<strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong>manifestation. The veil drops away, and the native purity of the soul begins tomanifest itself. Everything is ours already — infinite purity, freedom, love, andpower.The <strong>Vedanta</strong> also says that not only can this be realised in the depths of forests orcaves, but by men in all possible conditions of life. We have seen that the peoplewho discovered these truths were neither living in caves nor forests, nor followingthe ordinary vocations of life, but men who, we have every reason to believe, ledthe busiest of lives, men who had to command armies, to sit on thrones, and lookto the welfare of millions — and all these, in the days of absolute monarchy, andnot as in these days when a king is to a great extent a mere figurehead. Yet theycould find time to think out all these thoughts, to realise them, and to teach them tohumanity. How much more then should it be practical for us whose lives,compared with theirs, are lives of leisure? That we cannot realise them is a shameto us, seeing that we are comparatively free all the time, having very little to do.My requirements are as nothing compared with those of an ancient absolutemonarch. My wants are as nothing compared with the demands of Arjuna on thebattlefield of Kurukshetra, commanding a huge army; and yet he could find timein the midst of the din and turmoil of battle to talk the highest philosophy and tocarry it into his life also. Surely we ought to be able to do as much in this life ofours — comparatively free, easy, and comfortable. Most of us here have moretime than we think we have, if we really want to use it for good. With the amountof freedom we have we can attain to two hundred ideals in this life, if we will, butwe must not degrade the ideal to the actual. One of the most insinuating thingscomes to us in the shape of persons who apologise for our mistakes and teach ushow to make special excuses for all our foolish wants and foolish desires; and wethink that their ideal is the only ideal we need have. But it is not so. The <strong>Vedanta</strong>teaches no such thing. The actual should be reconciled to the ideal, the present lifeshould be made to coincide with life eternal.For you must always remember that the one central ideal of <strong>Vedanta</strong> is thisoneness. There are no two in anything, no two lives, nor even two different kindsof life for the two worlds. You will find the Vedas speaking of heavens and thingslike that at first; but later on, when they come to the highest ideals of theirphilosophy, they brush away all these things. There is but one life, one world, oneexistence. Everything is that One, the difference is in degree and not in kind. Thedifference between our lives is not in kind. The <strong>Vedanta</strong> entirely denies such ideasas that animals are separate from men, and that they were made and created byGod to be used for our food.Some people have been kind enough to start an antivivisection society. I asked amember, "Why do you think, my friend, that it is quite lawful to kill animals forfood, and not to kill one or two for scientific experiments?" He replied,"Vivisection is most horrible, but animals have been given to us for food."Oneness includes all animals. If man's life is immortal, so also is the animal's. Thedifference is only in degree and not in kind. The amoeba and I are the same, thefile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Chitra%20Selvar...ooksBySwami/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>PDF.html (4 of 113)2/26/2007 12:24:33 AM
<strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong>difference is only in degree; and from the standpoint of the highest life, all thesedifferences vanish. A man may see a great deal of difference between grass and alittle tree, but if you mount very high, the grass and the biggest tree will appearmuch the same. So, from the standpoint of the highest ideal, the lowest animal andthe highest man are the same. If you believe there is a God, the animals and thehighest creatures must be the same. A God who is partial to his children calledmen, and cruel to his children called brute beasts, is worse than a demon. I wouldrather die a hundred times than worship such a God. My whole life would be afight with such a God But there is no difference, and those who say there is, areirresponsible, heartless people who do not know. Here is a case of the wordpractical used in a wrong sense. I myself may not be a very strict vegetarian, but Iunderstand the ideal. When I eat meat I know it is wrong. Even if I am bound toeat it under certain circumstances, I know it is cruel. I must not drag my idealdown to the actual and apologise for my weak conduct in this way. The ideal is notto eat flesh, not to injure any being, for all animals are my brothers. If you canthink of them as your brothers, you have made a little headway towards thebrotherhood of all souls, not to speak of the brotherhood of man! That is child'splay. You generally find that this is not very acceptable to many, because