBATICESOLANUM BULBOCASTANUMCREAREA UNUI MATERIAL DE SELECŢIE LA CARTOF CU UNCONŢINUT RIDICAT DE AMIDONRezumatDupă o perioadă <strong>de</strong> cercetare <strong>de</strong> 3 ani (2000-2002) am <strong>de</strong>terminat perspectiva <strong>de</strong>alocare a formelor cu conţinutridicat <strong>de</strong> amidon dintre hibrizii interspecificiîncrucişaţiaicartofului cu participarea speciei sălbatice din Mexic Solanum bulbcastanum Dun.Prezenţa materialului cu conţinutmare <strong>de</strong> alnidon este mai importantă<strong>de</strong>cât la cele maibune soiuri standard în toti anii <strong>de</strong> studiu, ceea ce <strong>de</strong>lnonstrează valoarea ridicată aacestor hibrizi. În acelaşi timp, doar un numărlnic din fornlele create (7,5 - 12,2%) auun conţinut <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> amidon <strong>de</strong> 140/0 sau mai nlic. Baza genetică diversă a materialuluicreat a pennis alocarea hibrizilor prin combinarea conţinutului <strong>de</strong> amidon cu alte proprietăţi.agronomice, <strong>de</strong> exelnplu: rezistenţa la bolile virotice, productivitatea, po<strong>si</strong>bilitatea <strong>de</strong>vânzare, numărul <strong>de</strong> tuberculi per plantă şi altele.Cuvinte cheie: cartof, conţinut <strong>de</strong> mnidon, hibrid interspecific, caracteristiciagronomice.Tabele:1. Distribuţia hibrizilor interspecifici după conţinutul <strong>de</strong> amidon;2. Distribuţia nlaterialului după rezistenţa la boli, dăunători, şi după conţinutul <strong>de</strong> amidon;3. Caracteristicile agronomice ale hibrizilor interspecifici cu conţinut ridicat <strong>de</strong> amidon.82Anale I.C.DC.S.Z.


Mihaela PRODANI, Alina ISTVAN2, Maria IANOŞP1<strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong> - <strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong>.Cmtof şi Sfeclă<strong>de</strong> Zahăr(I.C.D.C.S.Z.) BraşovREZUMAT2 S.c. Tractorul UTB S.A. BraşovÎn lucrare se prezintă date privind calitatea culinară şi potenţialulproductiva optsoiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof (româneşti şi străine), cultivate la Braşov, în perioada 1997-2002, cuîncadrarea soiurilor pe categorii <strong>de</strong> folo<strong>si</strong>nţă şi evi<strong>de</strong>nţierea diferenţelor calitative şiproductive dintre soiuri în funcţie <strong>de</strong> condiţiile clinlatice din anii <strong>de</strong> cultură.Domeniul calităţii fiind.foarte vast, nu vom putea epuiza toate aspectele. Ne vomreferi numai la: calitatea culinară (încadrarea soiurilor în grupe <strong>de</strong> folo<strong>si</strong>nţă),pretabilitateala industrializare (culoare, randamentul <strong>de</strong> obţinerepentnlchips) şi productivitatea soiurilorluate în studiu.Cla<strong>si</strong>ficarea pe grupe <strong>de</strong> folo<strong>si</strong>nţă (consum, industrializare, fiuajare), aredrept scop evi<strong>de</strong>nţiereasoiurilor cu însuşiri valoroase şi astfel orientarea producţieispresegmentul <strong>de</strong> piaţă corespunzător.Cuvinte cheie: cartof, soi, condiţii climatice, productivitate, calitate culinară,calitate chips.Termenul <strong>de</strong> calitate la cartofcuprin<strong>de</strong> totalitatea însuşirilorfizice, chimice, culinareşi se raportează atât la pretenţiile consumatorilor cât şi la <strong>de</strong>stinaţia producţiei. DupăOrganizaţia Mondială <strong>pentru</strong> Standardizare (180) calitatea este <strong>de</strong>finită ca totalitateaînsuşirilor şi caracteristicilor unui produs care are capacitatea <strong>de</strong> a satisface cerinţeledorite sau implicite (www.iso-9000-2000.com).În general, atributele calitative sunt cla<strong>si</strong>ficate astfel:- externe (aspect, con<strong>si</strong>stenţă, <strong>de</strong>fecte);interne (miros, gust, textură);- ascunse (stare fitosanitară, valoare nutritivă, <strong>si</strong>guranţă alimentară).Atributele calităţii externe joacă un rol important în <strong>de</strong>cizia consumatorilor <strong>de</strong> aalege. Împreună cu însuşirile calităţiiinterne <strong>de</strong>terminăacceptarea produs. Cel <strong>de</strong>altreilea tip <strong>de</strong> atribute este mai greu <strong>de</strong> măsurat şi ajută la diferenţiere (Kramer şi1970; Pattee, 1985; Shewfelt, 1987).VoI, XXXI83


Mihaela PJ{(jUAN, Alina ISTVAN. Maria IANOŞIReferitor la cartof, calitatea este exprilnată în funcţie <strong>de</strong> caracteristiciprincipale:- calitatea fizică (cuprin<strong>de</strong> însuşiri legate <strong>de</strong> formă, culoare, vătămări,boli, care <strong>de</strong>terminăaspectul tuberculului în general);- calitatea culinară şi tehnologică (cuprin<strong>de</strong> însuşiri <strong>de</strong> comportareatuberculilor la fierbere şi prăjire);- valoarea biologică (compoziţia chimică).Importanţaacestor însuşiri variază în funcţie <strong>de</strong> scopul <strong>de</strong> folo<strong>si</strong>nţă. Astfel, <strong>pentru</strong>industrializare pon<strong>de</strong>rea mai mare o au următoarele caracteristici: <strong>de</strong>fectele, vătămărileinterne, înverzirea, înnegrirea enzilnatică, substanţa uscată şi cantitatea <strong>de</strong> zahamrireducătoare, în tilnp ce <strong>pentru</strong> consulnui direct au o ilnportanţă majoră următoareleaspecte: <strong>de</strong>fectele, vătămările externe, înverzirea, valoarea nutritivă, înnegrirea dupăgustul (Dale şi Mackay, 1Textura poate fi con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>ratăuna dintre cele luai importante calitative inceea ce priveşte cartoful <strong>de</strong> conSUITl. Textura este un telnen complex şi se la:făinozitate, umiditate, sfărâlnare la fierbere, con<strong>si</strong>stenţă, structura amidonului.Definirea noţiunii <strong>de</strong> calitate la cartofeste strâns legată <strong>de</strong> valorificare. De aceeaeste esenţială cunoaşterea cerinţelor calitative şi cla<strong>si</strong>ficarea soiurilor pe grupe <strong>de</strong>folo<strong>si</strong>nţă, <strong>pentru</strong> a răspun<strong>de</strong> exigenţelor consumatorilor legate în principal <strong>de</strong> aspect, 'calitate culinară, sen<strong>si</strong>bilitate la înnegrire.MATERIAL ŞIMETODĂA fost luat în studiu un nUlnăr <strong>de</strong> opt soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof (cinci româneşti şi treistrăine), aparţinând grupelor <strong>de</strong> precocitate: timpurii-semitimpurii (Ostara, Roclas,Christian, Dacia) şi semitardive (Amelia, Nicoleta, De<strong>si</strong>ree, Sante), cultivate la Braşovşi analizate în perioada 1997-2002.Datele meteorologice (regimul ternlic şi pluviometric) au fost înregistrate laLC.D.C.S.Z. Braşov (tabelul 1). Clilnatul zonelor lnontane din România este răcorosşi cu precipitaţiibogate. Condiţiile întâlnite aici sunt favorabile culturii cartofului, carenece<strong>si</strong>tă o sumă a precipitaţiilor <strong>de</strong> cca. 600 lnm anual şi tenlperaturi <strong>de</strong> 19 - 21 °C<strong>pentru</strong> creşterea părţii aeriene a plantei şi 16 17°C pentnl creşterea tuberculilor.Datorită condiţiilor ecologice specifice zonelor montane, este po<strong>si</strong>bilă evitareastresului hidric şi termic, <strong>de</strong>generarea fiziologică fiind redusă la minim. Altitudinilemari şi prezenţaunor bariere naturale, care crează condiţii <strong>de</strong> izolare a culturilor,şi răspândirea bolilor virotice.Capacitatea <strong>de</strong> producţie a soiurilor analizate s-a <strong>de</strong>terminat prin ............."...".."..,....tuberculilor <strong>de</strong> cartof recoltaţi din câlnp.Analizele <strong>de</strong> calitate culinară s-au realizat organoleptic, aprecierea indicilor <strong>de</strong> calitatefăcându-se după <strong>si</strong>stenlul <strong>de</strong> notare propus <strong>de</strong>: Lugt şi Goodijk, 1959 (tabelul 2).Anale 1.C.D.C.SZ.


VaIlatJla unor COil:ldllt!1 climaticeLunilemin73.14LJ5lUll34.013.3 15.8Culoarea: alb =tăierea.•",1 ........"... ""',...""'.11 smnHIS'Ul!UI <strong>de</strong> apă,elllDJ1]larf~asurplusuluiVOL.XXXJ85


Mihaela PRODAN, Alina ISTVAN, Maria IANOŞI7 -7,5 = A7,6 - 10,0 = AlB10,1 - 12,5 = B12,6 - 15,0 = B/C15,l-17,0=C17,1 - 20,0 = C/DPe baza multiplelor însuşiri calitative, cartoful prezintă 4 clase <strong>de</strong> calitate:Clasa A - cartoful <strong>pentru</strong> fierbere. Tuberculii nu se sfărâmă la fiert, sunt con<strong>si</strong>stenţi,<strong>de</strong>stul <strong>de</strong> umezi, iar structura mnidonului este fină.Clasa B - cartoful <strong>pentru</strong> salată. Nu se sfărâmă la fiert, sau crapă numai puţin, estecon<strong>si</strong>stent, uneori umed, iar amidonul are o structură fină.Clasa C - cartoful făinos, <strong>pentru</strong> piure. Tuberculii sunt făinoşi, crapă la fiert, au ocon<strong>si</strong>stenţă redusă, sunt uscaţi, iar structura amidonului este <strong>de</strong>stul <strong>de</strong> gro<strong>si</strong>eră.Clasa D - cartoful <strong>pentru</strong> industrializare. La fiert tuberculii se sfărâmă complet,con<strong>si</strong>stenţa este foarte redusă, sunt uscaţi, iar amidonul are structură gro<strong>si</strong>eră.Datele obţinute au fost prelucrate şi interpretate statistic.REZULTATE ŞIDISCUŢIIÎn unna studiilor efectuate s-a evi<strong>de</strong>nţiat o variaţie a însuşirilor calitative analizate şia capacităţii <strong>de</strong> producţie, atât între soiuri, cât şi în cadrul aceluiaşi soi, în funcţie <strong>de</strong>condiţiile climatice ale anilor <strong>de</strong> cultură.Capacitatea <strong>de</strong> producţieProducţia medie a variat în cei şase ani între 18,8 t/ha (Ostara) şi 29,6 t/ha (Dacia),cu valoarea minilnă înregistrată la soiul Ostara (7,0 t/ha) în anul 2000 şi cea maximăobţinută la soiul Nicoleta (41,1 t/ha) în anul 200 1. Menţionăm că anul <strong>de</strong> cultură 2000 afost un an <strong>de</strong>osebit, caracterizat prin temperaturi exce<strong>si</strong>ve şi precipitaţii reduse.Tabelul 3Producţia înregistrată la cele opt soiuri în perioada1997 - 2002SoiulProductia Hiba)1997 1998 I 1999 2000 2001 2002Soiuri timIlurii <strong>si</strong> semitimnurii (70 - 100 zile)Ostara 187 23 O 265 70 21 2 163Roclas 273 J9 1 410 119 246 27 OChristian 20.8 W 304 112 28.1 259Dacia 227 283 362 118 38.3 401Soiuri semitardive (100 -110 zile), Sante 275 31 5 405 134 30.9 22.2De<strong>si</strong>ree 215 276 358 173 273 216Amelia 25 O 28 O 34 1 158 358 224Nicoleta 226 29 1 369 134 41 1 29386Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Evaluarea calitativă şi structura producţiei la unele soiUri <strong>de</strong> cariu} in COFlalţWe cumuw;e ;:;PC:L~",C. •• ,Calitatea culinarăComplexitatea, dar şi caracterul al fac ca această noţiunesă se preteze cu greu la un studiu direct. Estenecesarăo corelare cu o însuşire cepoate fi <strong>de</strong>terminatăobiectiv. Am în acest caz <strong>de</strong> amidon. Astfel, s-aobservat faptul că sIarâmarea se corelează cu: con<strong>si</strong>stenţa, făinozitatea,structura amidonului şi C011ţU1Ul:llllTabelul 4Matricea <strong>de</strong> corelaţie a indicilor <strong>de</strong> ""'U.AiI.U~,"" ...."d..,'","',.ii1 ŞI [erm(JI!OI~ICa la soiurile studiate(n=24)--Sfărâmare Con<strong>si</strong>stentă Făinozitate Stmct. amidon Amidon %Sfărâmare 1000 0.759*'" ().SUC"" 0.77"/" 0.670....Con<strong>si</strong>stentă IJ)OO 0.749'" 0.770"'" 0.719**Făinozitate 1.000 0.935"'" 0.790:--Struct. amidon 1.000 0.797'*Amidon % i 1.000** corelaţie semnificativă (0,01%)Aceste relaţii între calitate ....~~II1in'''....,. t-r.,.hu""" încontextul fenomenelorce au loc în timpul fierberii.f-"""-h,,,';',1 este complei:ă şi inclU<strong>de</strong>o serie <strong>de</strong> procese interne: <strong>de</strong>gradarea v"""...,!:-""..... CeJlUl(m~ permeabilizarea lllembranelorcelulare, schimbul ionic~şi colah., 1993). Aceastadin urmă este puternic corelatăcu(Ludwig şi colah.,1978). Soiurile: Ostara, şi AlB, fiind pretabile<strong>pentru</strong> fierbere şi salată.Încadrarea soiurilorin funcţie <strong>de</strong> condiţiileclimatice. Putem susţine această atlnnlaţle M ..........LIJUI-".J...l ......UClIJl.... comportamentul la fierbere asoiurilor: Christian şi Amelia. în s-aîncadratîn clasa <strong>de</strong>calitate AlB, cuspecificarea că acest an ace într-un an normaldin punct <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re (1998), clasa A <strong>de</strong> calitate.Soiul Amelia a corespuns în clasei anul 1998, s-a încadratîn clasa B <strong>de</strong> calitate. Aceasta arată căa soiurilor studiate în clasele<strong>de</strong> calitate AlB sau B, în se <strong>de</strong>plasa spre claseleînvecinate la soiurile cu marea caracterelor culinare.VOL. XXXI87


,""",,''',''',''\,',,''',.""''',,'':i,'",,~"


23ţ-.~Comportarea soiurilor <strong>de</strong> cartofîn perioada 1997-2002 5 la BraşovSoiulProducţia tlha Amidon % Randament chips % Culoare chips Clasa'"min max med CV% miu mu med CV% Miu ma" med CV% min ma" med CV% min ma" med CVII/ IlSoiuri timpurii şi semitim:mril (70 • 100 zile)Ostara 7,0 26,5 18,8 36,0 12,0 17,0 14,0 17,1 23,5 30,0 27.,5 8,3 7,0 7,5 7;1. 3,6 6,9 10,0 9,0 13,9Rodas 11,9 41,0 28.,5 37,3 14,0 18,0 16,4 9,9 25,5 34,0 30,9 10,2 7,0 8,0 7,8 5,4 8,5 12,5 10,3 16,5Christian 11,2 30,4 23,5 29,2 13,0 16,0 13,9 8,0 19,5 31,0 27,3 15,2 6,0 8,0 6,9 11,5 7,5 9,1 8,5 8,3Dacia 11,8 40,1 29,6 36,9 15,9 20,0 17,7 9,8 27,0 32,0 30;1. 7,4 8,0 9,0 8.,5 3,7 7,5 13,5 10,1 24,2MEDIA 25,1 (CV=37,8%) 15.,5 (CV=15.2%) 29,0 (CV=II.3%) 7,6 (CV=10.2%) 9,5 (CV:=18.2%)Soiuri semitardive (100. 110 zile)Sante 13,4 40,5 27,7 33,3 14,0 20,0 16,2 13,2 24,5 30,0 27,7 9,3 7,5 8,0 7,8 3,3 9,1 14,5 11,6 16,3De<strong>si</strong>ree 17,3 35,8 25,2 25,8 12,4 19,0 14,7 16,0 23,0 30,0 27,6 9,5 7,0 8,0 7,7 5,3 8,5 11,0 9,9 10,1Amelia 15,8 35,8 26,9 27,8 14,0 21,0 16,6 15,1 25,5 30,0 27,8 5,6 7,5 9,0 8,0 6,9 10,0 12,5 11,0 10,5Nicoleta 0,4 41,1 28,7 34,6 15,8 23,0 18,5 15,8 27,0 35,0 30,2 9,8 8,0 8,5 8,3 3,3 11,0 15,0 12,2 12,4MEDIA 27,1 (CV=29.3%) 16,5 (CV=16.4%) 28,3 (CV=9.0%) 7,9 (CV=5.4%) 11,2 (CV=14.1%)Clasa·AlB = Ostara, Christian, De<strong>si</strong>ree;B = Sante, Roc1~$; Dacia, Amelia, Nicoleta,Tabelul 6~!:lii2"!:l~!:l(")~~.~.!:l.~.t


Mihaela PRODAN, Alina ISTVAN, Maria IANOŞICalitatea tehnologicăÎn prezent există o preferinţă în creştere a consmnului <strong>de</strong> produse industrializatecartof, care sunt gustoase~ hrănitoare şi mai uşor <strong>de</strong> preparat.Pentru calitatea tehnologică s",au unnărit: randamentul <strong>de</strong> obţinere <strong>pentru</strong> chips şiculoarea produsului finit. Calitatea cartofului, ca materie primă, este esenţială <strong>pentru</strong>obţinereaunui randmnent bun şi a unei culori atrăgătoare.20 T"''''''..''''..''' ..''·...... ,·· .... , " ....."",.."",,,,"'''''''....,,'''' '"'''''' "''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''T 311830,516301429,512291028,5828627,5427226,5o26Randamentul <strong>de</strong> prelucrare a soiurilor studiate a fost <strong>de</strong> cea. 30 %. Conţinutul înanlidon este corelat direct cu un randament eficient.Fig. 2 Corelaţia dintre conţinutul <strong>de</strong> mnidon şi randamentUn conţinut ridicat <strong>de</strong> mnidon <strong>de</strong>termină realizarea unui randament sporit <strong>de</strong>prelucrare, <strong>de</strong> aceea în procesul <strong>de</strong> fabricaţie sunt preferate soiurile cu un conţinutridicat<strong>de</strong> amidon. Soiurile: Sante, Roclas, Dacia, Amelia şi Nicoleta aparţinclasei <strong>de</strong> calitate B,fiind recomandate <strong>pentru</strong> salate şi chips.Factorul hotărâtorîn alegerea soiului îl constituie culoarea produsului finit. Culoareachips-ului este direct influenţată <strong>de</strong> cantitatea <strong>de</strong> zaharuri reducătoare din tubercul.Acestea, prezente într-un procent 111ai ridicat, conferă o culoare neplăcută, brună, respinsă<strong>de</strong> consumatori, care preferă o culoare aurie.90 Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


Evaluarea calitativă şi J./r',rrtm'·a ...·[.f'...rh... CG.nalţllte Cllma'llCe specificeAnalizând rezult:ateJle Obtullute.Roclas şi Dacia'selnitardive) variazăceltotală, fiind stabile în .....'..'n.nl.lt•• li'" c,Umatu::c U'.1IT''''''PAvând ve<strong>de</strong>re teIl(1Ut1ţa COIlstalută->'V.. ,,,.......·u.. n~zlstentela vafllaha cOI1ldlţllllm"c!lllllatlce, COlltntmle<strong>de</strong> aceste modificări ale rnD.rln.h~,l. ASQ. 2000. ISOInternet at2. CARCI fertiliserson3. DALE MACKAY and proces<strong>si</strong>ng quality,Potato Genetics4. GROZA BOWEN for cold chipping.Abstr. EAPR Italia: 3355. KRAMERVan6 LUDWIGand some texture78 1993.and IreneEAPRFranţa: 131VOL. XXXi


Mihaela PRODAN. Alina ISTVAN, Maria IANOŞJ9. PATTEE H.E., 1985. Evaluation of quality of fruits and vegetables. AVI, VanNostrand Reinhold Co., New York10. SHEWFELT R.L., 1987. Quality ofminilnally processsed fruits and vegetables. J.Food Qual. 10:" 143.QUALITATIVE EVALUATION AND PRODUCTION STRUCTURE OFSOME POTATO VARIETIES UNDER CLIMATIC CONDITIONSSPECIFIC TO BRAŞOV AREAAbstractThe paperpresents information regarding the culinary quality and the yielding potentialofeight Romanian and foreign varieties ofpotatoes cultivated in Braşov between 1997and 2002. The potato varieties are c1as<strong>si</strong>fied into categories ofuse and the differencesalnong the varieties are pointed out, as far as quality and production are concemed,<strong>de</strong>pending on the weather conditions during this period.Since the quality field is extrelnely wi<strong>de</strong>, we will not be able to exhaust all theaspects. The subjects <strong>de</strong>alt with herein are only the culinary quality (clas<strong>si</strong>fying thevarieties into categories ofuse), the suitability for industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng (color, chips obtainingefficiency) and the yielding ofthe varieties un<strong>de</strong>r research.The clas<strong>si</strong>fication into categories ofuse (consUlnption, industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng, seed,fod<strong>de</strong>r) has in view the pointing out the varieties with valuable qualities and, therefore,the directing ofthe production towards the proper lnarket segment.Keywords: potato, variety, weather conditions, yielding, culinary quality, chips quality.Tables:1. Variation ofSOlne c1ilnatic conditions between 1997-2002 in Braşov;2. Assessment schelne ofpotato culinary quality;3. Yield ofthe 8 potato varieties between 1997-2002;4. Correlation lnatrix of culinary and technological quality indices in the studiedvarieties;5. Starch content variation in <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce ofclilnatic conditions;6. Behaviour ofpotato varieties between 1997 - 2002 in Braşov.Figures:1. Variety cls<strong>si</strong>fication acoording to the quality;2. Correlation between starch content and chips obtaining efficiency.92Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


ASSESSMENT?VARIETYW. REUST, T. HEBEISEN!,T. BALLMERIAgroscope RAC Swiss fe<strong>de</strong>ral research station, Case postale 254,CH-i260 Nyon 1, SwitzerIandlAgroscope FAL Reckenholz, Swiss fe<strong>de</strong>ral research station and CH-8046Zurich, Switzerlan<strong>de</strong>-mail: wemer.reust@rac.admin.chSUMMARYNew proces<strong>si</strong>ng varieties like Panda,and others reveale0lower acrylami<strong>de</strong> content in crisps and Frel1ch ta content ofreducingsugars. N fertilization did not influence tlIe content in crisps in both seasons.Farmers will expand'their production areas these vmieties al the same tilneredudng con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rably the exposure of Swiss consumersExceUent rawmaterial for proces<strong>si</strong>ng wiU become evenproces<strong>si</strong>ng techniques may result in Ch;:ln~;eaSeveral Acrylami<strong>de</strong> projects in Switzerland lnay COli1S1lJer'aOj[econsumer's exposure to this harmful food CO]lltalrunmltconsumer acceptance ofpotatoes in the future.INTRODUCTIONAcrylalni<strong>de</strong> has been <strong>de</strong>tected by theAuthorities during thespring of2002, mainly in roasted and fried and cereaI products. harmfulproduct is formed by high temperature 120 0 in potato crispsFrench fries and Rostis (hash brown). It 18 thereduction process ofthe asparagine, prOlnoted by reducing sugars like fructose and during the Maillardreaction. The concentration ofthese sugars <strong>de</strong>pends largely on the potato variety, growingconditions, maturity, as well as the storage conditions. COlnplex interactions between anthese factors may reduce homogeneity in the raw material.The aim of this research is to lninimizecontent in roasted and friedpotato products prepared in households andcompanies, by u<strong>si</strong>ng suitablevarieties and storage conditions. Reducing sugars are key components for browningreactions and the <strong>de</strong>velopment ofthe typical roasted but also for the formation ofacrylami<strong>de</strong>. Growing conditions influence internal quality, aud low temperaturestorage increases reducing sugars content nlarkedly.VoI. XXXI 93


W. [(bU':>l, 1. Hblibl')bN,l. J::ALLlVl.bft..MATERIALS AND METHODSTrials ofpotato varieties are located in the lnain growing regions ofSwitzerland andwere used as raw material for the experilnentation. Tubers of ware and proces<strong>si</strong>ngvarieties were sampled frOln two locations after harvest and stored at 8-9 0 C, as usualfor proces<strong>si</strong>ng. Two samples of 15 gra<strong>de</strong>d tubers per variety have been analyzed forreducing sugars, fructose, glucose and the arnino acids asparagine and glutarnine.Acrylami<strong>de</strong> has also been <strong>de</strong>tennined by the laboratory on the same samples afterproces<strong>si</strong>ng French fries, Crisps and Rostis, in autumn and spring u<strong>si</strong>ng GC-MSmethodology.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThere was a good relationship between the crisps frying test (coloration) as usedfor proces<strong>si</strong>ng potatoes by the processors, and acrylami<strong>de</strong> content in the products (Fig.1). Clear gol<strong>de</strong>n crisps gave the lowest and dark brown crisps gave the highest acrylami<strong>de</strong>contents. Reducing sugars content varied about 0,2 g/kg fresh matter up to 10 g/kg<strong>de</strong>pending an the variety and storage telnperatures. One grq.m per kg Of less reducingsugar content resulted in bright chips, while the acrylami<strong>de</strong> content was about 500 mg/kgor less. Sugar contents of10 g/kg produced dark chips with acrylmni<strong>de</strong> contents ofabout3000 mg/kg. Of course, there was an important and con<strong>si</strong>stent variability in reducingsugar contents between varieties, whereas proces<strong>si</strong>ng and table varieties did not<strong>si</strong>gnificantly differ in their asparagine and glutarnine content. Proces<strong>si</strong>ng varieties areselected for their low content in reducing sugars, while table potatoes may have highercontents. However, some of the lnore polyvalent varieties such as Agria and Victoria,also have very low sugar contents. Highly <strong>de</strong>hydrated products such as crisps (Fig. 2)also have higher acrylami<strong>de</strong> contents than French fries (Fig. 3) or Rostis. The objectiveofaur Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Health Authorities is to reduce the whole acrylami<strong>de</strong> intake, this means inthe future ware potatoes should also have low reducing sugar contents. Different leve1sofnitrogen fertilization did not influence acrylami<strong>de</strong> content in crisps.10000,..---------------,CIt December 2002o April2003- Regres<strong>si</strong>on r 2 = 0,91Â November 2003t:. April2004---- Regres<strong>si</strong>on r 2 = 0.97o.L.---r---..,-----.-------,..-....I7Crisp cotour of samplesFig. 1: Relationshipbetween crisp color andacrylami<strong>de</strong>, crisp samples ofdifferent varieties from tubersharvested in 2002 and 2003respectively, mean ±standard<strong>de</strong>viation from 2 samples backedat 170°C at the beginning andat the end ofthe storage periods(n=8 sarnples per crisp calourand year)94Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Acrylami<strong>de</strong>a new criteriun for potato1600 r--------;=====-:;---,1400 1~ 2003 f12001000TT8006004002000 ................-..........................-........-......,..'"---hO\1- (\"iJ> 6."" ~ ~\(e {';,""e~'" ""....,." 'f?""~ o~e c.,\"ZJ! ţ>..~~,\(\'\l ~ \;.~ \-.2: Acrylami<strong>de</strong>V'L'AU.""'"'' in crisps of different·U':ll"'Pi·H-"C from tubers harvestedin 2003 respeetively,mean ± standard <strong>de</strong>viationcalcuJatc:d from 2 locations, 2C'''',.,nV'>l.nn-dates latewithinperiod) and 2per date, backed atsanlpH~Sper1000·800600(!)"C'E 400tU~~ 2003: Acrylami<strong>de</strong> content inFrench different varietiesfrom tubers harvested 2002 and2003 lnean ± standardcalculatedOTemperatures for handling and storage after harvest are very To maintainlow sugar content, most varieties should be notlower than 7-8 0 C, but there arealso some cold tolerant cultivars which can be term at 4 0 C.REFERENCES1 BIEDERMANN,M. and GROB,K. 2003. Mo<strong>de</strong>l studies on aClylami<strong>de</strong> formationin potato, wheat flour and corn starch. Mitt. Lebensm. Hyg. 94,406-422.2 HEBEISEN, T. BALLMER, T. and REUST, W. 2003. Acrylamid inKartoffelverarbeitungsprodukten bisherige Ergebnisse. Internal report, notpublished. Agroscope Reckenholz and Changins.VOL. XXXI95


W REUSI; T. HEBE1SEN. T. BALLMERSOIURILOR?- UN NOU CRITERIU PENTRU SELECŢIARezumatNoile soiuri <strong>pentru</strong> industrializare precum Panda, Lady Claire, Markies şi altele, auprezentat un conţinut mai scăzut <strong>de</strong> acrilamidă la chips şi pommes-frites datorităconţinutului mai scăzut <strong>de</strong> zaharuri rcducătoare. Fertilizarea cu azot nu a influenţatconţinutul <strong>de</strong> acrilamidă la în ambele sezoane <strong>de</strong> cultură. Fermierii îşi vor extin<strong>de</strong>suprafaţa <strong>de</strong> cultură cu aceste şi în acelaşi timp se reduce con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rabil expunereaconsumatorilor la acrilamidă. Rolul materiei prinle <strong>de</strong> calitate excelentă<strong>pentru</strong>va şi mai important, <strong>de</strong>oarece 1110<strong>de</strong>mizarea tehnicilor <strong>de</strong> prelucrarepoate avea ca rezultat creşterea calităţii produselor (<strong>de</strong> ex: albirea chipsurilor). Mainlulte elveţiene privind acrilamida contribui con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rabil la minimizareala acest contaminant alimentar periculos şi, <strong>de</strong> aselnenea, lamenţinerea şi în viitor a cartofului alimentele preferate <strong>de</strong> consumatori.Cuvinte cheie: prelucrare, calitateH.,-"nUiH. dintre culoarea chipsului şimostre <strong>de</strong> chipsuri din diferitetuberculi în 2002 şi respectiv 2003; <strong>de</strong>viation medie ± standard din2 mostre ţinute la 170°C la începutul şi la sfârşitul perioa<strong>de</strong>lor păstrare (nUlIlăr=8mostre per culoare şi an2. <strong>de</strong> acrilamidă al chipsurilor din difel~ite soiuri din tuberculi recoltaţi înşi respectiv 2003, <strong>de</strong>viation medie ± standard calculată <strong>pentru</strong> 2 locaţii, 2 date <strong>de</strong>prelevare (timpurie, în tinlpul perioa<strong>de</strong>i <strong>de</strong> păstrare) şi 2 mostre per dată, ţinute lalnllill;ar==(S mostre per soi şi4. Conţinutul <strong>de</strong> acrilanlidă al pOl1unes-frites din diferite soiuri din tuberculi recoltaţiîn 2002 şi respectiv 2003, <strong>de</strong>viation 111edie ± standard <strong>pentru</strong> 2 locaţii, 2 date <strong>de</strong> prelevaret1rrlnl1'rlp târzie în tilnpul perioa<strong>de</strong>i <strong>de</strong> păstrare) şi 2 mostre per dată, mostre pre-prăjitetimp <strong>de</strong> 4 minute şiprăjite la 170 ac tilnp <strong>de</strong> 3 minutes, (număr=8 mostre96Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


Estonian AgriculturalKatrin KOTKASPlant Biotechnological Research Centre EVIKATeaduse 6a, Saku 75501, Harjumaa, EstoniaE-mail: Katrin.Kotkas.002@maH.eeIn Research Center EVIKA we are preserving varieties as meristemplant<strong>si</strong>n vitro in slow-growth conditions. AH acces<strong>si</strong>ons n",~>C'"""xT",,1i in vitro are disease-freeand are tested on virus infection for severa! times.there arevarieties, breeding material, land-races and 574in vi/ro genebank.Slow-growth nlethod slows the <strong>de</strong>velopment and limits the """""Yth''''''ofnecessarysub-eultures... aim ofour research was to study the influence of some medium componentstogether with temperature and light reduction on the growth ofan<strong>de</strong>xtent of the sub-culture interval. The EVlKA potato propagation nledium wasused as control. The medium components - nitrogen, kinetin sucrose -were ad<strong>de</strong>d the propagation mediunl. The and preservationwere carried out in two different temperature and conditions. Explants regenerationlasted 2 weeks in following conditions: 16hJ22...24°C/2,4 Klux and 8hJ18...20°C. Afierregeneration the plants were placed into preservation conditions (l6h/3...4°CI1,2 Kluxand 8h/3 ...4°C) for 40.. .42 01' 87...89 days. In the test the following morphologicalcharacteristics ofplant were evaluated: height of plants~ number ofinterno<strong>de</strong>s; numberofroots and length ofroots. 4 varieties with different in vi/ro behavior involved in tests.Conclu<strong>si</strong>vely it was evi<strong>de</strong>nt that by changing the mediu111 compo<strong>si</strong>tion, loweringtemperature and light inten<strong>si</strong>ty and increa<strong>si</strong>ng preservation duration there was no negativeinfluence on plantregeneration or morphological characteristics. Modifying EVlKA potatopropagation medium by adding kinetin 0,2...0,3 mg/l, sucrose 20 g/l and KN0 34,0 git andmaintaining plant material at the temperatures 3..Aoe, 16h18h, 1,2 Klux, the sub-culturinginterval can be exten<strong>de</strong>d up to 100 days.Keywords: in vitro multiplication, meristemplants, medium.INTRODUCTIONDue to the changes in environnlental conditions the highest losses of biologica!diver<strong>si</strong>ty are proposed to vegetatively propagated species. Potato is vegetativelyVoi. XXXI91


lntlirlem~e of culture medium c0mpr~<strong>si</strong>tion r~n "in varieties ...AND METHODSTests were carried out in Center EVIKA 1999...2000. Potato..LlL'....,.... ,L~J..'uau'Cl maintained ai EVIKA gene bank were used asmaterial.UH•..,JlJl...'......patata was as ~V"".L'U".CI - EVIKA propagation un.,'U"'U,'"KNO~ 2jC3­C4 - Control + KN0 32 g/l + kinetinC5 - Control + KN0 32 g/l + kinetin 0,3- Control + KN0 32 gll + kinetin+ sucroseIn ta homogenize the initial material,r1 three weeks before the tests.at the beginning20 mlcrc'cuttnlgsregeneration and nrţ"c"'r~light andconditions (tabledark) was the same in aH 3 occa<strong>si</strong>ons. JLU'-/-"'


Katril1. KOTKASTable 2. The time schedule of the in vitro tests,Preservation treatmentAction 11H i nICultivation of microcuttinl!s 05 ...07.05 03 ...05.04 14... 16.02Plants into preservation conditions 19...20.05 17... 19.04 128.02...02.031Preservation oeriod (davs) 6...7 I 40...42 87...89Plantinl! into olastic rolls 26 ...28.05 26...28.05 26...28.05Time (days) from cuitivation of micro- 20...22 53...55 100... 102cuttinl!s until olantina into olastic mllsRESULTSIn our preliminary study the effectiveness ofthe rapid propagation ofpotato plant<strong>si</strong>n vitro the regeneration ofplants was influenced by the cOlnpo<strong>si</strong>tion ofmedium and bythe genotype (Kotkas, 1994). To supply seed potato growers with healthy initial seedmaterial the large number of in vitro plants are nee<strong>de</strong>d in a short period.Preservation of potato varieties in vi/ro has to guarantee that the <strong>de</strong>velopment ofplants is inhibited but the morphological characteristics are preserved. Minimizing thenumber ofsub-cultures by extending the interval between sub-culturing can do it.In this work some plant 1110rphological characteristics - the height of stems, thenumber ofintemo<strong>de</strong>s and roots and the length ofroots <strong>de</strong>pending on the compo<strong>si</strong>tion ofmedium were studied. Also the influence ofplantpreservation conditions and preservationduration on the plant morphological characteristics was tested.The height of stems was <strong>si</strong>gnificant1y influenced by the content of medium. It<strong>de</strong>creased in aH tested media compared with control (C 1) (figure 1). The height ofstemswas more influenced by kinetin (C5, C6) than by potasSiUlTI (C2) or sucrose (differencebetween C5 and C6).The height of stenlS was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly inf1uenced by the preservation conditions,increa<strong>si</strong>ng in treatments II and III compared with control 1. The plants were preservedat the temperatures 3 .. .4cC for 53 ...55 (II) or 100... 102 (III) days. During thepreservation the <strong>de</strong>velopment ofplants was not cOlnpletely inhibited. The height ofplantswas higher when the preservation duration was longer.e 9 ..........-.-----~.-------------------­~e 8~


charaeterizes the plant propagation rate. The plant..-'-'AL .."" ..." ...' ..... ta the number ofeuttings and intenl0<strong>de</strong>s. In our previous'VI-""'F".


