The geographical distribution of animals, with a study of the relations ...
The geographical distribution of animals, with a study of the relations ... The geographical distribution of animals, with a study of the relations ...
—46 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i.adapted to live, to increase, and to maintain itself under adversecircumstances, than the other.Now if we consider carefully the few suggestive facts herereferred- to (and many others of like import are to be found inMr. Darwin's various works), we shall be led to conclude thatthe several species, genera, families, and orders, both of animalsand vegetables which inhabit any extensive region, are boundtogether by a series of complex relations ;so that the increase,diminution, or extermination of any one, may set in motion aseries of actions and reactions more or less affecting a largeportion of the whole, and requiring perhaps centuries of fluctuationbefore the balance is restored. The range of any speciesor group in such a region, will in many cases (perhaps in most)be determined, not by physical barriers, but by the competitionof other organisms. Where barriers have existed from a remoteepoch, they will at first have kept back certain animals fromcoming in contact with each other; but when the assemblageof organisms on the two sides of the barrier have, after manyages, come to form a balanced organic whole, the destructionthe barrier may lead to a very partial intermingling of thepeculiar forms of the two regions. Each will have becomemodified in special ways adapted to the organic and physicalconditions of the country, and will form a living barrier to theentrance of animals less perfectly adapted to those conditions.Thus while the abolition of ancient barriers will always leadtomuch intermixture of forms, much extermination and widespreadalteration in some families of animals ; other importantgroups will be unable materially to alter their range ;or theymay make temporary incursions into the new territory, and beultimately driven back to very near their ancient limits.In order to make thissomewhat difficult subject more intelligible,it may be well to consider the probable effects of certainhypothetical conditions of the earth's surface :1. If the dry land of the globe had been from the firstcontinuous, and nowhere divided up by such boundaries as loftymountain ranges, wide deserts, or arms of the sea, it seemsprobable that none of the larger groups (as orders, tribes, orof;
chap, in.] CONDITIONS AFFECTING DISTRIBUTION. 47families) would have a limited range ; but, as is to some extentthe case in tropical America* east of the Andes, every suchgroup would be represented over the whole area, by countlessminute modifications of form adapted to local conditions.2. One great physical barrier would, however, even thenexist ;the hot equatorial zone would divide the faunas and florasof the colder regions of the northern and southern hemispheresfrom any chance of intermixture. This one barrier would bemore effectual than it is now, since there would be no loftymountain ranges to serve as a bridge for the partial interchangeof northern and southern forms.3. If such a condition of the earth as here supposed continuedfor very long periods, we may conceive that the actionand reaction of tjie various organisms on each other, combinedwith the influence of very slowly changing physical conditions,would result in an almost perfect organic balance, which wouldbe manifested by a great stability in the average numbers, thelocal range, and the peculiar characteristics of every species.4. Under such a condition of things it is not improbable thatthe total number of clearly differentiated specific forms might bemuch greater than it is now, though the number of generic andfamily types might perhaps be less ;for dominant species wouldhave had ample time to spread into every locality where theycould exist, and would then become everywhere modified intoforms best suited to the permanent local conditions.5. Now let us consider what would be the probable effect ofthe introduction of a barrier, cutting off a portion of this homogeneousand well-balanced world. Suppose, for instance, that asubsidence took place, cutting off by a wide arm of the sea alarge and tolerably varied island. The first and most obviousresult would be that the individuals of a number of specieswould be divided into two portions, while others, the limits ofwhose range agreed approximately with the line of subsidence,would exist in unimpaired numbers on the new island or on themain land. But the species whose numbers were diminishedand whose original area was also absolutely diminished by theportion now under the sea, would not be able to hold their
- Page 27 and 28: —CONTENTS OF THE FIRST VOLUME.xix
- Page 29: —CONTENTS OF THE FIRST VOLUME.xxi
- Page 33: THEGEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTIONOF ANIM
- Page 36 and 37: 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i.
- Page 38 and 39: 6 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part I.
- Page 40 and 41: 8 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i.
