Recipient’s incomeis taxed by a foreigncountryMassachusetts • Interest expense—Principal Interest expense—Principalpurpose of transac-purpose of transaction is nottax avoidance, amount is tion is not tax avoidance,arm’s length, and income is amount is arm’s length,taxed by a foreign country and income is taxed by aat rate within 3 percentage state at rate within 3 percentagepoints of MA ratepoints of MA rate• Interest and intangible expenses—Principalpurpose of transactionis not tax avoidance,and recipient is a resident of aforeign country with U.S. taxtreaty but is not a controlledforeign corporationMichigan Transaction has business purposeother than tax avoidance,is conducted at arm’s length,and recipient is organized inforeign country with U.S. taxtreatyMississippiNew Jersey• Interest expense—Principalpurpose of transaction is nottax avoidance, amount isarm’s length, and income istaxed by a U.S. possession orforeign country at rate within3 percentage points of NJ rate• Interest expense—Recipientis located in foreign countrywith U.S. tax treatyRecipient’s incomeis taxed by a U.S.state Conduit payment OtherInterest expense—Principalpurpose of transactionis not tax avoidance,amount is arm’s length,and income is taxed by astate at rate within 3 percentagepoints of NJ ratePrincipal purpose of transaction isnot tax avoidance, and recipientpays expenses to unrelated thirdparty in same yearTransaction has business purposeother than tax avoidance, isconducted at arm’s length, andis a pass through of comparabletransaction between recipientand unrelated third partyRecipient pays expenses to unrelatedthird party in same yearPrincipal purpose of transaction isnot tax avoidance, and recipientpays expenses to unrelated thirdparty in same year• Adjustment is unreasonable• Taxpayer agrees to alternateadjustment• Transaction has business purposeother than tax avoidance, isconducted at arm’s length, andadjustment is unreasonable• Transaction has business purposeother than tax avoidance, is conductedat arm’s length, and addbackresults in double taxation• Taxpayer and recipient includedin MI combined returnTransaction has business purposeother than tax avoidance, andrecipient is not primarily engagedin activities involving intangibles• Adjustment is unreasonable• Taxpayer agrees to alternateadjustment• Interest paid to an independentlender and taxpayer guaranteesdebtNew York Recipient is organized inforeign country with U.S. taxtreaty and is taxed by foreigncountry at rate equal to orgreater than NY rateNorth Carolina Recipient is organized inforeign country with U.S. taxtreaty, and is taxed by foreigncountry at rate equal to orgreater than NC rateOregonTransaction has business purpose,amount is arm’s length, and recipientpays expenses to unrelatedthird party in same yearRecipient pays expenses to unrelatedthird party in same yearTaxpayer and recipient included inNY combined returnIn same year, recipient includesthe amount as income in NC taxreturn and does not deduct theamount• Owner and user of intangible areincluded in same OR consolidatedtax return• Separation of ownership and useof intangible does not result inevasi on of tax or distortion ofinco me44
Rhode IslandTennesseeVirginiaWest VirginiaWisconsinDistrict ofColumbiaRecipient’s incomeis taxed by a foreigncountryInterest expense—Principalpurpose of transaction is nottax avoidance, amount is arm’slength, and income is taxedby a U.S. possession or foreigncountry at rate within 3 percentagepoints of RI rateRecipient is located in a foreigncountry with U.S. tax treatyIntangible expenses—Income istaxed by a foreign country withU.S. tax treatyTransaction has business purpose,amount is arm’s length,recipient is organized in aforeign country with U.S. taxtreaty, and is taxed by foreigncountry at rate equal to orgreater than WV rateIncome is taxed by a U.S. possessionor foreign country ataggregate effective tax rateequal to or greater than 80%of taxpayer’s aggregate effectivetax ratePrincipal purpose of transactionis not tax avoidance,amount is arm’s length, andincome is taxed by a U.S. possessionor foreign country withU.S. tax treaty at aggregate effectivetax rate of 4% or moreRecipient’s incomeis taxed by a U.S.state Conduit payment OtherInterest expense—Principalpurpose of transactionis not tax avoidance,amount is arm’s length,and income is taxed by astate at rate within 3 percentagepoints of RI rateIncome is taxed by a state,other than a state in whichmembers file a combinedreport and recipient’sincome offsets taxpayer’sexpenseIntangible expenses—Incomeis taxed by a stateIncome is taxed by a stateat rate equal to or greaterthan WV rateIncome is taxed by a stateat aggregate effective taxrate equal to or greaterthan 80% of taxpayer’saggregate effective taxrate, other than a statein which members filea combined report andrecipient’s income offsetstaxpayer’s expensePrincipal