Katrin KOTKASBy exten<strong>de</strong>d preservation period the height ofstems increased. At the sarnetime the distance between the interno<strong>de</strong>s ofvarieties 'Ants' and 'Saturna' increasedbut varieties 'Varajane kollane' and 'Berber' <strong>de</strong>creased.The number of1"oots characterizes the quality ofroot systern and rooting ofplant<strong>si</strong>n plastic roll and in field conditions. KN03 (C2) and kinetin (C3) separately reduced thenumber of roots per plant (figure 2). Mutual influence of KN0 3and kinetin (C4, C5)increased the same characteristic. The best rooting was obtained when sucrose togetherwith KN0 3and kinetin was ad<strong>de</strong>d into medium (C6).The preservation conditions and duration had <strong>si</strong>gnificant influence an the number ofroots per plant. By increa<strong>si</strong>ng the preservation duration the number ofroots increased.The number ofroots per plant ofthe varieties 'Varajane kollane' and 'Ants' wasmore influenced by the preservation treatment than by the medium. The number ofrootsper plant of the varieties 'Saturna' and 'Berber' was more inf1uenced by the mediumthan by the preservation treatment. The nUlllber of roots per plant of an varieties wasmore influenced by the medium and preservation treatments than by the mutual treatmentofmedium and preservation conditions.6.5tIlQQ6.... '"Q'"Il.>,.Q5,55:15c:Il.>.::::~ 4,5Ci C2 C3 C4 C5 C6MediumFigure 2. The average number ofroots <strong>de</strong>pending on medium contentThe length ofroots is important characteristic in the rapid propagation period oftheinitial seed production material and in growing the first tuber generation in the field. Invitro preservation the number ofroots is l110re valuable characteristic than the length ofroots,The length ofroots <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d <strong>si</strong>gnificantly an the medium content. Kinetin (C3) andkinetin + KN0 3(C4, C5) <strong>de</strong>creased the length of roots (figure 3). In the case of highconcentration ofkinetin (C4, C5) or kinetin con1bined with sucrose (C6) the plants hadshort intemo<strong>de</strong>s ofdark green color and many roots, In control (CI) and in 'media withKN0 3(C2) plants were stretched out, had long interno<strong>de</strong>s and paIe tip-leaves. In antreatments, except control, there was a negative correlation between the number ofroots and the length ofroots (figure 2 aud 3).102Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Influenee uf eulture medium cumpu<strong>si</strong>/irA1 (111 "in vi!p>" preserva!iCJl1 c/pCJ!at(.t varietiesCI C2 C3 C4 C5 C6MediumFigure 3. The average length ofroots <strong>de</strong>pending on medium contentThe length ofroots ofalI cultivars <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d <strong>si</strong>gnificantly on the preservationtreatment. The number and length ofroots increased by exten<strong>de</strong>d preservation period.Preserving plants at the tenlperature 3...4°C up to 100 days did not influence thenumber and length ofthe roots negatively.It was evi<strong>de</strong>nt that by changing the mediulTI compo<strong>si</strong>tion, lowering temperatureand increa<strong>si</strong>ng·preservation duration there was no negative influence on plantregeneration or morphological characteristics. The plant morphological characteristicswere more influenced by preservation temperature and duration than by f,~he mediumcomponents separately.There was no correlation between earliness of variety and its <strong>de</strong>velopment invitro. First early variety 'Berber' and late variety 'Ants' had short stems and<strong>de</strong>veloped slowly in vitro. Second early variety 'Varajane kollane' and latc variety'Saturna' were taU, had long homogencous intemo<strong>de</strong>s and big leaves. Ten<strong>de</strong>ncywas the same in aH studied media and prcservation conditions.In the current study the plant sub-culturing intervals varied from 20...22,53...55to 100... 102 days. Kinetin had clearly po<strong>si</strong>tive effect on plants' tolerance to lowtemperatures and long sub-culturing intervals. During the long preservation periodthe plants grown without kinetin (CI, C2) became elongated, tip leaves turnedyellowish and dropped when plantcd out from test tubes.The potato plants grown in 11lediulll with highcr concentration of kinetin (C5,C6) had more short interno<strong>de</strong>s and snlaller leaves. The roots located close to mediumsurface and some roots were regenerated out<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong> medium, especially in the case of'Berber'. Also 'Berber' had callus on leaves and on stern. It is known that theappearance ofcallus is connected with the phy<strong>si</strong>ological changes caused by change<strong>si</strong>n environment (Benson el al., 1989). It nleans the variety 'Berber' is more sen<strong>si</strong>tiveto lower temperatures than other tcsted varieties.VOL. XXXI103


KOTKAS1'A",,'v',l-tr.,.-,Inbut root rr\'f"Yn'.lhr,nbc onc of thc .'r'"Ul'''Thc cHeet of kinetin on ,·a,,"ana..~.br.~,meristems Musahige, 1 1980) and TAl"rY'I':]'!'"lin vi/ro (Mondolini el al., 1993) is well documented. In bIue light the kinetin incrcasedthe total weight of plants and root/shoot ratio (Aksenova et al., 1994).HU.ILU",'-"J", and appear to be controlled by coordinated participationenaOgell0l1S plant hormones the carly events leading ta tuber <strong>de</strong>velopment invitro (Escalante, Langille, 995).According an Dur results the addition ofkinetin together with higher concentrationof KN0 3to the nledia had a beneficial cffect on the of plant <strong>de</strong>velopmentKinetiin with KN0 3reduced stem and roots but increased the number ofroots.With increa<strong>si</strong>ng the coneentratioll, kinetiininhibited growth, compact shootswith smallleaves and short interno<strong>de</strong>s bcing produced. Rcsponse ofindividual varietiesvaried somewhat while the growth trcnds mentioned above were con<strong>si</strong>stent for alIvarieties.The plant morphological characteristics and sub-culturing interval were moreinfluenced by preservation tempcrature, inten<strong>si</strong>ty and duration than by the mediumcomponents separately. The height ofplants was higher with more intemo<strong>de</strong>s whenpreservation duration was longer. The nUl11Der and length of1'oots increased by exten<strong>de</strong>dpreservation period.Low temperatures sIow the growth and <strong>de</strong>velopnlent in a natural way, and Iimit thenecessary sub-cultures (Dodds et al., 1991). Reducing light inten<strong>si</strong>ty also affects growthrate by reducing photosynthetic requirements aud therefore metabolislTI (Westcott, 19S1).The protocol for mediun1-term in vitro conservation ofthc potato collection at CIPis as follows. Acces<strong>si</strong>ons are conserved in a conservation InediUln containing 4% sorbitolat a temperature 6...SoC, and light inten<strong>si</strong>ty 1000 lux (Harding, 1994). After severalyears in vi/ro culture, plants can recover normal growth after one ar two sub-culturespropagation media.In this work the plants werc prcservcd at the temperatures 3...4°C and light inten<strong>si</strong>ty1200 lux for 53 ...55 Of 100... 102 days. The trcatment storing plants at 3.. AOC was104Anale l.C.D,C.S.Z.


diffcrent mcthodsInalna:gCrncIlt and of geneticachievemcnt aud 18of potato genetictechnique.3aVaJ1Cf:o. state of <strong>de</strong>velopment audsmapllCllty and practîcality arestorage healthy germplasmredlucmg tiine aud costs for mainteuance. Anddls,em;c-1ree conditions. However,... n'lIC''''''·'''''-:'~'I1'1n H~C[]lnH~U{~S arc cunently used to the limitedarc little known and partly becauseCONCLUSIONS1. AU tested nlediunl COm[~Olllentscharacteristics of plants. Kinetin had aVOL. XXXIan inf1uence on the morphologicalcfIcct than potas<strong>si</strong>um Of sucrosc. In105


Katrin KOTKASup to 102 days.Dur fU11her ""L>.~''-'A'cAU'''''.LHU will concentrate on research of medium componentsthe optilnunl regeneratioll of ll1aterial for preservation. Probably thelTIOst step the whole process that needsacclin1atization beforeand/or beforethe Estonian Science Foundation (grant No 4729)ofAgricultural Genetic Resources are gratefully acknowledged.<strong>National</strong>1. Aksenova, N. Konstantinova, T. N L. Machackova,Golyanovskaya, S. A.1994.of potato plants in vitro. 1 Effect ofquality hormones, Jou111al growth regulation, 13 (3), pp. 143-146.Rarding, H. 1989. The etIect ofpre- and post-freeze lightan the recovery ofcryopreserved shoot-tips ofSolanum tuberosum L. Cryo-Letters,10, pp. 323-344.3. Dobranszki, J. 1997. Effect of 3nd in vitro tuberization of potato of pureSolanum tuberosum L. Acta Agronomika Hungarica, (4), pp. 383-397.Dodds, J. HUalnan, R. 199 . Potato germplasm conservation.ln:In vi/ro methods for conservation ofpotato genetic resources, pp. 93-109.5. Dodds, J.R. 1987. Review ofin vi/ro propagation and lnaintenance ofsweet potatogermplasm. Exploration, nlaintenance aud utilization of sweet potato geneticresources. Rpt.1 th Plan. Cont'., Int. Potato Center, Lima, Peru, pp. 185-192.6. Engelmann,1'. 1997. In vitro Conservation Methods. In: Biotechnology aud PlantGenetic Resources, Rome~ ltaly, pp. 19-161.7. Escalante, B. Z., Langille A. R. 1995. Role ofgrowth regulators in in vitro rhizomegrowth ofpotato. Rort. 30 pp. 1248-1250.8. Espinoza, N. O., Estrada, R. D., Tovar, P., Lizarraga,Dodds, J. H. 1982. The Potato: A Mo<strong>de</strong>l Crop Plant for Tissue Culture.Lirna, Peru, 24 p.106 Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z


InJluence1.plantspp.3constants, their....,..>OJ""'..."'....'U'u. Annual Report, 3,12. P. 1987. The "..n~iulI.......UU'H. ,,;~ i-u:'P"'" cultures to preserve potato gene resources.EAPR, Abstracts Posters. Aalborg, Denmark, p. 189 ..13. K. 1994. mikropistikutest in vitro s51tuvalttoitesegu koostisest. taotlemiseks. Tartu, lk.14.C. J. 1988. Serial microtubermCUl{J;{l for inAmeericanPotato pp ..15. Lebot, V. 1992. Genetic .. ""II..,,,,,,.,,,traditional crops. Experimental16.17.18.19.Agriculture,Mondolini,and genome ....""..nu.....pp. 251-252.Novak, J.V..on nleristemplants. Potato Ke~iem:·cll.Rosenberg, V.., 1981. U'jJ_V ..H.J'


Katrin KOTKASINFLUENŢAMEDIULUI DE CULTURĂ ASUPRACONSERVĂRII IN VITRO A SOIURILOR DE CARTOF PRINRezunlatLa Centrul <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong> EVIKA se conservă soiurile <strong>de</strong> cartof ca nlcristeme invitro în condiţii <strong>de</strong> creştere încetinită. Toate plantele conservate in vitro sunt libere <strong>de</strong>boli şi sunt testate contra virusurilor <strong>de</strong> mai multe ori. La ora actuală există417 soiuri <strong>de</strong>cartof, material pentm ameliorare şi o bancă in vitr/'j <strong>de</strong> gene cu 574 done <strong>de</strong> mcristeme.Metoda creşterii încetinite diminuează <strong>de</strong>zvoltarea plantelor şi limitează numărulsubculturilor necesare.Scopul cercetăriinoastre a fost să studiem influenţaunor elemente componente alemediului <strong>de</strong> cultură alături<strong>de</strong> reducerea tcmperaturii şi luminii asupra creşteriimeristemelorşi lungimea perioa<strong>de</strong>i <strong>de</strong> subcultură.l\1ediul <strong>de</strong> propagare EVlKA <strong>pentru</strong> planta <strong>de</strong> cartofa fost folo<strong>si</strong>t ca şi martor. Elementele mediului <strong>de</strong> cultură - pota<strong>si</strong>u, azot, kinetină andsucroză au fost adăugate în lllediul <strong>de</strong> propagarc. Regenerarea şi conservarea plantelors-au <strong>de</strong>sfăşurat la două variante <strong>de</strong> temperatură şi lunlină. Regenerarea explantelor adurat 2 săptă!nâni în următoarele condiţii: Klux şi 8h/18...20°C.regenerare, plantele au fost plasate în condiţii<strong>de</strong> conservare (16h/3 .. .4°C/l,2 Klux şi 8hJ3.. .4°C) timp <strong>de</strong> 40.. .4201' 87... 89 zile. Au fost evaluate în timpul testului următoarelecaracteristici morfologice ale plantelor: înălţimea pbntelor; numărul<strong>de</strong> intemodii; numărul<strong>de</strong> rădăcini şi lungin1ea lor. Au fost testate 4 soiuri cu cOlllportalnent in vitro diferit.În concluzie, a fost evi<strong>de</strong>nt că schimbarea compoziţieilnediului, scă<strong>de</strong>reatemperaturiişi inten<strong>si</strong>tăţii luminii şi creşterea perioa<strong>de</strong>i <strong>de</strong> conservare nu au avut nici o influenţănegativă asupra regenerăriiplantelor sau asupra caracteristicilor n10rfologice. Modificareamediului <strong>de</strong> propagare EVIKA prin adăugare<strong>de</strong> kinetină0,2...0,3 mg/l, sucroză 20 g/l şiKN0 34,0 gll şi menţinerea materialului la tcmperaturi <strong>de</strong> 3.. .4°C, 16h18h, 1,2 Klux,intervalul <strong>de</strong> subculturăpoate fi extins la 100 <strong>de</strong> zile.Cuvinte cheie: înmulţire in vitro, meristClT1C, ll1Cdiu <strong>de</strong> culturăTabele:1. Condiţiile <strong>de</strong> regenerare şi conservare a plantei2. Programarea testelor in vitrrJ3. Înălţimeatulpinilor şi numărul <strong>de</strong> internozi în funcţie <strong>de</strong> tratamentul <strong>de</strong> conservareFiguri:1. Înălţimea medie a tulpinii în funcţie <strong>de</strong> conţinutul ll1ediului <strong>de</strong> cultură2. Numărulmediu <strong>de</strong> rădăciniîn funcţie <strong>de</strong> conţinutul mediului <strong>de</strong> cultură3. Lungimea llledie a rădăcinilor în funcţie <strong>de</strong> conţinutuln1ediuhii <strong>de</strong> cultură108Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


RESEARCHSUMMARYViive ROSENBERG, KatIin KOTKAS, Marje SĂREKANNO,Peet TALVOJAPlant Biotechnological Research Centre EVlKA, Estonian Agricultural Univer<strong>si</strong>tyTeaduse 6a, Saku 75501, Harjumaa, EstoniaThe yield, the dry matter and starch content in the morphologicalcharacteristics and disease re<strong>si</strong>stance ofplants than 500 meristem clones of 35potato varieties has been studied over a long tinle period. In to the field trials theplants were tested in vitro for susceptibility toofPhytophthorainfestans (Mont.) De Bary. The biosynthe<strong>si</strong>sPVX and PVM in plant:ofmeristenl clones was studied as weB. Theclones differed by the yield, starch content, rY\,\t-ni'>nilnn""'''re<strong>si</strong>stance. The variability in tuber yield was re12~lstere;c1Keywords: seed potato, meristeln varietiesINTRODUCTIONMeristem method has been used as a for initial seedmaterial from virus diseases for about 40 years. Thet!le following:a slice of meristematic tissue is cut from tIle bud of a cultivated culturemedium in the conditions that are favorable for thenew plant.The exact method is varying according to the aimtreatmentsof plants 01' sprouts are used prior the eultivation of like thermotherapy,chemotherapy, x-rays etc. The eompo<strong>si</strong>tion of cuIture medium can vary as as the<strong>si</strong>ze or location lneristem explants. The meristematic can be excised from sproutor shoot, it can be lateral orIn Research Centre EVIKA a lot of factors thatregeneration ofpotato rneristem plants are studied. As a ofthe IUlll::-Ia.:'LIIlthe technology for virus eradication was created according to which the isexcised only from lateral (or sometimes apical) buds shoot8 of green plants thathave passed through the thennotherapy treatlnent. The optilnal <strong>si</strong>ze ofmeristem explantthat guaranteed the highest regeneration percentage and tlIe highest number ofdiseasefreeplants was 0,2-0,3 mln. The selection for the best plants starts already on the leveloffirst regenerants. The offspring ofaH meristem is and propagatedseparately, way the meristem cIones are fonned.production is ma<strong>de</strong>, the meristem are in the fields. Simultaneously onepart of each meristeln clane preserved in vitro Rosenberg, 1999).VoI. XXXI109


Viive ROSENBERG, Katrin KOTKAS, Malje SiREKANNO, Peet TALVOJAThe results ofpreliminary trials where seed potato was propagated by conventionalclone method <strong>de</strong>rnonstrated that some meristem clones differed frOln others by theiryield and level ofinfeetion with late blight. The <strong>si</strong>milar information was obtained from thedistriets of Moseow and TOlnsk, where the seed potato propagated in EVIKA wascompared to the potato eradieated in the Researeh Institute of Potato Management inRus<strong>si</strong>a. These results inspired us to study the eharacteristics ofn1eristern clones <strong>de</strong>eplyand <strong>de</strong>tailed. Thc gaal was ta find out if thcrc was any eorrelation betwecn theeharacteristies ofmeristcm explant and the yield and/or SOlne other quality ofmeristemdone. Interesting was also to know if the difference between meristem clones wasconstant phenomenon or random?MATERIAL AND METHODSThe cultivatian ofmeristem clones and preparation oftest materialMeristem tissue ofO,2-0,3 Inm in <strong>si</strong>ze was cut from apical or lateral buds ofgreenplants that had passed through 6-8 weeks of thermotherapy treatment. Usually 20-30explants were cut per variety. The explants were cultivated on modified Murashige­Skoog mediUln. The plants regenerated within 4-12 weeks. The speed ofregeneration<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d on genotypc, but not always. Fast <strong>de</strong>ve10ped plants with stem-length 8-12 cmin height and <strong>de</strong>veloped root primordial were selected for further studies. Regenerantswith chlorotic and abnormalleafor stern shape that remained short and did not <strong>de</strong>velopany roots were eliminated from tests. So the first selection was ma<strong>de</strong> at the stage offirstmeristem plants. The selected rneristem plants were propagated in vitro by means ofInicrocuttings. The progeny ofeach meristem plants was the ba<strong>si</strong>s for meristem clone.A part ofthe meristem clone plants remained in vitro, the others, usually 3 ofeach clone,were used for virus diagnostics. The ELISA-test was used for virus i<strong>de</strong>ntification. Theplants that did not react on.ELISA-test were tested onee again by indicator plants. Thedouble-checked virus-free plants were se1ected for further trials. The plants ofmeristemclones were propagated in vitro and in plastic ro11s and were used for cultivation offirstgeneration tubers in the field.Methods of field trialsThe majority of field trials were conducted in the test field of Research CentreEVIKA in North-Estonia; some trials were set up in the test fields ofEstonian AgriculturalUniver<strong>si</strong>ty in South-Estonia and some in Jogeva Plant Breeding Institute in Central Estonia.The trials ofjoint Nordic-Estonian Project were organized with one Estonian, oneDanish and one Swedish variety <strong>si</strong>multaneously in Estonia, Denmark and Swe<strong>de</strong>n. Onlysecond-generation tubers that were propagated in Finland were used in trials. Everyyear a new material of second-generation tubers was planted into fields.In EVIKA trials the first generation tubers were used for first year trials and everyfollowing year the second, third or fourth generation tubers were used respectively. In110Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Researc~ ofpotata meristem clonesthe first years the trials were set in 4 90 per plot. Later on the triallnethods were changed and 40 tubers.were planted per plat.The same agrotechnicalas in production fields were used in the trials.The potato was fertilized with complex feliilizer 500 kglha. The soil type was differentevery year. The planting time <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d an weather and varied from May 8 1h ta 25 1h aswell as harvesting time - from September 2 nd to 20 th • The chemical weed control wasma<strong>de</strong> when nee<strong>de</strong>d and potato was hilled up 1-2 tilnes during vegetation period. Therewas !lO chemical disease or pest control ma<strong>de</strong> in the test fields.The potato plants were monitored during the whole growing period. The speed andquality ofelnergence, begimling and inten<strong>si</strong>ty offlowering, infection with late blight wasevaluated. In some trials the number ofstelns an the plant was counted. The number oftubers per plant was counted and the weight of tubers was measured at harvesting; 2months later the dry matter and starch content as weH as the infection with rot diseasesand rhizoctonia was analyzed.The tests of meristem dones for tolerance to potato late blightThe infection ofin vitro plants with pure cultures ofvarious stems ofPh. infestancewas tested in the lab. Pure cultures were cultivated on rye agar and the layer of funguswas washed with sterile water to make the suspen<strong>si</strong>on necessary for inoculation. Theliquid was then filtrated through 2 layers of cheesedoth. The concentration of sporeswas <strong>de</strong>termined un<strong>de</strong>r the microscope at I20-fold nlagnification. Plants <strong>de</strong>veloped invitro fronl microcuttings were infected with suspen<strong>si</strong>on ofconidia with the ccncentrationof 25-50 conidia at .the field ofview ofmicroscope. After inoculation the plants weremaintained in vitro at temperature 20-21cC, photoperiod 18 hours. The level ofinfectionwas evaluated according the scale O...3 points starting on the 3 rd .day after inoculationuntil the <strong>de</strong>ath of plants. In the field the infection ofplants with Ph. infestans and its<strong>de</strong>veloplnent was evaluated according to the seale O...5 pomts. The percentage ofinfectionwas calculated according to the special fonnula.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe potato meristem clones have been studied mainly for their agronomiccharacteristics. There were the newest but also some ofthe ol<strong>de</strong>st Estonian varieties aswell as foreign varieties inclu<strong>de</strong>d to the trials. Meristenl clones ofaH varieties varied inyield but the range ofvariability differed between the varieties (table 1).The data in table 1 show that the yield of an 16 varieties varied in rather wi<strong>de</strong>range. Our previous studies had shown that some varieties do not express huge variationin yield but these results disproved our previous knowledge. For example, 12 fileristemc10nes out of 13 ofvariety Ando produced <strong>si</strong>milar yield in our earliest studies. Only onemeristem done cultivated in 1978 expressed <strong>si</strong>gnificantly higheryield potential than theothers. The 17 lneristem clones presented in table 1 were re-cultivated from the lastnlentioned done from year 1978 as mother plant.VOL. XXXI111


Table 1. The yield variation ofpotato meristem clones in 1996VarietvNumber of clonesYieldvmiation1. Ando 17 30,9 .. .43,52. Ants 10 32,4...39,73. Berber 15 22,8 ...39,14. Bintie 8 26,4.. .41,25. Eba 11 25,1 .. .46,76. Ere 26 26,8 ...35,07. J5geva kollane 11 25,9 ...35,8 •8. Kondor 32 28,6.. .47,49. Nicola 22 35,0...50,410. Premiere 9 29,8 .. .43,8Il. Prevalent 5 32,2 ...39,612. Procura 13 27,2...37,413. Sante 8 33,3 .. .43,114. Sarme 7 36,5 .. .44,315. Saturna 28 32,1 .. .40,016. Varaianekollane15 24,6 ...37,5Special trials were conducted with variety Eba in or<strong>de</strong>r to study the correlationbetween the yield and characteristics of meristem clones; and correlations betweencharacteristics ofmotherplant and progeny meristem clones (Rosenberg, 1995). VarietyEba was selected to trials because it expressed especially labile and varying properties inlneristelTI culture in our earliest tests (table 2).112Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z


Research ofpotato meristem cionesTable 2. Comparison results ofmeristem clones ofthe variety EbaYear of Size of Yield, t/haNumber ofcutting meristem cut, average of 3clonesmeristem mm years295 1981 0,5 28,53373 1983 0,2 47,53471 1983 0,5 44,03373 1983 0,2 36,7996 1986 0,3 24,6999 1986 0,3 23,11000 1986 0,3 23,53373 1983 0,2 27,73373/329 1991 0,3 24,33373/330 1991 0,3 24,23373/331 1991 0,3 27,03373/333 1991 0,3 17,83373/335 1991 0,3 18,7996 1986 0,3 16,8996/427 1991 0,3 27.3996/430 1991 0,3 17,2996/434 1991 0,3 28,5996/435 1991 0,3 16,9Years of fieldtests1986. 1987,19881986, 1987,19881986, 1987,19881989, 1990,19911989, 1990,19911989, 1990,19911989, 1990,19911995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,19971995, 1996,1997Meristem clone 295 was cultivated from heat-treated plant that was grown frOlTIthe seed tubers received from the Netherlands. All other meristem clones were theoffspring of done no 295. The clones no 996, 999 aud 1000 were the offspring ofselected plant that was characterized by extremely high number of tubers (177 tubersper plat) in super-elite seed field. The done numbers starting with 3373 and 996 areVOL. XXXI113


Vllve lC);)1'-JYbt,f(v, Katrin KUTKAS, Mm:je SA RE'KANNO, Peet TALVOJAindicating the number oflllother plant the meristems were operated and the clone wasstarted from.The results in table 2 are indicating that in every group there are some clones thatare expres<strong>si</strong>ng much higher yield capacity than others. There were no clear correlationbetween the characteristics of mother plant and the yield of llleristem clone. Even theprogeny ofthe above lllentioned high-yielding plant (117 tubers) produced fewer tubersthan clone 3373. Such kind ofplants with giant yield was found among clones 3373 and3471 grown in 2,8 ha field. The second-generation meristem tubers were p1anted to thatfield. Those 11 plants were characterized with numerous shoots and vigorous growth. Atthe harvesting 56-117 tubers were counted per plant.In or<strong>de</strong>r to study the factors affecting the yield capacity of meristem clones thenew nleristems were operated from clones 3373 and 996. The new clones werepropagated and these were compared to the mother plant. For this purpose in vitropropagated meristen1 plants were transferred to pots ex vitro. Acclilnatizedun<strong>de</strong>rwent 7 weeks ofthenllotherapy after which the new meristems were cultivatedand well-<strong>de</strong>veloped ll1icroplants were selected for further trials.The data given in table 2 show that yield capacity varied within progeny ofbothnlother plants. There was no po<strong>si</strong>tive correlation between the yield capacity ofmotherplant and its offspring. The yie1d ofprogeny ofllleristem clone ofhigher yield - 3373varied 17,8-27,0 t/ha while that of progeny of llleristem clone of lower yield - 996varied 16,9-28,5 t/ha. It is reillarkable that the clone no 3373 has retained its highpotential over lllore than 10 years. This fact asserts that the trait ofhigh yield capacity isper<strong>si</strong>stent.The yield level was registered to be lower in the last trial series compared to earliertrials. This was caused by the changes in trial conditions. We had to give over ourprevious trial area with better soil conditions and additionally the weather conditionswere not favorable for potato growth in these last years oftrial. In the last trial series theaverage yield of llleristem clone 3373 was 27,2 tlha and that of clone 996 was 16,8 tiha. In the previous years the average yield had been 36,7 and 24,6 t/ha respectively.OUl' results <strong>de</strong>monstrated also that there were no cIear correlations between the<strong>si</strong>ze of excised meristem tissue and the yield of meristelll clones. The same can besaid about the location of excised meristems an the shoot. The yield of llleristeillclones was in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt frOlll the fact weather the meristenl was operated from lateralor apical bud.During the field lllonitoring it was observed that the plants ofmeristelll clones withhigher yield capacity had more shoots, uniformed bush and lllore inten<strong>si</strong>ve floweringthan other clones. The plants ofclone no 3373 emerged earlier, their shoots were strongerand leaves wi<strong>de</strong>r than on other plants. Nevertheless, the differences did not exceed theparameters of true-to-typeness. It was also assured by the owner of the variety whovi<strong>si</strong>ted our fields - Dutch conlpany Agrico.114Anale l.C.D.C.SZ.


Research ofpotato meristem donesmf~ns:teln dones of Eba differed also in the terms of starch content.The content of tne seven tested varied from 16,3 to 17,6%. The starchtnt:.rlC'j-"'.,..... done 3373 was nllinber oftubers per plant varied fromCOIU1l1ClOIlS varied according to the 5-point scale fi~om 2,5DD DVO.""," Plant Institute the susceptibility ofmfl~l'-lnswerelul:ectlon once. The susceptibility offour""......""i-., Eba to the most susceptiblebeing 3373 \.c(;or~[lnJtg to the same tests the susceptibilityof 5 meristem dones of -''',""'M,,,,11-., Premiere varied from 2,53 to 3,07; the 13 meristemclones from to and the 5 meristem c10nes ofvariety PrevalentfrOlTI 2,43 to 2,59.We studiedaud age, new as weB as old varieties.The special ilie old grown variety in EuropeBintje. The dones "vas The special attention wasto the to]erance ilie is to be especially susceptibleta Ph. infection. In table 3 tbere are tne results ofyield aud visual evaluation ofplants and in table 4 ilie estimation to Ph. of4 merÎstem clones ofvarietyTable 3. The and visual ev:alUlauon ofmeristem dones ofvariety BintjeClone Yield Tuhers per Dry Numberof overall~no plant matter sterns per plantscontent. % vlant scale (1-5 _,832 33.7 lIJ 21.7 3,94.l--i834 327 111 20.6 41 4 1836 375 11,4 21.1 44 48 .1838 302 102 20.9 38 36 ITable 4. The re<strong>si</strong>stance ofmeristem clones "UI'.l,1,.lP1!"lT Bintje to Ph. .infestans in vitroandin fie1dCloneno832834836839lnten<strong>si</strong>ty ofmycdium g,;owtb 0lJ ritm plants, Ph. infestans În Ph. infestans on% thefield. % tubers %4. 6. B. 20. 31.* 1994 1995 ]994 1995~ TI:l 1000 ilO 22.1 17.1 100.00,72 3,8 40,0 2,5TI...3. f!Q;l 100.00,88 3,8 17,5 0,0O III 450 1000TI...3. 1:M m mt2 IOO.O0,53 1,0 10,0 2,51 1 333 555 1000~ f!6:1 1000O 222 189 889 10000,42 0,9 20,0 5,0* - 26 days after the moculatU)1l with SUSpeIlSU]ln ofconidianumerater - A stern; <strong>de</strong>uominator- B stern .VOL. XXXI115


The results with variety Bintje <strong>de</strong>nlonstrated that the lneristem clones were differentin yield, in the morphological characteristics ofplants and in the re<strong>si</strong>stance to late blight.It needs to be pointed out that there were no pestici<strong>de</strong>s against late blight used in the testfield. The meristem clone 836 expressed higher yield capacity and was less susceptibleto 13:te blight infection as in vitro as in the field. When the plants were visually evaluatedin the field it becarne evi<strong>de</strong>nt that the clones differed from each other by the height. Thelneristem clones 832 and 834 were lower in stern height than the nleristem clones 836and 838. AH meristemplants carne from the same mother plant that had been cultivatedin vitro and gone through thermotherapy.Similar tests were conducted also with other varieties. Below are presented testresults of Estonian variety Ants. This variety is characterized by high tolerance to lateblight, especially in tubers.Table 5. The yield and re<strong>si</strong>stance to Ph. infestans of meristem clones of variety Ant<strong>si</strong>n vitro and in fieldDisease in<strong>de</strong>x, % Mycelium evaluation Late blight in the field Yield, Uha 1Clonean in vitro olants % %no2 years IA B A B Dlants tubers average 'I 667 O 100 100 86 O 45 O4 333 O 100 333 38 O 51 85 333 O 100 0* 10 O 39512 333 667 100 100 1.8 O 339815 O O 100 II 1* 14 O 38 I* - 26 days after the innoculation with suspen<strong>si</strong>on of conidies, A, B - Ph. inJestans stemsThe studies with variety Ants showed that the test results in vitro were reliable<strong>si</strong>nce they matched to the results collected in the field. The meristem clone 1 was themost susceptible ta Ph. infestans in vitro and also in the field. The meristem clone815 was not infected by either of stern in vitro. However, in the field there was aslight infectiol1 an the leaves. Interestingly, 4 lneristenl clones ofvariety Ants were notinfected by stern B while clone no 12 suffered from strong infection. The meristemclones of variety Ants <strong>de</strong>rived frOln different mother plants.The meristem clones of new Estonian variety - Piret - was tested years 2001­2003. The cultivation method of in vitro microplants differed from the meristemcultivation lnethod applied in other varieties. On this variety the callus tissue wasproduced from meristems and the horizontal cuttings and buds formed on callus werecultivated on culture medium. The meristem clones are marked as follows: the firstnUlnber symbolizes the meristem slice and the second number the shoot <strong>de</strong>rived fromits horizontal bud. For example, the meristelll clones 78-1; -2 and -6 are alI the offspringofone meristern cutting.116Anale 1. C.D. c.S.z.


