27.11.2012 Views

Fire Protection Design Manual - Office of Construction and Facilities ...

Fire Protection Design Manual - Office of Construction and Facilities ...

Fire Protection Design Manual - Office of Construction and Facilities ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

September-2011<br />

Doors that are located in the means <strong>of</strong> egress <strong>and</strong> are permitted to be locked under<br />

other provisions <strong>of</strong> this chapter shall have provisions made for the rapid removal <strong>of</strong><br />

occupants by means such as the follows:<br />

Option A. Remote control <strong>of</strong> locks<br />

Option B. Keying <strong>of</strong> all locks to keys carried by staff at all times<br />

Option C. Other such reliable means available to the staff at all times.<br />

VA Clarification for Options A, B, <strong>and</strong> C above:<br />

For Option (A): The locked doors are required to be in the line <strong>of</strong> sight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> the remote operator.<br />

For Option (B): Self evident<br />

For Option (C): Card access security systems may be used provided that a<br />

mechanical key release is provided such that when the key is operated, it will directly<br />

interrupt the power to the locking mechanism independent <strong>of</strong> the card access system<br />

electronics <strong>and</strong> staff in the area carry keys at all times.<br />

3) Means <strong>of</strong> egress where patient special needs require specialized protective measures<br />

(18/19.2.2.2.5.2)<br />

Note: This locking permission was added in the 2009 edition <strong>of</strong> the Life Safety Code<br />

especially for pediatric wards. Pediatric wards were being locked to prevent babies from<br />

being stolen <strong>and</strong> the locking was not truly for the clinical needs <strong>of</strong> the patients. The use <strong>of</strong><br />

section 18/19.2.2.2.5.2 should rarely be used in the VA since the doors could be locked under<br />

the less stringent requirements for clinical reasons on 18/19.2.2.2.5.1.<br />

Addition criteria from NFPA 101 as follows {(1) through (5)(b) copied verbatim} is<br />

required to use this arrangement.<br />

(1) Staff can readily unlock doors at all times in accordance with 18/19.2.2.2.6.<br />

(2) A total (complete) smoke detection system is provided throughout the locked<br />

space in accordance with 9.6.2.9, or locked doors can be remotely unlocked at an<br />

approved, constantly attended location within the locked space.<br />

(3)The building is protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic<br />

sprinkler system in accordance with 18/19.3.5.1.<br />

(4) The locks are electrical locks that fail safely so as to release upon loss <strong>of</strong> power to<br />

the device.<br />

(5) The locks release by independent activation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

(a) Activation <strong>of</strong> the smoke detection system required by 18/19.2.2.2.5.2(2)<br />

(b) Waterflow in the automatic sprinkler system required by 18/19.2.2.2.5.2(3)<br />

Where the permission to lock doors in accordance with NFPA 101, 18/19.2.2.2.5.2 is<br />

used, NFPA 101, 18/19.2.2.2.6 requires the following:<br />

Doors that are located in the means <strong>of</strong> egress <strong>and</strong> are permitted to be locked under<br />

other provisions <strong>of</strong> this chapter shall have provisions made for the rapid removal <strong>of</strong><br />

occupants by means such as the follows:<br />

Option A. Remote control <strong>of</strong> locks<br />

- 8 ­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!