- Page 42 and 43: CHAPTEE II.THE MEANS OF DISPERSAL A
- Page 44 and 45: ;12 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 46 and 47: 14 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 48 and 49: ;16 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 50 and 51: 18 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part i
- Page 52 and 53: 20 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part i
- Page 54 and 55: ;22 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part
- Page 56 and 57: 24 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part I
- Page 58 and 59: 26 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part j
- Page 60 and 61: ;28 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part
- Page 62 and 63: 30 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part i
- Page 64 and 65: 32 DISPERSAL AND MIGRATION. [part i
- Page 66 and 67: 34 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 68 and 69: 36 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part r
- Page 70 and 71: 38 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 72 and 73: 40 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 74 and 75: 42 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 76 and 77: 44 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 80 and 81: ;48 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER IV.ON ZOOLOGICAL REGIONS.To
- Page 84 and 85: ;52 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 86 and 87: 54 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 88 and 89: 56 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 90 and 91: 58 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 92 and 93: ;GO DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 94 and 95: ;G2 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 96 and 97: G4 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 98 and 99: ;GG DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 100 and 101: ;68 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 102 and 103: 70 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part r
- Page 104 and 105: 72 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part I
- Page 106 and 107: 74 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 108 and 109: 76 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 110 and 111: 78 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 112 and 113: ;80 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 114 and 115: 82 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part.
- Page 116 and 117: 84 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i
- Page 118 and 119: 86 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part I
- Page 120 and 121: 131..88 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [p
- Page 122 and 123: ,62.:90 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [p
- Page 124 and 125: .92 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part
- Page 126 and 127: —94 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [par
—46 DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMALS. [part i.adapted to live, to increase, and to maintain itself under adversecircumstances, than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.Now if we consider carefully <strong>the</strong> few suggestive facts herereferred- to (and many o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> like import are to be found inMr. Darwin's various works), we shall be led to conclude that<strong>the</strong> several species, genera, families, and orders, both <strong>of</strong> <strong>animals</strong>and vegetables which inhabit any extensive region, are boundtoge<strong>the</strong>r by a series <strong>of</strong> complex <strong>relations</strong> ;so that <strong>the</strong> increase,diminution, or extermination <strong>of</strong> any one, may set in motion aseries <strong>of</strong> actions and reactions more or less affecting a largeportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole, and requiring perhaps centuries <strong>of</strong> fluctuationbefore <strong>the</strong> balance is restored. <strong>The</strong> range <strong>of</strong> any speciesor group in such a region, will in many cases (perhaps in most)be determined, not by physical barriers, but by <strong>the</strong> competition<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r organisms. Where barriers have existed from a remoteepoch, <strong>the</strong>y will at first have kept back certain <strong>animals</strong> fromcoming in contact <strong>with</strong> each o<strong>the</strong>r; but when <strong>the</strong> assemblage<strong>of</strong> organisms on <strong>the</strong> two sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> barrier have, after manyages, come to form a balanced organic whole, <strong>the</strong> destruction<strong>the</strong> barrier may lead to a very partial intermingling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>peculiar forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two regions. Each will have becomemodified in special ways adapted to <strong>the</strong> organic and physicalconditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, and will form a living barrier to <strong>the</strong>entrance <strong>of</strong> <strong>animals</strong> less perfectly adapted to those conditions.Thus while <strong>the</strong> abolition <strong>of</strong> ancient barriers will always leadtomuch intermixture <strong>of</strong> forms, much extermination and widespreadalteration in some families <strong>of</strong> <strong>animals</strong> ; o<strong>the</strong>r importantgroups will be unable materially to alter <strong>the</strong>ir range ;or <strong>the</strong>ymay make temporary incursions into <strong>the</strong> new territory, and beultimately driven back to very near <strong>the</strong>ir ancient limits.In order to make thissomewhat difficult subject more intelligible,it may be well to consider <strong>the</strong> probable effects <strong>of</strong> certainhypo<strong>the</strong>tical conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth's surface :1. If <strong>the</strong> dry land <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> globe had been from <strong>the</strong> firstcontinuous, and nowhere divided up by such boundaries as l<strong>of</strong>tymountain ranges, wide deserts, or arms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sea, it seemsprobable that none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger groups (as orders, tribes, or<strong>of</strong>;