Research ofpotato meristem clonesTabel 6 The yield ofthe meristem clones ofvariety PiTet average per 3 yearsClone no Tubers per plant Yield t/haDry matterStarch contentcontent % %74-1 78 345 192 13 O78-1 8,8 38,4 203 14,078-2 78 329 20.1 13878-6 67 33,9 19,0 12881-1 66 345 197 13,481-3 79 345 198 135-81-8 83 366 197 13482-9 85 338 205 14383-2 80 333 199 13683-8 83 33.7 199 136Average 7,9 34,6 19,8 13,5STDEV 0,7 1,0 0,4 0,4Among 10 meristem clones ofvariety Piret S01ne high yielding clones were found.Clone 78-1 is distinguishing by its espeeially yield. Remarkable is that the clonesof the highest (78-1) and the lowest (78-2) yield <strong>de</strong>rived from the sanle meristem.among the 3 progeny clones of lueristem 81, one clone expressed higheryield capacity while the other 2 produced lower yield.Meristem clones as the ba<strong>si</strong>e lnaterial for somaclonal variation and its applieationpos<strong>si</strong>bilities were studied together with the Jogeva Plant Breeding Institute. The term"somaclonal variation" covers the phenotypie ehanges, which oecur in plants regeneratedfrom cultured cells or tissties. Somaclonal variation is a disadvantage in alI used ofplant tissue culture where true-to-type plants have to be produced. At the same time itis a tool that can be used by plant bree<strong>de</strong>rs to offer a rapid and ea<strong>si</strong>ly acces<strong>si</strong>blesource ofvariatioll for use in breeding progralnmes.The aim ofresearch programme <strong>de</strong><strong>si</strong>gned to study the pos<strong>si</strong>bilities ofu<strong>si</strong>ngsomaclonal variation caused by meristem culture potato breeding. We hope tofind out genotypes which show greater variation in agronomic traits in use ofmeristemculture, to select best meristem clones with heritable character in agronomicallyimpotant properties.There were two varieties - Anti and Juku - and one breeding number 11488-88in the tests. The results <strong>de</strong>monstrated that the highest variation in the agronomiccharacteristics occurred on variety Juku. The breeding number J1488-88 wascharacterized by the highest variation in re<strong>si</strong>stance to Ph. infestans. This issue needsfurther investigation (Koppel et al., 1999).The inten<strong>si</strong>ty ofvirus biosynthe<strong>si</strong>s and susceptibility to the viruses in meristemclones of the same vaiety as weB as in the meristem clones regenerated from themeristem operated from different parts, apical and lateral buds ofshoot, immatureVOI. XXXI117


Viive ROSENBERG, Katrin KOTKAS, Marje SiREKANNO, Peet TALVOJAflower bud the same plant, were studied. The biosynthe<strong>si</strong>s inten<strong>si</strong>ty of PVX in 17meristem clones ofvarieties Premiere, Eba and Kondor and PVM in 27 dones Vigri,Eba, Kondor and Premiere.The higest relative re<strong>si</strong>stance to PVX was found in the meristem clones Eba 3373;Kondor 1065; Premiere 804 and to PMV - in Eba 1000; Kondor 1; Prenliere 356 andVigri 918. The <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce ofvirus re<strong>si</strong>stance ofthe meristelu clones an the location ofin the plants was established. All varieties showed the higest <strong>de</strong>gree of theinten<strong>si</strong>ty ofvirus biosynthe<strong>si</strong>s and susceptibility ta PVX and PVM in the meristem clonesobtained from an apical buds of soot, the lowest one in the clones from a lateral budsoot. In both experiments the inoculated plants and their second generation were analysed.In the 2nd year the <strong>de</strong>gree ofthe inten<strong>si</strong>ty ofvirus biosynthe<strong>si</strong>s and susceptibility to viru<strong>si</strong>nfection were higer than in the 1st generation, however, the relative differences betweellthe meristem clones of the variety remained the same (Agur&Rosenberg, 1999).CONCLUSIONSThe diverse studies of many varieties over a long period of time have evi<strong>de</strong>ncedthat meristem clones can vary in a wi<strong>de</strong> range by their agronomic traits. We did notregister the <strong>de</strong>viation from morphological true-to-type characteristics.In a production of high-quality seed potato the eradication of initial material i<strong>si</strong>nsufficient and ina<strong>de</strong>quate. It is necessary to select the meristem clones with the bestagronomical traits. In the i<strong>de</strong>al <strong>si</strong>tuation the in vitro tests are used ta i<strong>de</strong>ntify the mostre<strong>si</strong>stant illeristelu clones to late blight. Wc do not agree to N. S. Wright (1983) opinionthat only one clone is nee<strong>de</strong>d to propagate the sufficient amaunt of seed potato. In thereferred studies the productivity ofmeristeluatic progeny of2-3 clones of 10 varietiescollected from different regions was tested. The variations were registered among theseclones but the author did not con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>r it important enough to cultivate higher number ofnleristem clones.In 1999-2001 the field trials in Estonia, Swe<strong>de</strong>n and Denmark were established toinvestigate of potato meristem clone~ at different geographic localities. Four varietieswere established as meristem clones, ten ofeach. The results clearly show that <strong>si</strong>gnificantclone differences do exist (Nielsen, et al., 2002).The studies of virus re<strong>si</strong>stance provi<strong>de</strong>d us a lot of interesting data but this issueneeds more <strong>de</strong>tailed studies as weB as the pos<strong>si</strong>bilities to use the somaclonal variation inplant breeding.REFERENCES1. Agur, M., Rosenberg, V. 1999. Biosynthe<strong>si</strong>s ofviruses (PVX, PVM) in meristem clonesofpotato. Taimekoekultuurid, uurimine ja rakendmuine. EPMO EBI Harku, 194-202.2. Koppe1, M., Tsahkna, A., Rosenberg, V. 1999. Study and use ofsomaclonal variationin potato breeding. Taimekoekultuurid, uurimine jarekendamine. EPMO EBI, Harku,178-184.118 Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Research ofpotato rnp~'fNp'rn3.K.5.6.tissue63-70.7. Wright, N. S. 1983.Ameican Potato Joumal,ASUPRAALESOLCuvinte cheie: sămânţă, in vi/ro,Tabele:12.3.4.câmp5. Producţia şi rezistenţa lain vitro şi în câmp6. Producţia <strong>de</strong> dane din meristeme pe 3însoiul AntsVOL. XXXI 119


SUMMARYRoxana ROŞU!, Nicoleta CHIRUl and Jean-Louis ROLOPIResearch and Development Institute for Potato and Sugar Beet, Braşov2Section Systcmes Agricoles - CRA Libramont, BelgiumMicropropagation techniques are the <strong>si</strong>mpliest way for increa<strong>si</strong>ng the efficiency ofa seed potato crop and so ofware potato crop. Microtubers are an Îlnportant component,along plantlets and minitubers, for seed potato production prograIns. Researcheswere effectuated an 4 Romanian and 2 Dutch varieties. The microtuberizationmediulTI is a liquid lnedium and contains the salne substances as MS medium but in halfCoumarin, Kinetin and sucrose (80-90 g/l). By analyzing the results of thisexperience, we can condu<strong>de</strong> that microtubers <strong>si</strong>ze, as well as lnicrotubers number, i<strong>si</strong>nfluenced by genotype,Keywords: Solanum tuberosumINTRODUCTIONgenotype, microtuber, in vitr.o.Potato in vitro microtuberization represents a tran<strong>si</strong>tory phase between in vitromultiplication afthe material and field multiplication. Microtubers are small <strong>si</strong>zetubers o lTIill diaITIeter), spherical shape, with 0,05 to 1,3 g weight. Microtubers"'.. a ......."''"'. than 3 n1ll1 are not useful. Un<strong>de</strong>r normal cuIture conditions, microtubersI-'r,,:'h-::lQlr tubers can used for Ba<strong>si</strong>c plantsto in vitro techniques, healthy microtubers can be produced during theyear. can be at +2°C for 6-12 "-'-'.'VLnu."'.can be used in ".H~'-''' "J'UHV-'--'-''-'--'- "'-'.... LHl.I-V'J-'-u-oJu-'- exchange, Microtubers can planted di1'ectlythe there is 110 need to them (Rolot,AND l\;IETHODSBiological material is represented by the Romanian varieties A1nelia, Christian,Roclas and Dutch varieties Osta1'a and Sante.Researches have been divi<strong>de</strong>d in two steps:a) in vitro plantletsmultiplication (starting with pathogen agcnts free plantlets);b) in vitro microtuberization.120Anale l.c.D.c.S.Z


Researches on genotype influence on potato microtuberizationIn vitro ml1UJlplJlcatlonPotato plantlets were established from apical meristems of sprouted tubers. ThejJU",LUd''-'''''' have been fragmented inthe view ofobtaining uninodal cuttings (Dmnont, 1983).Figure 1 - Plantlet regenerated from meristemWe started with 25 plantlets forhas one leaf.VOL. XXXI121


Roxana ROŞU, Nicoleta CHIRU and Jean-LouÎs ROLOT3 - Uninodal cuttingsUH.'''-'H-


Researches on genotype influence on potato microtuberizationsolution (to protectmicrotubers against fungi), then we let them dry. After drying we cancalibrate the microtubers (10 mm; 7,1 mm; 5 mm; 3,15 mrn).The microtubers can be stored at +2°C for lnany lllonths.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSMicrotubers obtained from multiplied varietiesTable 1ValietyNumber of M:icrotuberslMultiplied Hanrestednot infected recipientplantlets microtubersrecipients averageSANTE 2380 1593 69 23,08OSTARA 3160 3103 153 20,28AMELIA 2720 1299 68 19,10ROCLAS 2340 2271 108 21,03CHRISTIAN 2140 1948 90 21,64DACIA 2780 2720 121 22,48TOTAL 15520 12934 609 21,23In the same conditions, from foreigll varieties, Sante had an average ofwith 23,08, compared withOstara variety wich had the average 20,28.Conceming the Romanian varieties, Dacia evi<strong>de</strong>nce with a nlicrotub ~rs/recipientaverage of 22,48, followed by Christian and Roclas varieties with very near averages,the last variety being Amelia with 19,10 average.The statistic interpretation has been ma<strong>de</strong> by Multiple Duncan test:Averages efror = 0.6500Liberty <strong>de</strong>grees efror = 603Observations number = 609LSD value= 0.09074s 0.03267 at a = 0.050xOriginal rankRank after testingSante 1 = 23.09 A Sante 1 = 23.09 AAmelia 2 19.10 F Dacia 6 = 22.48 BChristian 3 = 21.64 C Christian 3 = 21.64 COstara 4 = 20.28 E Roclas 5 = 21.03 DRocIas 5 = 21.03 D Ostara 4 = 20.28 EDacia 6 = 22.48 B Amelia 2 = 19.10 FFrom Duncan test we found out that Sante variety had the highest microtubersproduction efficiency, followed by Dacia, Christian, Roclas, Ostara and Amelia varieties.VOL. XXXI123


Roxana ROŞU, Nicoleta CHlRU and Jean-Louis ROLDTDifference between Sante and Dacia varieties is <strong>si</strong>gnificant, aud the same is the differencebetween Dacia and Christian, Christian and Roclas, etc. There is a distinct <strong>si</strong>gnificantdifference between Sante and Christian varieties, and between Sante and Roclas thedifference is very <strong>si</strong>gnificant.(IlOl~~ 25III'E 20III'Ci. 15'u cu 10~~ 5.a o2(.)~Genotype influence on microtuberizationFigure 4 - Genotype inf1uence on microtubers numberIn vitro obtained lnicrotubers caliberCaliberlMkrotubers numberVariety3,15-5 mm 5-7,1 mm 7,1-10 nun >10 mmSANTE 173 879 535 _ 6OSTARA 34 1653 1286 110A\1ELIA 95 604 589 11ROCLAS 89 1574 565 6CHRISTIAN 28 1398 718 1DACIA 89 1080 1268 4Sf--.TOTAL 508 7188 4961 171Table 2...P1r'll1l1nl!111lP iuHuence ou microtubers <strong>si</strong>ze18001600140012001000800600400200o3,15-5 mm 5-7,1 mm 7,HO mm >10 mmFigure 5 - Genotype influence on n1icrotubers124Anale I. c.D. c.S.Z


VOL.125


Roxana ROŞU. Nicoleta CHiRU and Jcan ..LouisFigure 7 - Microtubers obtained from DaciaFigure 8 - Microtubers obtained frorn Roclas variety126Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


genotype inJluence on potato microturerizationCONCLUSIONSFigura 9 - Microtubers obtained from Ostara.. Microtuberizatiol1 represents the tran<strong>si</strong>tory betwecn in vitro nlultiplicationofthe healthy and field or green-house nlultiplication;.. For microtuberization we can use alI virus-free minicuttings resulted fromlTIultiplication;.. FrOlll· foreign varieties, Sante had highest average,n... ,,,,~,.",a"·''7


Roxana ROŞU, Nicoleta CHIRU and Jean-Louis ROLOTSKOOG 1962 - A TP""''-'l-''ll LLL""~'L~LLLcultures. In:Phy<strong>si</strong>ol. Plant.8. RANALLI 1997 -InnovativeVF,"'"kULLLU''''',J, Potato Research 402004 L'usage <strong>de</strong>s techniques <strong>de</strong><strong>de</strong> pommes <strong>de</strong> terre <strong>de</strong> hauten


SUMMARYPLANTINGDENSITYVARIETIESMarius BĂRDAŞIILC.D.C.S.Z. BraşovMinitubers <strong>si</strong>ze and plant <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty inf1uenced in a different lYlanner the total yield andas well as seed potato yield (standard <strong>si</strong>ze: 30-55 lum dimTI.) in <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce ofvariety.The lowest total yield was achieved when planting minitubers <strong>si</strong>zed 5-15 mm, diam.,being of 1 to.ha- t ta 26 to.ha- t in Roc1as and Rustic varieties, and the highest totalyield was obtained when planting tubers <strong>si</strong>zed 25-35 mm diam, being of 31 tO.ha- 1 inRustic variety and over 35 tO.ha- 1 in Runica variety.Increa<strong>si</strong>ng planting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty trom 5 to 8 plants/m 2 is reasonable in the case odminitubers <strong>si</strong>zed 5-15 mm diam. aud, respectively, 15-25 mlTI diarrLseed potato, minitubers, stern, <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty, variety,Researches were done with the purpose ofstudying the potential use ofrninitubersplanted directly in the field and their behaviourun<strong>de</strong>r the ecological condition fronl Lăzarea,Harghita county; the experirnents were in the clonal field ofLC.D.C.S.Z. Braşov,Ronlânia.These researchers join the world concernings regarding optinmrn stenl <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>tyof potato crops by field of W.J.M. şi StnlikP.C.l995; 1996; Dolnicar, P.,1996 ; Roztropowicz, S., Szutkowska, M., Wierzejska, A.,& Zarzynska, K., 1996).This paper a synthe<strong>si</strong>s of the main results obtained in the period 1998 -2000 regarding the main stems number per hectare, seed yield, total yield and the totaltubers frOlTI Runica, Roc1as, and Rustic varieties.MATERIAL AND METHODSThe reseaches were dane in the period 1998-2000 at The Centre for Clonal Materialproduction from Lăzarea, Harghita County, affiliated ta LC.D.C.S.Z. Brasov.The altitu<strong>de</strong> ofthe experimental field was 1000 - 1200 m above sea level.The soil type is a typical luvic brown very <strong>de</strong>ep loamy with reasonable stanecontent.The phy<strong>si</strong>cal aspect ofthe soil is normal and the the soil surface is covered bystones in a of 10-20%.VoI. XXXI129


BARDASaofwere studied.Factors A (Variety)al - Runica middle early75 vegetation days 1998);middle80 vegetation days (Chiru, 1995);a - 3Rustic middle late3A * 3B * 3C * 3R = 8area- 150 cm up to the gravellevel -was achieved with anvariants in which the following factorsphy<strong>si</strong>ological maturity is achieved after approx.phy<strong>si</strong>ologicalluaturity is achieved after approx.phy<strong>si</strong>ological maturity is achieved after approx.108 vegetation days (Chiru, 1995).Factors B (Planting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty)b 1- 111000 plants/ha (75crn * 12,5cm) = 11,1 plants/ rn 2b z '- 83000 plants/ha (75CIU * 16,5crn) = 8,3 plantsl lU 2b 3- 83000 plants/ha (75cm * 20,Ocm) = 6,6 plants/ m 2Factors C (minitubers <strong>si</strong>ze)c 1- 5 15 mm;15-25mm;25 - 35 mnl.vigour sprouted minitubers with appr 0,5 - 1,5 cm sprouts, were forplanting at approx. 5 cm <strong>de</strong>pth. The luinitubers were produced in the biotechnologylaboratory of LC.D.C.S.Z. Brasov.obtained data were processed by variant analy<strong>si</strong>s method for alI ofthe studiedvariables. To COlupare the studied variables multiple comparings luethod by Duncan test0,5%) was used.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe number of main stems was variety specific due to tubers <strong>si</strong>ze planted andplanting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty, the differences were <strong>si</strong>gnificant among varieties, tubers <strong>si</strong>ze usedplanting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty. For a11 three varieties, the highest number ofmain stems was obtainedwith tuber <strong>si</strong>ze 25 - 35 mm.The highest number of main stems was achieved at Roclas variety (286.000main stelus/ha), followed by Rustic ( 270.000 main stems/ha ). Runica varietyhad the lowest 224.000 main stems/ha (table1).The average main stems nunlber achieved with 25 -- 35 mm minitubers <strong>si</strong>ze was335.000 main stems Iha, for 15 - 25 nllU minitubers <strong>si</strong>ze the average, main stems was263.000 aud 182.000 main stenlS for 5 15 lum minitubers <strong>si</strong>ze (tableI).For alI varieties, the main stelus number increases in the same tiiue with the increase........JlU..JLF-, {1''''r\C'1hr the maximum was recor<strong>de</strong>d at 111.000 minitubers/ha. The statistical130Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Eflects of minitubers <strong>si</strong>ze and planting distanceon seed potato production ofRomanian varieties<strong>si</strong>gnificance ofthe differences caused by increa<strong>si</strong>ng in at different tuber <strong>si</strong>ze isspecific for each variety.For studied varieties, when 25 35 mm minitubers <strong>si</strong>ze were planted, the increasein the number ofmain stems was <strong>si</strong>gnificant for each used level ofplanting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty. The3 levels ofplanting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty are between 66.000 and 111.000 plants/ha. The maximUlnmain stems for each variety was recor<strong>de</strong>d at 111.000 plants/ha, (419.000 for Runicavariety, 410.000 for Roclas variety aud 387.000 RusticWheu planting was ma<strong>de</strong> with 15 - 25 rom minitubers, <strong>si</strong>gnificant mcreasesmain stems nUlnber were achieved only by u<strong>si</strong>ng a plant of111.000 plants/ha, thedifferences between levels of plant <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty (66.000 and 83.000 used werein<strong>si</strong>gnificant (table1).The average accumulated total tiU the haulmend beginingofAugust, <strong>de</strong>pending on croping year, was 32,7 to.ha- I for variety, 30,0 to.ha- 1 ,for Rustic variety and 25,7 for Runica varietyThe average yields differed <strong>si</strong>gnificantly in accordance with the <strong>si</strong>ze ofminituber~and ranked between 22,9 tO.ha-l and 34,0 tO.ha-l. The highest influence oflninitubers<strong>si</strong>ze was on Runica variety yield (table 2).The highest yields were recor<strong>de</strong>d generally ai higy <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ties without being <strong>si</strong>gnificantlydiferent.The yields of seed were 19,8 tO.ha··1 for Roclas variety 18,7 ta.ha··I for Rusticand 14,8 tO.ha-I for Runica (table 3).The highest yield ofseed <strong>si</strong>ze 30 - 55 was obtained when planting we: s ma<strong>de</strong> withminitubers <strong>si</strong>ze 25 35 mrn.Increa<strong>si</strong>ng the 1?lant <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty did not po<strong>si</strong>tively affect the standard seed potato yield,the highest yieds were obtained at <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ties between 66.000 - 83.000 plants/ha.The seed yield fo alI the three varieties increases in the SaIne time with minitubers<strong>si</strong>ze and nutrition area. The highest seed yields (Runica 23,1 to.ha-I, Roclas 25,7 tO.ha­1Rustic 22,6 to.ha-l) were achieved by planting 25 - 35 lnm <strong>si</strong>ze oflninitubers. Also forRoclas and Rustic varieties the same levels ofyields can be achieved with 15 - 25 mm<strong>si</strong>ze ofminitubers (table 3).The tubers number per unit area for studied variants varied between 36,5 and130 tubers Im 2 due to planting <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty and the <strong>si</strong>ze ofminitubers used for planting.The highest tubers nUlnber per unit area was achieved at Roclas variety (l04,5tubershn 2 ). For Rustic variety the average tuber number producedhn 2 was 91,0 and forRunica only 63,9 (table 4).From big and middle <strong>si</strong>ze minitubers resulted in average 97,6 95,6 tubers/m 2 , a<strong>si</strong>gnificantly higher number than the variants in which small were used (66,3tubers /m 2 ).By increa<strong>si</strong>ng minitubers <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty per row in average the nUlnberproducedinaverage per unit area increases <strong>si</strong>gnificantly. Different <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ties different minitubers<strong>si</strong>ze results in different effects for each variety.VOL. XXXI131


t->:h.~t:l~~CJb o~NIwN1. influence and <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty on the number ofmain stems atalI studied varieties / hap:Imean 1998 2000) p:I-


~2.,....YJYJDLDLDL(b )( c )(d)-2.4- 2.4 t/ha- 2.4 t/haDL 50/0 ( b x d ) - 4.1 tlha5% ( c x d ) . - 4.1DI 5%) ( b x c x d) -7.1 t/haS' _.;.â(1) p.:lo..\/J~ (1)S (1) ::E: _ •.-c. ~S(1)~. .....~\/JN'(!)


~w~3. The inf1uence ofminitubers <strong>si</strong>ze and plant <strong>de</strong>n<strong>si</strong>ty on the seed yield(Lăzarea, Harghita County, mean values 1998 - 2000)Size ofRunica Roclas Rustic Aver1agePlantplantingnumber Seed Duncan Seed Duncan Seed Duncan Seed DuncanmaterialIIm production test production test production test production testmm)8 6.1 Q: 13,.5 e 13.4 d 11.0 f5-15 I 6 10.7 - efI! 16.0 <strong>de</strong> 16.0 bcd - 14.2 e5 8.6 fI! 18.6 bcd 18.5 abc 15.5 <strong>de</strong>AveraQe I x 8.5 c 16.0 b 15.9 b 13.5 c8 13.0 <strong>de</strong>f 17.6 c<strong>de</strong> 14.8 cd 15.1 <strong>de</strong>15-25 I 6 14.3 c<strong>de</strong> 22.6 - ab 20.7 ab - 19.2 bc5 15.6 cd 25.1 a 23.1 a 21.3 abAveraQe . I x 14.3 b 21.8 a 19.5 a 18.5 b17.8 bc 17.3 c<strong>de</strong> 16.8 bcd 17.3 cd25-35 I 6 I 22.3 ab 22.0 abc 22.4 a 22.2 a23.1 I a 25.7 a 22.62~;:sl:l~:--.(jb nV)NDL 5% (b)DL 5% (c)DL 5% (d)- 5.6 ti ha- 2.7 ti ha- 2.7 ti haDL 50/0 ( b x d ) - 4.6 ti haDL 5%) ( c x d ) - 4.6 ti haDI 50/0 ( b x c x d ) - 8.1 ti ha


dţ-


IvI.1.2.3REFERENCESICPC Brasov XX~ p. - 53.rc.pc Brasov XXV, p. 33 37.I.C.PC Brasov XXV, p. 38·- 42.1998 - Potato995 Potato variety Roclas.1995 - Potato Rustic.1996 - efticiency ofbreaking ,-,,-n.LU'eU.L'"In: 7hennaltheAssociation Potato Research ( E.A.P.R.progenyL0111menminitubers.p.e 1995 - Field performancenr""n-h'tC' and conventional seedResearch voI.996 - l1Yy...",rr\Hl1~7. &U.L.L."' .... L


Ioan GONTARIU. Daniela DONESCUDeterminărileefectuate pe parcursul celor trei ani, evi<strong>de</strong>nţiază că zborul afi<strong>de</strong>lor aavut o frecvenţă sporită în anii 1997-1999 (tab. 2), când temperaturile medii <strong>de</strong>cadaledin a doua jumătatea lunii iunie şi prima jumătatea lunii iulie au fost mai mari <strong>de</strong> 18° C,când nivelul <strong>de</strong> umezire pluvială (i.u.p.) nu a <strong>de</strong>păşit <strong>de</strong> două ori necesarul <strong>de</strong> precipitaţii(fig. 1,2,Fig. 1 Caracteristicile meteorologice inregistrate şi calculate· anul7060q>u'CJ 50o-O(; 40~C!l 30EOi:o 20«i> 10V3 Vi1 VI2 Vi3 VII1 VII2 VII3 V11I1 ViII2Luna şi <strong>de</strong>cadaFig.2 Caracteri<strong>si</strong>tciie meteorologice inreglstrate şi calculate· anul1998140.~CIE- 100eo 80~20oLuna şi <strong>de</strong>cadaPrecipitaţii(mm) ......,a,r--I.U.pAnale I.c.D.c.s.z.


inJluenţa conalţlllor meteorologice asupra evotuflel populaţiei ac aJlae al vlruSUrUur). IU 000Figo 3Caracteristicile meteorologice Înregistrate şi calculate·anui 199940v 35CIo 30Cio 252Il> 20E~ 15.2 10'">Luna şi <strong>de</strong>cada.....§-Prec ,pilati,{mm)În anul 1998, când înlnenţionattenl1pe:ratlura1 umezirii pluviale a <strong>de</strong> douămica a zborului afi<strong>de</strong>lor cu un total <strong>de</strong> 484 P


ioan UUNTAlU. U, Daniela DUNESCUMenţinerea la sfârşitul lunii iulie şi începutul lunii august a unui regim termic ridicat(20-22°C) şi a unui regim hidric scăzut (i.u.p. = 0,1-0,9) a rata înmulţiriiasociat cu un zbor mult luai redus în anii 1998 -160 exemplare (fig. şi1999 - 275 (fig. 6). Anul 1997 se remarcă printr-un zbor mai intens în ultima<strong>de</strong>cadă a lunii iunie şi prima <strong>de</strong>cadă a lunii iulie. Temperaturi mai mari <strong>de</strong> 18°C au fostultilna <strong>de</strong>cadă a lunii iulie şi prilna <strong>de</strong>cadă a lunii august, iar numărul indivizilor captaţi acuprins între 205-289. În ultima <strong>de</strong>cadă a lunii iunie (1998), s-au 271datorită faptului că telnperaturile au fost ridicate (18,7°C), iar precipitaţiilereduseFig. 5 Frecvenţa speciilor <strong>de</strong> afi<strong>de</strong>. funcţie. <strong>de</strong> unii parametrimeteorologiei - Suceava 1988V3 VI1 VI2 VIS Vlll VII2 VII3 VI1I1Luna şi <strong>de</strong>cadaFig. 6 Frecvenţa speciilor <strong>de</strong> afi<strong>de</strong>. funcţie <strong>de</strong> unii parametri meteorologiei.Suceava 1999Vf2 Vf3 Vlf1 Vlf2 Vlf3 V 11I1luna şi<strong>de</strong>cada142 Anale I. c.D. c.s.z.


Influenţa condiţiilor meteorologice asupra evoluţiei populaţiei <strong>de</strong> aji<strong>de</strong> (vectori ai virusurilo!',), la ...Fig. 7 Structura populaţiiior<strong>de</strong> afi<strong>de</strong>- Suceava 1997·199914001200Il)"ti1+:!'Il1000800)(lIE600:::lZ400200Total Alte D.f.afi<strong>de</strong> speciisfi<strong>de</strong>A.f.+ M.p. Ac.pis. R.sp.A.n.Fig.8 PartiCiparea speciilor <strong>de</strong> afida ia transmitereavirusurilor, exprimate În unităţi <strong>de</strong> transmitere (U.T.)- Suceava 1997 -19992501-: 200 II)c: 50~Total Alt., M.p. U.T. D.f. U.T. Af.+ A.n. Ac. Pis. R. sp.afi<strong>de</strong> specii IJ.T. II.T. u:r.IJ.T.a,fi<strong>de</strong>IJ.T.Dintre speciile <strong>de</strong>terminate se remarcă M per<strong>si</strong>cae, care sub formătransmitere, a fost predominant în anii 1997 (63 DT) şi 1999 (65 UT).a avut o prezenţă constantă în toţi anii studiu ca nmnăr <strong>de</strong> captaţi (278-349),dar şi ca unităţi <strong>de</strong> transmitere 27,8-34,9 DT (fig.Grupul <strong>de</strong> afi<strong>de</strong> "alte specii" a fost evi<strong>de</strong>nt pe primul loc cu 407captaţianul 1988 şi cu un maxinl <strong>de</strong> 811 exemplare în anul 1999, (fig. 7).VOL. XXXI143


Ioan GONTARIU, Daniela DONESCUCONCLUZII- Cei trei ani luaţi în studiu au confirmat faptul că în zona <strong>de</strong> nord a Podişuluiexistă un număr important <strong>de</strong> specii <strong>de</strong> afi<strong>de</strong> vectori ai virusurilor cartofului<strong>pentru</strong> săn1ânţă;- În 1997 şi 1999 se remarcă cea mai ridicată frecvenţă a numărului <strong>de</strong> indivizi.... HJ.U.L.~U..''--'L. <strong>de</strong> boli virotice, iar specia lt1yzus per<strong>si</strong>cae a fost <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntă <strong>de</strong> condiţiileOUT>'.':n",", (1998);speciilor Aphis frangulae, Aphis nasturtii şi Aphis fabae a fost maiinfluenţată<strong>de</strong> condiţiilec1imatice existente în zonă;- Izolarea în spaţiu a loturilor <strong>de</strong> producere a cartofului <strong>pentru</strong> sămânţă, rC'r"·C"·7H... t.:iuna din nlăsurile<strong>de</strong> bază în tehnologia acestei plante <strong>de</strong> cultură.BIBLIOGRAFIE:1. BEDO E. şi colab., 1998 Studiu comparativ privind zborul afi<strong>de</strong>lor în BazinulCiue şi câlnpul clonal Păuleni Ciue, în perioada 1987-1995, Anale I.voI. XXIII, p:2. BERINDEI 1977 - Zonarea cartofului, Editura Ceres, Bucureşti;3. COJOCARU N. şi colab., Zborul <strong>de</strong> atac al afi<strong>de</strong>lor în culturile <strong>de</strong> cartof dinzonele <strong>de</strong>stinate producerii materialului <strong>pentru</strong> sălnânţă, Anale 1. C.<strong>Cartof</strong>ul voI. IV, p: 93 - 111;4. COJOCARU N., 1987 - Virozele cmiofului în "Protecţiacartofului, boli, U-U"


influenţa (;,;naltllirJr mp1fN,v,r,/,"71rfY asupra evoluţiei populaţiei al vlrusunlor), la ...~V1n?'>"'·1.,.., .. ~n't", results on three years P1'Yl1"'\h':>C'1~'Pthe average of ac(;aaew ternpl~ratUl'efirst of 18 C and thetwice the necessary of rainfalls.,o"iT'(1lTll!1I"rlI.,· aphids, seed potato, climatic conditionTables:1.2. TheSuceava 1997-1999.do1. Meteorological characteristics, and calculated, 1997.2. Meteorological characteristics, registrated and 1998.3. Meteorological characteristics, registrated and calculated, 1999.4. The frequency ofaphid species, on some meteorologica!Suceava -5. The frequency ofaphid species, on SOlne u .... '"'''..."J~Suceava - 1998.6. The frequency ofaphid species, <strong>de</strong>pending on some ..u,....,"...,,,JL'"JJl.,.;F~Jl.v.' ... par3lm~~te]~sSuceava - 1999.7. The structure aphid population-Suceava 1997-1999.8. Participation ofaphid species on virus transmis<strong>si</strong>on, onunits - Suceava 1997-1999.VOL. XXXI145


REZUMATPaul VÂRCAN 1 , Aurelia DIACONUJ·~t(lţlUnea <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong>-<strong>Dezvoltare</strong> <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong>, Mârşani - 207380, Dolj, România""VjU.'U"~.i.l.jl'-'din sud-vestul României, tipice zonei <strong>de</strong> stepă, pe un sol ni<strong>si</strong>po-lutos, înperioada 1991-1 în condiţii irigare, în localitatea Amărăştii <strong>de</strong> Jos, s-au efectuatinfluenţa condiţiilor <strong>de</strong> climă şi a epocii <strong>de</strong> întrerupere a vegetaţiei asupraHU.""'V""''-''. cu virusuri şi a producţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof în al II-lea an <strong>de</strong> cultivare (postcultură).'-'\J~ÂU,",",,"''''' unui material <strong>de</strong> plantat cu o infecţie cu viroze cât mai redusă, trebuievegetaţiei la 60-65 <strong>de</strong> zile <strong>de</strong> la răsărire. Cu toate acestea,din timpul vegetaţiei şi în timpul păstrării conduc la îmbătrânirea.LU,,~V"VMjLV"" a tuberculilor şi la reducerea dramatică a producţiei, în funcţie <strong>de</strong> soicum urmează: (în primul an) 47,4 to/ha postcultură) la soiul Sante,la 60,6/1 la Mariame, 56,2/31,1 to/ha la Oscar, 51,7/39,6 tol48,7/31,3 tolha la Titus, 48,6118,8 to/ha la Rustic, 45,9/36,71ala 46,5/27,8 to/ha la Bârsa, 47,9/22,8 to/ha la Bran, 44,3/27,4De<strong>si</strong>ree, 41 5,8 tolha la Ostara.cartof, soi, calitate, întrerupere vegetaţieINTRODUCEREcartofu1ui din întreaga lume dove<strong>de</strong>şte că toate soiurile <strong>de</strong> cartof.an <strong>de</strong> an îşi potenţialul <strong>de</strong> producţie, se<strong>de</strong>Jgerlen~aza. Degenerarea este un proces irever<strong>si</strong>bil.Degenerarea cartofului a fost observată cu în meaXVIII --- lea când "Agricultural Society Manchester" a instituit un'-'\-.LI........,'''' cercetarea cauzelor acestei progre<strong>si</strong>ve a capacităţii <strong>de</strong> producţie1974). În anul AUGUSTINE PARMANTIER,bunădreptate răspândirii cartofului în a se<strong>si</strong>zat <strong>de</strong>generareacartofcultivate în Franţa, explicând ca un efect al îmbătrânirii~IJ""LULU. Ca <strong>de</strong> a <strong>de</strong>generării, PARMANTIERpreconiza crearea '-'V....U.lLUUvechi, <strong>de</strong>generate.noi din şi scoaterea din cultură a .J'-'x .......... J, ......Una pârghii1e cele mai eficiente <strong>de</strong> sporire a agricole o reprezintăcartoful sămânţa sau materialul <strong>de</strong> care potenţialul biologicproducţie al soiului creat şi caracterizat printr-o anumită structură genetică.Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


