Million Book Collection - The Fishers of Men Ministries

Million Book Collection - The Fishers of Men Ministries Million Book Collection - The Fishers of Men Ministries

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

448 THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH ANDthe weakness and groundlessness of stoic doctrines.It is chiefly in his assaults on the assertions andassumptions of his adversaries that Carneades isvictorious : when i he attempts anything positiveon his own side, it amounts to this, that a rationalman will take probability for his guide, when hecannot be assured of truth : and his chief meritappears to have been in more accurately determiningthe degrees of probability.The contests of these schools bring us downto the middle of the second century before Christ,when Greece fell under the dominion of Rome.From this time forth not only were Greek philosophersof eminence drawn to live themselvesat Rome, and so to meet her statesmen and noblesin habits of intercourse, but the higher classes ofthe great capital commonly completed their educationby visiting and studying at Athens, Rhodes,and other centres of Grecian thought. Thusthe fusion of Greece with the empire, while herpolitical importance dwindled away, her influenceupon the mind of her subjugators was immenselyincreased. But the Roman on his side obtaineda sort of victory. As a rule he was anything butan original thinker. He was an essentially practicalman : he had a steady instinct which ledhim to distrust first causes and general principles.The Greek schools were to him of value only as3t For a full account of the line of thought followed by Carneades,-see Zeller, vol. iii. part 1, pp. 454-477.

THE GREEK PHILOSOPHY.449they might fit into his daily life, not as coherentsystems of thought. The spirit therefore in whichhe rearded their differences was to select fromthem what best suited his tastes and feelings. Ifhe had no power to originate, he could choose.But such likewise had been the result among theeeks themselves of two centuries of conflict, inwhich the rival systems of Stoicism, Epicureanism,and Scepticism had stood over against each other.They sprung from the same soil; they might evenbe termed three branches of one stem,35 inasmuchas their common root was the desire to find for*the individual man something which would givehim tranquillity of mind, happiness in fact, independentof his civil circumstances. In this theyall took up a practical rather than a theoreticalground, the ground indeed which is now assignedto religion. Utterly opposed, then, as they werein their means, they sought the same end, and itwas not in nature that the collision of their variousarguments should not at length kindle thepirit of eclecticism. Thus the temper of than statesman and noble, and the course ofGreek philosophy itself, combined to produce thisspirit, which from the beginning of the first centurybefore Christ pervaded the thinkers of theGreco-Roman world.36 But eclecticism betokens aweakening of the philosophic mind, that wearinesswhich is unable to take a firm grasp of truth,35 Zeller, vol. iii. part 1, p. 436. " Ibid. pp. 482, 492.II.GG

THE GREEK PHILOSOPHY.449they might fit into his daily life, not as coherentsystems <strong>of</strong> thought. <strong>The</strong> spirit therefore in whichhe rearded their differences was to select fromthem what best suited his tastes and feelings. Ifhe had no power to originate, he could choose.But such likewise had been the result among theeeks themselves <strong>of</strong> two centuries <strong>of</strong> conflict, inwhich the rival systems <strong>of</strong> Stoicism, Epicureanism,and Scepticism had stood over against each other.<strong>The</strong>y sprung from the same soil; they might evenbe termed three branches <strong>of</strong> one stem,35 inasmuchas their common root was the desire to find for*the individual man something which would givehim tranquillity <strong>of</strong> mind, happiness in fact, independent<strong>of</strong> his civil circumstances. In this theyall took up a practical rather than a theoreticalground, the ground indeed which is now assignedto religion. Utterly opposed, then, as they werein their means, they sought the same end, and itwas not in nature that the collision <strong>of</strong> their variousarguments should not at length kindle thepirit <strong>of</strong> eclecticism. Thus the temper <strong>of</strong> than statesman and noble, and the course <strong>of</strong>Greek philosophy itself, combined to produce thisspirit, which from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the first centurybefore Christ pervaded the thinkers <strong>of</strong> theGreco-Roman world.36 But eclecticism betokens aweakening <strong>of</strong> the philosophic mind, that wearinesswhich is unable to take a firm grasp <strong>of</strong> truth,35 Zeller, vol. iii. part 1, p. 436. " Ibid. pp. 482, 492.II.GG

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!