<strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong>God is a separate entity by Him, self and man is a separate entity by himself andnature is a separate entity by itself. This is dualism, which holds that the subjectand the object are opposed to each other in everything. When man looks at nature,he is the subject and nature the object. He sees the dualism between subject andobject. When he looks at God, he sees God as object and himself as the subject.They are entirely separate. This is the dualism between man and God. This isgenerally the first view of religion.Then comes another view which I have just shown to you. Man begins to find outthat if God is the cause of the universe and the universe the effect, God Himselfmust have become the universe and the souls, and he is but a particle of whichGod is the whole. We are but little beings, sparks of that mass of fire, and thewhole universe is a manifestation of God Himself. This is the next step. InSanskrit, it is called Vishishtâdvaita. Just as I have this body and this body coversthe soul, and the soul is in and through this body, so this whole universe of infinitesouls and nature forms, as it were, the body of God. When the period of involutioncomes, the universe becomes finer and finer, yet remains the body of God. Whenthe gross manifestation comes, then also the universe remains the body of God.Just as the human soul is the soul of the human body and minds so God is the Soulof our souls. All of you have heard this expression in every religion, "Soul of oursouls". That is what is meant by it. He, as it were, resides in them, guides them, isthe ruler of them all. In the first view, that of dualism, each one of us is anindividual, eternally separate from God and nature. In the second view, we areindividuals, but not separate from God. We are like little particles floating in onemass, and that mass is God. We are individuals but one in God. We are all in Him.We are all parts of Him, and therefore we are One. And yet between man andman, man and God there is a strict individuality, separate and yet not separate.Then comes a still finer question. The question is: Can infinity have parts? What ismeant by parts of infinity? If you reason it out, you will find that it is impossible.Infinity cannot be divided, it always remains infinite. If it could be divided, eachpart would be infinite. And there cannot be two infinites. Suppose there were, onewould limit the other, and both would be finite. Infinity can only be one,undivided. Thus the conclusion will be reached that the infinite is one and notmany, and that one Infinite Soul is reflecting itself through thousands andthousands of mirrors, appearing as so many different souls. It is the same InfiniteSoul, which is the background of the universe, that we call God. The same InfiniteSoul also is the background of the human mind which we call the human soul.file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Chitra%20Selva...oksBySwami/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>PDF.html (82 of 113)2/26/2007 12:24:34 AM
<strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong><strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong>11. CosmologyThere are two worlds, the microcosm, and the macrocosm, the internal and theexternal. We get truth from both of these by means of experience. The truthgathered from internal experience is psychology, metaphysics, and religion; fromexternal experience, the physical sciences. Now a perfect truth should be inharmony with experiences in both these worlds. The microcosm must beartestimony to the macrocosm, and the macrocosm to the microcosm; physical truthmust have its counterpart in the internal world, and the internal world must haveits verification outside. Yet, as a rule, we find that many of these truths are inconflict. At one period of the world's history, the internals become supreme, andthey begin to fight the externals. At the present time the externals, the physicists,have become supreme, and they have put down many claims of psychologists andmetaphysicians. So far as my knowledge goes, I find that the real, essential partsof psychology are in perfect accord with the essential parts of modern physicalknowledge. It is not given to one individual to be great in every respect; it is notgiven to one race or nation to be equally strong in the research of all fields ofknowledge. The modern European nations are very strong in their research ofexternal physical knowledge, but they are not so strong in their