Influenţa condiţiilor <strong>de</strong> climă şi a calităţii materialului <strong>de</strong> plantat asupra producţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof in ...La cartof: mai mult ca la oricare altă plantă <strong>de</strong> cultură, calitatea materialului <strong>de</strong>plantare este un factor esenţial care <strong>de</strong>termină mărimea şi calitatea recoltei(CONSTANTINESCU ECATERlNA şi colab., 1965 ).Înmulţirea cartofului pe cale vegetativă,prin tuberculi pennite translniterea <strong>de</strong> la unan la altul a unui număr însemnat <strong>de</strong> boli cauzate <strong>de</strong> virusuri, bactelioze, nematozisau mycoplasme. De calitatea biologică a lliaterialului <strong>de</strong> plantare <strong>de</strong>pin<strong>de</strong> capacitatea<strong>de</strong> încolţire, răsărirea, creşterea plantelor şi acumularea producţiei,ll1ărimea şi calitatea acesteia. Starea biologicăa <strong>de</strong> plantare, în general, estetot atât ilnportantă<strong>pentru</strong> practica agricolăca soiul <strong>de</strong> cartof(CATELLY, 1974).Din aceste con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rente cartoful <strong>pentru</strong> sămânţă o problemă <strong>de</strong> actualitatepermanentă în toate ţările producătoare <strong>de</strong> cartof <strong>de</strong> chiar şi în cele cu vechetradiţie în producerea şi înmulţireaacestuia.Analizând, printr-un mo<strong>de</strong>l matematicmare număr <strong>de</strong> factori cauzali la realizarea producţiei <strong>de</strong>producţia este <strong>de</strong>tenninată proporţional <strong>de</strong> u. u ..'.,J.I ...,.'.H .>- 51 <strong>de</strong> valoarea lnaterialului <strong>de</strong>>- 21 % <strong>de</strong> potenţialul biologic al soiului;'Y <strong>de</strong> utilizarea raţională a ln1:l;ra~?anllntel,)r>- <strong>de</strong> măsurile <strong>de</strong> protecţie a "".......u.......>- 3% <strong>de</strong> alţiCalitatea materialului <strong>de</strong> plantare, explimatăşicolab., 1986) contribuţia unuiîn condiţiileunei telmologii<strong>de</strong>tennină în cea mai lnare Inăsură nivelul pn)OlictJtel. COllstJltUllnO ,'>""11"""'"producţiei, în tilnp ce <strong>de</strong> şi.u ,....!: ...,'l..., a potenţialului biologic. Iată <strong>de</strong> ce AhlIPf'·tnnnl p:nnl:;lp:alA.U ...,Jl' "...... '...... <strong>de</strong> plantare la cartof în Jl.'-v........u ...uumenţinereala un nivel cât mai ridicat a jJv'c"'U!:.......'lU...UMATERIALDE CERCETAREPentru <strong>de</strong>telUlinarea '''''''''r>'o'''''folo<strong>si</strong>t soiul Fresco. '-'V"~"''''''


Paul VÂRCAN, Aurelia DIACONUFertilizarea s-a făcut organic ( 25 t/ha gunoi <strong>de</strong> grajd) administrat sub brazdă şichimic (N120 P 120 K ), I20la pregătirea terenului în ve<strong>de</strong>rea plantării, la care s-a adăugatN64 în tinlpul vegetaţiei la împreunarea rândurilor.Culturile au fost menţinute curate <strong>de</strong> buruieni printr-o rebilonare şi erbicidare cuDual 500 EC - 31/ha plus Sencor 70 WP 0,4 kg/ha. Gândacul din Colorado şi ceilalţidăunători <strong>de</strong> sol au fost combătuţi prin administrarea <strong>de</strong> Vydate 10G- 15 kg/ha, înainate<strong>de</strong> planatare, care a menţinut culturile protejate timp <strong>de</strong> cea. 30 zile <strong>de</strong> la răsărire, dupăcare s-au folo<strong>si</strong>t piretroizi. Împotriva manei şi alternariozei s-au aplicat două tratamentecu Ridomil MZ 72 WP -2,5 kg/ha.Necesarul <strong>de</strong> apă a fost a<strong>si</strong>gurat prin 10- 15 udări prin asper<strong>si</strong>une cu norme <strong>de</strong>udare <strong>de</strong> 300-350 m 3 /ha în fncţie <strong>de</strong> perioada <strong>de</strong> vegetaţie, menţinând plafonul nlinim peadâncimea <strong>de</strong> O,4m la 60-70% din lUA.Au fost făcute observaţii privind data răsăritului <strong>pentru</strong> stabilirea datei <strong>de</strong> întreruperea vegetaţiei şi infecţia cu virusuri, fără eliminarea plantelor virozate.Întreruperea vegetaţieis-a făcut prin smulgere, lăsând vrejii pe bilon <strong>pentru</strong> evitareaînverzirii tuberculilor care nu întot<strong>de</strong>auna pot fi acoperiţicu pământ.La 18-20 <strong>de</strong> zile <strong>de</strong> la întreruperea vegetaţiei, după suberificarea tuberculilor, s-afăcut recoltarea. La recoltare, au fost reţinute trei probc a câtc 1800 tuberculi care aufost păstrate în pivniţă.În postcultură,materialul <strong>de</strong> plantat provenit din anul I, a fost încolţit şi plantat înparcele experimentale aşezate în blocuri randOlnizate, în 4 repetiţii a câte 12 rânduri,lungimea parcelei 6 m, distanţa între rânduri <strong>de</strong> 0,75 m, distanţa între cuiburi/rând <strong>de</strong>0,20m.Elementele <strong>de</strong> tehnologie legate <strong>de</strong> fertilizare, erbicidare, combaterea bolilor şidăunătorilor, irigare, au fost aceleaşi ca în anul I (anul <strong>de</strong> înmulţire).În timpul vegetaţiei au fost făcute aceleaşi observaţii ca în anul I, iar recoltarea s-afăcut la maturitatea fiziologicăa soiului.De asemenea, în perioada 1993-1995, în aceleaşi condiţii <strong>de</strong> sol, mediu, şi tehnologie,s-a testat capacitatea <strong>de</strong> producţie la mai multe soiuri <strong>de</strong> cartof din România şi Olanda.REZULTATE ŞIDISCUŢIIInfecţia cu virusuri în anul <strong>de</strong> înmulţire (tabelul 1). Materialul <strong>de</strong> plantat adusdin zona închisă Braşov, a fost sănătos din punct <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re al infecţiei cu virusuri; infecţiafiind diferită <strong>de</strong> la un an la altul, având valori <strong>de</strong> 0,94% în anul 1992, 1,5% în anul 1993şi 1,74% în anul 1994. La viroze grave (Y+VRF), infecţia a fost în anul 1992 <strong>de</strong> 0,45%,în anul 1993 <strong>de</strong> 0,77%, iar în anul 1994 a fost <strong>de</strong> 0,86%. În lnedie <strong>pentru</strong> cei 3 ani <strong>de</strong>experimentare, infecţia cu virusuri a fost <strong>de</strong> 1,39% la total viroze, din care 0,77% laviroze grave (Y+VRF).148Anale 1.C.D.C.S.Z.


Influenţa condiţiilor <strong>de</strong> climă şi aplantat asupra prDducţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof in ...Anul18531993 18201994 1876LMedia 1850AJlJU'....... '!;JlMcu virusuri in post(::uliLUI"aO,94c}~, după un anrI.1r""... t"'> în <strong>de</strong> factoriiH.l.L'''''.......JL''' l""r.n'l':lr":' <strong>de</strong> 0,490/0, după un an1%.U.AJl'..,vL'lU totalăa fost cuprinsălnlectle n'r1n11':i1''';:l<strong>de</strong> 0,77%, după un an <strong>de</strong>0,86%, după un an <strong>de</strong>infecţia totală cu virusuriîn 1995 a fost <strong>de</strong> 4,870/0.1rr.'I''''ru·.''


PaulAurelia DJACONUgrave, (Y+VRF) a fost în anul 1993 <strong>de</strong> 1,28%~ în anul 1994 afost iar în 1995 a fost <strong>de</strong> 3,07%. Condiţiile climatice ale anului <strong>de</strong>îmnulţire 1992 au favorizat mai puţin răspândireavirusurilor, astfel că în anul 1993,anii 1994 şi 1995, infecţia a fost mai redusă, fiind a<strong>si</strong>gurată statistic.Epoca <strong>de</strong> întrerupere a vegetaţiei în anul <strong>de</strong> înmulţire a influenţat infecţia viroticădin anul <strong>de</strong> cultură a cartofului timpuriu, la total viroze, crescând <strong>de</strong> la 2,46% la 55 <strong>de</strong> zileşi 3, Il% la 65 <strong>de</strong> zile, până la 5,51 % la maturitate, diferenţele <strong>de</strong> infecţie fiind a<strong>si</strong>gurate0LUH0'U.v. La viroze grave, infecţia a crescut <strong>de</strong> la 1,55% la 55 <strong>de</strong> zile la 1,96% la 65 <strong>de</strong>zile şi a ajuns la la maturitate, <strong>de</strong> asemenea diferenţele fiind a<strong>si</strong>gurate statistic.<strong>de</strong> a asupra infecţiei cu virusuri în funcţieVVJlAU.J.~UJl"'"climatice (tabelulanul 1993, la total viroze, infecţia la materialul <strong>de</strong> plantat provenit din întrerupereavegetaţiei la maturitate a crescut la 2,76% faţă <strong>de</strong> materialul <strong>de</strong> plantat provenit dinvegetaţiei la 55 şi 65 <strong>de</strong> zile la care infecţia a fost <strong>de</strong> 1,15 - 1,81 %.La viroze grave, materialul <strong>de</strong> plantat provenitdin întrenlperea vegetaţiei la maturitate,crescut la 1)4% faţă <strong>de</strong> 0,95 - 1,14% la materialul provenit din întreruperea"';;;"~LU"i'-'A la 55 <strong>de</strong> zile şi respectiv la 65 <strong>de</strong> zile, nu au fost diferenţe <strong>de</strong> infecţie virotică8c,rnlr·~T~ statistic.anul 1994, la total viroze, faţă <strong>de</strong> materialul provenit <strong>de</strong> la întrerupereavegetaţiei la 55 <strong>de</strong> zile, la care infecţia a fost <strong>de</strong> 0,94%, materialul provenit <strong>de</strong> laîntreruperea vegetaţieila 65 <strong>de</strong> zile a avut o infecţie virotică nlai mare (3,48%), iar cel<strong>de</strong> la întreruperea vegetaţiei la maturitate infecţia cu virusuri a crescut la6,3%, creşterea fiind a<strong>si</strong>gurată statistic atât <strong>de</strong> materialul obţinut la 55 <strong>de</strong> zile cât şi<strong>de</strong> cel obţinut la 65 <strong>de</strong> zile.La viroze grave, faţă <strong>de</strong> l1laterialul obţinut la 55 <strong>de</strong> zile, la care infecţia a fost <strong>de</strong>,73%, Întârziereaa întreruperii vegetaţiei, infecţia a crescut la 2,2% la 65 <strong>de</strong> zile şila 3,980/0 la maturitate.3. Infleuenţa epocii <strong>de</strong> Întrerupere a vegetaţiei asupra infecţiei cu virusuri lasoiul Fresco, în funcţie <strong>de</strong> condiţiile cliillatice (1993-1995)Y+VRFTestDuncan150Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


producţiei <strong>de</strong> carta] In ...anulrilllltermllli VU'''.Ul......'' la 55 <strong>de</strong> zile, la care infecţiavirotică a mt:lfZllen~a Il1tn:rultJeru vegÎ~ta1ţlella 65 <strong>de</strong> zile, infecţia a crescutla 4,04%, iarla la 7,46%.La viroze grave, <strong>de</strong> >JU', la 55 <strong>de</strong> la care infecţia a fost<strong>de</strong> 1,97(%, prin Întârzierea l·.... f-.."'rn~.""T1l. vef~etitu:a ,-l-"",~t.~ a ajuns la 2,55% la 65 <strong>de</strong> zile şila la maturitate.S-au testat <strong>de</strong> asemenea mai multe soiuri <strong>de</strong> s-a constatat că ele au reacţionatfoarte diferit în postcultură faţă <strong>de</strong> 1Figurat. Producţia<strong>de</strong> cartofîn anul 1 şi in postculturăla soiurile timpul"semitimpurii (1994- 1995)OstaraDochcsc Florcttc SafraneAidaAtlasIim Ptot Anul 1 50,653,3 53 58,343,138,3!II Ptot. Postcultura 1618,3 14,6 23,5Soiul19,824,6La soiul Ostara în anul 1s-a totală <strong>de</strong> 50,6 tlha, iar în postcu1tllră s-a obţinut o producţie <strong>de</strong> 16 tlha~ La producţiaobţinutăîn postcultură a fostmai mică <strong>de</strong>cât cea în 1şi anume 18,3 faţă <strong>de</strong> 53,3 t/ha. La soiul Florettes-a obţinut o 53 tlha în 1 şi în anul al II-lea. La soiul Safrane înanul I s-a obţinuto <strong>de</strong> t1ha, s~a obţinut o producţie 23,5t1ha. La soiul Aidaanul!, iar în postculturăs-a realizato producţie <strong>de</strong> 19,8 La soiul o producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi în anul 1<strong>de</strong> 38,3 aceasta fiind obţinută la soiurile prezentate lnai sus,dar ceea ce este foarte<strong>de</strong> tuberculi obţinută în postculturăa fost mai mare şi anume 24,6 t1ha.figura 2 estetuberculi care s-a realizat în condiţiile<strong>de</strong> la Amărăştii <strong>de</strong> Jos în anul 1 şi înLa soiul De<strong>si</strong>ree s-a obţinut în anul 1oproducţie <strong>de</strong> 44,3 iar în la soiul Mariane în anul 1s-a obţinutoproducţie 60,6 s-a realizat o producţie <strong>de</strong> 18,7 tlha, la soiulLatona în anul 1s-a totală <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> 63,3 tlha iar în postculturăs-a obţinut o cea mare producţie totală <strong>de</strong>SYlnfonia s-a realizat o producţiemică producţie comparativîn anul 1 s-a obţinut o producţieVOL. XXXI151


PaulAurelia DIACONUtotală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 56,2 tlha, iar în postcultură s-a obţinut o producţie totală <strong>de</strong> 31 tiha. La soiul Minerva s-a obţinut în anul 1o producţie totală 51,2 tlha, iar în postculturăproducţia totală obţinută a fost <strong>de</strong> 39,6 t/ha.Figura2. Productia În anul 1 şi în postculturăla soiurilesemitardive (1994- 1995)10050oDe<strong>si</strong>ree Mariane Latona Symfonia Oscar MinervaIm Ptot. Anul 1 44,360,663,352,956.251,2IIIPtotPostcultura 27,418.742,210,431,139,6SoiulÎn figura 3 sunt prezentate, <strong>de</strong> asemenea, rezultatele privind producţia obţinută înfuncţie <strong>de</strong> soi în anul 1 şi în postcultură. Se poate constata că la soiul Ostara producţiatotală obţinută a fost în anul 1 <strong>de</strong> 41,4 tllha, iar în postcultură s-a obţinut o producţie <strong>de</strong>tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 15.8 t/ha. La soiul Fresco în anul 1s-a obţinut o producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi<strong>de</strong> 45,9 t/ha, iar în postculturăs-a realizat o producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 36,7 t/ha; lasoiul Cibin s-a obţinut în anul 1 o producţie <strong>de</strong> 46,9 t/ha, iar în postcultură s-a obţinut oproducţie <strong>de</strong> 37,9 t/ha. La soiul Bârsa în anul 1s-a obţinut o producţie <strong>de</strong> 46,5 t/ha iar înpostcultură s-a obţinut o producţie <strong>de</strong> 27,8 t/ha. La soiul Bran producţia obţinutăîn anul1 a fost <strong>de</strong> 47,9 t/ha iar în postcultură producţia realizată a ,fost <strong>de</strong> 22,8 t/ha. La soiulMureşan producţia totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi a fost <strong>de</strong> 42,8 tlha în anul 1, iar în postcultură s-aobţinuta producţie totală <strong>de</strong> 36,9 t/ha.Fig.3. Productia în anul 1 şi în postcultură la soiurile timpurii,semitimpurii <strong>si</strong> semitardive (1993- 1994)100§l Ptot. Anul I50°lIIIl Ptot. PostculturaoSoiul152Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z


Influenţa condiţiilor <strong>de</strong> climă şi a calităţii materialului <strong>de</strong> plantat asupra proaucţlel ae CarlOj In ...În figura 4 sunt prezentate rezultatele privind producţia <strong>de</strong> tuberculi care s-aobţiniut în anul 1 şi în postucltură la soiurile De<strong>si</strong>ree, Sante, Titus, Roc1as, Rustic şiTeo. La soiul De<strong>si</strong>ree în anul 1 s-a obţinuto producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 43,3 t/haiar în postculturăs-a obţinut o producţie <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 27,1 t/ha. La soiul Sante înanul 1 s-a obţinut o producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi 63,2 iar în postculturăs-aobţinut o producţie <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 47,4 t/ha. La soiul Titus în anul 1 s-a obţinut oproducţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 48,7 tlha iar în postculturăs-a obţinuto producţie <strong>de</strong>tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 31,3 t/ha. La soiul Roclas în anul 1 s-a obţinut o producţie totală <strong>de</strong>tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 47,3 t/ha iar în postculturăs-a obţinuto producţie <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 38,6 tiha. La soiul Rustic în anul 1 s-a obţinuto producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 48,6 t/ha iarîn postculturăs-a obţinuto producţie <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 18,8 La soiul Teo în anul Is-a obţinuto producţie totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 42,6 în s-a obţinuto<strong>de</strong> tuberculi <strong>de</strong> 24,6 t/ha.Figura 4. Productia in anul 1 şi în la soiurilesemitardive <strong>si</strong> tardive (1993- 1994)De<strong>si</strong>rec Sante Titus Roclas Rustic Teo48,6 42,6Soiul18,8 24,6CONCLUZIIun an <strong>de</strong> îninfecţiatotalăcua fost în anul 1993 <strong>de</strong> 2,03%, înanul <strong>de</strong> înmulţire 1992 condiţiile au favorizat1995 a fost <strong>de</strong> 4,87%..!.AU..·"'''',".Jl" virotică,clasând anul 1993 ca an cu secundarăcea acest fenomen aal[Or:an


Faut VARC'AN, Aurelia DIACONUgrave, infecţia a crescut <strong>de</strong> la 1,55% la 55 zile la 1,96% la 65 <strong>de</strong> şi a ajuns la3,48% la maturitate, <strong>de</strong> asemenea diferenţele fiind a<strong>si</strong>gurate statistic.Producţia care s-a obţinut în postcultură a Ulai mică <strong>de</strong>cât cea care s-aVUO_UA'''' în anul 1 la toateînregistrându-se diferenţe foarte mari întreîn ceea ceproducţia obţinutăîn postcultură.La Sante s-a obţinutcea mai nlare producţie atât în primul an (63,2 câtşi în postcultură(47,4 urmat <strong>de</strong> soiul Latona cu 42,2 t/ha, soiul Minerva cut/ha, soiul Roclas cu 38,6 t/ha, soiul Mureşan cu 36,9 t/ha şi soiul Fresco cu 36,7 t/ha.La soiul Symfonia s-a obţinutcea mai mică producţie<strong>de</strong> tuberculi în postculturăşianume 10,4 t/ha precum şi la soiul Florette la care s-a obţinuto producţie <strong>de</strong> tuberculi14,6 t/ha.BIBLIOGRAFIE1. Catelly T. 1974 - Zone <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>generare a cartofului şi reînnoirea lnaterialului<strong>pentru</strong> în România. Teză <strong>de</strong> . <strong>Institutul</strong> Agronomic Cluj- Napoca.2. Catelly 1988 - <strong>Cartof</strong>ul banalitate sau lniracol? Editura Ceres. Bucureşti.3. Constantinescu Ecaterina şi calah. , 1965 - Cultura cartoful ;EdituraAgro<strong>si</strong>lvică, Bucureşti.4. Gorea T., T. Catelly, S. Man, H. Groza şi C. Draica, 1986 - Contribuţia soiului şia materialului <strong>de</strong> plantat la creşterea producţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof. Buletin informativ al ASASnr.15.INFLUENCE OF CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND SEED POTATOQUALITY ON POTATO YIELD IN THE SOUTH-WEST REGION OFROMANIAAbstractResearches were carried out un<strong>de</strong>r the conditions ofthe S-W ofRomania, specifico the steppe area, on a sandy-loamy soil~ between 1991-1995, and un<strong>de</strong>r ilTigationconditions. The purposes of the researches was to establish the influence of climaticconditions and ofthe moment ofhaulm killing on the the vinis infection rate and on thepotato yield in the second crop year (postculture). In or<strong>de</strong>r to obtain a planting materialwith a infection as low as pos<strong>si</strong>ble, haulm killing must be operated at 60-65 daysafter emergence. Despite these, the w~ather conditions during the crop season and thestorage period lead to phyi<strong>si</strong>ological senescence oftubers and to the dramatic <strong>de</strong>creaseofyield, as follows: 63,2 to/ha (in the first year) / 47,4 to/ha (in postculture) in Santevariety, 63,3/42,2 to/ha in Latona, 60,6118,7 to/ha in Marimne, 56,2/31,1 to/ha in Oscar,51,7/39,6 to/ha in Minerva, 48,7/31,3 to/ha in Titus, 48,6/18,8 to/ha in Rustic, 45,9/36,7in Fresco, 46,9/37,9 to/ha in Cibin, 46,5/27,8 to/ha in Bârsa, 47,9/22,8 to/ha in Bran,44,3/27,4 to/ha in De<strong>si</strong>ree, 41,4/15,8 ta/ha in Ostara.154Anale 1.C.D.C.S.Z.


Influenţa condiţiilor <strong>de</strong> producţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof in ...Tables:Fresco variety (1992-1994)c1imatic conditions and therate ofviruses infection in <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce1. Potato(1994-1995).2. Potato yield3. Potato of(1993-1994).4. Potato1994).in 1st year and in post-cultureyear and post-culture (1994-1995).varieties in 1st year and in post-culturepost-culture (1993-VOL. XXX!155


USING A WORMCOMPOST FORINCREASINGPOTATO"\'IELD IN ORGANIC FARMSSUMMARYS. D. KIRU 1 , 1. V. GRISHK02'N.I.Vavilov Institute ofplant Industry, 190000, Saint-Petersburg, 42, B.Morskaya str.e-mail: step_kiru@imail.ru2Agrophy<strong>si</strong>cal Institute, 195220, Saint- Petersburg, 14, Grazhdansky pr.During last years wonncompost have got a high importance especially in organicfarms. Use ofsuch fertilizer allows to bring up a organic crop product with high yield,least expenses and excluding ofneces<strong>si</strong>ty of<strong>de</strong>struction ofweeds.A field trials for studying the influence of u<strong>si</strong>ng wormcompost on potatogrowing as ecologically adaptive technology ofsoii amelioration for increase the yieldand prevention the <strong>de</strong>gradation processes in agrosysten1s was carried out during 3 years(2001-2003). A different variants with application ofvarious doses ofwormcompost,comparing with use of mineral fertilizers (MF-variant) were used in the experiment.There was used a wonncompost from various vegetable-manure substratum with theestablished optimum share of cow manure (40 %). A wormcompost of intermediatestage ofbioconver<strong>si</strong>on, as the most adaptive for applying into soil was used. The frequencyofvariants oftrial was triple. Dutch potato cultivar Sante was used in the trials as varietywhich have a high respond to soii fertilizing. A phenological observations and measuresof tuber growth were carried out by standard methods.Keywords: worrnkompost, fertilizers, potato, yield.INTRODUCTIONThe low efficiency ofapplication oftraditional organic fertilisers is pre<strong>de</strong>terminedby incompatibility ofmanure and soii biota with and <strong>de</strong>gradation oflast one, caused byused agrotechnology and aggravated natural and climatic factors. Particularly it <strong>de</strong>gra<strong>de</strong>because the ground during the winter peri6d freeze so that their standard biomass isrestored only by the end ofJune. So, the plants in the most important period ofgrowthare <strong>de</strong>prived the alive substance of the ground playing certain and, probably, a mainrole in a metabolisnl oftheir nutrition and <strong>de</strong>formation of a proton barrier in the rootzone, ari<strong>si</strong>ng at adverse conditions of an enviromnent (stress).Obtained by wormcomposting bioorganic fertilisers have a number ofdistinctivebiophy<strong>si</strong>cai properties being consequence of presence in them of specific humussubstances and regulators of plant growth, formed with participation of consuments156Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


the wormcompoststennofermentation duringorganisms and <strong>de</strong>compo<strong>si</strong>tion",U.j,.L.L.L';'U to natural organic sut)stjln{~eecosystem open-en<strong>de</strong>d, a necessaryofmicrobiocenoze reducents-<strong>de</strong>compo<strong>si</strong>tors and ~>J'''.L''J,.L''F,andbyForfinal of2-ndIt allows ta J.U"'J.L,",4;4.~""toxico<strong>si</strong>s appreciably CallSeaJlVA..L.IU..' .... by specific tTIlprr,_Al'O,;tnlCt1t"'ICit i8 offered tathe products ofaccordingly, mterrnelj.1ateIn the beginningexperiences in Rus<strong>si</strong>awere divi<strong>de</strong>d on the groups:terms: ··"",·,...r1-nt",A'~"',""A",t",-,u., '",.,. a the increase a crop up to 35% is IJv."",A.Jln.',,",,wheat) - an increase up tata 15%; 4/01ive cultures - reaet poorly.


8. LJ. Klf(U, J. v. uf(JSHKUpreliminary sprouting. The seed tuber <strong>si</strong>ze was 20-40 g. The scheme ofplanting ­70635 SITI. The wonncompostwas applied locally un<strong>de</strong>r tubers. Phenological observationswere carried out by methods ofN. Vavilov Institute, including measures oftuber increase.Harvesting was carried out in the first <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> ofSeptember. Meteorological conditionsforresearches differed (quantity and distribution ofrain and the sums oftemperatures) - was favourable tor <strong>de</strong>velopment ofa potato in 2001 and 2002 butin 2003 they were adverse: (the summer of2003 year more cold and rainy in comparisonwith 2002 and 2001, that promoted a high <strong>de</strong>velopment oflate blight.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe phenological observations over growth and <strong>de</strong>velopment ofplants ofa potatoin 2001-2003 shown a different terms of passage of phenological phases of start an<strong>de</strong>nd of flowerings were established: In the variant with applying WOlID compost 4t/haand 8t/ha the period <strong>si</strong>nce planting to flowerings was: in variants with use wormcompostthey began correspondingly on 5 and 7 day earlier in cOlnparison with the variant wherewere used MF-varÎant.In variants with applying ofthey began earlier for 3 days (with a doze 4 t/ha) andfor 5 days (with a doze 8 t/ha) in comparison with the variants with mineral fertilisers, ati<strong>de</strong>ntical tenns ofoccurrence of shoots (table 1).Table 1 Inf1uence ofuse ofdifferent kinds offertilisers on length ofphenologicalphasesA different ternlS of plant <strong>de</strong>veloping was established between variants of trial.mean number and length of stems was also different in the variants (table 2). Theaverage length of stems, as weB as their number was more in variants with usewOlIDcOlnpost 8 t/ha.Accumulation tubers weight was accounted an 60-th day of vegetation....... U-J.......v·v... and tubers weight excee<strong>de</strong>d parameters of MF- variant already at applying adoze ofcompost 4 Ii/ha, and the most essential distinctions were established at doze 8 tiFor the period of harvesting this ten<strong>de</strong>ncy was same.In result ofexperiment trials was <strong>de</strong>termined, that use ofwonncompost with dose81 Iha have not so <strong>si</strong>gnificant difference on yield comparing use mineral fertilisers buthave advantage as fine ecological product (table 3).158Anale I.c.D.C.s.z.


U<strong>si</strong>ng a wormcompost for increa<strong>si</strong>ng potato yield in organic farmsTable 2. Deve10pement ofpotato plants in flowering phase (number and length ofstems) in <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce ofdose ofused fcrtilizersTable 3. Influence ofwormcompost dose to potato tuber yield In comparison with useother fertilisers (2001-2003 years)Variants of triaj~~~~~~~~__L_?]2101~_~l.~O,~l_L_85tlha89-+------1-----82 27333{)Conclu<strong>si</strong>on: Use of wormcOlnpost is the nlost effective method of increase ofpotato yield in organic farms. Themost doze ofapplied wormcompost - 8t/ha.Even at higher yield at use ofmanure as organic fertilizer, application ofwormconlpost iseconomically more favorable.REFERENCE1. Gorodnij N.M. etc. Bioconver<strong>si</strong>on oforganic waste products in a facilitiesII of science and technology in agroindustrial c0111plex, 1992, 1 4,C.13-15 (russ).2. Grishko IV., O<strong>si</strong>pov Koltashov N.A. ofwermicompsting anduse of end-products in of dynamics of process. II Abstr. of papers on l-stinternational scientific-practical conference «Earthworms and fertility», Vladimir,November, 21-23, 2002 C.59-61 (russ).3. Pokrovskaya S.F. Use of earthworms for proces<strong>si</strong>ng organic waste products andincreases of soil fertility (wormculture). II ofVNIITEI-Agroprom M"1991 37 p.(nlss.)4. Chemova N.M. zoological characteristic ofcomposts // Aca<strong>de</strong>my ofSciencesofUSSR, A. Severtsova Institute ofAnimals morphology; Science, 1966 (russ).VOL. XXXI159


S. D. KIRU, J. v: GRlSHKO:FOLOSIREAPENTRUAGRICULTURII ORGANICERezumata căpătat o importanţă <strong>de</strong>osebită, maitratamenteproductivitate.Tabele:<strong>de</strong> îngrăşăminteasupra lungimii2. <strong>Dezvoltare</strong>a plantelor <strong>de</strong> cartofîn faza Înfloririi (numănl1 şi înălţiInea tulpinilor);.LLUl.......''-'.ll... !,u. dozei cOlnpost asupra producţiei tuberculi în comparaţie cu folo<strong>si</strong>reafertilizatori (anii 2001-2003).160Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


Cristina LOPEZ MATEO', Maria LuisaMARCOS!, ServandoLucio GARCiA CALV02,ĂLVAREZ RODRIGUEZ!'Univer<strong>si</strong>dad <strong>de</strong> Santiago <strong>de</strong> Compostela. Escuela Politecnica Departamento <strong>de</strong> Edafologia yQufmica Agricola. 27002 Spain. qamarisa@lugo.usc.es2Instituto do Campo. Diputaci6n Provincial <strong>de</strong> Ourense. c/Dos <strong>de</strong> 37. 32630 Xinzo <strong>de</strong> Limia.Spain.SUMMARYA three-year field experiment was vvJ..luu..., ......'u.response ofpotato (Solanum tuberosum to P Kwas carried out on an sandy-loam soil. Two potatowere sown x ID. following parameters were on h':l1'..... TPCt-P'tifresh tuber yield, (40-75 mm) yield, average tuberlnatter, starch, an :lcontents; inci<strong>de</strong>nce of COffilllon scab,browning; frying quality; aptitu<strong>de</strong>Four nitrogen (O,nitrate), four potas<strong>si</strong>um levels (O,three phosphorus levels (O,were applied in the field in a factorialthreeyield was on average 70/0 higher for cv.parameters were <strong>si</strong>gnificantly affected byThere were <strong>si</strong>gnificant mainon tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber un"" H'-"U'I--'..'...,......,,""'concentration, enzylnatic browning, frying quality and .... '-"CA"..........,rates yiel<strong>de</strong>d higher crop production tuber but lower matter content.enzymatic browning was at higher K rates. crisp quality was thethe K rate. The aptitu<strong>de</strong> for washing was higher at higher K rates. The inci<strong>de</strong>nceCOlnmon scab, <strong>si</strong>lver scurf and were lower at K rates.N fertilisation affected but incon<strong>si</strong>stently contentP fertilisation affectedincon<strong>si</strong>stently the reducing sugars contentfrying quality. There were <strong>si</strong>gnificant year x N x P interactions on reducing sugars contentand year x P interactions on French fries colour.VoI. XXXI 161


Servando ALVAREZ POUSA2, Lucio (iARC/A CALV02, Esperanza ALVAREZ RODRiGUEZlyeal' '-"AA''''..,'''''.... uU.F>,LUAC""'AAAHcontents ofstarch, sugars,quality and aptitu<strong>de</strong> forNone of starch, total 1""\1 ....'I'>{""',"citricaffected by fertilisation.potato yield, quality, .L..,'- 'UJ..U"U.~l.VU.•contentstubers werePotato 111 region ofGalicia Spain) 1S one ofthe most importantagricultural A is onc ofthe arcas in this region potato is a staplecrop upon which farmers' incornc <strong>de</strong>pends. Currently potato cropping occupies30 % of the total agricultural land of A Limia, with a production of 110millionwhich 40% are of cultivar Agria and 30% of cultivar Kennebec.v ..... '....,"JlVJ.L of lnainly directed to the crisping and to"'VAA"~A.AJU.IJU"'H. In any of thcsc cases, quality parameters arc ofproducers.Several parameters can be used to characterise the tuber some themrefer to <strong>si</strong>ze or appearance, whilst others are related ta chelnical compo<strong>si</strong>tion or"'l.UJ..LJl. (NPK) fertilisation on the tuber yield and quality oftwo cultivars (AgriaKennebec) grown in A Limia (Galicia, NW Spain) aver three seasons.MATERIALS AND METHODSField experiments were COlIGu:cte:Q over consecutive years (1998, 1999 and2000) in <strong>de</strong> Limia (42 Ş 04' N . 04 Ş 01 'W long.; 630 fi altitu<strong>de</strong>). The soil used in162Anale l.CD.C.S,Z.


