27.11.2012 Views

Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement ...

Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement ...

Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION TO SPORTS BIOMECHANICS<br />

critical feature – the jumper must have a fast run-up; we need <strong>to</strong> develop an ‘eye’ for<br />

this as qualitative analysts whereas a quantitative analyst would need <strong>to</strong> devise the best<br />

way of measuring this speed. The second component – speed added on the board – is of<br />

little use, being unobservable (although measurable), so we need <strong>to</strong> replace it by a<br />

biomechanical relationship.<br />

The one relationship that should spring <strong>to</strong> mind most easily – because it is the<br />

simplest – is the impulse–momentum relationship outlined in Appendix 2.1 (see<br />

pages 77–8) and explained in more detail in Chapter 5. This is represented graphically in<br />

Figure 2.6(b), in which the speed added on the board has been replaced by the take-off<br />

impulse and the athlete’s mass (at the same level of the model). Take-off impulse<br />

depends at the next level down on the mean force and the time on the take-off board.<br />

This figure may not seem much of an advance on Figure 2.6(a) – the jumper’s mass<br />

is no problem but observing take-off impulse, time on board or mean force is downright<br />

impossible although, interestingly, all of these are easily measurable if the take-off<br />

board is mounted on a force plate (see Chapter 5). In a way, this impossibility is<br />

fortunate for the qualitative analyst, as this ‘branch’ of the model is a blind alley, down<br />

which the quantitative analyst could easily wander. The reason is that this branch of the<br />

model implies that we need <strong>to</strong> maximise both the mean force and the time on the board<br />

<strong>to</strong> improve performance. Given the fast run-up of good long jumpers, trying <strong>to</strong> extend<br />

the board contact time (about 15 ms) would be difficult at best; if feasible, it would<br />

have a deleterious effect on the mean force. Fortunately we have escaped from this blind<br />

alley simply by being unable <strong>to</strong> observe these features; that is not always the case.<br />

A better approach al<strong>to</strong>gether is <strong>to</strong> use the work–energy relationship outlined in<br />

Appendix 2.1 (see page 78). This is shown in the new version of level 4 (and level 5) of<br />

Figure 2.6 Level 4 of long jump model – fac<strong>to</strong>rs affecting take-off speed: (a) initial model; (b) ‘blind alley’.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!