Havemeyer Foundati<strong>on</strong> M<strong>on</strong>ograph Series No. 3<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tb-in-Tb c<strong>on</strong>trol and lowest in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> P-in-Pc<strong>on</strong>trol placentae, and was higher in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> P-in-Tbthan <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tb-in-P pregnancies, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reby indicatingthat this parameter is influenced more by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> breed<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intrauterine experiences<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fetal foal. The very str<strong>on</strong>g correlati<strong>on</strong> thatexisted between foal birthweight and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total area<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fetomaternal c<strong>on</strong>tact across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> placentalinterface dem<strong>on</strong>strated c<strong>on</strong>vincingly that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> inutero growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> foal is governed by ‘real’placental size and competence which, in turn, isgoverned by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> available endometrium.The sec<strong>on</strong>d cohort <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 32 normal, commercialThoroughbred mares resident in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Newmarketarea were separated into 4 groups <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>age and parity; primigravid mares aged 4–7 yearsand parous mares aged 5–9 years, 10–15 years and≥ 16 years. The gross placental parameters andfoal birthweights were all lower in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> primigravidmares than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 3 groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parous mares. Ofparticular interest was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> finding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a reducedsurface density <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> microcotyled<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>seprimigravid animals, compared to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5–9 year oldparous mares, despite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>able assumpti<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a healthy, virginal endometrium in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> maidengroup. The surface density <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> microcotyled<strong>on</strong>swas also lower in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> aged (≥16 years) mares thanin <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 2 groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parous mares, presumablydue to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> age-related endometrosis in<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> opposing endometrium. However, thismicroscopic interface deficiency was <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fset by ahigher volume and gross area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> placenta in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>aged animal which maintained a high mean foalbirthweight in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> group. Thus, primiparityappears to be more important in determining foalbirthweight than maternal age, due to reducti<strong>on</strong> inmicrocotyled<strong>on</strong> surface density, coupled withreduced volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> chori<strong>on</strong>, lessening <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> totalarea available for haemotrophic exchange <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>nutrients and gases across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> placental interface.Accordingly, when selecting recipient maresfor use in an embryo transfer programme it shouldbe remembered that maternal parameters such assize, age and parity will all bear varying degrees <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>influence <strong>on</strong> health and total microscopic area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> placenta which, in turn, will govern <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sizeand health <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> foal at birth and in later life.Ideally, recipient mares should be between 5 and 9years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> age, should have already produced at least<strong>on</strong>e healthy foal, and should have a body size thatis equal to, or bigger than, that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mareproducing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> embryo.REFERENCESBarr<strong>on</strong>, J.K. (1995) The effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maternal age and parity<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> racing performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Thoroughbred horses.Equine vet. J. 27, 73-75.Bracher, V., Mathias, S. and Allen, W.R. (1996)Influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> chr<strong>on</strong>ic degenerative endometritis(endometrosis) <strong>on</strong> placental development in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mare. Equine vet. J. 28, 180-188.Finocchio, E.J. (1986) Race performance and itsrelati<strong>on</strong>ship to birthrank and maternal age. Proc.Am. Ass. Equine Pract. 31, 571-578.Hintz, H.F., Hintz, R.L. and Van Vleck, L.D. (1979)Growth rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Thoroughbreds. Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dam,year and m<strong>on</strong>th <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> birth, and sex <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> foal. J.anim.Sci.48, 480-487.Ricketts, S.W. and Al<strong>on</strong>so, S. (1991) The effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ageand parity <strong>on</strong> development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equine chr<strong>on</strong>icendometrial disease. Equine vet. J. 23, 189-192.Tischner, M. and Klimszak, M. (1989) Development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Polish p<strong>on</strong>y foals born after transfer to large mares.J. reprod. Fert. Suppl. 8, 62-63.Walt<strong>on</strong>, A. and Hamm<strong>on</strong>d, J. (1938). The maternaleffects <strong>on</strong> growth and c<strong>on</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> in Shire horse-Shetland p<strong>on</strong>y crosses. Proc. Roy. Soc. Series B.125, 311-335.75
