Fire Protection Design Manual - Office of Construction and Facilities ...
Fire Protection Design Manual - Office of Construction and Facilities ...
Fire Protection Design Manual - Office of Construction and Facilities ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
September-2011<br />
Doors that are located in the means <strong>of</strong> egress <strong>and</strong> are permitted to be locked under<br />
other provisions <strong>of</strong> this chapter shall have provisions made for the rapid removal <strong>of</strong><br />
occupants by means such as the follows:<br />
Option A. Remote control <strong>of</strong> locks<br />
Option B. Keying <strong>of</strong> all locks to keys carried by staff at all times<br />
Option C. Other such reliable means available to the staff at all times.<br />
VA Clarification for Options A, B, <strong>and</strong> C above:<br />
For Option (A): The locked doors are required to be in the line <strong>of</strong> sight <strong>of</strong> the<br />
location <strong>of</strong> the remote operator.<br />
For Option (B): Self evident<br />
For Option (C): Card access security systems may be used provided that a<br />
mechanical key release is provided such that when the key is operated, it will directly<br />
interrupt the power to the locking mechanism independent <strong>of</strong> the card access system<br />
electronics <strong>and</strong> staff in the area carry keys at all times.<br />
3) Means <strong>of</strong> egress where patient special needs require specialized protective measures<br />
(18/19.2.2.2.5.2)<br />
Note: This locking permission was added in the 2009 edition <strong>of</strong> the Life Safety Code<br />
especially for pediatric wards. Pediatric wards were being locked to prevent babies from<br />
being stolen <strong>and</strong> the locking was not truly for the clinical needs <strong>of</strong> the patients. The use <strong>of</strong><br />
section 18/19.2.2.2.5.2 should rarely be used in the VA since the doors could be locked under<br />
the less stringent requirements for clinical reasons on 18/19.2.2.2.5.1.<br />
Addition criteria from NFPA 101 as follows {(1) through (5)(b) copied verbatim} is<br />
required to use this arrangement.<br />
(1) Staff can readily unlock doors at all times in accordance with 18/19.2.2.2.6.<br />
(2) A total (complete) smoke detection system is provided throughout the locked<br />
space in accordance with 9.6.2.9, or locked doors can be remotely unlocked at an<br />
approved, constantly attended location within the locked space.<br />
(3)The building is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic<br />
sprinkler system in accordance with 18/19.3.5.1.<br />
(4) The locks are electrical locks that fail safely so as to release upon loss <strong>of</strong> power to<br />
the device.<br />
(5) The locks release by independent activation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />
(a) Activation <strong>of</strong> the smoke detection system required by 18/19.2.2.2.5.2(2)<br />
(b) Waterflow in the automatic sprinkler system required by 18/19.2.2.2.5.2(3)<br />
Where the permission to lock doors in accordance with NFPA 101, 18/19.2.2.2.5.2 is<br />
used, NFPA 101, 18/19.2.2.2.6 requires the following:<br />
Doors that are located in the means <strong>of</strong> egress <strong>and</strong> are permitted to be locked under<br />
other provisions <strong>of</strong> this chapter shall have provisions made for the rapid removal <strong>of</strong><br />
occupants by means such as the follows:<br />
Option A. Remote control <strong>of</strong> locks<br />
- 8