<strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong>ideas? You must get rid of this tendency once for all. Accord a place to everyone.I once read a story about some ships that were caught in a cyclone in the SouthSea Islands, and there was a picture of it in the Illustrated London News. All ofthem were wrecked except one English vessel, which weathered the storm. Thepicture showed the men who were going to be drowned, standing on the decks andcheering the people who were sailing through the storm (H.M.S. Calliope and theAmerican men-of-war at Samoa. — Ed). Be brave and generous like that. Do notdrag others down to where you are. Another foolish notion is that if we lose ourlittle individuality, there will be no morality, no hope for humanity. As ifeverybody had been dying for humanity all the time! God bless you! If in everycountry there were two hundred men and women really wanting to do good tohumanity, the millennium would come in five days. We know how we are dyingfor humanity! These are all tall talks, and nothing else. The history of the worldshows that those who never thought of their little individuality were the greatestbenefactors of the human race, and that the more men and women think ofthemselves, the less are they able to do for others. One is unselfishness, and theother selfishness. Clinging on to little enjoyments, and to desire the continuationand repetition of this state of things is utter selfishness. It arises not from anydesire for truth, its genesis is not in kindness for other beings, but in the utterselfishness of the human heart, in the idea, "I will have everything, and do not carefor anyone else." This is as it appears to me. I would like to see more moral menin the world like some of those grand old prophets and sages of ancient times whowould have given up a hundred lives if they could by so doing benefit one littleanimal! Talk of morality and doing good to others! Silly talk of the present time!I would like to see moral men like Gautama Buddha, who did not believe in aPersonal God or a personal soul, never asked about them, but was a perfectagnostic, and yet was ready to lay down his life for anyone, and worked all his lifefor the good of all, and thought only of the good of all. Well has it been said by hisbiographer, in describing his birth, that he was born for the good of the many, as ablessing to the many. He did not go to the forest to meditate for his own salvation;he felt that the world was burning, and that he must find a way out. "Why is thereso much misery in the world ?" — was the one question that dominated his wholelife. Do you think we are so moral as the Buddha?The more selfish a man, the more immoral he is. And so also with the race. Thatrace which is bound down to itself has been the most cruel and the most wicked inthe whole world. There has not been a religion that has clung to this dualism morethan that founded by the Prophet of Arabia, and there has not been a religionwhich has shed so much blood and been so cruel to other men. In the Koran thereis the doctrine that a man who does not believe these teachings should be killed; itis a mercy to kill him! And the surest way to get to heaven, where there arebeautiful houris and all sorts of sense-enjoyments, is by killing these unbelievers.Think of the bloodshed there has been in consequence of such beliefs!In the religion of Christ there was little of crudeness; there is very little differencefile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Chitra%20Selva...oksBySwami/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>PDF.html (36 of 113)2/26/2007 12:24:33 AM
<strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Vedanta</strong>between the pure religion of Christ and that of the <strong>Vedanta</strong>. You find there theidea of oneness; but Christ also preached dualistic ideas to the people in order togive them something tangible to take hold of, to lead them up to the highest ideal.The same Prophet who preached, "Our Father which art in heaven", also preached,"I and my Father are one", and the same Prophet knew that through the "Father inheaven" lies the way to the "I and my Father are one". There was only blessingand love in the religion of Christ; but as soon as crudeness crept in, it wasdegraded into something not much better than the religion of the Prophet ofArabia. It was crudeness indeed — this fight for the little self, this clinging on tothe "I", not only in this life, but also in the desire for its continuance even afterdeath. This they declare to be unselfishness; this the foundation of morality! Lordhelp us, if this be the foundation of morality! And strangely enough, men andwomen who ought to know better think all morality will be destroyed if these littleselves go and stand aghast at the idea that morality can only stand upon theirdestruction. The watchword of all well-being, of all moral good is not "I" but"thou". Who cares whether there is a heaven or a hell, who cares if there is a soulor not, who cares if there is an unchangeable or not? Here is the world, and it isfull of misery. Go out into it as Buddha did, and struggle to lessen it or die in