Equine Embryo TransferUSE OF BUSERELINE TO INDUCE OVULATION INDONOR MARESJ. F. Bruyas, E. Trocherie, S. Hecht, N. Lepoutre, A. Granchamp des Raux,J.-L.Nicaise, X. Vérin, J. Bertrand, I. Barrier-Battut, F. Fiéni, R. Hoier*,A. Renault † , L. Egr<strong>on</strong> † and D. TainturierDepartment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Reproducti<strong>on</strong>, Nantes Veterinary School, B.P. 40706-44307 Nantes cedex 03, France;*Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Clinical Studies, Royal Veterinary and Agricutural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark;† Intervet, BP 17144, 49071 Beaucouzé Cedex, FranceHuman chori<strong>on</strong>icg<strong>on</strong>adotropin (hCG) injected iv(2,500 ui) is comm<strong>on</strong>ly used for inducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ovulati<strong>on</strong> in mares. However, repetitiveadministrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> xenogenic g<strong>on</strong>adotropin inhorses were described as resp<strong>on</strong>sible forantibodies producti<strong>on</strong>. In France, implantablesustained release deslorelin for ovulati<strong>on</strong>inducti<strong>on</strong> in mares, are not commerciallyavailable. It would be desirable to have ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rmeans <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inducting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ovulati<strong>on</strong> in d<strong>on</strong>or mares.The <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e GnRH-analogue available in Francefor animal treatment is busereline. Many previousstudies have shown that a single injecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> GnRHor GnRH-analogues were not effective in mares.Harris<strong>on</strong> et al. (1991) suggested that repeatedinjecti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> busereline were able to induceovulati<strong>on</strong> in mares. The purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se 5 studieswas to test <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> efficacy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> busereline for hasteningovulati<strong>on</strong> using different protocols in d<strong>on</strong>or mares.MATERIALS AND METHODSFive cross trials were performed to compare, ineach experiment, 2 treatments alternativelyinjected to induce ovulati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2 or 4 successiveoestrous cycles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> embryo-d<strong>on</strong>or mares (Fig 1). Atotal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 22 mares were used. Oestrus was detectedby teasing. Follicular growth and ovulati<strong>on</strong> werechecked by ultras<strong>on</strong>ography, daily untilobservati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 33 mm follicle, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n every 12 h(excepted in Experiments 4 and 5) untilobservati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a corpus luteum.Tested treatments started when a growingfollicle reached 33 mm <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter.In Experiment 1 and 2, Treatment A(busereline 40 µg) and placebo were injected iv 4times every 12 h. In Experiment 2, blood sampleswere taken every 15 min, until ovulati<strong>on</strong>, formeasurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> LH using an homologousradioimmunoassay (Hoier 1994).In Experiment 3, Treatment A (busereline 40µg) and B (busereline 20 µg) were injected iv 4times every 12 h.In Experiment 4, Treatment B (20 µgbusereline injected iv 4 times every 12 h) and hCG(2,500 ui, <strong>on</strong>e iv injecti<strong>on</strong>) were compared andtime <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ovulati<strong>on</strong> was determined by hourlyultrasound examinati<strong>on</strong>s between 32 h and 48 hafter <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first injecti<strong>on</strong> or <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>treatments.In Experiment 5, treatment C (13.3 µgbusereline injected iv 3 times every 6 h) and hCG(2,500 ui, <strong>on</strong>e iv injecti<strong>on</strong>) were compared, andtime <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ovulati<strong>on</strong> was determined by hourlyultrasound examinati<strong>on</strong>s as in Experiment 4.In Experiments 1 and 3, mares wereinseminated with fresh semen from a fertilestalli<strong>on</strong> with a dose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 400.10 6 spermatozoadiluted in skim milk extender, every o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r day,from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> start <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ovulati<strong>on</strong>. N<strong>on</strong>surgicalembryo collecti<strong>on</strong>s were performed 6days after ovulati<strong>on</strong>.STATISTICALANALYSISQuantitative data were analysed by Student’s t test<strong>on</strong> paired series and qualitative data were analysedby <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> method <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> McNemar, each mare being itsown c<strong>on</strong>trol.RESULTSIn Experiment 1, busereline treatment inducedsignificantly a higher rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ovulati<strong>on</strong> both within76