Fotato tuber yield andsugars were ......,._"".. A ......La....,....andas Del~Cell1tIna<strong>de</strong> after two or threewere estinlatedTo evaluate pn~nTn'':lt1IP h,.."'",,,.!·u.... nblen<strong>de</strong>r. After one(Rousselle et al.,browning.potat4JeSrlt:>i·"'...."n.1l'v:d·,."'......n,'-..nrrt"" COltlC(~ntratlOI1Swerer-nl'... C'pnTr'':l-t''....nc (asfresh lnatter. Reducing(Miller, 1959)of reducing sugars wasfreshSeheele el 1937).n~1nn_.npPIP'rI and homogenised in aeomparison a colour ehartto 9, a higher number indieating lessVOL. XXXI163


Servando ALVAREZ POUSA1, Lucio GARciA CALV01, Esperanza ALVAREZ RODRiGUEZlThe texture of cooked potatoes was <strong>de</strong>scribed based on sensory perception by atrained sensory panel (Meilgard el al., 1991). Potatoes were steam-cooked for 13minutes. By evaluating four sensory characteristics (di<strong>si</strong>ntegration, firmness, mealinessand structure) potatoes were clas<strong>si</strong>fied into four main types ofcooking behaviour (A,B, C, D; Rousselle el al., 1996). To assess darkening of cooked potatoes, cookedtubers were hOlTIogenised in a blen<strong>de</strong>r and colour <strong>de</strong>termined after one hour, u<strong>si</strong>ng ascale from 1 to 9.The suitability for frying was assessed in both crisps and French fries. Potato crispswere prepared by peeling. and slicing (1.3 mm thick) tubers. The three central slieeswere selected from each tuber, washed with water, dried with.filter paper and fried insunflower oiI for 3 minutes at 178şC. The crisp colour was evaluated by comparisonwith IBL charts; values range from 1 to 9; 1-4 values indicate unacceptable, very darkcolour, 5 or 6 aeeeptable colour, and 7-9 very good gol<strong>de</strong>n crisps. Be<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>s colour evaluation,the percent ofreject fries (greenish, spotted, very dark) was estimated visually.To prepare chips (French fries), potatoes were peeled and cut, u<strong>si</strong>ng a hand-operatedchipping machine, into strips having a cross section of 1 em x 1 cm. Strips were washedand blanched in hot water for 3 minutes, cooled, dried and prefried at 140şC in sunfloweroiI for 3 minutes. After storage at 4şC for 24 hours, colour was evaluated by comparisonwith a colour chart. The strips were then fried at 180şC in sunflower oiI for 3 minutesand the colour evaluated again. A higher number indicates a lighter colour, values below5 being unaceeptable.The aptitu<strong>de</strong> oftubers for washing was evaluated u<strong>si</strong>ng a scale going from 1 (nowashing) to 9 (perfect washing). This is an important factor of quality for potatoesdirected to fresh consumption.The inci<strong>de</strong>nce of common scab (Streptomyces scabies), <strong>si</strong>lver scurf(Helminthosporium solani) and Rhizoctonia (Rhizoctonia solani) were estimated aspercent of tuber surface affected.Analy<strong>si</strong>s ofvariance was performed u<strong>si</strong>ng the statistical progrmume SPSS 12.0 forWindows.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONTuber yield and <strong>si</strong>zeThe fresh tuber yield was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influenced by the year, the variety and thepotas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation. Significant interactions were observed between theseparameters. Yield was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly higher in 2000 (Table 1); this highest production isrelated to lower values ofthe maxinlum temperatures during tuberisation (Krauss andMarschner, 1984) in this year (Figure 1). This influence ofclimatie faetors is <strong>si</strong>gnificantlyhigher for variety Agria (fresh tuber yield in 2000 differed <strong>si</strong>gnificantly, P


nitrogen, phosphoros potas<strong>si</strong>um Jertllisation in ..,Table 1Yield and tuber ch(lra~c:te:nsl:Ics1998 2000Kennebec Agria Kennebec Agria Kennebec44±9 a44±47 ±9"UhaAverage weight, gSpecific gravity,Dry± 43 9" 39± 39 ± 8°nd 153 ±47" ± 34 a 175 ± 29"1.077 1.077 1.082 1.084 L081±O.008· ±O.006 a ±O.007 e ±O.OOS" ±O.OO9 h22.5 ± 2.7 22.3 ± 4.7 21.7 ± IA 21.9 ± LO 22.9 ± 2.8±:7'193 ± 38"1.081±0.006 b22.1 ± 2.6not C1eternilmed~different letters indicate 81g-mtlCaJnt differences between yearsevery year studied, butin the most favourable year30May June July August September_ -+-1998 .•.111- •• 1999 _. j, • _ 2000 ____g__long-term averageFigure 1. Mean monthly nlaximunl temperature in the years oftrials and long-termaverage"'"1'.... ""'1... ' .l'\..eruleo1ec. the yield increased rates ofapplied potas<strong>si</strong>um,mg:ne:Sl one, in 1998 1999. In increase of potas<strong>si</strong>um ratedid not a C'1fl1T1'ro"""Y "'.,,,....""'''''''''' ofyield (Figure 2). On2000 was the yield respon<strong>de</strong>d po<strong>si</strong>tivelyI-Iv........"'H .......,...... ......,L .....UJ"."AV·... A up ta tIlerate. Itappears that for this varietyXXXI165


Servando ALVAREZ POUSA 2 , Lucio GARCIA CALV02, Esperanza ALVAREZ RODRJUUHZIa synergy existed between climaticfactors and fertilisation. Also Chapman et al.Maier el al. (1994) and Allison et al. (2001), among others, reported increased tuberyields at higher potas<strong>si</strong>mTI application rates.Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisation, at the rates applied, did not affect fresh tuberyield.al 80.r:.';;:1~CI>'~70CI>.tiE~CI> 60u:A80Bo Controlti Kl70 be De 8 K2l8! K360 baaa504020'-----.,.----,----,.--19981999200050a:: ~20~,1998 1999 2000Figure 2. Fresh tuber yield for both potato varieties studied in every year oftrial asa function ofpotas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation. A: Kennebec; B: Agria. Control: unfertilised; Kl:150 kg K 20/ha; K2: 300 kg K 20/ha; K3: 450 kg K 20/ha. In one year, different letter<strong>si</strong>ndicate <strong>si</strong>gnificant differences.The marketable tuber (40 to 75 lnm) yield varied in a way <strong>si</strong>milar to that of totalfresh tuber yield. The most rel11arkable difference is that in 2000 (the most productiveyear) the highest potas<strong>si</strong>um rate (450 kg K 20/ha) produced a <strong>de</strong>crease of marketableyield, not only in variety Kennebec but also in Agria. In the Iatter variety, the <strong>de</strong>crease ofmarketable production, while the total fresh tuber yield increased, resulted from acon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>rable increase ofyield oftubers >75 cm.The marketable tuber (40-75 cm) yield as a percentage oftotal yield was <strong>si</strong>gnificant1ylower in variety Kennebec that in Agria, as a resuIt ofa higher proportion oflarge tubers(>75 cm) in variety Kennebec. The lower percentage of large tubers in variety Agriamakes it more suitable for crisp production, because the large tubers produce largeslices, which terid to break on packaging.Year, variety and potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation had <strong>si</strong>gnificant effects on averageweight, which was <strong>si</strong>gnificant1y higher in variety Kennebec and in 2000 (the mostproductive year). It increased with the rate of applied potas<strong>si</strong>um, being <strong>si</strong>gnificant1yhigher at the highest K rate (450 kg K 20/ha) than in the control plots.166Anale I. C.D. c.s.z.


Potato tuber yield and quality in response to nitrogen, phosphorus potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation in ...Ch.eulicai COlllllJiOSJltU]lnThe matter concentration (Table 1) was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly H.LLLU...........,••, ....fertilisation, <strong>de</strong>crea<strong>si</strong>ng as potas<strong>si</strong>um rate increased in range ., UU.l...·ukg K 20/ha). Similar results were reported by el al. (1995) in pot and fie1<strong>de</strong>xperilnents. Allison ei al. (2001) reported reduction ofdry marter concentration at highpotas<strong>si</strong>um application rates. No influence was observed of nitrogen or phosphorusfertilisation on dry matter content.Percentage ofdry matter in potatoes for crisp production should be 20-250/0 (Kita,2002). Lower luatter contents in <strong>de</strong>creased yields, increased consumptionand crisps with higher oiI content and les<strong>si</strong>n our experiments,including those produced at the highestpotas<strong>si</strong>um application rates, met requirement.The tuber specific gravity was <strong>si</strong>gllificantly influenced by the year and the potas<strong>si</strong>umfertilisation, and interactions were observed these parameters. specificgravity increased in the or<strong>de</strong>r 1998


Servando ALVARC'L POU5'.A", Lucio GARCJA CALVO J , Esperanza ALVAREZ RODRlGUEZIFigure 3. Concentrations ofreducingsugars for both varieties in the three yearsoftrialso AgriaThe content ofreducing sugars (glucoseand fructose) in tubers was <strong>si</strong>gnificantlyinf1uenced by the year,. the variety, and theYearnitrogen and phosphorus fertilisation.Significant interactions betwecn theseparameters were i<strong>de</strong>ntified. The content of reducing sugars (Table 2~ Figure washigher in variety Kennebec in aU three years, the difference being statistically <strong>si</strong>gnificant< 0.05) in 1999 and 2000. In the year 2000 tubers of both varieties had the lowestcontent of reducing sugars; this lower content could be attributed to drier climaticconditions in 2000 (Figure 4). Hamouz elal. (2000) reported lowerreducing sugar contentspotatoes from drier and warmer regions.The contents ofreducing sugars were very often (Table 2, Figure 3) below 0.150/0FW, threshold value recOlnmen<strong>de</strong>d for crisps, and almost always below 0.25(% FW,recommen<strong>de</strong>d for chips (Borruey el al., 2000).The <strong>si</strong>gnificantly lower content of reducing sugars in variety Agria in 1999 and2000 is con<strong>si</strong>stent with the lighter colour ofAgria chips and crisps. Potatoes suitable forfrying should have low levels of reducing sugars to avoid exces<strong>si</strong>ve browning of friesthrough the Maillard reaction (Roe el al., 1990).200150100EE 500.:-I-w all.-50-100-150May_-+-_1998June July August September.. 1999 _. &,. _ 2000 .-jI-- Long-term averageFigure 4. Rainfall minusevapotranspiration potential in theyears of trials and long-termaverage168Anale J.C.D.C.S.Z.


"''''''-'''"'':>"1-':>''"


Servando ALVAREZ POUSAl, Lucio GAR(~/A CALV02, Esperanza ALVAREZ RODRIGUEZIThe texture ofsteam-cooked tubers was not <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influenced by the variety.Yet it was inf1uenced by the nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisation, and interactions betweenthese two parameters have also been i<strong>de</strong>ntified.The softest texture (mealy) correspon<strong>de</strong>d to tubers from control plots, coincidingwiththe highest content of starch. As for the nitrogen rate" the firmest potatoes correspond tothe intermediate rate. The phosphorus fertilisation <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influenced texture only atthe highest nitrogen rate; in this case, the texture is mealier at the lowest phosphorus rate.For the most part tubers belong to the B class of potatoes, which are quite firm andappropriate for several uses.The crisp colour was <strong>si</strong>gl1ificant1y influenced by the year, the variety and the rate ofapplied potas<strong>si</strong>um. The crisps ofvariety Agria presented lighter colourthan thoseKemlebec (on average 6.1 and 5.5, respectively). As for the year, in 1998 crisps had<strong>si</strong>gnificantly darker colour than in years 1999 and 2000. Increa<strong>si</strong>ng potas<strong>si</strong>um rates gaveplace to better crisp colour. Similar Înfluence ofK fertilisation was reported by Zehler elal.(1981).percentage ofreject crisps was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly inf1uenced by the year, the varietyand the rate of applied potas<strong>si</strong>um; no interactions existed between these parameters at a950/0 <strong>si</strong>gnificance level. The percentage ofreject crisps was lower in 1999, when productionwas also lower. This percentage was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly higher in variety Kennebec (23% onaverage) than Agria (16% on average) and lowest for the highest potas<strong>si</strong>um rate.The score ofprefried and fried chips (French ffies) was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influencedthe variety, and the potas<strong>si</strong>um and phosphorus fertilisation; there existed interactions betweenthese variables as well as with the year and the rate of applied nitrogen. The score ofprefried and fried chips was higher for variety Agria (onaverage 6.6 and 6.3, respectively)than Kennebec (on average 5.7 and 5.8, respectively). Fertilisation produced a <strong>de</strong>teriorationprefries colour with regard to the control. The highest rate of applied Pled to lighterFrench fries.The aptitu<strong>de</strong> for washing was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influenced by the variety, the year and thepotas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation. The variety Agria washed better than Kennebec (scores 3.4 and2.3, respectively). The low aptitu<strong>de</strong> for washing is related to the presence ofdisease le<strong>si</strong>ons.The year 1999 was the most favourable for washing. Higher potas<strong>si</strong>unl rates improvedwashing aptitu<strong>de</strong> with regard to control plots.Inci<strong>de</strong>nce of diseasesThe inci<strong>de</strong>nce ofcornrnon scab was on average 7% and was <strong>si</strong>gniticant1y influencedby the year and the potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation; <strong>si</strong>gnificant interaction was observed betweenthese two variables. The inci<strong>de</strong>nce ofthis disease was imperceptible in the year 1999. In1998 the inci<strong>de</strong>nce of common scab was minimum in control plots. On the contrary, in2000 the highest potas<strong>si</strong>um rate (450 kg K 20/ha) is that which results in the minimuminci<strong>de</strong>nce ofcornrnon scab.The inci<strong>de</strong>nce of<strong>si</strong>lver scurf(that was studied only in year 2000) amounted to 35%on average and was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influenced by the variety and the potas<strong>si</strong>mTI fertilisation,no interactions existing between these two parameters. The inci<strong>de</strong>nce of <strong>si</strong>lver scurfwas170Anale /.C.D.C.S.Z.


Potato tuber yield and quality in response to nitrogen, phospllOYUS ana potassmm jenmsauon In ...<strong>si</strong>gnificant1y higher in Kennebec thoo in Agria. The maximum mci<strong>de</strong>nce took place incontrol plots and the minimum at 300 kg K 20lha.The inci<strong>de</strong>nce ofRhizoctoma, which was studied only in 2000, amounted on averageto 8% and was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly influenced by potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilisation, being lower at higherpotas<strong>si</strong>um rates.CONCLUSIONSFertilisation, especially potas<strong>si</strong>mll application rates, affected <strong>si</strong>gnificantly the yieldand quality ofpotato tubers fu ilie conditions ofthe present study. Higherpotas<strong>si</strong>um ratesresulted in increased tuber yie1d and <strong>si</strong>ze as weB as lighter colour, less enzymaticbrowning and slightly better washing aptitu<strong>de</strong>. On the other hand, increased potas<strong>si</strong>umfertilisation led to lower dry matter concentration and specific gravity, which arerelatedto poorer crisp yield and texture.Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisation affected <strong>si</strong>gnificantly the concentration ofreducing sugars and the texture ofste31Il-cooked In hoth cases <strong>si</strong>gnificantinteractions were i<strong>de</strong>ntified between both variables. Moreover phosphorus fertilisatiOl.exerted a main effect on colour ofprefried and fried chips.The scant influence ofnitrogen and phosphorus fCltilisation ontuberyield and qualityindicates that the applied rates are above the optimum levels. As for potas<strong>si</strong>um, in spiteofthe high rates applied, <strong>si</strong>gnificant responses were observed, at least in some years arvariety; this fact confinns to some extent the general belief that potato shows largeresponses to K fertilisers. Nevertheless, high K application rates resulted, some cases,in <strong>de</strong>crease offresh tuberyield and/or marketable tuberyield; in other cases, the increase<strong>si</strong>n fresh tuber yield and crisp colour at high potas<strong>si</strong>um rates were counterbalanced by a<strong>de</strong>crease in dry matter content. So it seems that tIle high K rates usually applied in theregion are notjustified. Similarly, Allison el al. (2001) advocate the application to potatocrops in Great Britain ofK rates lower than iliose currently usuaI.Be<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>s fertilisation, clinlatic factors play a principal role in <strong>de</strong>tenniningpotato tuberyield and quality.REFERENCES1. Ab<strong>de</strong>l Gadir, A.H., Errebhi, M.A., AI-Sarhan, H.M., Ibrahiln, M. 2003. The effectofdifferent leve1s ofadditional potas<strong>si</strong>um onyield and industrial qualities ofpotato(Solanum tuberosum L.) in an irrigated arid region. American Joumal of Potato cResearch 80: 219-222.2. Allison, M.F., Fowler, J.H., Allen, E.J. 2001. Responses of potato (Solanumtuberosum) to potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilizers. Journal ofAgricultural Science 136: 407-426.3. Almeida, M.E.M., Nogueira, J.N. 1995. The control ofpolyphenol oxidase activityin frits and vegetables - A study ofthe interactions between the chemical-compoundsused and heat-treatfnent. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 47: 245-256.4. Baerug, R., Enge, R. 1974. Influence ofpotas<strong>si</strong>um supply and storage conditionson the discoloration of raw and cooked potato tubers of cv. Pimpemel. PotatoResearch 17: 271-282.VOL. XXXi171


5.32: 521-527.8. 1998. Wor1d Reference Base for Soil Resources. FAO, Rome.9. Franz, De Jong, R.W. 1998. Effect of phosphorus onpetiolarconcentrations ofpotatoes (cv Russet BurbankKennebec) grown in krasnozem and duplex soils of Victoria.Journal ofExperimental Agriculture 38: 83-98.10. K., Vokal, B., LachlTIan, J., Cepl, 1.- 2000. Influence of environmentalconditions and way ofon the reducing sugar content in potato tubers.Rostlinna Vyroba 46: 23-27.11 A. 2002. The inf1uence ofpotas<strong>si</strong>um chemical compo<strong>si</strong>tion an crisp texture.Food Chemistry 76: 173-179.12. Klein, L.B., Chandra, S.,. Mondy, N.I. 1980. The effect ofphosphoruson the chemical quality of Katahdin potatoes. American Potato Journal 57: 259­266.13. L.B., Chandra, S., Mondy, N.I. 1982. Effect ofnlagne<strong>si</strong>um fertilization onthe quality of potatoes: total nitrogen, nonprotein nitrogen, protein, amino acids,minerals and firmness. Journal ofAgricultural and Food Chemistry 30: 754-757.14. H., Mtiller, K., Olteanu, G., Gorea. T. 1995. Effects ofnitrogen, phosphonlsand potas<strong>si</strong>mTI fertilizer treatments an weight 10ss and changes in chemicalcompo<strong>si</strong>tion of potato tubers stored at 4şC. Potato Research 38: 97-107.15. Krauss, Marschner, H. 1984. Growth rate and carbohydrate metabolism ofpotato tubers exposed ta high temperatures. Potato Research 27: 297-303.16. Meilgard, M:, Civille, G.V., Carr, B.T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2 n<strong>de</strong>d. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA17. Maier, N.A., Dahlenburg, A.P., Willianls, C.M.J. 1994. Effects of nitrogen,phosphorus, and potas<strong>si</strong>mTI on yield, specific-gravity, crisp color, and tuber chemicalcompo<strong>si</strong>tionofpotato (Solanum tuberosum L) cv Kennebec. Australian Joumal ofExperimental Agriculture, 34: 813-824.18. Millard, P. 1986. The nitrogen content of potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers inrelation to nitrogen application: the effect on amino acid compo<strong>si</strong>tion and yields.Joumal ofthe Science ofFood and Agriculture 37: 107-114.19. Miller, L.G., 1959. Use ofdinitrosalicylic acid reagent for <strong>de</strong>termination ofreducingsugar. Analytical ChelTIistry. 31: 426-428.20. Mondy, N.I., Mobley, E.O., Ged<strong>de</strong>-Dahl, S.B. 1967. Influence of potas<strong>si</strong>um172Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Potato23.25.27.28.29.30.3 .32.~"'''''.LLI->''L''''''', M.A. 1994. u".......u ....u ...~vu" <strong>de</strong>tl~rmmaltlOngreen beansInternational 77: 1056-1 059.33.potas<strong>si</strong>um433-453.34. ZehIer, E., Kreipe, P.A. Poitas~nU1n "".,..t-'.........~ andpotas<strong>si</strong>um ehIori<strong>de</strong>- their influenee on the yield and quality PotashInstitute Bulletin no. 9. Basel, Switzerland.VOL. XXXI173


:Servando ALVAf


Potato tuber yield cmd quality in respeJnse nitrogen, phosphorus and potas<strong>si</strong>um jertilisation in ...Cuvinte cheie: producţie, calitate, fertilizareTabele:1. Caracteristicile producţiei şi ale tuberculilor2. Compoziţia chimică a tuberculilorlfiguri:1. Temperatura maximă medie lunară în anii <strong>de</strong> experienţă şi media pe termen lung2. Producţia <strong>de</strong> tuberculi proaspeţi din ambele soiuri studiate în fiecare an <strong>de</strong>experienţă în funcţie <strong>de</strong> fertilizarea cu pota<strong>si</strong>u. A: B: Agria. Martor:nefertilizat; Kl: 150 kg ~O/ha; K2: 300 kg ~O/ha; K3: 450 ~Olha. În cadrul unuian, literele diferite indică diferenţe selnnificative.3. Concentraţiile <strong>de</strong> zaharuri reducătoare <strong>pentru</strong> ambele soiuri în cei trei ani <strong>de</strong>experienţă4. Precipitaţiile, mai puţin potenţialul <strong>de</strong> evapotranspiraţie, în anii <strong>de</strong> experienţă şilnedia pe termen lung5. Conţinutul <strong>de</strong> acid ascorbic <strong>pentru</strong> diferite valori ale brunificării enzimaticeVOI. XXXI 175


Alto176Anale


!-'r,)riuetnJltv ana qualily responseunu177


climate and soiIstreatment178


DAP. Total water724 (1989),218 to<strong>si</strong>te season, aH datafor main effectsVOL. XXXI179


c FERRElRA140 , ..,... 25202015~~ ;:,"§CIICI.10 E$c:!liCII5 ::ii:May~Rain8B.. -Ci.. 88JunMonthAugSep"'liliiii Ri~in 97 98--0-Ta 97 _.-.- Ta 98I.CD.C.S.Z.


Productivity(Solanum tuberosum, L.) to waler ana•


Effect of "".11-11"""'",,,,,,,,,treatment on fresh tuberFERREIRAEffect oftreatmeJlt on tuber <strong>si</strong>ze distribution<strong>si</strong>ze >100 mm were found in any ofrmn; 30-50 mIU; 50-100 mm and >100roi""",f",,,,,rl L'nr\H'C"ri a clear ta irrigation "''''''''''YY'!'''Cand compensatoryas the pelrcentalgefor"marketabletubers used in consumption varied in a complementary manner.average, all four seasons, the yield obtained from crops grown un<strong>de</strong>r the,U".LL,"'UL'~U regime (I4) displayed a (P


quality re;,lJ()nse patterns1I


T.C FERREIRAof treatment tuber <strong>si</strong>ze distributionHJ'-I'HV.U in to N application was notno <strong>si</strong>gnificant effect was observed in any ofthe four trialsCon<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>ring all faur seasons at one time, the mean tuber <strong>si</strong>zemaintainedunchanged by nitrogenrates from O(NO) ta 240 kg ha-l (N3) varying from42AO% (SO-100 Imn); S2-53% (30-50 mrn) to 6-7% «30 mrn). Interestingly, fertilisertreatments are con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>red one at time, the <strong>si</strong>te factor appears to affect more than theother factors on the overall percentage oftuber <strong>si</strong>ze distribution in the final freshyield. As a result, the mean (1988-89) pattern of tuber <strong>si</strong>ze distribution obtained atBragan9a, irrespectively of nitrogen treatment, was 49% (SO-100 mrn), 42% (30-S0mrn) and 9% «30 Imn). By contrast, the corresponding values (1997-98) obtained atMontalegre were 34%, 63% and 3%.(a)(b)-o 80o.;";"100 ...,. .6011130-50mm100 , ···············11III


ana ...VOL. XXXI185


T. C. FERREIRAThis work is part of two projects carried out at Braganc;a through the Inter-Univer<strong>si</strong>ty Project (UTAD/Braganc;a Polytechnic/Cranfield Univer<strong>si</strong>ty) with financialas<strong>si</strong>stance from Junta Nacional <strong>de</strong> Investigac;ăo Cientifica e Tecno16gica (JNICT) andThe British Council and in Montalegre through the PAMAF 8111 Project financed byINIA, the Portuguese Ministry ofAgriculture.REFERENCES1. Arsenault, W. J., LeBlanc, D. A., Tai, G. t. C., Boswall, P., 2001. Effects ofnitrogen application and seedpiece spacing on yield and tuber <strong>si</strong>ze distribution ineight potato cultivars. American Joumal ofPotato Research, 78: 301-3092. Dyson, P. W., Watson, D. J., 1971. An analy<strong>si</strong>s ofthe effects ofnutrient supply onthe growth ofpotato crops. Annals ofApplied Biology, 69: 47-63.3. Fabeiro, C., Olalla, F. M. D., <strong>de</strong> Juan, 1. A., 2001. Yield and <strong>si</strong>ze of<strong>de</strong>ficit irrigatedpotatoes. Agricultural Water Management, 48: 255-266.4. Gonc;alves, D. A., 1985. Contribuic;ăo para o estudo do clima da bacia superior dorio Sabor. (Influ~ncia da circulac;ăo geral na estructura da baixa atmosfera). VilaReal. Portugal. Tese <strong>de</strong> Doutoramento. I.U.T.A.D.5. Hanks, R. 1., Keller, J., Rasmussen, V P., Wilson, G. D., 1976. Line source sprinklerfor continuous variable irrigation-crop production studies. Soil Science Society ofAmerica Joumal, 40: 426-429.6. Harris, P. M., 1978. Water. In The potato crop. The scientific ba<strong>si</strong>s for improvement.244-277. (Ed. P. M. Harris). London: Chapman & HalI.7. Harris, P.M., 1992. tvIineral nutrition. In: Harris P.M (Ed.) The Potato Crop: TheScientific Ba<strong>si</strong>s Improvement. Chapman & Hall, London. Second edition. pp.162-2138. Levy, D., Genizi, A., Goldman, A, 1990. Compatibility ofpotatoes to contrastingseasonal conditions, to high temperatures and to water <strong>de</strong>ficit: The association withtime ofmaturation and yield potential. Potato Research, 33: 325-334.9. Mohabir, G., John, P., 1988. Effect of temperature on starch synthe<strong>si</strong>s in potatotuber tissue and in amyloplasts. Plant Phy<strong>si</strong>ology, 88: 1222-1228.10. Morgan, D. D. V., Carr, M. K. V, 1988. Analy<strong>si</strong>s of experiments involving linesource sprinkler irrigation. Experimental Agriculture, 24: 169-176.Il. Porter, G. A., Sisson, 1. A., 1993. Yield and market quality and petiole nitrateconcentration ofnonirrigated Russet Burbank and Shepody potatoes in response to<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>dressed nitrogen. American Potato Joumal, 70: 101-116.12. Porter, G. A., Opena, G. B., Bradbury, W. B., McBumie, J. C., Sisson, J. A., 1999.Soi1 management and supplemental irrigation effects on potato: 1. Soil properties,Tuber Yield and Quality. Agronomy Joumal, 91: 416-425.186Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


j-'roaUCllvlty ana quallty response patterns o} potatoes (Solanum tuberosum, L.) to water and ...13. Rab 5 Md. A., S. 1987. Water-use irrigated potatoes on a duplex soi!.Australian Journal ofExperimentat Agriculture, 27: 165-172.14. Sale, P. 1. M., 1973. Productivity ofvegetable crops a region ofhigh solar inpuLII. Yields and efficiencies ofwateruse and energy. Australian Joumal ofAgriculturalResearch, 24: 751-762.15. Shimshi, D., Susnoschi, M., 1985. Growth and yield studies ofpotato <strong>de</strong>velopmentin a semi-arid region. 3. Effect ofwater stress and amounts ofnitrogen top dres<strong>si</strong>ngon phy<strong>si</strong>ological indices and on tuber yield and quality ofseveral cultivars. PotatoResearch, 28: 177-191.16. Susnoschi, M., 1982. Growth and yield studies ofpotatoes <strong>de</strong>veloped ina semi-aridregion. I. Yield response of several varieties grown as a double crop. PotatoResearch, 25: 59-69.17. Waterer, D., 1997. Influence ofirrigation, nitrogen aud seed piece spacingon yieldsand tuber <strong>si</strong>ze distribution ofseed potatoes. Canadian Joumal ofPlant Science, 77:141-148.ELEMENTELE DECARTOFULUI (S9LANUMIRIGARE FERTILIZARE CU AZOTCALITATE ALECA RĂSPUNS LANORDUL PORTUGALIEIRezumatS-au efectuat cercetări în câmp folo<strong>si</strong>nd metoda anlplasării în be'lzi la cartof(Solanum tuberosum, soiul De<strong>si</strong>ree, pe perioada a 4 sezoane diferite şi în 2 localităţidin regiunea Tras-os-Montes din nordul Portugaliei (1988-89 în Bragan9a la 680 maltitudine şi între 1997-98 în Montalegre la 1005 m altitudine). Culturile au fost supuse la4 nivele <strong>de</strong> fertilizare cu azot (N) (NO. NI, N2 şi N3) şi la 5 tratamente <strong>de</strong> irigare (1) (I4­10). lrigarea cOlnpletă a dus la creşterea producţiei medii <strong>de</strong> tuberculi proaspeţi în câmpul<strong>de</strong> la Bragan9a <strong>de</strong> la 11.8 la 24.7 tolha în 1988; <strong>de</strong> la 13.6 la 49.8 tolha în 1989; <strong>de</strong> la19.3 la 44.5 tolha (1997) şi <strong>de</strong> la 15.6 la 56.0 tolha (1998) în câmpul <strong>de</strong> la Montalegre.În toate cele 4 experienţe, producţia totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi proaspeţi din culturile cu <strong>de</strong>ficit<strong>de</strong> apă şi cu fertilzare cu N au avut tendinţa <strong>de</strong> a scă<strong>de</strong>a până la 80 kg/ha. Deasupraacestui prag valoric, efectul aplicării <strong>de</strong> N asupra producţiilor <strong>de</strong> tuberculi proaspeţi nu afost semnificativ <strong>de</strong>cât la doza extremă a tratamentului cu N (N3) şi a iri gării (I4) în1989, 1997 şi 1998. Culturile din varianta cu completă (14) au prezentat unprocentaj mai mare <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> mărime "<strong>pentru</strong> piaţă" (50-100 mm) (61%) <strong>de</strong>câttuberculi "<strong>de</strong> sămânţă" (30-50 mrn) (36%) urmaţi <strong>de</strong> dimen<strong>si</strong>unea ce mai mică «30mrn) (3%). Regimurile <strong>de</strong> irigare au fost cuprinse' Între irigare completă şi regim <strong>de</strong>precipitaţii;medie a mărimii tuberculilor a variat indirect între doar24% (50-100 64% (30-50 mm) and 10% «30 mrn). Aplicarea <strong>de</strong> îngrăşământazotat nu a avut nici un.efectasupra mărimii tuberculilor în nici unul dintrecele 4 A o legătură irigare şi localitate asupraVOL. XXX!187


procentajului distribuţiei mărimiiT.e. FERREJRASe pare că temperatura indusă <strong>de</strong> altitudinealocalităţii este un factor important care influenţează procentul <strong>de</strong> tuberculi "<strong>pentru</strong> piaţă"şi "<strong>pentru</strong> sămânţă"din producţia finală la culturile irigate. Condiţiile <strong>de</strong> climă mai blân<strong>de</strong>par a favoriza prezenţaunui procentaj mai mare <strong>de</strong> tuberculi "<strong>pentru</strong> piaţă" (50-100 mm)şi a numărul <strong>de</strong> sămânţă" (30-50 din producţia finală.Aceste rezultate indică faptul că în ambele localităţi irigarea este o soluţie eficientăcreşterea producţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof şi <strong>pentru</strong> a controla calibrarea tuberculilor.Cuvinte cheie: Solanum tuberosum, productivitate, mărimea tuberculilor, irigare,azot, N Portugaliei.Tabele:1. Producţia finală tuberculi proaspeţi (to/ha) obţinuţi pe o perioadă <strong>de</strong> 4 sezoanela Braganya (1988-89) şi Montalegre (1997-98) ca răspuns la diferite nivele <strong>de</strong> irigare(<strong>de</strong> la precipitaţiila irigare completă) (10-14) şi <strong>de</strong> aplicare <strong>de</strong> N, <strong>de</strong> la NO (O kglha) la N4(240 kg/ha). Valorile se referă la recoltările făcute la 120 zile după plantare (DAP) în1988 şi 140 DAP în 1989, 1997 şi 1998.2. Rezultatele analizei varianţei aplicate la producţia totală <strong>de</strong> tuberculi proaspeţi(tolha) şi la distribuţialnărimiituberculilor, ca procentaj din masa totală, reultate obţinutepe parcursul a 4 sezoane la Bragalwa (1988-89) şi Montalegre (1997··98) ca răspuns ladiferite nivele <strong>de</strong> irigare (<strong>de</strong> la precipitaţiila irigare completă) (10-14) şi <strong>de</strong> aplicare <strong>de</strong> N,<strong>de</strong> la NO (O kg/ha) la N4 (240 kg/ha). Valorile se referă la recoltările făcute la 120 ziledupă plantare (DAP) în 1988 şi 140 DAP în 1989, 1997 şi 1998.Figuri:1. Totalul precipitaţiilorlunare (mm) şi temperatura medie lunară a aerului (şC) întimpul celor 4 sezoane <strong>de</strong> cultivare (mai-septembrie) laBraganya (1988-89) şi Montalegre(1997-98).2. Mo<strong>de</strong>le <strong>de</strong> distribuţiea mărimii tuberculilor (50-100 mm; 30-50 mm;


