11.07.2015 Views

The geographical distribution of animals, with a study of the relations ...

The geographical distribution of animals, with a study of the relations ...

The geographical distribution of animals, with a study of the relations ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chap, iv.] ZOOLOGICAL REGIONS. 55developed and adjusted, is<strong>the</strong> living barrier that now keeps outintruders.When it is ascertained that <strong>the</strong> chief differences whichnow obtain between two areas did not exist in Miocene orPliocene times, <strong>the</strong> fact is one <strong>of</strong> great interest, and enables usto speculate <strong>with</strong> some degree <strong>of</strong> probability as to <strong>the</strong> causes thathave brought about <strong>the</strong> present state <strong>of</strong> things ; but it is not areason for uniting <strong>the</strong>se two areas into one region. Our objectis to represent as nearly as possible <strong>the</strong> main features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>distribution</strong> <strong>of</strong> existing <strong>animals</strong>, not those <strong>of</strong> any or all pastgeological epochs. Should we ever obtain sufficient informationas to <strong>the</strong> geography and biology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth at past epochs, wemight indeed determine approximately what were <strong>the</strong>Plioceneor Miocene or Eocene zoological regions ; but any attempt toexhibit all <strong>the</strong>se in combination <strong>with</strong> those <strong>of</strong> our own period,must lead to confusion.<strong>The</strong> binary or dichotomous system, although it brings out<strong>the</strong> fundamental differences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respective regions, is aninconvenient one in its application, and ra<strong>the</strong>r increases thanobviates, <strong>the</strong> difficulty as to equality or inequality <strong>of</strong> regions;for although a, b, c, and d, may be areas <strong>of</strong> unequal zoologicalrank, a being <strong>the</strong> most important, and d <strong>the</strong> least, yet thisinequality will probably be still greater if we first divide<strong>the</strong>m into a, on one side, and b, c, and d, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r,and <strong>the</strong>n, by ano<strong>the</strong>r division, make b, an area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second,and c, and d, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> third rank only.Coming to <strong>the</strong> second objection, <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten incompatible<strong>distribution</strong> <strong>of</strong> different groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>animals</strong>, affords ground foropposition to any proposed scheme <strong>of</strong> zoological regions.<strong>The</strong>reis first <strong>the</strong> radical difference between laud and sea <strong>animals</strong>;<strong>the</strong> most complete barriers to <strong>the</strong> dispersal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> one, sometimes<strong>of</strong>fering <strong>the</strong> greatest facilities for <strong>the</strong> emigration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r,and vice versa. A large number <strong>of</strong> marine <strong>animals</strong>, however,frequent shallow water only ;and <strong>the</strong>se, keeping near <strong>the</strong> coasts,will agree generally in <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>distribution</strong> <strong>with</strong> those inhabiting<strong>the</strong> land. But among land <strong>animals</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>the</strong>re are verygreat differences <strong>of</strong> <strong>distribution</strong>, due to certain specialities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!