Organizing on the Streets: A Study of Reclaimers in ... - Inclusive Cities

<strong>Organizing</strong> on the Streets: A Study of Reclaimers in the Streets of Cape Town3. MethodologyThe main purpose of this project was to gain insight into the informal and formal ways in whichreclaimers working in the streets of Cape Town are currently organized. This was done through athree-part research process:• Desk-top research on reclaiming and the waste management and recycling industry in CapeTown. Included here was the identification of organizations working with reclaimers inCape Town, and gathering basic information on their activities.• A scoping exercise in three areas of Cape Town – Salt River-Woodstock, Site B Khayelitsha,and Philippi-Gugulethu, in order to develop a sense of the broad trends amongst the livesof reclaimers in Cape Town.• In-depth fieldwork, including interviews, in one targeted area of Cape Town. The areaselected was Philippi-Gugulethu.3.1 Training FieldworkersBefore carrying out the scoping exercise, a group of four activists was trained as researchassistants who, along with two ILRIG researchers, carried out interviews for the scoping and indepthinterviews. Two human rights interns also spent a week working with the project. 2In the training sessions, reclaiming and where it fits into the City’s waste management andrecycling functions was discussed, as well as the value chain, and the economy as a whole.We outlined why WEIGO was interested in reclaimers and we discussed the importance, fororganizing purposes, of establishing how reclaimers refer to themselves.We then moved on to the field work and the role of the research assistants. We went over thequestionnaires for the buy-back centres and for the reclaimers, and our chosen method of carryingout the scope. The ethics of research were discussed, as well as the letter of introduction, the useof photography, the distinctions between observations and facts, and the importance to the projectof everyone involved. The survey and researcher reflection forms both had sections that explicitlyasked for researchers’ observations, which needed to be completed at the end of each day.Personal research experiences were shared, and included doing interviews on sanitation for aproject on women and public health, to working with reclaimers on the streets in Cape Town. Wediscussed how the survey was designed in four parts so that there was flow as well as the optionof generalizing or skipping sections if reclaimers did not have a lot of time. Working in pairs forsafety as well as practical support was recommended, as this would also facilitate the flow ofconversation and help to maintain eye contact.We spoke about challenges in interviews: What if someone doesn’t want to talk to you? Orsomeone is in a rush? What about the different languages spoken in Cape Town? Because of therange of experience with interviews, the research assistants were able to share their previouschallenges and suggest creative solutions to fieldwork practicalities.We divided into teams that could cover the anticipated different languages spoken in CapeTown. As the research evolved, the combinations of researchers shifted according to need, basedsometimes on language, sometimes on how well someone knew a specific area, or who neededtime to flesh out the survey forms after interviews.2 Research assistants: Letty Madosi, Anele Mbi, Jean Beukes and Elize Petoors. Interns: Dogu Büyükyağcıoğluand Matthew Evans. ILRIG researchers: Nandi Vanqa-Mgijima and Koni Benson.3