'Mustafa Kemal2CukurovaMehmet Emin CALISKAN',Halis ARIOGLU 2Science, TR-31 034TURKEY (e-mail: mehmet@mku.edu.tr)of AglrICultm"e, Dep2lftITlent of Crop Science, TR-01330 Adana,TURKEYSUMMARYenvÎronments.XXXI


MehmetCALISKAN, Sevgi CALISKAN, Halis ARlOGLUtubers used in early potatocomes from autumn harvest of""'J"."VU,",o Therefore, mostly phy<strong>si</strong>ologically younger tubers are used innHmUlcnon. However, is that rather young seedin long season, while ol<strong>de</strong>r is suitable ta obtainthe season or in short seasons (Wurr, 1979). Pre-sproutingseed can a solution to seeds suitable for early planting. Hence, rapi<strong>de</strong>mergence, fast initial growth and a homogeneous <strong>de</strong>velopment of the crop can bePre-sprouting also the growth ofa larger numberof sprouts/stems per seed potato, which leads to a more efficient use of the(Baarveld et aL, 2001).This study was aimed to <strong>de</strong>termine the effects ofplanting date with or withouttreatment an earliriess, growth and of early patato crap aeU1Vlf()nrnellt in Turkey.~Jl'O.."r1l.1!LJUAND METHODSThis was conducted at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Faculty,Mustafa Kemal Univer<strong>si</strong>ty in Hatay, Turkey (36 0 39' N, 36 0 40' E) during winter andspring seasons of2001 and 2002. The soi! ofthe experimental fields has low organicmatter content and was slightly alkaline in both years. Hatay provinee has typicalJlVy......."".........JLHJU...... climate eonditions with hot-dry summers and mild-rainy winters. Someimportant elimatie data of Hatay provinee during experimental periods are given inTable 1.Table 1. Some climatie data during experimental period in 2001 and 2002Months----January 4,7 13,6 8,9 35,0 1,0 lL8 5,8 99,7February 4,0 15,4 9,5 129,7 3,9 18,5 10,8 72,2March 8,6 22,7 15,3 66,1 6,8 20,7 13,2 77,8Aprii 11,4 25,2 17,9 24,2 10,7 22,1 16,1 50,8May 13,3 28,4 20,9 175,6 13,9 28,3 20,8 13,5June 19,2 37,2 26,6 19,2 33,4 26,2 2,8The pre-sprouted and normal seed tubers were planted at <strong>si</strong>x different datewith 13-15 days interval starting from 1 January. Tubers were pre-sprouted at 18-20°C in a temperature and light controlled storage starting one month before of eaehplanting date. The potato tubers were kept in the dark until they have formed sproutsofa few millimeters, and then lights turned ono Rests oftubers used in pre-sprouting190Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


DISCUSSIONXXXI191


Mehmet Emin CALISKAN, Sevgi CALISKAN, Halis ARJOGLUTable 2. The effects ofplanting date on emergence aud totalgrowing duration ofearly potato.Seed types Planting dates Days ta emergence Total growth durationPre-sprouted 1 January 59 52 87 9215 January 48 38 83 911 February 36 28 82 8515 February 28 22 82 771 March 21 20 76 75Normal 1 January 64 58 82 8615 January 54 44 80 851 February 41 34 77 7915 February 35 27 75 761 March 26 24 75 7015 March 20 19 67 65Seed types (A)Planting dates (B)****** *** **************: d" ** :p d" 0.01Total growth duration ranged 67 to 87 days in 2001 and from 65 to 92in 2002 (Tablecaused longer growth duration due to earlier emergence.tÎlne the first and the planting was 74 days, betweenlast emergence were 30 days in 2001 37 days in 2002, and betweenlongest growing duration were 20 days in 2001 27 days in 2002. AlthoughtenlDE~rat:un~s caused <strong>de</strong>laying of emergence, the temperatures over the~ >""'U'''''''''''''' for potato crop growth after Optimum for growth andnet for potato is 16-21°e and Struiket al., 1989a; Gawronska et al., 1992; van Dam et 1996). The mean temperatureswere around 20 0 e in May, temperatures reached 27-28°e daytime inMay.the crops to mature earlier.aud Haulm Growth192


Table 3.4.22.624.44.7 33.832.6fiSns:Growth and


ofpre-sproutingmean tuber neT"'" rr'-."I"Pre-sprouted 7.1 8.5 85.3 53.4 79.9 78.5Nonnal 6.4 8.4 83.3 48.5 77.7 76.21 January 7.4 8.9 98.4 65.1 81.9 82.515 January 7.8 9.1 97.4 61.3 82.5 83.81 February 7.0 9.0 93.1 54.2 83.9 82.915 February 6.7 9.0 84.5 44.7 81.1 78.01 March 6.5 7.9 74.4 41.0 76.5 72.915 March 5.2 7.0 58.1 39.1 67.0 63.9LSD (Planling date) (0.05) 0.3 0.4 2.8 2.5 0.8 1.5Seed types (A) ** ns * ** ** **P. dates (B) ** ** ** ** ** *** *** : p d" 0.05, ** . P d" 0.01, ns: non <strong>si</strong>gnificantthe seed types and planting dates <strong>si</strong>gnificantly affected mean tuber weightwhile the effect ofseed type x planting date interaction was not <strong>si</strong>gnificant in both years(Table 4). Pre-sprouted seeds gave <strong>si</strong>gnificantly higher mean tuber weight at harvestboth years. Mean tuber weight reduced with <strong>de</strong>laying of planting in both years. Asdiscussed earlier, total growing period ofpotato crap increased with earlier planting (Tabledry matter accumulations to tubers continued for longer periods, and,..rv.~"",,..n1,,,t-I,, mean tuber weight increased. Furthermore, <strong>si</strong>gnificant part oftuberbulkingA{"'t'''...·..'''ri un<strong>de</strong>r cooler canditions comparing to late plantings. Temperature<strong>si</strong>gnificantly affects partitioning ofphotosynthate between shoots and tubers, and in general,temperatures above 20°C favor shoot growth and temperatures below 20°C favorgrowth (Ewing, 1981; Benoit et al., 1983). Cao and Tibbitts (1994) subjectedpotato to different temperature regimes during there succes<strong>si</strong>ve growth periods,and conclu<strong>de</strong>d that tuber <strong>de</strong>velopment ofpotatoes is optimized with a pha<strong>si</strong>c pattern ofhigh during later growth. In the194Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


lntl~ral~tlCln <strong>si</strong>gnificantlyharvestUJUlJl""'J.',,",J.U, pl(Jmtlug dates werefrom 63.9%later than 1 February<strong>de</strong>crease was moreat5.effectstuber yield35.39 13.26 26.28Normal 24.97 1.84 23.441 19.42 11.71 32.8115 5.40 43.22 18.31 11.84 31.741 37.24 15.17 10.90 27.8215 32.04 10.23 10.91 22.901 March 5.88 28.18 7.29 9.15 18.3915 March 17.30 4.87 8.24 15.52LSD 1.87 0.85 1.10 1.74** ** ns ns** ** ** *** .


Mehmet Emin CA LISKAN, Sevgi CA LISKAN, Halis1981~ Wo1f et16 to"''''''''1-v\t'''C' and <strong>de</strong>and marked1y reduces tuber yield (MarinusStruik et et 992). Pha<strong>si</strong>c tenl0e:rature \,I1,1,'4,.l.H::'\..- """,it"tomtuberÎzation of ",",,.,.·t,,i',,~,,and low temperature (1 7°C)for tuber Tibbitts, thepotato is grown during winter and spring months. Temperature isstages and gradually increases Iater in growing season.un<strong>de</strong>r of regime with eveneonsequence yield potential is generally low eomparing to telnperate zones. In aur.......,,,,'I-'J".""."'''''''''''' potato crops subjected to higheratyield was dramatieally reduced with late planting.1. Baarveld, H.R:, Hajer, M.P. and H.M.G., 2001. Profes<strong>si</strong>onal PotatoGrowing. Pre-sprouting. The Netherlands Consultative Potato Jl.U':'Hl.'LH"'"Den Haag, 16 p.2. Benoit, G.R., Stanley, C.D., Grant, W.J. and 1983. Potatoas by temperatures. Am. Potato J. 60: 489-501.3. Cao, W. Tibbits, TW., 1994. Pha<strong>si</strong>c ehange ual-l.v.Li.!.';)and tuberization potatoes. J. Amer. Soc. ROft. Sei. 119:4. Dean, B.B., 1994. Managing the potato prCIC!UCt!emNew York, 183 p.


8.10.1.12. 1989b. Effect of rootn.'n,r.H'" tuberosumVOL. XXXI 197


Mehmet Emil1 CALISKAN. Sevgi CALISKAN, Halis ARIOGLUPreîncoltirea a avut ca efect o germinare rapidă şi o creştere mai viguroasă adrept unnare, producţiimai mari <strong>de</strong> tuberculi la recoltare. Întârziereaplantării, în special după începutul lunii februarie, a avut ca efect reducerea aproducţiei din cauzaale aerului. S-a ajuns la concluzia că tuberculiiar atunci când <strong>de</strong> sol sunt înReducerea producţiei datoratăplantării ar putea fi acceptată într-o U.li.li'UUjl.li~Umăsură până la lunii februarie, însă nu trebuie să se mai facăaceastă dată, în condiţiile<strong>de</strong> mediu semi-arid zona mediteraneană.cheie: cartoftimpuriu, epocă <strong>de</strong> preîncolţire, sezon <strong>de</strong>zona mt~alter;am~ana""",,',,-,,-:1,"'1-:1 experimentală din 2001 şi 2002.<strong>de</strong> plantare asupra germinării şi asupra durateii-t:>,.,.-tt:l> I A'" ''''..'''';.'..... r'AI1h.... şi ale datei <strong>de</strong> plantare asupra numărului <strong>de</strong>şi asupra uscate a cartofului 1.> 1-', .JLJ"-''''..d.\_i.VJ. 1"\1"1"1'1"1(',-,,11"1'"11 şi ale datei <strong>de</strong> plantare asupramedii a tuberculilor şi asupra in<strong>de</strong>xului <strong>de</strong> recoltă a5. preîncolţirii şi datei <strong>de</strong> plantare asupra calibrării şi asupra<strong>de</strong> cartoftimpuriu.198Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Jaroslaw CEPL, Pavel KASALPotato n.~:s,t::iiH"l1 .ti.!li:tU....nI;;, Dobrovskeho 2366, 580 01 Havlickuv Brod, Czech Republiccepl@vubhb.cz2000-2002 the ofselected herbici<strong>de</strong>s onand potato qualityThe trials wereof Valecov Station. Five""''''.. nrl...i- was measured in from<strong>de</strong>t,ernrnned: winterBras<strong>si</strong>ca Galium aparine,1Jr,"lIn'r,M'"'''''' r>r,..n,r,'"~I'H''' and Viola arven<strong>si</strong>s. Following activeaplPlu;atJ[on with clomazone: metribuzin, linuronHrl"1f.'!f.'!lf't7 napus was dominant species. Thi<strong>si</strong>n 2001 and 79% in 2002 of fresh weight of alIuntreated control. The weed ofuntreated135,4 g.m- 2 in 2001 163 g.m- z in 2002. Weedwas very high in 2000 and 2001 (98,tl to 99,6%),infestation. Itwas 84,5% (87,9% efficiencyagainst winter Bras<strong>si</strong>ca metribuzin, 95,8% for linuron (94,9%) and 90,8%(88,4%) for terbuthylazine withterbutryn. Tuberyieldwas <strong>si</strong>gnificantly lower onuntreatedvariants, no <strong>si</strong>gnificant differences were found among individual active ingredients. Yieldreduction (between herbici<strong>de</strong>-treated variant with the highest yie1d and the controluntreated variant) was 44% in 2000, 41% in2001 and48% in 2002. Post-harvest measuredtuber dry matter content was not affected by herbici<strong>de</strong> treatments.Keywords: weed management; weeds; herbici<strong>de</strong>s; tuber yieldINTRODUCTIONWeeds are highly <strong>si</strong>gnificant injurious agents. Depen<strong>de</strong>nt on range ofweed speciesand inten<strong>si</strong>ty ofoccurrence, they have adverse impacts, especially on tuber yield. Lowerand intermediate weed infestation reduces yield at least about 20-30%; however, highweed infestation <strong>de</strong>creases yield up to 85%. Weeds compete withpotato plants as regardas alI conditions ofpotato growth and <strong>de</strong>velopment. Plants ofmany weeds are able tobetter take up soil moisture aud this e~ables more rapid growth and prevalence ofweedsover potatoes. It is also associated competition for nutrient uptake - weeds havebetter capacities, sha<strong>de</strong> young potato plants and <strong>de</strong>prive them ofsun radiation. Itleads toVoi. XXXI199


200Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


Weea COmrOI m pOlGroes m me LZeCI1 nepUDttCMATERIALS ANDExactthe research stationloam topsoihn in '""V'UlUJ......VJu.Pre-emergentwere done by C'nr-


~..,'" a'-'-'L~"""""""~ herbici<strong>de</strong> trcatments2 metribuzin Sencor 70 WP 0,5 kg.ha-l3 linuron Afalon 45 SC ],0 l.ha-lyear 2002untreated control----2 metribuzin Sencor 70 WPnote: alI mentioned preparations were applied together with a.i. clomazone in dose ofCommand 4 Eeo, Il/haRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONNatural occurrence on is result ofpotential weed reserve in soil andprogress ofweather vVJ.JUJHVU~. Weightmatter per lm 2 are2.to...... "'.....v'-'"" mean temperature and also the .UJl;:;Hv,;:,JI,2002.Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z


2. ofweed and tuberweeds~les'BRSNW GALAp· CHJ .POLCO VIOARtotaltuber yieldi weight weight ~ l':ht •weight weight .weight[of freshlof fresh o eshof ,hof fresh 9ffresh dry ,..matter mauer matter matter maltei maUeI [marter t.ha-l F testdif.i g per in g pei in g per in g per 111 per In g per gvar. 1 m2 1 m2 1 m2 lm2 1 m2 lm2vear 2000I 243.6 83 4393 949 26 7888 3286 3087 5% - 86F=2 00 02 00 31 01 34 .Jl..:L 5484 iA7,17** 1%-124'3 OI II 00 29 09 50 6.4 5399~r2001I 5757 318.4 57.2 1473 368 11354 2455 3389 5%-1602 00 1.2 00 0.0 00 12 02F=5764 15.32**1%-2583 00 118 00 19 00 137 22 5208Ivear 2002 .1 1281.9 8.0 266.7 0.0 74.5 16311 359.7 31.36 5% - 19.1'2 155.6 2.4 86.3 0.0 8.0 252.4 50.5 58.05 1% - 27.43 65.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 68.7 9.6 59.14 II,*4 149.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 150.5 23.2 59.84metntmzlne and linuron was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly high in the years 2000inboth years. In


JaroslavPavel KASALamong variants'''''''''''''''''I''''rt for matter content.in the framework ofthe project NAZV417-424.2 Scherrer, 2001. Weed "'A....rrAII-'~"""H'U"-''''' after direct Agrarforschung2001. Potato weed managernent [in24pp.4 2002. Weed infestation control in conditions ofpotato In u.\.J-•.,un".'-',",-[in Czech]. Agro 7(3): 18-20.Kasal, P. 2003 Comparison ofinten<strong>si</strong>ve and low input potato growing[in In Udrzitelne polnohospodârstvo a rozvoj vidieka. Zbornik prâc z v '-'U.'-''-'L~.'-''konferencie s lnedzinarodnou ucasti 25.-26. Septembra 2003 SPU Nitra Slovenskârepublika. Nitra SPU, pp. 117-119.6 Divis, 1. 2002. Potato growing in econolocal fanning [in Czechl Uroda 50(2): 13-14.7 Gallandt, E.R. et a1., 1998. Effects ofpest and soil management systenls on weeddynamics in potato. Weed Science 46(2): 238-248.8 Kazinczi, G., Horvath, Takacs, A. 2001. Role ofweeds in the epi<strong>de</strong>nliology ofviruses . In Slovenian Conference on Protection., Ljubljana (Slovenia),pp. 222-226.9 H., H.R., 2001. Potatoes: Effects ofincorporation ofmedicinalinto soi!. Agrarforschung 8(11-12): 470-475.10 Natural, M. P., 200 L Variability of the potato bacterial pathogen, Jl......'l"'''V.Ult....solanacearum (E.F. Smith), College, Laguna (Philippines). [nd] 25 leaves11 Rajalahti, R.M., Bellin<strong>de</strong>r, R.R., Hoffmann, 1999. Tilne of andinterseeding affects weed control and potato yield. Weed Science SocietyAmerica 47(2): 215-225.12 Ramsak, A., 2001 Flufenacet (terano, axiom, plateen) a new type ofbroadleafand204 Anale


BURUIENILOR LA CARTOFREPUBLICA,,,,,,,.IA')!,'':! 2000-2002 auefectul erbici<strong>de</strong>lorşi asupra pararnetrilor <strong>de</strong> şi........''"'jU'~'"'LV au fost pe un sol brun cu textură medie..... ~~.~AU'jLU.. <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong> Valecov. S-a observat inci<strong>de</strong>nţaa 5 <strong>de</strong> buruienia în g/m 2 şi s-a <strong>de</strong>tenninatBras<strong>si</strong>ca napus <strong>de</strong>şi Viola arven<strong>si</strong>s. AuClO,m2lzona: metribuzin~ linuron anddominantă. Această hU'''-''''3n''iîn 2002 din totalul cantităţii <strong>de</strong>verzi dinla martorul netratat a fost <strong>de</strong>788,8 g/m 2 în în 2001 şi 1,1 în 2002. Eficienţaîn combatereaa testate a foarte mare în 2000 şi 2001 (98,8 - 99,6%), în2002 a mai scăzută ridicat Eficaciatea a fost <strong>de</strong>84,5% (87,9% Bras<strong>si</strong>ca napus în cazul llletribuzinei, 95,80/0 <strong>pentru</strong>AHA!"''' 'U'AA (94,9%) şiterbutilazinăcu terbutrin. Producţia <strong>de</strong> tuberculia fost semnificativ mai scăzută la variantele netratate; nu s-au observat diferenţesemnificative înrândulindividuali. Reducerea producţiei (între variantatratată cu cea mare producţie şi din varianta netratată) afost 44% în în 2001 şi 48% în 2002. Conţinutul în substanţăuscată nlăsuratnu a afectat <strong>de</strong> tratamentul cu erbici<strong>de</strong>.Cuvinte cheie: combatereaerbici<strong>de</strong>; producţie <strong>de</strong> tuberculiTabele:1.2.tratamente cu erbici<strong>de</strong> pf(~enlergellte:,,-,aHU'.U~",u<strong>de</strong> ŞI ~1!"'r,,,rI,.roi-,,,,, <strong>de</strong> tuberculi.VOL, XXX]205


Manuela HERMEZIU1, Radu HERMEZIlP<strong>Institutul</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Cercetare</strong> Devzoltare <strong>pentru</strong> <strong>Cartof</strong> şi Sfeclă<strong>de</strong> Zahăr-BraşovMana cartofului, produsă <strong>de</strong> ciuperca Phytophthora infestans, este cea maiGlstrugatomre boală a cartofului, producând pier<strong>de</strong>ri <strong>de</strong> producţie foarte importanteSunt necesare fungici<strong>de</strong> care să a<strong>si</strong>gure o bună protecţie atât cantitativă cât şicalitativă a culturii <strong>de</strong> Din păcate, nici un fungicid disponibil la ora actuală nua<strong>si</strong>gură un control absolut al manei.Condiţiile climatice in tinlpul atacul <strong>de</strong> mană sunt foarte importante.În perioada 2001-2002 la ICDCSZ-Braşov a fost iniţiat un program <strong>de</strong> testare aunor fungici<strong>de</strong> din gnlpe chimice diferite.S-a folo<strong>si</strong>t soiul Sante, soi cu rezistenţă mijlocie la mană, având în ve<strong>de</strong>re că 450/0din suprafaţa cultivată cu cartofîn România, la ora actuală este ocupată acestCuvinte cheie: Phytophthora infestans, fungici<strong>de</strong>, control, condiţii climaticeINTRODUCERECondiţii favorabile manei:~ Noaptea temperaturi nu mai scăzute <strong>de</strong> 7°C~ Temperaturile între 15 şi 21°C sunt cele mai favorabile <strong>pentru</strong>leziunilor şi sporulare, în timp ce la temperaturi mai mari <strong>de</strong> 29°C patogenul nu se mai<strong>de</strong>zvoltă)- Perioada cu umiditate pe frunze (roua sau ploaie) peste 6 ore este favorabilăproducerii <strong>de</strong> noi infecţii~ Perioa<strong>de</strong>le cu umiditate pe frunze mai mult <strong>de</strong> 8 ore sunt foarte criticeÎn cazul infecţiilorsevere ale culturii, tuberculii <strong>de</strong> sămânţă. sunt purtătorii uneicantiţăţi<strong>de</strong> inocul în noul sezon agricol. (Louise R., Cooke, 1999)2001 Precipitaţii (mm/m Z ), BraşovPerioada Iunie Iulie AmmstDecada 1 ---l~ 30.0 (8)* 15 O(2)*Decada II 38.7 (5) 501G2L- 49(1)Decada III 40.0 (6) 1.5 (3) 483(6)Total lunar 80.0 816 68.2Media multianuală 91,9 874 673Diferenta -11 9 -58 +09-* număr zileAnale


Mana rrw/'nfuj'ui............'AA .......!!'.,,..,,.WcUmatice exiis1Jen1teXXXI


U."i'U-UL"'''V tratate.Ridomil Gold Mza întrerupt practic atacul1n1i""n"'1"1"C'. <strong>de</strong> 1 cea scăzută<strong>de</strong> cupru (copper oxi<strong>de</strong>) <strong>de</strong> la,...n,'l1nI"Vrf"f" <strong>si</strong>milar, iar Ranman a atins o inten<strong>si</strong>tateInten<strong>si</strong>t.atac9Inten<strong>si</strong>tate atac 20018765432o +---------~.---------.----------,2Notari (zile)Inten<strong>si</strong>tatea atacului <strong>de</strong> mană pe foliaj -2001'11"\"/,',,0-,


Mana cartofului şi controlul aceSlelO In conUlfwt: ;SpetA)'''''' ""VH"'• ....., ~'i~'Efectele fungici<strong>de</strong>lor asupra productiei la soiul S8nte(Brasov 2(01)45 ,.. _ ,40+-----------------1.. 35+-------lS.tii! 30~Il. 252015ax. Cu Manco:rob Rarman Ridomll Mâlody M. nelrata!Efectul fungici<strong>de</strong>lor'asupra producţiei <strong>de</strong> cartof-2001În anul 2002 (figura 2) în primul interval <strong>de</strong> notare, mana a progresat lent, darconstant la toate variantele.Departajarea a început practic în 5 august, când s-a produs o diferenţiere întreproduse. Alcupralul (copper oxi<strong>de</strong>) nu a stopat o creştere rapidă a atacului, confrrmândfaptul că produsul este eficient la începutul perioa<strong>de</strong>i <strong>de</strong> vegetaţie, în continuare fiindnecesare alte substanţe active.Folpetul (folpet), nepătrunzând în ţesuturile plantei nu protejeazănoile creşteri.Atacul înregistrat a fost relativ sever. Pentru a fi eficient sunt necesare intervale maiscurte între tratamente (7 zile) ( A.R. Egan, A. Murray & S. 1996).Clorotalonilul (chlorothalonil) s-a <strong>si</strong>tuat în jurul a 50-52% inte<strong>si</strong>tate atac, ceeace nu reprezintă potenţialul substanţeiactive (Schwinn, El., 1983).Bine şi foarte bine s-au comportatfungici<strong>de</strong>le Acrobat (dimethomorph)şiRanman(cyazofamid), având un nivel al inten<strong>si</strong>tăţii cuprins Între 42-47%.Martorul netratat a înregistrat o evoluţie ascen<strong>de</strong>ntă pe totparcursul, ajungând lanivelul <strong>de</strong> 77-78%.IntenmiLalac {%} 9.00 "Inten<strong>si</strong>tate atac 20028.00t---------------7.00+----------r----6.00 +--------~~"-----I·Alcupral2 -F.... ~·..;!34·.·',··.. ,··"5 .Ctawtolnnilfi - Mnrtor5.00 +------~r---,~~--3.00 +-----;;o~---V'~..L----2.00+---L-----::;7"h1jL------1.00 t-----::~~~~------0.00 +---=---...,-----~----~2Nollllrl{zI!e}-Seriss1 -SeriaS2" ... Serias3 ·······Seriss4 -SeriesS -Series6Inten<strong>si</strong>tatea atacului <strong>de</strong> mană pe foliaj - 2002VOL. XXXI209


Manuela HERMEZIU, RADU HERMEZIUvariante "''''U'1''.rIapariţia mai târziemanel pe ~... '-'''''............,Efectele fungici<strong>de</strong>lor asupra productiei la solul SanIe(Brasov 2002)40 +--------~---------:~ 35.ci.;:; 30+---­-eiEQ.252015Alcupral Folpet Ranman Aerobat Clorotalonil M netratatCONCLUZIIEste util să alegem produsele în funcţie <strong>de</strong> modul lor <strong>de</strong> acţiune, <strong>de</strong> pre<strong>si</strong>unea <strong>de</strong>U .. -'-"""'.d...... , <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> spălare şi <strong>de</strong> evoluţia culturii, în aşa fel încât să valorificămatuurile fiecărei substanţe active, menţinând în acelaşi timp un cost rezonabil altratamentelor.Pentru a alege <strong>de</strong> manieră optimă produsele, sunt <strong>de</strong> reţinut câteva i<strong>de</strong>i -cheie:y Produsele <strong>de</strong> contact (ex: ditiocarbamaţii) sunt utile făcând raportul eficacitate/în perioa<strong>de</strong>le cu pre<strong>si</strong>une <strong>de</strong> infecţie slabă spre mo<strong>de</strong>rată.y Produsele <strong>de</strong> contact (gen Brestan, Fluazinam) sunt <strong>de</strong> reţinut <strong>pentru</strong> protecţiay Interesul <strong>pentru</strong> produse translaminare (Acrobat, Tattoo C) este <strong>de</strong> subliniat încu spăIări importante (ploi, irigaţii, furtuni).Produsele penetrante (pe bază <strong>de</strong> cymoxanil) permit stoparea contaminărilorrecente (1-2 zile lnaxim).y Produsele <strong>si</strong>stemice prezintă un interes în timpul fazei active <strong>de</strong> creştere a foliajuluişi <strong>pentru</strong> stoparea contaminărilormai vechi (maxim 3-4 zile).BIBLIOGRAFICE1. Anonymus, 1947-The key for Late Blight infection - British Mycological Society;Anonymus 1947)2. A.R. A. Murray & S. 1996 - Mullins Past history and future prospects forfungici<strong>de</strong>s for control of Phytophthora infestans an potatoes înPhytopthora infestans 1503. Louise Cooke, 1999 - Plant microbial interactions (The role offungici<strong>de</strong>s in theplant-fungal interaction - stu<strong>de</strong>nts notes)------------------------210 Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Mana carto/ului acesteia m conUlţllle "peLljlCC"r>&1lTVf/TV'rf lnfeSl'ans 150AbstractThe paper presentsthefungici<strong>de</strong>s in Braşov area.Phytophthora infestans isricH'i-.......r·i-'luo disease of''''''''''AH'':>",,!" yieldofyield.absolUte t·l .........tU ofPhytophthora.2002-2003 a test prograIlline has CQI10ulcte:u in ICDCSZ Brasov plotsfor controlling Phytophthora.We used Santelnany farmers in Romania,aproximatively 45% surface several IUIIgIIClQCS, different ingredients.The 2001 year was not very suitable regarding the ofPhytophthora on andThe year was better for ..................F,...,different fungici<strong>de</strong>s.The results are presented in a poster.A'u1wnr.nll;:· Phytophthora mtl~stlms.illIIgllclOes,1. Fungici<strong>de</strong>s an Sante yield prc,oulcuc)n .....·..""'r'" 20012. Fungici<strong>de</strong>s effects on Sante yield 2002Figures:1. Attack inten<strong>si</strong>ty ofpotato late blight 20012. Atack inten<strong>si</strong>ty ofpotato late blight 2002VOI. XXXI


SUMMARYPavel KASAL, Jaroslaw CEPLPotara Research Institute Havlickuv Brod, Dobrovskeho 2366, 58001 Havlickuv Brod,Czech RepublicE-mail: potato@quick.czThe technology of potato growing in the Czech Republic has been subjected to""':>'::>'-'.U.lCJ.""J. changes the beginning 1990s. New technological trends influencethe eiements; most <strong>si</strong>gnificant changes appear in soii preparation prior to"""'L""'V.H':>J.1.J.J.J.\oIJill" and in crop establishment. It is an eS,sential shift from so-called....U .••J.'U'A,... UJ. or clas<strong>si</strong>cal technology towards technology ofpotato growing in stone-....... """'..V .....UJ,)'; technology meant an impOltant change for Czech potato growers.ten years it has distributed every agricultural enterprise specializedinten<strong>si</strong>ve growing. In spite ofhigh purchase costs, it brings an economic effect.results performed at the Valecov Research Station the PotatonC't,hl'h:> Havlickuv Brod give evi<strong>de</strong>nce an advantages of soil cultivation......."J,,'U'.UUJ.... technology. Presence of c10ds <strong>si</strong>zed more 20 mm in topsoil wasreauct':a compared to c1as<strong>si</strong>cal technology ofsoi! preparation and clods more50 mm were not present in soil after separation. Post-planting and pre-harvest'"'VJ....qJlu.""".LVawas measured with penetrOlneter in spring and/or autumn. Fromresults we can conclu<strong>de</strong> reduction in soil compaction u<strong>si</strong>ng <strong>de</strong>stoning technologycompared to c1as<strong>si</strong>cal technology. Increa<strong>si</strong>ng values ofsoi! compaction were observedin technology fronl <strong>de</strong>pth of 120 mm, however u<strong>si</strong>ng <strong>de</strong>stoning technologysoi! cOITlpaction increased up to 240 mm. A large po<strong>si</strong>tive influence ofthe technologywas found on and soil volume weight; on the contrary, a negative influencewas recor<strong>de</strong>d for maximum capillary water capacity, immediate soil moisture and relativeIn other words we can say that soii remainedloose for the whole growingperiod, 100se soil appeared to dry out compared to clas<strong>si</strong>cal soii preparation.Tuber yieldwas not negatively by this fact; it was increased by 12% averagedover faur experimental years and three potato varieties. Lower mechanical damagewas estimated for harvested lnechanical damage up to <strong>de</strong>pth more than5 according to variety about 40-55%.212Anale 1.C.UC.S.z.


technology of~SS:~llILlalchanges <strong>si</strong>ncethe elements; most oJ jLA"" _u~ar clas<strong>si</strong>cal technolOrgyapplication of COlnrnlef(~lal ...""...............""."'"MATERIAL AND METHOD....'~,n... ,r'~r< where is on 800/0 ofareas. Itbeginning of90s lastare operation there at present andapproximately one of potatocrop areas.technology is used most growerspotato growing on the area moreofXXXI


Pavel KASAL, Jaroslav C'EPLof <strong>si</strong>fting are usedstones (more than 150the ofthe row. Athis way.nrp·C'P1-.t weed species.214Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


New trends in potato growmgRESULTS ANDVOL. XXXI


Pavel KA SA L, Jaroslav CEPL..,""JLA'-


New trends In pOTaTo growlng uSlng ue-MUrtlflb '':;l-'''''hV5Y ." ... ~ ~~-_.. "-r"- .. _Destoning technology lueant an importantgrowers.last ten years it has been into every enterprise specializedpotato growing. In spite of purchase costs, ittechnology has a <strong>si</strong>gnificant influence oneffect was found on poro<strong>si</strong>ty, soil"V!--'CJV~~ stone content and reduction in clod "",,,,1",,..,,,1­50 mm, is an advantage of the lC'r"'Tnr


tuberculii<strong>de</strong> aprox. 40-55%....uF,.......,? .........·U... L'V ...'J... chhnÎce în cadrul tehnologiei mo<strong>de</strong>rne <strong>de</strong>"'U'-'-LA"""VAHU., <strong>de</strong>oarece în timpul efectuării braz<strong>de</strong>lor şi al "'''''....,.., .....') ....,,în toată masa şi o mare cantitate îngrăşăminte<strong>de</strong> cartof. locală a înfi o soluţie.aplicării N cu aprox. 25-30~) în r'Al"Y'1n-::n''".1!t1Pşi o plasare exactă a îngrăşăn1intelor în zona<strong>de</strong> a folo<strong>si</strong> elementelor nutritive din m~~a~~anlanlLcând lipsa umezelii,.-....'"' ... ".~" "".J.lu.tuJ.. Din 1·........-r"l ,,,ilrn'::i."h.u......,'I_!\JU... L'.I..l'-' şi înazot încorporat, azotul este eliberat încet în sol, producţia <strong>de</strong> este uU.Jl au.folo<strong>si</strong>rii îngrăşămintelor cu eliberare încetinită, iar folo<strong>si</strong>rea UUL'" '-' ~......,J ...îmbunătăţeşte.Cuvinte cheie: cartof, eliminare a pietrelor, aplicare <strong>de</strong> producţie <strong>de</strong>tuberculi.Tabele:L ...AL."'A'''"'U.!,.... sfărâmăriipietrelor1. Rezistenţa solului plantare - media pe mai mulţi ani.(Mpa);2. Efectele tehnologiilor <strong>de</strong> cultivare asupra producţiei <strong>de</strong> tuberculi.218Anale J.C.D.C.S.Z.