theattempt. Forget yourselves; this is the first lesson to be learnt, whether you are atheist or an atheist, whether you are an agnostic or a Vedantist, a Christian or aMohammedan. The one lesson obvious to all is the destruction of the little self andthe building up of the Real Self.Two forces have been working side by side in parallel lines. The one says "I", theother says "not I". Their manifestation is not only in man but in animals, not onlyin animals but in the smallest worms. The tigress that plunges her fangs into thewarm blood of a human being would give up her own life to protect her young.The most depraved man who thinks nothing of taking the lives of his brother menwill, perhaps, sacrifice himself without any hesitation to save his starving wife andchildren. Thus throughout creation these two forces are working side by side;where you find the one, you find the other too. The one is selfishness, the other isunselfishness. The one is acquisition, the other is renunciation. The one takes, theother gives. From the lowest to the highest, the whole universe is the playgroundof these two forces. It does not require any demonstration; it is obvious to all.What right has any section of the community to base the whole work andevolution of the universe upon one of these two factors alone, upon competitionand struggle? What right has it to base the whole working of the universe uponpassion and fight, upon competition and struggle? That these exist we do not deny;but what right has anyone to deny the working of the other force? Can any mandeny that love, this "not I", this renunciation is the only positive power in theuniverse? That other is only the misguided employment of the power of love; thepower of love brings competition, the real genesis of competition is in love. Thereal genesis of evil is in unselfishness. The creator of evil is good, and the end isalso good. It is only misdirection of the power of good. A man who murdersfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Chitra%20Selva...oksBySwami/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>/<strong>Practical</strong><strong>Vedanta</strong>PDF.html (37 of 113)2/26/2007 12:24:33 AM
- Page 1 and 2: Practical VedantaPractical VedantaP
- Page 3 and 4: Practical Vedantaworld. If I am a s
- Page 5 and 6: Practical Vedantadifference is only
- Page 7 and 8: Practical VedantaThe ideal of faith
- Page 9 and 10: Practical Vedantamoment of our live
- Page 11 and 12: Practical Vedantaof the Christs and
- Page 13 and 14: Practical Vedanta"This life is Brah
- Page 15 and 16: Practical Vedantadark fifteen days,
- Page 17 and 18: Practical Vedantalife. This is the
- Page 19 and 20: Practical Vedantaeverything would b
- Page 21 and 22: Practical Vedantait is only through
- Page 23 and 24: Practical Vedantawhich is that subt
- Page 25 and 26: Practical Vedantanoumenon and pheno
- Page 27 and 28: Practical Vedantato which is the be
- Page 29 and 30: Practical VedantaAbsolute.The finit
- Page 31 and 32: Practical Vedantawhich is not the q
- Page 33 and 34: Practical Vedantaexperience that th
- Page 35: Practical Vedantafulfilled. The Jiv
- Page 39 and 40: Practical Vedantacome out straight.
- Page 41 and 42: Practical Vedantawar with one anoth
- Page 43 and 44: Practical Vedantanobody could under
- Page 45 and 46: Practical VedantaMy idea, therefore
- Page 47 and 48: Practical Vedantathe same methods.
- Page 49 and 50: Practical Vedantavarious minds, all
- Page 51 and 52: Practical Vedantabrotherhood; but t
- Page 53 and 54: Practical Vedantabrotherhood, but w
- Page 55 and 56: Practical Vedantawe all go with ves
- Page 57 and 58: Practical Vedantareason. What can y
- Page 59 and 60: Practical Vedantabeen preached in t
- Page 61 and 62: Practical Vedantathe husband kisses
- Page 63 and 64: Practical Vedantaof the knowledge a
- Page 65 and 66: Practical Vedantafor those who only
- Page 67 and 68: Practical Vedantasun exists because
- Page 69 and 70: Practical Vedantaof death was pleas
- Page 71 and 72: Practical VedantaGod. We must learn
- Page 73 and 74: Practical Vedantaa plague comes, it
- Page 75 and 76: Practical VedantaAtman? "As with a
- Page 77 and 78: Practical Vedantathat immortal One,
- Page 79 and 80: Practical Vedantaand the third egoi
- Page 81 and 82: Practical VedantaWitness of the uni
- Page 83 and 84: Practical VedantaPractical Vedanta1
- Page 85 and 86: Practical Vedantaeternal ; every ot
- Page 87 and 88:
Practical Vedantafaculty, Buddhi, w
- Page 89 and 90:
Practical VedantaPractical Vedanta1
- Page 91 and 92:
Practical Vedantastepping-stone to
- Page 93 and 94:
Practical Vedantarecognition? Findi
- Page 95 and 96:
Practical Vedantasentient." This is
- Page 97 and 98:
Practical Vedantaessentially differ
- Page 99 and 100:
Practical Vedantaexistence is limit
- Page 101 and 102:
Practical Vedantalive, for I am lif
- Page 103 and 104:
Practical Vedantasee from Kapila's
- Page 105 and 106:
Practical Vedantalimitation, but th
- Page 107 and 108:
Practical Vedantaperfect, infinite,
- Page 109 and 110:
Practical Vedantaindividuality, of
- Page 111 and 112:
Practical Vedantarepeat [something]
- Page 113:
Practical Vedantaperson who dies in