purpose of transactionis not tax avoidance,amount is arm’slength, and income istaxed by a state at aggregateeffective tax rate of4% or moreTransaction does not have taxavoidance as its significant purpose,and recipient pays expenses tounrelated third party in same yearRecipient pays expenses to unrelatedthird party in same yearIntangible expenses— Principalpurpose of transaction is not taxavoidance, and recipient paysexpenses to unrelated third partyin same yearIntangible expenses— Transactionhas business purpose, and recipientpays expenses to unrelatedthird party in same yearRecipient pays expenses to unrelatedthird party in same yearPrincipal purpose of transactionis not tax avoidance, amount isarm’s length, and recipient paysexpenses to unrelated third partyin same year• Adjustment is unreasonable• Taxpayer agrees to alternateadjustmentUpon application by taxpayer, IRSdetermines that principal purposeof expenses is not tax avoidance• Intangible expenses—Recipientderives at least one-third ofrevenues from licensing intangiblesto unrelated third partiesin comparable transactions• Interest expense—Recipient hassubstantial business operationsrelated to interest-generatingactivity, 5 full-time employees,interest is not related to intangibleproperty, business purposeother than tax avoidance,arm’s-length amount, and otherrequirements are met• Taxpayer agrees to alternateadjustment• Interest expense—Transactionhas business purpose andamount is arm’s length• Income is taxed by a U.S. possessionat rate equal to or greaterthan WV rate• Recipient is a bank holding companyor subsidiary thereof, withcertain exceptions• Primary motivation for transactionis a business purpose otherthan tax avoidance, transactionchanges economic position oftaxpayer in a meaningful wayapart from tax effects, andamount is arm’s lengthRecipient is allowed deduction onDC tax return to extent relatedpayer is denied a deductionSource: CCH IntelliConnect, Multistate Quick Answer Charts, Corporate Income Tax, Related Party Expense Addback Requirements; J. Healy and M.Schadewald, 2013 Multistate Corporate Tax Guide (Chicago: CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business, 2012), at 3217–51; and applicable state statutes (seeTable 1 for listing).45
- Page 1 and 2: GLOBAL TAX WEEKLYa closer lookISSUE
- Page 3 and 4: GLOBAL TAX WEEKLYa closer lookISSUE
- Page 5 and 6: FEATURED ARTICLESISSUE 30 | JUNE 6,
- Page 7 and 8: taxation treaties concluded by Swit
- Page 9 and 10: FEATURED ARTICLESISSUE 30 | JUNE 6,
- Page 11 and 12: FEATURED ARTICLESISSUE 30 | JUNE 6,
- Page 13 and 14: UK, its offshore dependencies, and
- Page 15 and 16: financing and all forms of financia
- Page 17 and 18: Th e Government pointed out in part
- Page 19 and 20: Talks are now underway. The TIEA wi
- Page 21 and 22: through which they can clamber in o
- Page 23 and 24: fi nally, and most egregiously, the
- Page 25 and 26: office space, or own tangible asset
- Page 27 and 28: extended for 2 years in December 20
- Page 29 and 30: Financial transactions ( e.g. inter
- Page 31 and 32: OECD Section E - Redraft On Safe Ha
- Page 33 and 34: suggests that the following items m
- Page 35 and 36: FEATURED ARTICLESISSUE 30 | JUNE 6,
- Page 37 and 38: State Interest And IntangibleExpens
- Page 39 and 40: States generally define "intangible
- Page 41 and 42: Code Sec. 1563(controlledgroup)Stat
- Page 43: ConnecticutGeorgiaIllinoisIndianaRe
- Page 47 and 48: Table 4. Comprehensive Income Tax T
- Page 49 and 50: include federal interest income, st
- Page 51 and 52: Recurring IssuesRestructuring of th
- Page 53 and 54: M&A. Nick has extensive experience
- Page 55 and 56: and consumers." As Germany and Chin
- Page 57 and 58: on many levels. The panel found tha
- Page 59 and 60: equirements placed on the states, i
- Page 61 and 62: NEWS ROUND-UP: COUNTRY FOCUS - ITAL
- Page 63 and 64: NEWS ROUND-UP: REAL ESTATE AND PROP
- Page 65 and 66: ates - such that, in 2014, the 4 pe
- Page 67 and 68: NEWS ROUND-UP: FTTISSUE 30 | JUNE 6
- Page 69 and 70: NEWS ROUND-UP: ENVIRONMENTAL TAXESI
- Page 71 and 72: Finally, the Federal Council veheme
- Page 73 and 74: Singapore Plugs Benefits For SMEsOf
- Page 75 and 76: TAX TREATY ROUND-UPISSUE 30 | JUNE
- Page 77 and 78: CONFERENCE CALENDARISSUE 30 | JUNE
- Page 79 and 80: Key speakers: John Capasso (Alvarez
- Page 81 and 82: Key speakers: TBA6/27/2013 - 6/27/2
- Page 83 and 84: 6/14/2013 - 6/14/2013http://www.con
- Page 85 and 86: THE CYPRUS BAIL-OUT ANDFOREIGN CLIE
- Page 87 and 88: Chair: Jonathan Levy (Partner, Reyn
- Page 89 and 90: IN THE COURTSISSUE 30 | JUNE 6, 201
- Page 91 and 92: on including the profit from the do
- Page 93 and 94: deduct VAT as a result of incomplet
- Page 95 and 96:
where the taxpayer had somehow offs
- Page 97 and 98:
een paid in the destination State.
- Page 99 and 100:
that Spain has gone its own way fir