fiecărui soi înCuvinteINTRODUCERE"",ni-~..r ..r·;;'nr1l'l.lP4;!tp ~rUl{,,>llrp'>lv ....'......"'..... încolţire.cartof obţinută, doar])rc)3S1Pelta, cartoful a cunoscutdiver<strong>si</strong>ficare a fonnelor <strong>de</strong>Pornind la tendinţelemeto<strong>de</strong>lor nepoluantescopul a<strong>si</strong>gurăriiam iniţiat această""......."'.....Jl .........,""'... I--,....u."~.... " .....""..,.. ,.., ............"'.... seceea ce duce la pier<strong>de</strong>riVoi. XXXI


i""'...·H'V71T creeazăserioaseşi nu în ultimulmomentulmicul producător, <strong>pentru</strong> nlarilecultivatoare <strong>de</strong> ca şi <strong>de</strong>pozitele <strong>de</strong> (Donescu, 1998).contextul intrării ţării noastre în Conlunitateareducerea r'A ...~t",'Y111'·';:;""produselor prin eliminarea tratamentelor cu substanţe chimice dăunătoare, Illt:n!Jlnereacalităţilor culinare şi cu încadrarea normele unei "~LL""UH~WLlutilizarea meto<strong>de</strong>lor mo<strong>de</strong>rne, nepoluante, <strong>de</strong>aa cartofilor.încolţirii se realizează cu mijloace chimice saufizice, iradierea cu raza gamma a fost cel maiexperimentată,nrp'7Pt'lt o serie <strong>de</strong> rezultate notabile în acest sens. Tehnologiile <strong>de</strong> conservares-au dovedit a fi mai proce<strong>de</strong>e, la care, în urma a peste 40cercetare şi investigaţii ştiinţifice, s-a caracterul al produselor .-A ........:> ..... l .......H .....U~;u. conţinutăîn uleiurile volatilespontană."rlr"'>.!t,...... , fără afectarea calităţilor culinare şimediuluiUllJl.l1J.lLVAJlAV.I. U.U'C'-U'U.U,a tuberculilor <strong>de</strong> cartof, în condiţiile{'''1.... ~p,T'[7·''Irll la tenlperaturi mai ridicate (8-12°C) precum şi un efect ~UH,"'.U"."'''';;:;'''''_<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>pozitare (HARTMANS şi,-,,,,-n."-i."-LIJ şi colah., 1993,MATERIAL ŞIAnale l.CD.CS.Z


Tehnologii mo<strong>de</strong>rne <strong>de</strong> ('rif1


lH'ln",,.,,,,,. <strong>de</strong> aerosoliAnale 1. c.D. C.S.Z


Tehnologii moaerne ae conservare U Gur 'C:J"VfcmVOL. XXXI223


.LJA.VV~\_U t-"","-r:>'lYIc'n1'e>.I,,,.. CU diferiteVar.TratamentulPier<strong>de</strong>rile totale.acestora la toate u~n''''A.U''''La224Anale rCD.CSZ


~ TestTehnologii moaerne ae conservare U(;WtUjttUfA-JL'-''-''.....Atratamentelor CUTabelul 3uleiuri volatile asupra pier<strong>de</strong>rilor totale În timpulpăstrăriiVar.Tratamentul1% pier<strong>de</strong>ri totaleROCLAS ROMANO SANTE DESIREE MediaTest Test Test Testem Duncanem DUReanem Duneanem Duneaucm Dunean1 Martor netratat 12,9 ABC 8,5 E 13,4 AB 15,1 A 12,5 A2 Mentha crispa 10,7 CDE 9,6 DE 9,7 DE 10,2 DE 10,0 B3 Carumcarvi 10,8 CDE 8,8 E 9,9 DE 11,9 BCn 10,3 B4 Anethmn gqweolens 10,7 CDE 9,9 E 13,4 AB 11,9 BCn 11,5 AMedia 11,2 A 9,2 b 11,6 a 12,3 a 11,7D15%(SOi) = 1,1%D15%(tratament) = 1,1%D1 5%(soi. tratament) = 2,20/0Structura pierdElril()r .. soiul Roclas16-,---------------------,14+------------------------;12%ple 10r<strong>de</strong>ri 8Structura pier<strong>de</strong>rilor - soiul Romana16 , ..-.-.---.-.-,.-----.----.-.-.--.-, .- .- .- .- ,%ple 10r<strong>de</strong>ri Il-14+--------------------;12-t----------------------;Martor Montha crispa Carurn carvl AnethumgraveoiensMartor Mon!ha crispa Carum caM AnelhumgraveoiensStructura pier<strong>de</strong>rilor • soiul Sante16 ,..-------'-----------------,14+------------------;12;'ie 10r<strong>de</strong>rl 8VOL. XXXI225


LJUjVb;)r~u, Mana lAiVUyl, LJana bUbl/, ~.t


lehnologll moaerne ae conservare a eUflUjtlUIMODERN TECHNOLOGY FOR POTATO STORAGEAbstractTechnological and quality requirements imposed upon table potato and those <strong>de</strong>stinedto industrial proces<strong>si</strong>ng <strong>de</strong>mand adopting the mo<strong>de</strong>m technology ofstorage, unpolluted,cheap, easy of access.This paper intends to establish the technical conditions to apply new, unconventionalmethods of storage: applications with natural sprout inhibitors. Similar research havebeen done years ago in Netherlands, having as main inhibitor carvone, extracted frommature caraway seed (Carum carvi).Application were done with oils extracted from three different medicinal and essentialplants (Carum carvi L., Mentha crispa L., Anethum graveolens L.,). The experimentswere done on ICDCSZ Braşov research storage. The application were ma<strong>de</strong> on thesecond part of storage period, after sprouting of potato tubers. Four different potatocultivars were used (Roclas, Romano, Sante, and De<strong>si</strong>ree) which were treated witheach natural extract. The influence of application upon losses due to sprouting, uponweight losses and totallosses were followed.The best results were obtained u<strong>si</strong>ng the oiI of caraway seed. Sprouting losseswere diminished with an avetage of 5.6.25%, and the lenght of sprouts with 48.86%.These results were <strong>si</strong>milar for aH cultivars comparatively with the control. The potatocultivars respon<strong>de</strong>d favourably to application and the level oflosses was specific to eachcultivar.Keywords: potato, storage, essential oiI, losses, sproul.oils.Tables:1. Effect ofessential oils application on the lengh ofsprout during storage.2. Effect ofessential oils application on sprout weight during storage.3. Effect ofessential oils application on totallosses during storage.Figures:1. Device for aerosol scatter.2. Structure of losses during storage of potato varieties treated with essentialVOL. XXXI227


RESEARCHES CONCERNINGECONOMICSUMMARYPăun Ion OTIMAN*, Cosmin SăIăşan*, Sorina Mihacea** U.S.A.M.VB. Timişoara, RomâniaThe present work represents a start-up for the scientific and economic literature inRomania <strong>si</strong>nce it shows the partial results conceming the economic efficiency of thegenetically modified crops against the clas<strong>si</strong>c technology for potatoes.In the case of this crop, there is a high level of high profitability due to the costsavings related to differential technologies (savings in Regent, in the case ofpotatoes).Keywords: genetically modified plants, clas<strong>si</strong>c technology, RRtechnology, fix costs,variable costs, monovariable functions.INTRODUCTIONThe econOlnic efficiency of cultivating OM crops (GMC's) represents a complexissue which has a multitu<strong>de</strong> of influence factors. In principle, the economic efficiency(E) (ar the profitability <strong>de</strong>gree or level) on the farm's gate for a certain agriculturalproduct is function oftwo variables:E = f(V,C,),where:V - incomes (tumover) from the product's sale;C - costs generates by the product's release;The two in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt variables, V and C, an their turn, as absolute values are<strong>de</strong>pending on the price (P), sold quantity (Q), unit costs (c), and the harvested andsotred quantity (Q), meaning:V=pxQ vC = c x Q,.Ifthe tra<strong>de</strong>d quantity is equal ta the harvested quantity (when the entire harvest issold), the i<strong>de</strong>al <strong>si</strong>tuation for the farmer, then the profit volume he records is:P = Q (p-c)RESULTS AND DISCUTIONSFrom the previous formula we can observe the factor product quantity(harvest) Qv is very important for the profit volume and for the profitability <strong>de</strong>gree(efficiency) ofthe farm. Therefore the "market" element by its "<strong>de</strong>mand" componentis <strong>de</strong>terminant for the GM228Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


229


?ăun lan UJ'JMAN, Cosmin SALA~AN, Sorina M1HACHAcalled political or civic and ecological forces are motivated financialmaterial reasons than a scientific one (many ofthese claimed ecologica! movementsnothing to do with ecology or biology, generally speaking);fiii The GMO's obtained by agro-bio-technological methods in public Of privatecompanies (laboratories) <strong>de</strong>aling with research and production, are submitted to new severeaccreditation and screening rules with the breeds. Also,accreditation ofthe living agro-bio-technological is more complicated and strictconlpared with the accreditation ofthe agrochemicals ormeans for ...Fo,LL"" ......"'......In many countries, Romania, cannot as<strong>si</strong>milated to the BIO ""..r,rt"r>rC'(Of ecological products), certain employed in cultivation are .......h).U.J.H..... ~...''Uthe BIO crops (Romanian Government no. 49-2000).The reasons have an important influence hoth the <strong>de</strong>mand ofGM agricultural products and, implicitly, over the Un<strong>de</strong>r such circumstances,GMC's do not have yet a cel1ain market and the of these arenot with those the conventional products. But, the above ......"".... u.U'........''UpI""rYlpnTC' are estimations as in Romania, as well in the lnain part of East 1-''''''''''r\''''''1,\countries there is no lnarket for the GM products and we have no pos<strong>si</strong>bility to rnl"Jlnr11N;f(monitor) market related to the GM products.Regarding the costs GM today we have observationsfonn the experimental fields for GM Btpotatoes fron1 the Banat's Univer<strong>si</strong>tySciences Timişoara.The analy<strong>si</strong>s ofthe cost variance for the GMC's and non-GMC's is realised by theof the comparable costs (fix costs) and by differentiate costsEven ifthe year 2000 was severely unfavourable for the potatoes, especially in theBanat's plane in the un-irrigated area, due to the serious drought, we still have the pos<strong>si</strong>bilityto estimate certain aspects concerning the production costs based on the recor<strong>de</strong>d'VaIJv..............'''''...... '''....... data for this crop at the Research Facility Fann ofthe Banat's Univer<strong>si</strong>tyAgricultural Sciences Timişoara.The variable costs which differentiate the costs for the two breeds are referring toinsectici<strong>de</strong>s for Colorado beetle control and mechanical works to completethe chemicals application. For the beetle control two treatments were employed(300.000 lei/ha, 13,6 USD/ha) with Regent lIha; 340.000 lei/ha, 1 USD/ha). Theexpenditure for the conventional potatoes were higher with 851.700 lei/ha,respectively 38,7 USD/ha, representing + 10,5% compared to the Bt Overpas<strong>si</strong>ng the expenditures for the851.700 lei/ha originates, aswe J..U....'J.H,JlVU"".... ,treatment (35%) 211.700Onthe country level, where 250.000 ha are cultivated with potatoes, employingthe Bt seeding material, evaluates the Regent economy at around 3,9-4,0 millionand the other connected expenditure at about million USD, meaning a total of9,7-10,0 million USD on ROlnania's scale.230Anale J.C.D.C.S.Z.


Researches concerning the economic impact lij lecnnowgy U'''IL.U'''UFl U, pUlU


Păun Ion oTJMA N, Cosmin SALAŞAN, Sorina MIHACEACOMPARATIVE COSTS FOR POTATOES(USD/ha)REFERENCES:1. Ba<strong>de</strong>a, Elena Man~ela, 2000. Plante transgenice în cultură, Bucureşti2. Bonny, Sylvie, 1998. «Les OGM risquent-ils d'accroître la <strong>de</strong>pendance <strong>de</strong>l'agriculture vis-t-vis <strong>de</strong> l'industrie 7». Pp. 42-44 in Organismes GenetiquementModifies a 1'INTRA: Environnement, Agriculture et Alimentation. Paris: INRA3. Bonny, Sylvie, 1998. «Quels benefices technique et economiques l'agriculturepeut-elle attendre <strong>de</strong>s OGM 7». Pp. 38-41 in Organismes GenetiquementModifiesa 1'INTRA: Environnement, Agriculture et Alimentation. Paris: INRA4. Commis<strong>si</strong>on europeene. «Les Europeens et la Biotechnologie». Eurobaromctre,Commis<strong>si</strong>on europeenne, 20005~ European Commis<strong>si</strong>on, 1998. «Communicating Genetic Engineering in the AgrofoodSector to the Public». Brussels: Directorate - general Research6. European Commis<strong>si</strong>on, 2000. «The Agricultural <strong>si</strong>tuation in the European Union»,1999 Report, Luxembourg7. Joly, Pierre-Benoit, 1998. «Quelles sont les strategies <strong>de</strong>s firmes industriellessur le marche <strong>de</strong>s OGM 7». Pp. 51-66 in Organismes Genetiquement Modifiesa l'INTRA: Environnement, Agriculture et Alimentation, Paris: INRA8. Rausser, G., S. Scotchmer and L. Simion, 1999. «Intellectual Property andMarket Structure in Agriculture». Department of Agricultural and ResourceEconomics Working Paper 880, Berkeley, Calif.: Univer<strong>si</strong>ty ofCalifomia - Berkeley.232 Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


Researches concerning the economic impact o} tJj tectmolOgy UllllZalLUrI lfI pUIUtU lA


SUMMARYMilanPotato Research Institute Havlîekuv Brod, Ud.Dobrovskeho 2366, 58001 Havlfekuv Brod, Czech ~,"vL'UU'AVvubhb@vubhb.czto cropsTP'l'.-rn,n.n,nlt'


XXXI


Mi/an CjZEK- seed cost- fertilizer cost (comrnercial fertilizers and farmyard manure)- chemical protection cost- cost of foreign subject services- wage cost- machinery variable costs (fuels, spare parts, repairs)- other variable costs- fixed costs (production and administrative overheads, <strong>de</strong>preciation, taxes, renl. ..)Ca1culation oftotal costs results from so-called managerial approach ofeconomy(calculation method of "gross margin"). It is particularly focused on direct (variable)costs, directly allocating to growing ofcertain crop, in this case potatoes. In next stageindirect (fixed) costs are ca1culated, which remain unaltered with volume ofproduction.All calculations result from the price level ofinputs and production in the year 2002. Thecalculation method ofgross margin differs in estimate ofca1culation offarmyard manure(FYM) production in comparison with conventional calculations; aH costs associatedwith FYM production and field application are costs of animal production. Value ofmanure produced in animal production (in CZK) is distributed in the whole crop rotation,so it does not charge only crops with direct application ofFYM (in this case potatoes).Further difference from conventional ca1culations we can find in evaluation of ownproduction. Only market prices are always ca1culated both in harvested production an<strong>de</strong>valuation of own seed. Therefore u<strong>si</strong>ng own seed it is necessary to calculate a price,for which own seed could be realized on the market.A hectare ofagriculturalland was <strong>de</strong>termined as a unit ofcalculation for estimationoffixed costs. Other calculations could result from estimation oflevel ofvariable costs,in such case potatoes are often exces<strong>si</strong>vely charged with fixed costs compared to othercrops.In general we can say that cost rate per ton of product <strong>de</strong>clines with growth ofyields, although total costs per hectare are increased.The aim of the assessment of cost <strong>de</strong>velopment and structure of chemical potatoprotection against pests was economical expres<strong>si</strong>on ofcosts ofpotato protection againstmajor pests, share in variable and total costs per hectare ofpotatoes in selected potatogrowers during 1997-2002. Own <strong>si</strong>x-year results of economical analyses of selectedagricultural enterprise management were inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the assessment and they werecompared with published results ofState Phytosanitary Administration (output reviews).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONFor economical assessment ofpotato production results ofeconomical analyses ofmanagement ofselected agricultural enterprises from 1997-2002 were used. However,they only present a small part ofpotato areas in the Czech Republic. Therefore results ofsample survey of agricultural product cost rate in FADN CZ net. are inclu<strong>de</strong>d forcomparison.236 Anale /. C.D. C.s.z.


XXXI


Mi/an (;iZEKTable 2. Results ofsample survey on potato production cost rate in FADN Cl(ClK.ha- i )Cost item 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002CZK CZK CZK CZK CZK CZKDirect (variable) costsSeed (purchased + own) 10517 13216 13600 14827 16710 19070Fertilizers (purchased + own) 3691 3575 3155 3037 4296 3925Chemical protection 4780 5 111 4953 5528 6444 7717Variable machinerv costs 8563 7847 8724 8545 7940 10763Labour costs 13582 14408 12658 12862 15719 146641Other direct costs 5595 5716 5769 5916 8164 5512Total direct costs 46728 49873 48859 50715 59273 61 651Indirectafixed costsMaterial fixed assets <strong>de</strong>preciations 2049 2051 2570 2743 6092 2410Production overheads 7654 6805 7250 6908 4875 6354Administrative overheads 2435 3152 3747 3254 2994 4717Total indirect costs 12138 12008 13568 12906 13961 13481Total costs (UVN) 58866 61 881 62427 63621 73234 75132Yieid (t) 23,38 25,64 22,14 26,29 28,27 24,85Averaqe realization price 2353 2501 2943 3106 2971 3300Costs per ton of production 2518 2413 2819 2420 2591 3023Profit (Ioss) per ton of production -165 88 123 686 380 277Total price of production in CZK 53547 64513 61 057 59759 65028 64319Sold Quantitv 22,76 25,79 20,75 19,24 21,89 19,49Rate of profitability (%) -9,04% 4,25% -2,19% a6,07% ·11,21% ·14,39%Number of enterprises 123 117 111 101 85 87Source: Cost rate of agncultural products 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,2002.From FADNel survey on potato production cost rate, foUowing conclu<strong>si</strong>ons couldbe drawn:1/ growth ofaverage realization price ofpotatoes by 40% to 3 300 eZK.t 1 , growthofaverage stated potato production per hectare by 6 % to 24,9 t.ha- I resulting in growthofproduction price per hectare ofpotatoes by 20% to 64 319 elK2/ growth ofdirect costs per hectare ofpotatoes by 32%, total costs per hectare by28% and per ton by 20% to 3 023 eZK3/ late table potatoes were surveyed in respon<strong>de</strong>nts u<strong>si</strong>ng double-entry bookkeeping4/ number ofsurveyed (tested) enterprises was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly higher, i.e. 85 - 1235/ total price ofproduction in eZK inclu<strong>de</strong>s sold quantity oftable potatoes multipliedby average realization price6/ negative rate ofprofitability oflate table potato growing is recor<strong>de</strong>d in aU yearsstudied.238Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


E,CGiTlUn'ly ofpotato nrnrhH'finnRepublicYeai Tl II Cos "",,"1potato ha Herbici<strong>de</strong>s Fungici<strong>de</strong>s Ctheri1997 1 107 1 018 2353 399 1 092 17 48791998 1217 1497 2911 462 1291 43 62051999 1063 1385 2912 506 1453 438 66932000 1038 1466 3307 583 1241 674 72702001 1 225 1 383 4342 649 1808 972 91532002 1409 2079 4392 735 1555 793 9555Average 1117 1411 3369 556 1401 490 ! 7293Percentage of individual components of chemical997 1 107 20,9 48,2 8,2 22,4 0,4 100,0998 1217 24,1 46,9 7,4 20,8 0,7 100,01999 1063 20,7 43,5 7,6 I 21,7 6,6 100,01 038 20,2 45,5 8,0 17,1 9,3 100,0~ 1 225 15,1 47,4 7,1 19,7 10,62002 1409 21,8 46,0 7,7 16,3 83 100,0Average 1177 20,5 46,3 7,7 19,7 6,0Costs of ........L'V.L.L" .."".....L protection SPAVear Total Costs ofOfPO"Io.s;n~!potato ha Herbici<strong>de</strong>s ~~nsectici<strong>de</strong>1997 69316 1025 1 2 171 24! 1998 66099 989 1435 256 21 270 i1999 68729 1005 1492 344 54 2 )9~2000 67102 1 193 1603 394 104 3 )gL2001 54290 1277 2116 253 104 3 52002 35509 1346 2290 282 138 4 )57*<strong>si</strong>nce 1997 SPA has inclu<strong>de</strong>d herbici<strong>de</strong>s and <strong>de</strong><strong>si</strong>ccants in ana itemAverage 60174 1139 1692 283 I I 14 1 3189Percentage of individual components of chemic:al protection1991 69316 42,04% 49,96% 7,01% 0,99% 100,00%1998 66099 36,63% 53,14% 9,46% 0,77% 100,00%1999 68729 34,70% 51,56% 11,88% 1,86% 100,00%2000 67102 36,22% 48,66% 11,96% 3,17% 100,00%2001 54290 34,06% 56,42% 6,75% 2,7'7% 100,00%2002 35509 33,19% 56,44% 6,96% 3,41% 100,00%Average 36,14% 52,70% 9,00% 2,16 % 100,00%Data of State Phytosanitary Administration (SPA) involve costs of chemicalprotection of potatoes on the whole potato area in the Czech In contrast tosmall group of potato growers, mentioned in Table 3, data of SPA are andsUlnnlarize an treated potato areas in given year regardless inten<strong>si</strong>ty andproduction, specialization, level of chemical protection etc. Therefore costlower compared to specialized potato Since 1997, SPA have J..u'""Jlu.......,......herbici<strong>de</strong> and <strong>de</strong><strong>si</strong>ccant costs one cost ishigher mentioned in Table 3.VOL. XXXI 239


averagecosts to EU ""'-'\.U.lU.l""'::>.In recent years, we canto price chemicals, services, .lu....,v......J.uv...level ofchemical protection. growth is compensated bysa costs are <strong>de</strong>creased. For example, yield growth by 1,29 t.ha- 1necessary for average realization price 3 626 CZK.t 1 in 2002 for compensation.Anale


Economy 0/potato nrn,duc,/innthe Czech Republic2003.potatoes: 1-2.2003. Economy and profitability51(10), Suppl. Early Potatoes: 14-15.Cizek, M., 2002. Portion ofchemical Dr()te(~tlOnprClowcttcm costsUroda 5production.M., 2002. Development of early potatoBramborarstviCizek, M., 2000. ofpotato production.Kralicek, 2004. Competitiveness of ourBramborarstvi 12(2): 19-20.Novak, 2001. Cost rate ofagricultural product<strong>si</strong>n 2000. Praha, 32 pp.Novak, 1., 2000. Cost rate ofagricultural products in ...F,JlJlVUJl.......in 1999. Review. Praha, 29 pp.pntprn,1"le,"'C ofCRNovak, 1999. Cost rate In ...MA""" ..............in 1998. Review.31 pp.1998. Cost rate ofagricultural products in ...1->" ... _ ...............Praha, 31 pp.Polackova, 2003. Cost rate m rc~·.,...,.It-v, ...1CR in 2002. Review. Praha, vUZE, 32 pp.Polackova, 2002. Cost rate ofagricultural products in '""""'.....""".........,"-Ud' t"ntt"lM'l,r""l"CCR in 2001. Review. vUZE, 32 pp.Vokal, B. et al., 2004. Potato growing [in '\-/Li"'V"';lI.Vokal, B. et 2000. Potatoes Czech]. Praha,ECONOMIARezumatDE CARTOF<strong>Cartof</strong>ul face parte din culturile cu cerinţe mari din punct <strong>de</strong> ve<strong>de</strong>re financiar,organizaţional şi tehnologic. Evaluarea economiei cultivării cartofului este influenţatăputernic <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>zvoltarea suprafeţelorcu cartof,totală, <strong>de</strong> preţul <strong>de</strong> producţieîn zonele <strong>de</strong> cultivare individuală,<strong>de</strong> importul şi cartofului etc.Alături <strong>de</strong> evaluarea cantitativă şi <strong>de</strong> piaţă a producţiei, nivelul total al cheltuielilor(rata <strong>de</strong> cost) este principala premiză <strong>pentru</strong> succesul cultivatorului <strong>de</strong> cartof. Pentru<strong>de</strong>terminarea costului total, putem folo<strong>si</strong> un mo<strong>de</strong>l calcul cu următoareleelelnente:- costul materialului <strong>de</strong> plantat;- costul îngrăşămintelor(chimici şi organici - <strong>de</strong> grajd);- cheltuieli cu protecţiape cale chimică;- cheltuieli cu lucrărileprestate <strong>de</strong> terţi;VOL. XXXI241


Mi/an eiZEK.A-lV'VAH.,A".L.... producţiei cartofi la cultivatorii incluşi în studiu (CZK.ha- l )u"..... "".. vU .....A asupra ratei cost a producţiei <strong>de</strong> în FADN CZchimică aîn ,"",t"l"'C>"l"""l"'1""rl "''''1",,1->1""''''''' a cartofului conform SPA "l"'C>.. T1r:nlU'·~~....""...r.t"'f,h .... ,",h1rnll~"" în cadrulagricole studiate242Anale 1. C.D. C.s.z.


Corlsta:ntm DRAICA, DIMA, Maria-Alina Eugen-Ion PÎRVANResearchfor Potato2 Fundaturii Brasov, Romania; ~~!:!...!.!..~~~~ e-mail: cdraica@potato.ro..............u·.u 1'"lf"t"'1"


Constantin DRAICA, Elena-Laura DIMA. Maria-Alina IONESCU. Eugen-Ion PÎRVANPotato 1S a younger crop is Europe and potatoes were shipped during the secondhalf of the 16 th centrury (1567-1Potato (Solanum tuherosum is one of the world's food crops. It may come asa surprise to many people to leam potato is very wi<strong>de</strong>ly grown on the world scaleand ranks fourth in food production, following wheat, maize and rice.According to the Food and Agriculture Grganization (FAG) ofthe United Nations,between 1960s and 1990s, wheat, maize and rice production have increased at annualrates of4.30/0, 3.9% and 2.9 % , respectively, in the <strong>de</strong>veloping countries. Despite offact that potato crop has received less empha<strong>si</strong>s, the annual increase ofpotato productionduring the same period was 4.0 % in the <strong>de</strong>veloping countries (Guenther, 2001).Potatoes are becoming quite irnportant in many <strong>de</strong>veloping countries. Potato areaand production have increased more rapidly in the Third World than the rest ofthe world.Significant potato production in the Third World countries may even go uncountedgovenlment sources because of the abundance of sub<strong>si</strong>stence farmers whopotatoes on small plots for their own consumption (Van <strong>de</strong>r Zaag, 1987).Taking into account the following advantages: high yield potential, excelent nutrientsource, high proportion of edible biomass, ea<strong>si</strong>ness to prepare for consumption, wi<strong>de</strong>acceptance as an adaptability for exten<strong>si</strong>on and inten<strong>si</strong>ve cultivation, rangecultivars, security ofproduction un<strong>de</strong>r stress conditions, short crop season, had apo<strong>si</strong>tive <strong>de</strong>velopment in the last 10 years and represents a staple food for the 3 rd millenium(Draica and Caciuc, 1997).Potato (as a crop and tubers) is affected by a large number of pest and diseases,usually spread by planting material, by stress conditions (high temperature, drought) andby the level oftechnology. Therefore, the average potato yield is <strong>si</strong>tuated between lessthan 5 tonnes/ha in some african and east-european countries, to more than 40 tonnes/hain the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany, The Netherlands etc.This paper gives a general view ofthe <strong>si</strong>tuation ofpotato in the world and especiallyin Europe in the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> (1993-2003) which can give the opportunity ofthinking forthe future <strong>de</strong>velopment ofpotato in Europe, mostly in the Central and East-Europeancountries.MATERIAL AND METHODFAO data regarding area, production, yield and tra<strong>de</strong> of potato from 2003 incOlnparison with 1993 were taken into account for analyses (FAG, 1992-2003).RESULTS AND DISCUSSION1. Potato area1.1. Potato area in the worldIn the last ten years (1993-2003) an increase of5.5% ofpotato area was recor<strong>de</strong>d,from 18.2 million hectares in 1993 to 19.22 million hectares in 2003 (table 1). Agreat244Anale I. C.D. c.s.z.


* Faostat Database ResultsTable 2....... "".HV·."'.-.area In 1!-..1\....Jl. 'V LIV993-20031019816914793242255981373530535478002915064*Faostat Database ResultsVOL. XXXI245


Constantin DRAiCA. Elena-Laura DiMA. Maria-Alina IONESCU, Eugen-Ion PiRVAN1) Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy,Luxenlbourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Swe<strong>de</strong>n and United Kingdom;2) Czech Republic, Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta,Poland. Slovakia and Slovenia.Table 3.area in the European countries during 1993-2003 r\p~"lrtJr"~dtc 199~ ·.2003 .......... ,2003/1993iwy. ..... .... % ..• .............V" .. % ....• •...•• %•..•.. """".......)< ..~ JlI!.'Y......1 "'"1 Total EuroDe 10.198169 100.0 8.451.708 100.0 82.92 Albania 10313 0.10 Il 300 0.13 109.63 Austria -31090 0.30 22500 0.27 72.344 Belarus 749000 7.34 600000 7.10 80.15 Bel2:ium+Luxembur2: 48120 0.47 60.014 0.71 124.76 Bosnia and Herze2:ovina 3R200 0.37 47.000 0.56 123.07 Bul2:aria 39000 0.38 51.000 0.60 130.88 Croatia 64.754 0.63 64.500 0.76 I 99.69 Czech Rpnllhli,· 102.816 1.00 35.982 0.42' 35.010 "")1"'- rlC 45.000 0.44 37693 0.45 83.711 Estonia 42600 0.41 18300 0.22 42.912 .Faeroe Islands 110 0.001 110 0.001 100.013 Finland 36400 0.36 30000 0.35 82.414 France 164 000 1.60 162000 1.92 98.815 Germanv 322334 3.16 283624 3.36 88.016 Greece 49094 0.48 48000 0.57 97.817 Hun2:arv 79445 0.78 35000 0.41 i 44.018 Iceland 800 0.007 800 0.009 100.0.19 i Ireland 21600 0.21 15000 0.18 i 69.420 Italv 93442 0.92 75335 0.89 80.621 Latvia 87700 0.86 45000 0.53 51.322 Lithuania 121,900 1.19 102000 1.20 83.723 Macedonia The Fmr YUQ" Ro 12851 0.13 14000 0.16 108.924 Malta 1200 0.01 1 140 0.01 95.025 Moldova. Republic of 71058 0.70 45.000 0.53 63.326 Netherlands 166000 1.63 157 129 1.85 94.627 Norwa~ 18.670 0.18 15320 0.18 82.028 Poland 1760676 17.26 800000 9.46 45.429 Portugal 87903 0.86 80000 0.95 91.030 Romania ! 249003 2.44 285000 3.37 I 114.431 Rus<strong>si</strong>an Fe<strong>de</strong>ration 3547800 34.78 3290000 38.92 1 92.732 Serbia and MonteneQ"ro 108,705 1.07 80400 0.95 73.933 Slovakia 47210 0.46 25130 0.30 53.234 Slovenia 12434 0.12 7200 0.08 57.935 Soain 207971 2.04 102300 1.21 49.236 Swe<strong>de</strong>n 36284 0.36 31 731 0.37 87.437 Switzerland 18600 0.18 12200 0.14 65.638 Ukraine 1534000 15.04 1600000 18.93 104.339 United Kin2:dom 170086 1.67 160000 1.89 94.1* Faostat Database Results246Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Actual sUuatian ofpotato in burope1. Potato production1.1. Potato produdion in the worldIn the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> (1993-2003) a 3.5% increase ofpotato production was recor<strong>de</strong>d,from 300.85 million tonnes in 1993 to 311.42 million tonnes in 2003 (table 4). Agreatincrease was recor<strong>de</strong>d in Africa (58%), A<strong>si</strong>a (cir 47%) and South America (26.50/0).An important reduction ofpotato production was recor<strong>de</strong>d in Europe. Also, for the firsttime in the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, Europe has lost the supremacy ofpotato production in the world.Taking into accountthe following advantages: high yield potential, excelent nutrientsource; high proportion of edible biomass, ea<strong>si</strong>ness to prepare for consumption, wi<strong>de</strong>acceptance as a daily adaptability for exten<strong>si</strong>on and inten<strong>si</strong>ve cultivation, wi<strong>de</strong> range ofcultivars, security ofproduction un<strong>de</strong>r stress conditions, short crop season, potato had apo<strong>si</strong>tive <strong>de</strong>velopment in the last 10 years and represents a staple food for the 3 rd millenium(Draica and Caciuc, 1997).Table 4. Evolution ofpotato production in the world during 1993-2003 period*.. ·i :.• i ·i:.::::.C .•.:'"'''' .\::•• O>· .• :..;;.·:..··~.·\i\ .• >.< ••••.• >: :••:••:"'_••••••••••........» .~gj] ....••..•••• /••y••••••••.••.•. ii?'ii •. :.:.•.....• ).k« \ ..:....••. iy.... .•WORLD 300850.9 100.0 311.416.3 100.0 103.5AFRICA 7734.2 2.57 12224.4 3.93 158.1CENTRAL andNORD AMERICA24,478.3 8.14 28,695.9 9.21 117.2SOUTH AMERICA 11 163.5 3.71 14 118.4 4.53 126.5ASIA 84311.6 28.02 23779.4 39.75 146.8EUROPE 171620.8 57.05 1308252 42.01 76.2OCEANIA 1542.5 051 1 773.1 0.57 114.9* Faostat Database Results1.1. Potato production in EuropeIn the same interval agreat reduction was recor<strong>de</strong>d in Europe (cir 24%), from171.65 million tonnes to 130.83 million tonnes (table 5). The highestreduction (590/0) ofpotato area was registered in the group ofthe 10 new members ofthe European Dnion,from 44.35 million tonnes in 1993 to 18.1 million tonnes in 2003 (table 5). With no bigchanges in the last ten years, the cOUl\tries which belong to the Rus<strong>si</strong>an Fe<strong>de</strong>ration andthe group of"othercountries" summarized a big production ofpotato (35.9 million tonnesand 40.45 million tonnes respectively).A high increase ofpotato production was recor<strong>de</strong>d in Macedonia (69%), Albania(67.4°,10), Bulgaria (48.4%), Croatia (44.7%). an the other hand, a <strong>si</strong>gnificant reductionofpotato production was registered in the Czech Republic and Poland (63%), RepublicofMoldova (56°,10), Slovakia (5-0%), Latvia (49%) and Estonia (47%), as it is mentionedin table 6.VOL. XXXI 247


