Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement ...
Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement ...
Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Data errors<br />
There are several ‘mathematical’ models that calculate body segment parameters<br />
from standard anthropometric measurements, such as segment lengths and circumferences.<br />
Some of these models result in large errors even in estimates of segment<br />
volumes. Others are very time-consuming, requiring up <strong>to</strong> 200 anthropometric<br />
measurements, which take at least an hour or two <strong>to</strong> complete. All these models require<br />
density values from other sources, usually cadavers, and most of them assume constant<br />
density throughout the segment, or throughout large parts of the segment.<br />
The greatest problems in body segment data occur for moments of inertia. There<br />
are no simple yet accurate methods of measuring segmental moments of inertia for a<br />
living person. Many model estimations are either very inaccurate or require further<br />
validation. A relative error of 5% in segmental moments of inertia may be quite common.<br />
Norms or linear regression equations are often used, but these should be treated<br />
with caution as the errors involved in their use are rarely fully assessed. It may be<br />
necessary <strong>to</strong> allow for the non-linear relationships between segmental dimensions and<br />
moment of inertia values.<br />
Uncertainties, also referred <strong>to</strong> as errors, in the results of biomechanical data processing<br />
can be large, particularly for computation of kinetic variables. This is mainly because of<br />
errors in the body segment data and linear and angular velocities and accelerations, and<br />
the combination of these errors in the inverse dynamics equations. If such computations<br />
are <strong>to</strong> be attempted, scrupulous adherence <strong>to</strong> good experimental pro<strong>to</strong>cols is<br />
essential. A rigorous assessment of the processing techniques is also necessary. The <strong>to</strong>pic<br />
of error analysis is a very important one and the value of sports biomechanical measurements<br />
cannot be assessed fully in the absence of a quantification of the measurement<br />
error. The accuracy of the measuring system and the precision of the measurements<br />
should be assessed separately. Error propagation in calculations can be estimated using<br />
standard formulae (see Challis, 2007; Further Reading, page 152).<br />
PROJECTILE MOTION<br />
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF MOVEMENT<br />
In this section, we illustrate an important example of linear (in fact, curvilinear) motion<br />
– the motion of a projectile in the air. Projectiles are bodies launched in<strong>to</strong> the air that<br />
are subject only <strong>to</strong> the forces of gravity and air resistance. Projectile motion occurs<br />
frequently in sport and exercise activities. Often the projectile involved is an inanimate<br />
object, such as a shot or golf ball. In some activities the sports performer becomes the<br />
projectile, as in the long jump, high jump, diving and gymnastics. An understanding of<br />
the mechanical fac<strong>to</strong>rs that govern the flight path or trajec<strong>to</strong>ry of a projectile is, therefore,<br />
important in sports biomechanics. The following discussion assumes that the<br />
effects of aerodynamic forces – both air resistance and more complex lift effects – on<br />
139