study of the innernature of man. On the other hand, the Orientals have not been very strong in theirresearches of the external physical world, but very strong in their researches of theinternal. Therefore we find that Oriental physics and other sciences are not inaccordance with Occidental Sciences; nor is Occidental psychology in harmonywith Oriental psychology. The Oriental physicists have been routed by Occidentalscientists. At the same time, each claims to rest on truth; and as we stated before,real truth in any field of knowledge will not contradict itself; the truths internal arein harmony with the truths external.We all know the theories of the cosmos according to the modern astronomers andphysicists; and at the same time we all know how woefully they undermine thetheology of Europe, how these scientific discoveries that are made act as a bombthrown at its stronghold; and we know how theologians have in all timesattempted to put down these researches.I want here to go over the psychological ideas of the Orientals about cosmologyand all that pertains to it, and you will find how wonderfully they are inaccordance with the latest discoveries of modern science; and where there isdisharmony, you will find that it is modern science which lacks and not they. Weall use the word nature. The old Sânkhya philosophers called it by two differentfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Chitra%20Selva...oksBySwami/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>PDF.html (83 of 113)2/26/2007 12:24:34 AM
- Page 1 and 2:
Practical VedantaPractical VedantaP
- Page 3 and 4:
Practical Vedantaworld. If I am a s
- Page 5 and 6:
Practical Vedantadifference is only
- Page 7 and 8:
Practical VedantaThe ideal of faith
- Page 9 and 10:
Practical Vedantamoment of our live
- Page 11 and 12:
Practical Vedantaof the Christs and
- Page 13 and 14:
Practical Vedanta"This life is Brah
- Page 15 and 16:
Practical Vedantadark fifteen days,
- Page 17 and 18:
Practical Vedantalife. This is the
- Page 19 and 20:
Practical Vedantaeverything would b
- Page 21 and 22:
Practical Vedantait is only through
- Page 23 and 24:
Practical Vedantawhich is that subt
- Page 25 and 26:
Practical Vedantanoumenon and pheno
- Page 27 and 28:
Practical Vedantato which is the be
- Page 29 and 30:
Practical VedantaAbsolute.The finit
- Page 31 and 32: Practical Vedantawhich is not the q
- Page 33 and 34: Practical Vedantaexperience that th
- Page 35 and 36: Practical Vedantafulfilled. The Jiv
- Page 37 and 38: Practical Vedantabetween the pure r
- Page 39 and 40: Practical Vedantacome out straight.
- Page 41 and 42: Practical Vedantawar with one anoth
- Page 43 and 44: Practical Vedantanobody could under
- Page 45 and 46: Practical VedantaMy idea, therefore
- Page 47 and 48: Practical Vedantathe same methods.
- Page 49 and 50: Practical Vedantavarious minds, all
- Page 51 and 52: Practical Vedantabrotherhood; but t
- Page 53 and 54: Practical Vedantabrotherhood, but w
- Page 55 and 56: Practical Vedantawe all go with ves
- Page 57 and 58: Practical Vedantareason. What can y
- Page 59 and 60: Practical Vedantabeen preached in t
- Page 61 and 62: Practical Vedantathe husband kisses
- Page 63 and 64: Practical Vedantaof the knowledge a
- Page 65 and 66: Practical Vedantafor those who only
- Page 67 and 68: Practical Vedantasun exists because
- Page 69 and 70: Practical Vedantaof death was pleas
- Page 71 and 72: Practical VedantaGod. We must learn
- Page 73 and 74: Practical Vedantaa plague comes, it
- Page 75 and 76: Practical VedantaAtman? "As with a
- Page 77 and 78: Practical Vedantathat immortal One,
- Page 79 and 80: Practical Vedantaand the third egoi
- Page 81: Practical VedantaWitness of the uni
- Page 85 and 86: Practical Vedantaeternal ; every ot
- Page 87 and 88: Practical Vedantafaculty, Buddhi, w
- Page 89 and 90: Practical VedantaPractical Vedanta1
- Page 91 and 92: Practical Vedantastepping-stone to
- Page 93 and 94: Practical Vedantarecognition? Findi
- Page 95 and 96: Practical Vedantasentient." This is
- Page 97 and 98: Practical Vedantaessentially differ
- Page 99 and 100: Practical Vedantaexistence is limit
- Page 101 and 102: Practical Vedantalive, for I am lif
- Page 103 and 104: Practical Vedantasee from Kapila's
- Page 105 and 106: Practical Vedantalimitation, but th
- Page 107 and 108: Practical Vedantaperfect, infinite,
- Page 109 and 110: Practical Vedantaindividuality, of
- Page 111 and 112: Practical Vedantarepeat [something]
- Page 113: Practical Vedantaperson who dies in