Manual on sea level measurement and ... - unesdoc - Unesco
Manual on sea level measurement and ... - unesdoc - Unesco Manual on sea level measurement and ... - unesdoc - Unesco
Sea Level Measurement and InterpretationSea Level Measurement and InterpretationFigure 8.1 The University of Tasmania GPSbuoy (C. Watson, personal communication).Figure 8.2 Height time-series (SSG 2.194, 2003).Figure 8.3 The GFZ Potsdam GPS buoy.Figure 8.4 Height time-series from a GPS buoy;the time-series is dominated by sea state. Thesmoothed curves are the running mean filteredtime-series; the dot is the actual RA measurementused for comparison.8.2 GNSS ReflectometryOnce the European satellite constellation GALILEO startstransmission of navigation signals in 2008, an infrastructureof three global satellite navigation systemswill be available for commercial and scientific applications.GALILEO, together with the US Global PositioningSystem (GPS) and the Russian GLONASS (Global’nayaNavigatsionannaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) constellation,offers novel opportunities for remotely sensing the Earth’satmosphere and oceans with dense spatial and temporalcoverage.The high reflectivity of GPS signals in the L-band frequencyrange (1.2276 and 1.57542 GHz) at water andice- or snow-covered surfaces allows for the detectionand analysis of reflected GNSS (Global Navigation SatelliteSystem) signals. The passive reflectometry and interferometrysystem (PARIS) was the first concept proposed forocean altimetry using GNSS (Martín-Neira, 1993). In theFigure 8.5 The PARIS concept.46IOC
PARIS scheme, direct and ocean-reflected signals aredetected by spaceborne receivers, and altimetric heightinformation is extracted from the delay in arrival timesof the reflected signals relative to the direct signals(Figure 8.5).Using dedicated GNSS receiver instruments, sea levelheights accurate up to ~5 cm were determined in anumber of airplane and balloon experiments (Garrisonand Katzberg, 2000; Rius et al., 2002; Ruffini et al.,2004). In ground-based GNSS reflection experimentsabove an artificial pond, Martín-Neira et al. (2002)achieved an accuracy of 1 cm, and at an altitude ofabout 500 m above Crater Lake (Oregon, USA) altimetricheight values accurate to 2 cm were obtained (Treuhaftet al., 2001). Anderson (2000) reported on 12-cm accuracyin near-surface measurements at heights between7 and 10 m. In addition, the dependency of the codecorrelation function on the slope characteristics ofthe reflecting surface can be used to infer sea-surfaceroughness as well as wind speed and direction (GNSSscatterometry) (Katzberg et al., 2001; Cardellach et al.,2003; Germain et al., 2004).First spaceborne observations of signal reflections aredescribed by Pavelyev et al. (1996) and Lowe et al.(2002); later, signatures of coherent GPS reflections atgrazing incidence angles were found in radio occultationdata observed by the GPS/MET, CHAMP andSAC-C satellites (Beyerle et al., 2002; Hajj et al., 2004).CHAMP and SAC-C are both already supplied withnadir-looking antennas to detect reflected GPS signals;efforts are now being made to establish space-basedGNSS altimetry as a viable remote-sensing technique(e.g. Hajj and Zuffada, 2003).IOC
- Page 2 and 3: Manuals and Guides
- Page 4 and 5: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 6 and 7: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 8 and 9: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 10 and 11: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 12 and 13: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 14 and 15: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 16 and 17: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 18 and 19: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 20 and 21: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 22 and 23: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 24 and 25: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 26 and 27: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 30 and 31: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 32 and 33: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 34 and 35: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 36 and 37: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 38 and 39: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 40 and 41: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 42 and 43: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 44 and 45: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 46 and 47: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 48 and 49: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 50 and 51: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 54 and 55: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 56 and 57: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 58 and 59: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 60 and 61: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 62 and 63: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 64 and 65: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 66 and 67: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 68 and 69: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 70 and 71: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 72 and 73: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 74 and 75: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 76 and 77: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 78 and 79: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 80 and 81: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 82 and 83: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 84 and 85: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
- Page 86: Sea Level Measurement and Interpret
Sea Level Measurement <strong>and</strong> Interpretati<strong>on</strong>Sea Level Measurement <strong>and</strong> Interpretati<strong>on</strong>Figure 8.1 The University of Tasmania GPSbuoy (C. Wats<strong>on</strong>, pers<strong>on</strong>al communicati<strong>on</strong>).Figure 8.2 Height time-series (SSG 2.194, 2003).Figure 8.3 The GFZ Potsdam GPS buoy.Figure 8.4 Height time-series from a GPS buoy;the time-series is dominated by <strong>sea</strong> state. Thesmoothed curves are the running mean filteredtime-series; the dot is the actual RA <strong>measurement</strong>used for comparis<strong>on</strong>.8.2 GNSS ReflectometryOnce the European satellite c<strong>on</strong>stellati<strong>on</strong> GALILEO startstransmissi<strong>on</strong> of navigati<strong>on</strong> signals in 2008, an infrastructureof three global satellite navigati<strong>on</strong> systemswill be available for commercial <strong>and</strong> scientific applicati<strong>on</strong>s.GALILEO, together with the US Global Positi<strong>on</strong>ingSystem (GPS) <strong>and</strong> the Russian GLONASS (Global’nayaNavigatsi<strong>on</strong>annaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) c<strong>on</strong>stellati<strong>on</strong>,offers novel opportunities for remotely sensing the Earth’satmosphere <strong>and</strong> oceans with dense spatial <strong>and</strong> temporalcoverage.The high reflectivity of GPS signals in the L-b<strong>and</strong> frequencyrange (1.2276 <strong>and</strong> 1.57542 GHz) at water <strong>and</strong>ice- or snow-covered surfaces allows for the detecti<strong>on</strong><strong>and</strong> analysis of reflected GNSS (Global Navigati<strong>on</strong> SatelliteSystem) signals. The passive reflectometry <strong>and</strong> interferometrysystem (PARIS) was the first c<strong>on</strong>cept proposed forocean altimetry using GNSS (Martín-Neira, 1993). In theFigure 8.5 The PARIS c<strong>on</strong>cept.46IOC <str<strong>on</strong>g>Manual</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <strong>and</strong> Guides No 14 vol IV