itteaches them to give up the actual, and go higher up to the ideal. But if you bringout a theory which is reconciled with their present conduct, they regard it asentirely practical.There is this strongly conservative tendency in human nature: we do not like tomove one step forward. I think of mankind just as I read of persons who becomefrozen in snow; all such, they say, want to go to sleep, and if you try to drag themup, they say, "Let me sleep; it is so beautiful to sleep in the snow", and they diethere in that sleep. So is our nature. That is what we are doing all our life, gettingfrozen from the feet upwards, and yet wanting to sleep. Therefore you muststruggle towards the ideal, and if a man comes who wants to bring that ideal downto your level, and teach a religion that does not carry that highest ideal, do notlisten to him. To me that is an impracticable religion. But if a man teaches areligion which presents the highest ideal, I am ready for him. Beware when anyoneis trying to apologise for sense vanities and sense weaknesses. If anyone wants topreach that way to us, poor, sense-bound clods of earth as we have made ourselvesby following that teaching, we shall never progress. I have seen many of thesethings, have had some experience of the world, and my country is the land wherereligious sects grow like mushrooms. Every year new sects arise. But one thing Ihave marked, that it is only those that never want to reconcile the man of fleshwith the man of truth that make progress. Wherever there is this false idea ofreconciling fleshly vanities with the highest ideals, of dragging down God to thelevel of man, there comes decay. Man should not be degraded to worldly slavery,but should be raised up to God.At the same time, there is another side to the question. We must not look downwith contempt on others. All of us are going towards the same goal. The differencefile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Chitra%20Selvar...ooksBySwami/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>PDF.html (5 of 113)2/26/2007 12:24:33 AM
- Page 1 and 2: Practical VedantaPractical VedantaP
- Page 3: Practical Vedantaworld. If I am a s
- Page 7 and 8: Practical VedantaThe ideal of faith
- Page 9 and 10: Practical Vedantamoment of our live
- Page 11 and 12: Practical Vedantaof the Christs and
- Page 13 and 14: Practical Vedanta"This life is Brah
- Page 15 and 16: Practical Vedantadark fifteen days,
- Page 17 and 18: Practical Vedantalife. This is the
- Page 19 and 20: Practical Vedantaeverything would b
- Page 21 and 22: Practical Vedantait is only through
- Page 23 and 24: Practical Vedantawhich is that subt
- Page 25 and 26: Practical Vedantanoumenon and pheno
- Page 27 and 28: Practical Vedantato which is the be
- Page 29 and 30: Practical VedantaAbsolute.The finit
- Page 31 and 32: Practical Vedantawhich is not the q
- Page 33 and 34: Practical Vedantaexperience that th
- Page 35 and 36: Practical Vedantafulfilled. The Jiv
- Page 37 and 38: Practical Vedantabetween the pure r
- Page 39 and 40: Practical Vedantacome out straight.
- Page 41 and 42: Practical Vedantawar with one anoth
- Page 43 and 44: Practical Vedantanobody could under
- Page 45 and 46: Practical VedantaMy idea, therefore
- Page 47 and 48: Practical Vedantathe same methods.
- Page 49 and 50: Practical Vedantavarious minds, all
- Page 51 and 52: Practical Vedantabrotherhood; but t
- Page 53 and 54: Practical Vedantabrotherhood, but w
- Page 55 and 56:
Practical Vedantawe all go with ves
- Page 57 and 58:
Practical Vedantareason. What can y
- Page 59 and 60:
Practical Vedantabeen preached in t
- Page 61 and 62:
Practical Vedantathe husband kisses
- Page 63 and 64:
Practical Vedantaof the knowledge a
- Page 65 and 66:
Practical Vedantafor those who only
- Page 67 and 68:
Practical Vedantasun exists because
- Page 69 and 70:
Practical Vedantaof death was pleas
- Page 71 and 72:
Practical VedantaGod. We must learn
- Page 73 and 74:
Practical Vedantaa plague comes, it
- Page 75 and 76:
Practical VedantaAtman? "As with a
- Page 77 and 78:
Practical Vedantathat immortal One,
- Page 79 and 80:
Practical Vedantaand the third egoi
- Page 81 and 82:
Practical VedantaWitness of the uni
- Page 83 and 84:
Practical VedantaPractical Vedanta1
- Page 85 and 86:
Practical Vedantaeternal ; every ot
- Page 87 and 88:
Practical Vedantafaculty, Buddhi, w
- Page 89 and 90:
Practical VedantaPractical Vedanta1
- Page 91 and 92:
Practical Vedantastepping-stone to
- Page 93 and 94:
Practical Vedantarecognition? Findi
- Page 95 and 96:
Practical Vedantasentient." This is
- Page 97 and 98:
Practical Vedantaessentially differ
- Page 99 and 100:
Practical Vedantaexistence is limit
- Page 101 and 102:
Practical Vedantalive, for I am lif
- Page 103 and 104:
Practical Vedantasee from Kapila's
- Page 105 and 106:
Practical Vedantalimitation, but th
- Page 107 and 108:
Practical Vedantaperfect, infinite,
- Page 109 and 110:
Practical Vedantaindividuality, of
- Page 111 and 112:
Practical Vedantarepeat [something]
- Page 113:
Practical Vedantaperson who dies in