27.11.2012 Views

Integration of Operations and Underground Construction: Sound ...

Integration of Operations and Underground Construction: Sound ...

Integration of Operations and Underground Construction: Sound ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

� removing the heavily reinforced concrete tunnel “eyes” without undue disturbance to the ongoing<br />

transit operations<br />

ALTERNATIVE DESIGN<br />

A few alternative approaches were originally considered, in addition to the PE design. One <strong>of</strong> the initial ideas was to<br />

determine whether any <strong>of</strong> the TBM breakthrough preparation work could be carried out under the PSST contract,<br />

which was still underway at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the University Link design period. This preparation work would have<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> the partially exposed soldier piles <strong>and</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the anchors that intersect the proposed<br />

tunnel alignment from the surface prior to the restoration <strong>of</strong> Pine Street, as well as removal <strong>of</strong> the break-out panels<br />

in the PSST headwall. However, it was quickly ascertained that this idea would be difficult to implement given the<br />

necessity for a very late change to the scope <strong>and</strong> schedule <strong>of</strong> the PSST contract, which was near completion at that<br />

time.<br />

The alternative discussed in this paper was developed as part <strong>of</strong> the Capitol Hill Tunnel contract (U230), <strong>and</strong><br />

eliminated the need for any further construction work within Pine Street, minimizing disruption to residences <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses in the area. This alternative was used in the final design, <strong>and</strong> involved the following activities:<br />

� Ground treatment to facilitate tieback removal through the TBM cutterhead for the SB tunnel, <strong>and</strong><br />

stabilizing TBM break-ins for both tunnels.<br />

� Installation <strong>of</strong> “demising wall” bulkheads within the PSST to facilitate removal <strong>of</strong> the NB <strong>and</strong> SB breakout<br />

panels <strong>and</strong> installation <strong>of</strong> utility connections <strong>and</strong> light rail within an agreed length <strong>of</strong> the PSST<br />

� Temporary access/retrieval shaft construction for the NB tunnel only, taking advantage <strong>of</strong> the PSST<br />

headwall <strong>and</strong> the existing Controlled Density Fill (CDF) backfill on two <strong>of</strong> the four shaft sides.<br />

� Access drift from the temporary shaft to a temporary chamber, constructed within the safety <strong>of</strong> the CDF<br />

located between the existing soldier pile wall <strong>and</strong> the PSST headwall.<br />

� Removal <strong>of</strong> soldier piles from the temporary chamber <strong>and</strong> replacement with CDF backfill.<br />

� In-tunnel disassembly <strong>of</strong> the SB tunnel TBM.<br />

� Removal <strong>of</strong> soldier piles from NB retrieval shaft.<br />

Figure 3 shows a general layout <strong>of</strong> the alternative used in the final design.<br />

Ground Treatment<br />

Due to the presence <strong>of</strong> both recent alluvium deposits <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slide deposits below the groundwater <strong>and</strong> overlying<br />

the over-consolidated glacial soils, a limited ground treatment zone was determined to be required for both tunnels.<br />

The ground treatment zones, as shown in Figure 3, vary for each tunnel. For the NB tunnel, the zone is large enough<br />

to provide a stable face to allow for bottom removal <strong>of</strong> the east soldier piles, which are used for support <strong>of</strong> the<br />

retrieval shaft <strong>and</strong> later be removed from the path <strong>of</strong> the TBM. For the SB tunnel, the zone also needed to provide a<br />

stable face for the east soldier pile removal, but also provide stability for the tunnel heading to allow removal <strong>of</strong><br />

tiebacks from within the face <strong>of</strong> the TBM, to be carried out under atmospheric pressure. The SB tunnel geometry<br />

was also dictated by an existing sewer that needs to stay in operation throughout the tunnel construction phase.<br />

Ground treatment to stabilize the tunnel crown <strong>and</strong> improve the soil st<strong>and</strong>up time was designed as jet grouting<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the high silt content <strong>of</strong> the in situ soils, <strong>and</strong> used to create a consolidated block <strong>of</strong> material in the zone <strong>of</strong><br />

l<strong>and</strong>slide debris between the alluvium <strong>and</strong> over-consolidated glacial soils. This work has been planned to be carried<br />

out from the <strong>Sound</strong> Transit staging site shown in Figure 1 next to Pine Street <strong>and</strong> extend at an angle below the street<br />

to prevent further surface disruption <strong>and</strong> minimize any potential traffic impacts.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!