Faostat L"~"uv,u-o,-, ResultsTable. 6 Evolution :potato JJI' in the fi. 'lt~ii : countries 19 1993-2003Nof"O...".t..."", 1993 2003000 tonnes % 000 tonnes % .%1 Enrone 171.620.7R9 100 nOJtl".174 100 76.22 Albania 101.527 0.06 170.000 0.13 167.43 Austria 885.833 0.52 685.000 0.52 77.34 Belarus 11.644.000 6.78 R '1nn noo 6.50 73.05 R"laillin-l-T ? dO? 00'\ 1.40 "J "J'\'\ ""0 1.72 93.96 Bosnia and" 325.000 O.IR 400.000 0.30 12li7 Bulgaria 357.079 0.20 I 530000 0.40 148.48 Croatia 507.89R 0.29 735000 0.56 144.79 Czech Reoublic ? 10'1 RIn 1.40 877 306 0.67 36.610 I Dnnf'mnrk 1.740.495 1.01 1530000 1.17 87.9Il Estonia ! 538.600 0.31 285693 0.22 53.012 Faeroe Islands 1500 0.0008 1.500 0.00! 100.013 Finland 777.200 0.45 780.000 0.60 100.414 France 5.859700 3.41 f.. ann non 4.90 109.215 Germanv 12645520 7.37 10.170.000 7.77 80.4i-J6 Greece 1000000 0.58 900000 0.6~__ . 90.017 Hu...!:!Kill:Y 1057411 0.62 800000 0.61 75.618 Iceland 8900 0.0005 8800 I 0.006 98.9~LJ.reland 569000 0.33 500.000 0.38 87.9JJL Italv "J nOR aOO 1.22 1.829.590 1.40 87.221 Latvia 1.271.700 0.74 650.000 0.50 51.122 Lithuania 1 772.600 1.03 I AOO.OOO 1.07 79.0.23 .The Fmr YUg Ro 107763 0.06 182.088 0.13 169.724 Malta 27.000 0.01 27.500 0.02 101.9l:.,1 Moldova Reoubhc of 725.965 0.42 320.000 024 44.1~. .267.698.600 4.48 h '{OC) OOf! 4.89 83.127 Norwav 446.960 0.26 340.000 0.26 76.128 Poland 36.270.544 2113 114014nn 10.31 37.229 Portugal 1.241.192 0.72 1250000 1.05 100.730 Romania 3708903 2.16 ' 3500000 2.67 94.431 Rus<strong>si</strong>an Fe<strong>de</strong>ration ,37650368 22.03 35900000 37.44 95.332 Serbia and Montenegro 646927 0.37 724322 0.55 112.033 Slovakia 856689 0.50 426106 0.32 49.734 Slovenia 156345 0.10 164 000 0.12 104.935 Soain 3,821,365 2.22 2724400 2.08 71.336 Swe<strong>de</strong>n 1.361.000 0.80 920000 0.70 67.637859.000 0.50 468000 0.35 54.538 Ukraine 21009000 12.24 17 606000 13.45 83.839 United Kin!!dom 7072 000 4.12 I 6971.000 5.32 98.6n ,* Faostat Database Resultsr248 Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


* Database Jl"-.....,,:)u.."'Table 8. tweHutlon~~_----li---__---""-'~,-+-_-"-,,=-+__---l,,,-,5.=48"'-1-_~"-'Y~"'--I111I-""'~""'-- +-- ~=~_~,-=-+- 28.72~_-"-"'""~ ~-'-I116.94 i----"-~'-t-------=~ !23.2310.9114.31* Faostat UalmbjClSe .11."''-''''........'''249


Constantin DRA IC'A , Elena-Laura DIMA, Maria-Alina IONESCU, Eugen-Ion PIRVANTaking into account the average potato yield, the most important countries thatusually harvest between 35 tonnes/ha and 45 tonnes/ha are the following: Great Britain,The Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium/Luxembourg and Switzerland (table 9).an the other hand, there are some countries which harvest less than 12 tonnes/ha:Bulgaria, Croatia, Iceland, Rus<strong>si</strong>an Fe<strong>de</strong>ration and Ukraine, or less than 9 tonnes/ha:Bosnia-Herzegovina, Republic ofMoldava, Serbia and Montenegro.Table 9. Evolution ofaverage yield ofpotato in the European countries during 1993­2003 period*I ................................2.. ••.•. ~........··>1993· ·•••••••• ·•·•.......·•••••• ·>1 ·····)2ooîi ·>i lân.nllqqc-t·'.'- nn'l"'~ . .. ,......n ..• !....,. .•..•..••. ;~)N()··%·............di) > ........... %it1 I Eurone 16.8 100.0 15.5 100.0 91.92 Albania 9.8 58.6 15.0 96.8 152.83 Austria 1 28.5 169.6 30.4 196.2 106.84 Belarus 15.5 92.3 14.2 91.6 91.15 Belpjum+Luxembun!: 49.9 297.0 37.6 242.6 75.26 Bosnia and Herzel!ovina 8.5 50.6 8.5 54.8 100.07 Bull!aria 9.2 54.8 10.4 67.1 113.58 Croatia 7.8 46.4 11.4 73.5 145.39 Czech Reoublic 23.3 138.7 24.4 157.4 104.610 Denmark 38.7 230.3 40.5 261.3 104.7Il Estonia 12.6 75.0 15.6 100.6 123.512 Faeroe Islands 13.6 80.9 13.6 87.7 100.013 Finland 21.4 127.4 26.0 167.7 121.814 France 35.7 212.5 39.51 254.8 110.615 Germanv 39.2 233.3 35.9 231.6 91.416 Greece 20.4 121.4 18.7 120.6 92.017 Humrarv 13.3 79.2 22.8 147.1 171.718 Iceland 11.1 66.1 11.0 71.0 98.919 Ireland 26.3 156.5 33.3 214.8 126.520 Italv 22.5 133.9 24.3 156.8 108.121 Latvia 14.5 86.3 14.4 92.9 99.622 Lithuania 14.5 86.3 13.7 88.4 94.423 Macedonia The Fmr YUl! Ro 8.4 50.0 13.0 88.9 155.124 Malta 22.5 133.9 24.1 155.5 107.225 Moldova Reoublic of 10.2 60.7 7.1 45.8 69.626 Netherlands 46.4 276.2 40.7 262.6 87.827 Norwav 23.9 142.3 22.2 143.2 94.228 Poland 20.6 122.6 16.8 108.4 81.929 Portul!al 14.1 83.9 15.6 100.6 110.630 Romania 14.9 88.7 12.3 79.3 82.431 Rus<strong>si</strong>an Fe<strong>de</strong>ration 10.6 63.1 10.9 70.3 102.832 Serbia and MonteneQ"ro 5.9 35.1 9.0 58.1 151.433 Slovakia 18.1 107.7 16.9 109.0 93.434 Slovenia 12.6 75.0 22.8 147.1 18I.l35 Soain 18.4 109.5 26.6 171.6 145.036 Swe<strong>de</strong>n 37.5 223.2 29.0 187.1 77.337 Switzeriand 46.2 275.0 38.4 247.7 83.138 Ukraine 13.7 81.5 11.0 71.0 80.339 United Kinl!dom 41.6 247.6 43.6 281.3 104.8* Faostat Database Results250Anale I. C.D. c.s.z.


Actual <strong>si</strong>tuation ofpotato in Europe1. Potato tra<strong>de</strong>1.1. Potato tra<strong>de</strong> in the worldOver 16 million tonnes ofpotatoes are tra<strong>de</strong>d every year (table 10) which representsmore than 3.3 bilhonUSD (table 11). In the last tenyears (1992-2002) a low increase ofpotato tra<strong>de</strong> was recor<strong>de</strong>d (2.6%). A high increase ofpotato tra<strong>de</strong> was registered in theCentral and North America (over 44%), Oceania and Africa (table 10).The highest import ofpotato was recor<strong>de</strong>d in Africa (114.8% ofquantity and 110.8%of value) <strong>de</strong>termined by seed potato import and the highest export was registered inOceania (over 75% of quantity and over 16% ofyalue) and in ilie Central and NorthAmerica (35.70/0 of quantity and 78% of value) <strong>de</strong>termined by the export of potatoprocessed products.The largest potato tra<strong>de</strong>r in the world is Europe (approx. 75%) which tra<strong>de</strong>dmore than 12.2 million tonnes in the lastyears. An increase ofpotato tra<strong>de</strong> quantitywithcir 70/0 was registered in the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> (table 10), with a reduction ofvalue of cir 5%(table 11).The highest augment of potato value in last ten years (around 84%) hasbeen registered in the Central and North America (table 1Table 10. Evolution ofpotato tra<strong>de</strong> in the world during 1992-2002 period (000 tonnes)*c.."i>~ i...••.·....> ...~•.••..i2..........;2.... ........,...../Y


COllstantin DM1CA, ~Elena-Laura U1MA, Maria-Alina JUNl:'.SCU, l:'.ugen-lon nJÎn Europe was recor<strong>de</strong>d, from10.67 tonnes in 1993 to 12.29 mi11ion tonnes 2002 as well as anincrease of potato value tra<strong>de</strong>d in Europe, from $1.73 billion in 1993 toin 2002 (table The highest increase (26% in and 400/0 in value) wasrecor<strong>de</strong>d the actual 15 members of the European Union, and the highest reduction(over was in the new 10 members ofthe European Union.Nevertheless, he Europe-15 countries predominated potato tra<strong>de</strong> in Europe,around 950/0 in the last years.It is necessary to mention that the EU-15 imports more potatoes (as quantity andthan exports, usualy as early potato as weB as potata processed products.252Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


Actual <strong>si</strong>tuation olpotato in t:urope4.928~.'", ":;'1;" .... ·····199: ............. ..... ..·..•·.··20(l~ :......... .."".. ""...pua..............~i"t.100a Tonnes 'o/ei iboOTtJlllll1l€s' ~V%1 1 988 100 6.276.934 100 127.3Total EUROPE E 5,742.721 100 (,; 011 C)I1Q 100 ~1Total 10671.721 100 12.288.883 100 115.21 4343805 88.1 5 766,82f>_;.-. 91.9 132.7EU-15 E 4906666 85.4 5873583 97.7 119.7Total 9250471 86.7 11,640.409 94.7 125,-li1 159321 32 131,744 2.1 82.7EU-lO E' 363544 6.3 70.600 1.2 19.4'-----o Total 522865 4.9 202.344 1.6 38.71 4503 126 91.4 5.898.570 94.0 131.0EU-15+10 E 5270210 90.8 5,944.183 98.9 112.8Total 9773336 91.6 11.842.753 96.4 121.2_.1 226000 4.6 192.971 3.0 85.4RUSSIAN FED. E 147.000 2.6 9.724 0.2 6.6Total 373000 3.5 202695 1.6 54.3The othercountries1 199,862 4.0 185393 2.9 92JiE 325511 5.7 58,042 1.0 17.8Total 523,373 4.9 243,43iJ 2.0 46.5* Faostat Database .L"'-"'_"AHCl, 1- ,E13. 1993-2002r....("'tr. ...... ...... ....... ....··000$ • ...•••.... % ...•... \ ·... 000$ ••••.• ••..·%>i ........%:..11'·1993 '200~:• U' ~....... Z.uU.1!1'J"lfc"i'Il 866.379 100 1.151.505 100 132.9Total EUROPE E 864.091 100 1151.624 100 13:\.3Total 1.730.4TIl_. 100 2.302.129 IOCL __---..Uy1 745 127 86.0 1025076 89.0 137.6EU-15 _. E 796402 92.2 1 137090 98.7 142.8Total 1544529 89.1 2162166 93.8 140.01 22302 2.6 49 186 4.3 220.5EU-IO E 35817 4.1 8032 0.7 22.4Total 58 119 3.4 57218 2.5 98.41 767429 88.6 1074262 I 93.3 140.0EU-15+1O E 832219 96.3 1 145 122 99.4 137.6Total 1 599648 923 2219384 96.3 138.71 57000 6.6 31 718 2.7 55.6RUSSIAN PED. E 19,000 2.2 1.243 0.1 6.5Total 76000 4.4 32961 1.4 43.4The othercountries1 39662 4.6 45644 4.0 115.1E 12872 1.5 5259 0.5 40.8Total 52534 3.0 50903 2.2 -~. *Faostat Database Results; 1- import, E - exportVOL. XXXI253


IVln ..rn_AI""n IONESCU, LUJ~"en-lOYiTotal EUROPEEU-15EU-iOEU-15+10RUSSIANThe other254*Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


*) LmalO;gue255


Constantin DRAICA. Elena-Laura DIMA, Maria-Alina IONESCU, Eugen-Ion PIRVANPotato remains one ofthe most important crop in the world, with a po<strong>si</strong>tive evolutionin the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> (1993-2003), especially in Africa and A<strong>si</strong>a, and potato will represent astaple food for the 3 rd millenium.In the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, for the first time, Europe has 10st the supremacy of potatoproduction in the world by reduction ofarea as well as potato production, especially inthe Central and Eastern Europe countries.As the most ilnportant seed potato grower and a big potato processof, Europedominates the world potato tra<strong>de</strong> with approx. 75% ofquantity and over 65% ofvalue.Over 950/0 of potato tra<strong>de</strong> belong to the EU-15 countries. That is why potato can bemore than a <strong>si</strong>mple indicator ofthe stage ofeconomical <strong>de</strong>velopment ofa country.Europe remains the most important potato bree<strong>de</strong>r and seed potato grower. In year2003, 748 potato varieties were recor<strong>de</strong>d in the EU catalogue ofpotato varieties, whichcover over 95,000 hectares ofseed potato in 10 ofthe EU-15 countries: Scotland, France,Germany, and especially The Netherlands remain the most important potato bree<strong>de</strong>rsand seed potato growers and exporters.Although the EU-15 countries possessed only 15% ofpotato area and used120/0 oftotal seed potato used in Europe in 2003, due to the high technologicallevel andto the "free market" principles, they succe<strong>de</strong>d in obtaning 27.8% of Europe's potataproduction, 94.7% ofquantity and 93.8% ofvalue ofinlported and exported potato.FOf the improvement ofpotato <strong>si</strong>tuation in the Central and East-European countriesthe following rnain measures have to be taken into con<strong>si</strong><strong>de</strong>ration: concentration ofpotatocrops in bigger farms, use ofhealthy (certificated) seed potato, improvement oftechnology,<strong>de</strong>velopment of potato proces<strong>si</strong>ng. A strong help could corne frorn the EU-15 + EU­10(12) countries by training of the young scientists and technical staff (farmers) bypromoting projects with financial support from EU and national programmes.1.2.3.4.5.REFERENCESDraica, C., N. Cojocaru, S. Man, Felicia Mitroi. 1992. Producerea cartofului <strong>pentru</strong>sălnânţă în România/Seed potato production in Romania. Analele ICPC Braşov,România, voI. XIX. p. 46-68;Draica, C., C. Caciuc. 1997. <strong>Cartof</strong>ul- aliment important <strong>pentru</strong> mileniul al III-leaI Potato - a staple food product ,for the 3 rd millenium. Analele ICPC Braşov,România, voI. XXIV, p. 12-29. .Guenthner, J.F., 2001. The international potato industry. Woodhead PublishingLtd., Cmnbridge, England.Hawkes, J.C. 1993. The historical and social role of the potato. Proceedings ofthe 12 th Triennal Conference of the EAPR, Paris, France, p.75-84.Zaag, D.C., Van cler. 1986. The potential <strong>de</strong>mand for seed potatoes: worldperspective. Potato fiesearch, voI. 29, p. 541-548.256Anale J.C.D.C.SZ.


Actual <strong>si</strong>tuation ofpotato in Europe6.nru""c>."\Y-of the potato in7.8.ReZUfilatA CARTOFULUIEUROPAlnilioanelaVOI. XXXI257


elena-Laura LJIMA, Marta-Alma JUN~SCU, l'..ugen-lon fJlf{VANveni dinmembre1-''"''''''-'".....,,'''''..... ştiinţific şi tehnic,totală, producţie lnedie, comerţ,Tabele:suprafeţei<strong>de</strong> cartofla nivel mondial în perioada 1993-2003suprafeţei <strong>de</strong> cartofîn Europa în perioada 1993-20030'-«""""..1.'-'''''';.1. <strong>de</strong> cartofîn ţările Europei în perioada 1993-2003producţiei totale <strong>de</strong> cartofla nivel mondial în perioada 1993-20035. producţiei totale <strong>de</strong> cartofîn Europa în perioada 1993-20036. Evoluţia producţiei totale <strong>de</strong> cartofîn ţările Europei în perioada 1993-20037, Evoluţia medii <strong>de</strong> cartofla nivel mondial în perioada 1993-20038. Evoluţia producţiei medii <strong>de</strong> cartofîn Europa în perioada 1993-20039. Evoluţia producţiei Inedii <strong>de</strong> cartbfîn ţările Europei în perioada 1993-200310. Evoluţia comerţului cantitativ cu cartofla nivel mondial în perioada 1992-200211. Evoluţia comerţului valoric cu cartofla nivel mondial în perioada 1992-200212. Evoluţia comerţului cantitativ cu cartofîn Europa în perioada 1992-200213. Evoluţia comerţului valoric cu cartofîn Europa în perioada 1992-200214. Evoluţia cantităţii <strong>de</strong> cartof<strong>pentru</strong> sămânţă folo<strong>si</strong>tă la nivel mondial în perioada1993-200315. Evoluţia cantităţii <strong>de</strong> cartof<strong>pentru</strong> sămânţă folo<strong>si</strong>tă în Europa în perioada 1993­200316. Situaţia suprafeţelor cultivate cu cartof<strong>pentru</strong> sămânţăîn EU-15 în anul 2003258Anale rc.D.c.S.Z


A S sVoi. XXXI259


Petru ILIEV, Irina ILIEVMaize and Sorghum research Institute, 4834 Pascani, Criuleni, Republic ofMoldovaE-mail: petruiliev@hotmail.comPotato production in Moldova for the moment is characterized as reducing theareas in the last 5-6 years from 53000 ha ti1141000 ha in 2003. The average potato yieldin this period show a slightlyfi-om 8-9 tlha tiU 9-10 t/ha. In the samethere are many farmers which obtain un<strong>de</strong>r the irrigation condition 30-40 Accordingto thc program for potato <strong>de</strong>velopment adopted by Agricultural Ministry the potato areaestablished at 40000 ha and average yield should reach I5t/ha.It is very well known that in potato production the choice ofvariety andare one ofthe most important factors in yield increa<strong>si</strong>ng and tubers quality. Startingfrom 1991 year, when in the <strong>National</strong> List ofpotato varieties was inclu<strong>de</strong>d only 5 varieties,a large activity ofvarieties trailing start. Later parallel with the official testing a lot of<strong>de</strong>lnonstration fields in different where organized. Step by step varietiestrailing has been un<strong>de</strong>rgoing modification in response to the changing requirements ofproducers and consumers. At the beginning we have been looked only for andsome consumer quality - color ofskin and flesh. Then for pests and diseases re~nstance,adaptation on high tempe- rature and drought growing condition, suitability for one twoyears multiplication of seed for own use, consumer quality, storage characteristics.Now in the officiallist are registered 20 varieties, from different grope ofmaturity and<strong>de</strong>stination. More adopted for South part ofcountry are early and middle early varieties:Impala, Velox, Minerva, Rosara, ROIIlano. Forthe North part - second early and middle varieties: RomanoBaltica,Raja, Sante, De<strong>si</strong>ree. This to the .HHHLlUUJlUsupplied fi-om the temporary source.In the same time a big work was the seed For examplethe seed ofregistered varieties can be introduced in country only ofclass E or A.of seed ofnon registered varieties, or at not in the testing process 1S notis very important for our countrythe Inoment seed quality ti""1~""""n111"",riabout 70°,10 from yield, and the same time cost from in......r·""l1·.I"'"I""I""...... is around 65-700/0, directly frOln seed producecountry260Anale I.C.D.C.S.z.


ISand UVJlJ.""'..U C'~"r'>rrH"O condition, one two year ...... '-~ .. HtJU'V....L"AVJlAbe than yield of varieties is drastically. That iswhy is recommen<strong>de</strong>d to use for tableseed of class A or B and notlower. In the will be very expenslVe veryVOI.. XXXI 261


POTATOES VARIETIESAND USES ACROSSAGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONESOLADELE, 0.1Department ofAgricultural Exten<strong>si</strong>on and Rural Development, Univer<strong>si</strong>ty ofIbadanNigeria.Ola<strong>de</strong>le20002001@yahoo.comPresent address: Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Development ResearchDivi<strong>si</strong>on, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305 Japan 1-10hawashi, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305-8686, JAPAN Tel:+81-29-838-6382, Fax: +81-29-838-6342 Email: ola<strong>de</strong>le@,iircas.affrc.gQjpThis paper examines the variations in the adaptation and uses ofpotatoes varietiesacross different ecological zones in Nigeria. This is predicated on the fact that a high<strong>de</strong>gree ofdifferentiation exist in terms ofthe eco-climatic nature and the socio-culturalmilieu of the country. In this way the genetic diver<strong>si</strong>ty ofpotatoes is exploited.. Thesevariations have serious implications for the adoption ofexten<strong>si</strong>on messages on potatoesfor planting, proces<strong>si</strong>ng and uses. The climatic setting of each of the five agriculturalzones in Nigeria informs the careful import and assemblage of different genotypes frointen<strong>si</strong>ve selection programmes. FrOlTI 228 ascen<strong>si</strong>ons from world wi<strong>de</strong> provenancesfield grown in south western Nigeria 20 have been found adaptable in Nigeria. Thesehave been adapted in different agro-ecological setting in Nigeria. The paper conclu<strong>de</strong>with the result gathered from a rapid rural appraisal indicating that variety preferred foreach ecological zone and the prevalent product generated in each zone. The adaptationand uses would go a long way to set the agenda for potato research and exten<strong>si</strong>on in thispart ofthe world.262 Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z.


N. COJOCARU I , BRAN I Mihaela DOLOru lResearch and Development Institute for Potato500470,2 Fundaturii str., Brasov, Romania; !lttl'r:.!J.J~y:.p!lliili1IQ'-'VjlUJl"'IJu"Jli'nh."",...r.


wasrng enzYlne toas"",o/,n"'rn!-L~r! with the antibodies, lnixture was for 24 hours with[",A""llr.e>t", were stored at 4°C in <strong>si</strong>liconizedU.H.·UH'JU., of plant extracts enzymeconjugates, three dilutions ofhomologous virus were used (1: 10; 1: 1.1000), two ofsap (1 :10; 1: 100), extraction buffer and three dilutions from IgG ( 1:300;1 1:2700) and enzyme conjugates ( 1:400; 1: 1200; 1:3600). On the ba<strong>si</strong>s of theresulted the dilution 1: 1500 for both viruses was chosen to be used in routineThis dilution allowed a reliable <strong>de</strong>tection of the two viruses even at very lowL\.''''l-.HLj;;;..concentrations ofthese (l :1000).Also resulted that in seed potato production, where testing play a selecting role,testis can be rna<strong>de</strong> with a mixture of antisera for the two viruses, without <strong>si</strong>gnificantlyatIecting their <strong>de</strong>tection reliability, comparatively to <strong>si</strong>ngle antisera testing. Testing with amixture ofIgG and enzyme conjugates for both viruses allows an important reduction oftesting costs.1."'\L.4.5.6.7.REFERENCESCojocaruN., Bran Şt., 1993. Rezultate privind utilizarea amestecurilor <strong>de</strong> seruri <strong>pentru</strong>i<strong>de</strong>ntificarea infecţiilorvirotice la cartofprin tehnica ELISA. Analele IepC voI. XX,136-144.F eţeanu A., 1973. Anticorpi marcaţiîn biologie şi medicină.Ed. Ceres, Bucureşti, 36­50;363-380.Hattinga H. and Maat D.Z., 1987. Purification. În " Viruses of potatoes and seedpotatoproduction". Eds. De Boks and van <strong>de</strong>r Want. Pudoc, Wageningen, 45-47.Hollings M. and Brunt A. A., 1981. Potyviruses. In "Handbook of Plant viruse<strong>si</strong>nfection". Ed. By kurstake E. EIsevierlNorth-Holland Biomedical Prees, 771-778.Matt D.Z., 1992. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Asen<strong>si</strong>tive methodfor the <strong>de</strong>tection ofplant viruses. IPO-DLO, Wageningen. Manuscris, 7-12.Wei<strong>de</strong>nlann H.L., 1982. Scheme şi metodologii <strong>de</strong> purificare a virusurilor cartofului,a antiserurilor şi marcarea anticorpilor cu fosfatază alcalină. Nepublicat. Institut rurViruskrankheiten <strong>de</strong>r Pflanzen, Braunschweig- Germania.Wettwr C. and MiIne R.G., 1981. Carlaviruses. In"HandbookofPlant virus infection".Ed. By Kurstake E. ElsevierlNorth-Holland Biomedical Press, 695-730.264Anale rc.nc.sz


FORMATION OFPOTATOYlELDAND ITS QUALITYACCORDINGTO SEED TUBERPRE-PLANTINGPREPARATION AND AGROTECHNOLOGYJuhan JOUDU, Vyacheslav EREMEEV, Alfons LOHMUS, Hugo ROOSTALUEstonianAgricultural Univer<strong>si</strong>ty, Kreutzwaldi 64,51014 Tartu, ESTONIA, joudu@eau.eeThe yield of potato may vary 2-5-fold <strong>de</strong>pending on pedoclimatic conditions.Summarizing ofthe results offertilization experiments with potato, conducted in Estoniaduring several <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, allows to conclu<strong>de</strong> that the effect ofpedoclimatic conditionsaccounts for 45% and fertilization for 35% general yield disper<strong>si</strong>on. The yield ofpotatoobtained at the expense ofsoil fertility is 270 kg per soil fertility point.Agronomically effective amounts ofnitrogen fertilizer which ensure the maximumpotato yield <strong>de</strong>pend on soil humus content, climatic conditions, preceding crop and itsfertilization. an mo<strong>de</strong>rately moist soils with a humus content of 2-4% the averageeffectiveness of the N 60fertilizer norm for potato is 30-70 kg N kg- I • an gleyic andgley soils with a humus content of6-8%, the effectiveness ofnitrogen ferilizer is 5-40kg N kg- I . In the case ofpotato, very important factors influencing the effectivenessofnitrogen fertilizers are the PK fertilizer background and the soil's requirement forphosphorus and potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilizers. Non-application of PK fertilizers results in a<strong>si</strong>gnificantIy lower effectiveness ofnitrogen fertilizers and involves higher risk onhumusrichsoils.an potas<strong>si</strong>um-poor soils the average effectiveness of the fertilizer norm K sois80-100 kg per kg of K, while in favourable years it can be as high as 150-180 kg.An increase of 10 mg in soil potas<strong>si</strong>um content results in the average reduction ofthe effectiveness ofthe K sonorm by 8 kg. The effectiveness ofphosphorus fertilizers<strong>de</strong>pends even to a greater <strong>de</strong>gree on the differences between years compared withthe effectiveness of nitrogen and potas<strong>si</strong>um fertilizers. The difference in theeffectiveness of phosphorus fetrilizers between favourable and unfavourable year<strong>si</strong>s up to 225 kg per kg ofP. Phosphorus fetrilizers produce an effect every other yearon soils whose content oflactate soluble P is below 90 mg/kg. an phosphorus-poorsoils (below 30 mg) the effect ofphosphorus fertilizers is evi<strong>de</strong>nt almost every year,and the effectiveness ofthe use of low phosphorus amounts (P26) is on the averagehigher than 100 kg per kg of P. An increase of 10 mg in the amount of soil lactatesoluble phosphorus results in the average reduction of the effectiveness of the P26norm by 17 kg.Voi. XXXI265


a effect onof the tubers.Theperformed in 2000-2002 in the Department of FieldHusbandry of the EstoniaUniver<strong>si</strong>ty with the aim to investigatepos<strong>si</strong>bilities of growing potato u<strong>si</strong>ng different methods of treating the tubersplanting. tubers were treated as pre-sprouting thern1al treatment(TT) and zero treatment (O). The medium late variety 'Ants' and the mediumvariety 'Piret', <strong>de</strong>veloped at the J6geva Plant Breeding Institute, and the early variety'Agrie dzeltenie', <strong>de</strong>veloped at the Latvian Priekuli Plant Breeding Institute, wereused in the experiments. The dynamics of tuber yield formation was <strong>de</strong>termined bytaking samples from alI treatments for each variety. The purpose was to find outwhich treatment is the best for cultivating potato varieties with different growig period<strong>si</strong>n the c1imatic conditions ofEstonia in or<strong>de</strong>r to ensure higher yield and better qualityper vegetation period. The results were processed u<strong>si</strong>ng regres<strong>si</strong>on analy<strong>si</strong>s.The soil type was glos<strong>si</strong>sol by FAO c1as<strong>si</strong>fication aud Stagnic Luvisol by WRBc1as<strong>si</strong>fication. The trial soil was weakly acid: pH KC16.2; humus 2.40/0; N 0.11 %; P 183mg kg- 1 (AL); K 164 mg kg- 1 (AL); Ca 674 mg kg- 1 ; Mg 101 mg kg- 1 for the soil.Agricultural technology typical ofpotato experiments were employed. The dynamicsofyie1d formation was <strong>de</strong>termined after every 3 to 5 days.As different tuber treatment methods were used, the first samples were taken atdifferent times. The sampling time and the number of samples were different fordifferent treatments. The number of samplings also <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d an the length of thevegetation period. As the varieties used in different treatments started to <strong>de</strong>veloptubers at different times, the number ofsamplings fluctuated each year +/- 3 samples.The dynamics ofyie1d formation in the vegetation period was <strong>si</strong>gnificantly affectedby weather conditions. In this respect, the most favourable year for potato growth was2001. In 2000 and 2002 the weather was not so good for the growth and <strong>de</strong>velopmentof potato and the yield was lower than the three years' average.Phy<strong>si</strong>ological age proved very important for formation of the tuber yield. Aphy<strong>si</strong>ologically ol<strong>de</strong>r seed accelerates the growth rhythm ofpotato, as a result ofwhichthe yield is formed earlier, while yield formation capacity <strong>de</strong>creases. The results alsoshowed that the earlier is the variety, the greater is the effect of treatlnent, and thatthe yield <strong>de</strong>velops uniformly throughout the vegetation period in the case ofvarietieswith a longer growing period. Obviously, any thermal treatment ofseed tubers increasestheir phy<strong>si</strong>ological age. Thus, both pre-sprouting and thern1al treatment increase tasome extent the phy<strong>si</strong>ological age oftubers.266Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.


VOL. XXXI 267


Luule TARTLANEstonian Research Institute ofAgricultureSaku, 75 501, Teaduse 4, Harjumaa; Estonialuule.tartlan@mail.eequality.DOl:atcles. field experiments, pre-sprouting, vitamin C, chlorogenic acid,growing period ofpotato is relatively short, so it is essentialand avoid plants diseases during growing period. Theyicld received exploiting the whole growing remainsailn out was to the"'V'~V"""""_'-'" to that estimate the duration of vv.....u ....... -'- ... I-'~ ... v ......methodsand discus<strong>si</strong>onwas r!",f-"""'l'YilY'Ar!and hot sununer <strong>de</strong>()re:asedyear of2002.268Anale l.C.D.C.S.Z


The quality lJen~lstt.·ncelnt4enSIve after-cookingvarieties, the varietyin case ofbalancedVOL. XXXI269


EVOLUTION THE POTATO INDUSTRY IN LAST TENYEARS IN PORTUGALFemando MARTINSI ,Joao Coutinhol, Vicente Sousa 2Portuguese Ministry ofAgriculture, R. da Republica, 133, 5370~347 Miran<strong>de</strong>la Portugalemail: dregional@dratm.min-agricultura.ptUTAD, ISoils and 2Crop Science Department, 5000 Vila Real Portugalemail: Lcoutin@utad.ptand.v_sousa@utad.ptThe potato crop in Portugal has suffered a constant reduction in area cropped andtotal production ofpotatoes in the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>, <strong>si</strong>nce the increase in yield was insufficientto compensate the reduction in area.In the Fig. 1, we can see the evolution of the area planted and the productionobtained from 1970 ti112000:~ tlJ.A.U l-------r=====~-------------------------------------"...----\,~-----ÎI;.... uu..A..OJ-.----------,YearsFig. 1 - Evolution ofthe area and total production ofpotatoes in Portugal from 1970to 2000.The reduction in the area cropped with potatoes is due mainly to the low yieldobtained (Fig. 2). This is the "calculated" yield, obtained dividing the total production bythe total area <strong>de</strong>voted to the crop. A Iarge number offarmers get better yieIds, but this isnot the ruIe.270Anale 1. C.D. c.s.z.


The evolution of the potato Industry in last ten years in Portugal16 -r""""~--~------------~14 +---------------I-~_____112 +--------------fl---------"''---410 -J1!!"II"'........-..c---~ 8+------­';;:J6-i--------------------{4-{----------­2+---------------------{0+---,......----,,.-----,.---.....---.,---41970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000YearsFig. 2 - Evolution ofthe potato yield in the period of 1970 - 2000The potato industry wiU have many difficulties to survive in countries where highyields are not obtained and where low cost production is not achieved (the seed tubersaccount for about 50% ofthe production cost). So, it may be it is useful to un<strong>de</strong>rstandwhat had happened in Portugal, and try to avoid a <strong>si</strong>milar evolution.1 - The reduction ofthe importance ofthe potato crop is ba<strong>si</strong>cally related with thelower yield obtained bythe crop, which causes very high production costs with a consequentreduction on the competitiveness of the crop. A large part of potatoes consumed inPortugal are produced in other European countries just as Spain, France, Netherlandsand Belgium.2 - The low yield obtained is related with ilie natural climatic conditions: Portugalhas a Mediterranean type climate, with hot and dry sumrners and mild winters, with rain.Traditionally, the potato crap was produced in the interior ofthe country, where the lackofproper irrigation is the main constraint to get high yields.In last years, the crop moved to the coastal area, where it can be planted earlier,where the winter is mil<strong>de</strong>r and allows an earlier plantation, from February onwards. Inthis part ofthe country, late blight can be a severe disease. The temperature is normallyabove 10 şC and ifhumidity is high enough, the attack is very severe, affecting the finalproduction.3 - The changes occurred in the Portuguese society during the period 1970 - 2000are also respon<strong>si</strong>ble for the lack ofcompetitiveness ofthe potato crop:- In 1974, we change from a dictatorship system, with a market strict1y controlledby the authorities, to a <strong>de</strong>mocracy system.Val. XXXI271


Fernando MARTJNS, ioilo COUTINHo. Vicente SOUSAIn 1986, Portugaljoints the Communityand 1992 boundaries werebanned. It becomes pos<strong>si</strong>ble that any merchant go abroad, with owntruck ta load it ofpotatoes and bring them to Portugal to seU.- More or less by the same time, the large supermarkets started operating, and thesmall producers start to fen more and more difficulties ta sell the production, <strong>si</strong>nceare not able to organize themselves through Associations and Cooperatives.- In the beginnings ofthe nineties, a large factory ofAmerican chips start operating,near Lisbon, but most ofthe row lnaterial used is produced abroad, mainly in Spain.The potato crop has a very high social value, especially in rural areas with smallproducers. So, it is economical and social relevant to maintain the potato industry.Therefore, the competitiveness ofthe crop i8 an important issue and the lowering ofthecosts through an increase in yields 1S the main goal. Consequently, technical tools need tobe optiInised and farmers must look for soun<strong>de</strong>d support for <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>si</strong>ons un<strong>de</strong>rtaken duringthe crop season.BIBLIOGRAPHYINE. Estatisticas Agricalas, from 1970 to 2000. Lisboa.272 Anale I.C.D.C.S.Z.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!